Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Dr. Michael R. Hyman, NMSU Experiments in Marketing Research.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Dr. Michael R. Hyman, NMSU Experiments in Marketing Research."— Presentation transcript:

1 Dr. Michael R. Hyman, NMSU Experiments in Marketing Research

2 2 Criteria for Establishing Causal Relationships Concomitant variation Temporal ordering of variables Control over other possible causal factors

3 3 Preliminary Definitions: Independent Variable Experimenter controlled variable Value can be manipulated by experimenters to whatever they wish it to be

4 4 Dependent Variable Value expected to be dependent on experimenter’s manipulation Criterion or standard by which results are judged

5 5 Test Units Subjects or entities whose response to the experimental treatment are measured or observed

6 6 What is an Experiment? Research investigation under controlled conditions At least one independent variable is manipulated Its effect on at least one dependent variable is measured Purpose: To test hypothesis

7 7 Unit Pricing Experiment

8 8 Basic Experimental Design Issues Manipulation of independent variable Selection of dependent variable Assignment of subjects (or other test units) to treatments/conditions Control over extraneous variables

9 9 How Can Experimenters Control for Extraneous Variation? Eliminate Extraneous Variables Hold Conditions Constant Randomization Matching Subjects Presentation Order Blinding

10 10 Control Groups Isolate extraneous variation

11 11 Erroneous Inferences Caused by Lack of Control

12 12 Field vs. Laboratory Experiment

13 13 Types of Research Environments

14 14 Artificiality of Laboratory vs. Field Experiments

15 15 Laboratory ExperimentField Experiment High Internal Validity Few Extraneous Variables High Control Low Cost Short Duration Subjects Aware of Participation High External Validity Many Extraneous Variables Low Control High Cost Long Duration Subjects Unaware of Participation Demand Artifacts HighDemand Artifacts Low Few ParticipantsMany Participants Easier to DoHarder to Do

16 16 Guinea pig effect Hawthorne effect Demand Characteristics Experimental procedures that intentionally hint to subjects something about experimenter’s hypothesis

17 17 Internal Validity Ability of experiment to determine if the experimental treatment was the sole cause of changes in a dependent variable Did the manipulation do what it was supposed to do?

18 18 Threats to Internal Validity History Maturation Testing Instrumentation Selection bias Mortality

19 19 Type of Extraneous VariableExample History - Specific events in the environment between the Before and After measurement that are beyond the experimenter’s control Maturation - Subjects change during the course of the experiment Testing - The Before measure alerts or sensitizes subject to nature of experiment or second measure. A major employer closes its plant in test market area Subjects become tired Questionnaire about the traditional role of women triggers enhanced awareness of women in an experiment.

20 20 Instrument - Changes in instrument result in response bias Selection - Sample selection error because of differential selection comparison groups Mortality - Sample attrition; some subjects withdraw from experiment New questions about women are interpreted differently from earlier questions. Control group and experimental group is self-selected group based on preference for soft drinks Subjects in one group of a hair dying study marry rich widows and move to Florida Type of Extraneous Variable Example

21 21

22 22 Types of Experimental Designs

23 23 Sample Marketing Experiments Using Different Experimental Designs

24 24

25 25

26 26

27 27

28 28

29 29

30 30

31 31

32 32

33 33

34 34 Test Marketing

35 35 Test Market Field test of a new product or marketing mix element(s) of a current product using experimental or quasi-experimental designs

36 36 Uses and Objectives Evaluate proposed natural programs Estimate market shares and volumes Estimate cannibalization rate on existing product line Collect classification data on potential customers Analyze competitor reactions

37 37 Benefits and Disadvantages Benefits Estimate sales potential under realistic conditions Find and correct weaknesses in marketing mix Disadvantages Costs Tipping hand to competitors

38 38 What to Consider Tradeoff of costs and risk of product failure versus potential profits and probability of success Speed of competitor response Cost to produce product for test market Impact of failure on company reputation

39 39 Cost of Two-Market Test Direct costs: $500,000 POP materials, coupons, samples, syndicated research, media time/space, ad agency payments, initially high trade allowances Indirect costs Management time, diversion from current products, negative internal/external impact of test failure, etc.

40 40 Steps in Test Market Study 1.Define objectives Estimate market share, purchase frequency, cannibalization rates Discover who buys product and where 2.Select testing approach Standard Simulated (mall testing facility) Controlled test market (e.g., BehaviorScan)

41 41 Steps in Test Market Study 3.Develop marketing plan 4.Select test markets Should reflect regional differences if important, but have similar demographics and little media spillover from/to other markets Avoid over-tested and idiosyncratic markets

42 42

43 43 Steps in Test Market Study 5. Run test markets Sales estimates take 6-12 months because initial estimates of repeat purchases high 6.Analyze results Check purchase data (i.e., trial versus repeat purchases), awareness data, competitive response, and sales of all similar products


Download ppt "Dr. Michael R. Hyman, NMSU Experiments in Marketing Research."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google