1. International Workshop: Istanbul – Twente – Sarajevo GROUP 3 Ines Coralic, Yeşim Çiloğlu, Nikola Grubesic, Rick van der Heemst, Derya Karadağ, Evren Özsoy, Sinem Uçğun

2. THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s 3 Box in Box ConceptRail&Roller ConceptModular Pavillions Concept Modular concept is established based on 1 m modules of rails and a roller of plastic film. Other parts of concept are connection parts which are L-shaped corner units and T-shaped post-beam connections. Using this elements pavilion structure can expand in all 3 dimensions. Connecting I-L and T-shaped elements rails are established. The roller is rolled to establish the plastic skin of the pavilion. The plastic film is considered to be perforated in hot weather and double layered in cold weather. The pavilion concept is based on two minor pavilion spaces which can be extruded from one major pavilion space. The minor element is designed as a box in modular sistem 2x2 meters. Additional element creates a flexibile shell which covers the pavilion space. These spaces can be combined to use for one function or can be used separately for different functions. The shell is designed to accomodate technical instalations during the winter, and it shades pavilions during the summer. Pavilion in Sultanahmet is based on a module size of 60x60 cm. This size is suitable for different arrangements and sizes of internal and external spaces. Standard sized pavilion is flexible and can be divided up to 5 shop. Open spaces in between pavilions establish a calm space for users. A calm alley is defined between pavilions and the courtyard of the Blue Mosque in contrary of the more crowded street in Atmeydanı.

3. KEY CRITERIA COMPARISON Design Criteria Matrix THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison Box in Box Concept = - Rail&Roller Concept = - Modular Pavillions Concept = + Architectural quality - Multi-functionality +/- Transformability +/- Sustainability + Comfort & health + Constructability - Cultural + local context - - +/- + - + - - + + + + + 3

4. THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE approach

5. CONTEXT OF SITE relation to adjacent buildings THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE

6. orientation / accessibility rooting Text THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE

7. zoning THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE

8. THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE BUILDING CONCEPT scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 scenario 5 BUILDING CONCEPT 2 tea&desert shop with seating area

9. THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE BUILDING CONCEPT scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 scenario 5 BUILDING CONCEPT 1 restaurant, 1 fast food shop, 1 book store

10. THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE BUILDING CONCEPT scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 scenario 5 BUILDING CONCEPT 1 restaurant with semi opened space

11. THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE BUILDING CONCEPT scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 scenario 5 BUILDING CONCEPT

12. THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE BUILDING CONCEPT scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 scenario 5 BUILDING CONCEPT

13. THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE BUILDING CONCEPT scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 scenario 5 BUILDING CONCEPT desert, candy, ice cream, snacks take away

14. THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE BUILDING CONCEPT scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 scenario 5 BUILDING CONCEPT Shops, arts&crafts, bookstore, silver, souvenir

15. 3D DIGITAL / PHYSICAL MODELS THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE BUILDING CONCEPT scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 scenario 5 3D digital / physical models

16. 3D DIGITAL / PHYSICAL MODELS THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE BUILDING CONCEPT scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 scenario 5 3D digital / physical models

17. CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE BUILDING CONCEPT scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 scenario 5 3D digital / physical models CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION

18. THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE BUILDING CONCEPT scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 scenario 5 3D digital / physical models CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION

19. CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE BUILDING CONCEPT scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 scenario 5 3D digital / physical models CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION

20. KEY CRITERIA – ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY The see-trough design of the pavilion gives a neutral impression which does not interfere with its surroundings THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE BUILDING CONCEPT scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 scenario 5 3D digital / physical models CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION KEY CRITERIA architectural quality

21. KEY CRITERIA – MULTI FUNCTIONALITY The construction-methods provide for an easy adaptation of the interior partitions of the pavilions. The floor-system provides utilities on key points within the pavilion. THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE BUILDING CONCEPT scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 scenario 5 3D digital / physical models CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION KEY CRITERIA architectural quality multi functionality

22. KEY CRITERIA – TRANSFORMABILITY The panel-system provides an easy way of transforming both exterior and interior. THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE BUILDING CONCEPT scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 scenario 5 3D digital / physical models CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION KEY CRITERIA architectural quality Multi functionality Transformability

23. KEY CRITERIA – SUSTAINABILITY The panels include insulation. This will reduce energy consumption for cooling during summer and heating during winter. THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE BUILDING CONCEPT scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 scenario 5 3D digital / physical models CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION KEY CRITERIA architectural quality transformability functionality comfort & health sustainability

24. KEY CRITERIA – CONSTRUCTABILITY AND HANDLING OF COMPONENTS The components are lightweight and designed to be handled by 1-2 persons. Panels 60x60 cm, the H-profiles are 360 centimeters long and the horizontal H-profiles are 60 cm long. Both profile are made of aluminum. THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE BUILDING CONCEPT scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 scenario 5 3D digital / physical models CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION KEY CRITERIA architectural quality Multi functionality Transformability Sustainability comfort & health constructability and handling of components

25. KEY CRITERIA – CULTURAL AND LOCAL SITE CONTEXT Pavilion is designed for weather conditions of Istanbul whether it being sunshine or rain. THREE CONCEPTS developed concept s key criteria comparison CONTEXT OF SITE BUILDING CONCEPT scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 scenario 5 3D digital / physical models CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION KEY CRITERIA architectural quality Multi functionality Transformability Sustainability comfort & health constructability and handling of components cultural and local site context