Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Diffraction at CDF and Universality of Diffractive Factorization Breaking Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Diffraction at CDF and Universality of Diffractive Factorization Breaking Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University"— Presentation transcript:

1 Diffraction at CDF and Universality of Diffractive Factorization Breaking Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University http://physics.rockefeller.edu/dino/my.html / Low x 2010, 23-27 June 2010 Kavala (Greece) PhillippiThassos

2 CONTENTS  Introduction  Diffraction at CDF: latest results  Dijets  W and Z  Jet-Gap-Jet  Universality of Diffractive Factorization Breaking

3 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 3 INTERACTIONS Diffractive: Colorless exchange carrying vacuum quantum numbers Non-diffractive: Color-exchange POMERONPOMERON Goal: understand the QCD nature of the diffractive exchange rapidity gap Incident hadrons acquire color and break apart CONFINEMENT Incident hadrons retain their quantum numbers remaining colorless pseudo- DECONFINEMENT

4 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 4 Definitions  dN/d  M p p’ rap-gap  =-ln  0 p M ,t,t p p p’ ln M 2 ln s particles M 2 scaling: no price paid for increasing diffractive gap size

5 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 5 Diffractive pp(pp) processes @ CDF Single Diffraction dissociation (SD) Double Diffraction dissociation (DD) Double Pomeron Exchange (DPE)  Central Diffraction Single + Double Diffraction (SDD) SD SDD   Elastic scatteringTotal cross section  T =Im f el (t=0) OPTICAL THEOREM   gap nested gap use gap nesting until no diffractive gap fits in √s'  

6 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 6 M 2 scaling KG&JM, PRD 59 (1999) 114017  factorization breaks down to ensure M 2 scaling - why? Regge 1  Independent of s over 6 orders of magnitude in M 2 !  d  dM 2 | t=-0.05 independent of s over 6 orders of magnitude ! data

7 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 7  T SD (pp & pp) Factor of ~8 (~5) suppression at √s = 1800 (540) GeV  suppressed relative to Regge KG, PLB 358, 379 (1995) 1800 GeV 540 GeV M ,t,t p p p’  T SD mb √s=22 GeV

8 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 8 REMARKS  MC generators for diffractive studies:  PYTHIA & PHOJET disagree with each other and with data.  Diffractive factorization breaking at HERA: Vector mesons:  vs. W, b-slopes of t-distributions, … Dijets: E T jet dependence, resolved vs. direct components,...  Renormalization (RENORM) model: describes both p ( p ) - p and  – p  MC based on RENORM model: MBR (Minimum Bias Rockefeller) used at CDF.  Luminosity measurement: requires a known x-section and MC predicted acceptance of a detector component.  suggest SD: well defined and slowly varying x-section

9 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 9 The CDF II Detector

10 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 10 Diffractive Structure Function  breakdown of QCD factorization !

11 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 11 Diffractive Structure Function CDF H1 momentum fraction of parton in “Pomeron” – note quotes Using preliminary PDF’s from same suppression as in soft diffraction – why?

12 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 12 Dijet E T distributions  similar for SD and ND over 4 orders of magnitude Kinematics

13 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 13 DSF from Dijets in Run II )(xF ) F Bj ND jj Bj SD jj )(xRate )(xRate )R(x Bj ND jj Bj SD jj Bj   t - distribution The x Bj -distribution of the SD/ND ratio has no strong Q 2 dependence the slope of the t-distribution is independent of Q 2 the t-distribution displays a diffraction minimum at |t| ~ 2.5 (GeV/c) 2 (?)  all three results  “ first observation ” ?????? x Bj - distribution CDF Run II Preliminary b - slope of t-distribution ?

14 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 14 Pomeron dominated  &  dependence of F D jj – Run I

15 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 15 Diffractive W / Z - analysis CDF Run II Preliminary

16 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 16 Diffractive W / Z - results CDF Run II Preliminary

17 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 17 CENTRAL GAPS Jet gap

18 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 18 DIFFRACTION PHENOMENOLOGY

19 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 19 Gap probability MUST be normalized to unity! Single Diffraction 2 independent variables: t color factor gap probability sub-energy x-section

20 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 20 Single diffraction (re)normalized  Pumplin bound obeyed at all impact parameters Grows slower than s 

21 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 21 Unitarity and Renormalization  Two free parameters: s 0 and g PPP  Obtain product g PPP s 0  from  SD  Renormalized Pomeron flux determines s 0  Get unique solution for g PPP Pomeron-proton x-section Pomeron flux  gap probability Set to unity – determines g PPP and s 0 KG, PLB 358 (1995) 379

22 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 22 Dijets in  p at HERA from RENORM Factor of ~3 suppression expected at W~200 GeV (just as in pp collisions) for both direct and resolved components K. Goulianos, POS (DIFF2006) 055 (p. 8)

23 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 23 Multi-gap Diffraction (KG, hep-ph/0205141)  y

24 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 24 Multi-gap Cross Sections Same suppression as for single gap! Gap probabilitySub-energy cross section (for regions with particles) 5 independent variables color factor

25 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 25 Rapidity Gaps in Fireworks

26 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 26 “Gap survival probability” S =

27 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 27 Hard Diffraction Phenomenology

28 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 28 Diffractive dijets @ Tevatron p jet reorganize jet

29 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 29 F D JJ ( , Q 2 ) @ Tevatron

30 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 30 SD/ND dijet ratio vs. x Bj @ CDF 0.035 <  < 0.095 Flat  dependence for  < 0.5 CDF Run I

31 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 31 Diffractive DIS @ HERA e Q2Q2 ** p jet  reorganize J. Collins: factorization holds (but under what conditions?) e **  t p IP Pomeron exchangeColor reorganization Results favor color reorganization

32 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 32 Dijets in  p at HERA - 2008 DIS 2008 talk by W. Slomiński, ZEUS  20-50 % apparent rise when E T jet 5  10 GeV  due to suppression at low E T jet !!!

33 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 33 Vector meson production (Pierre Marage, HERA-LHC 2008)  left - why different  vs. W slopes?  more room for particles  right - why smaller b-slope in  *p?  same reason

34 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 34 Unexpected, not understood QCD factorisation not OK Dijets in  p at HERA – 2007 Hadron-like  e Q2Q2 ** p jet  reorganize Direct vs. resolved  the reorganization diagram predicts:  suppression at low Z | P jets, since larger  is available for particles  same suppression for direct and resolved processes

35 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 35 Pomeron  '  and  t in a QCD inspired parton model approach

36 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 36  SD and ratio of  ' 

37 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 37 The total x-section √s F =22 GeV SUPERBALL MODEL

38 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 38 Monte Carlo Strategy for the LHC   T  from SUPERBALL model  optical theorem  Im f el ( t=0 )  dispersion relations  Re f el ( t=0 )  differential  SD  from RENORM  use nested pp final states for pp collisions at the IP ­ p sub-energy √s‘ See K. Goulianos, Phys. Lett. B 193 (1987) 151 pp “A new statistical description of hardonic and e+e− multiplicity distributions “  T optical theorem Im f el (t=0) dispersion relations Re f el (t=0) MONTE CARLO STRATEGY CONCUSION stay tuned …

39 K. Goulianos low-x 27-29 June 2010 KavalaDiffraction at CDF and Universality of DFB 39 The first CMS event


Download ppt "Diffraction at CDF and Universality of Diffractive Factorization Breaking Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google