1. Conceptual Development When, Where, Why, and How Many? Concepts are general ideas or understandings that can be used to group together similar –Objects –Events –Properties etc. Concepts help us simplify the world and think more efficiently. e.g Boy Scout rule for being lost in the woods without food e.g. possible origin of stereotypes?

2. Perceptual Categorization Grouping according to similar appearances (size, color, movement..) children first categorize according to overall shape, then later by function

3. 9-10 month olds expect similar looking objects to perform the same function (e.g. castanets study) By age 2, children can categorize to determine which actions go with which objects (e.g. knowing if a cup is used to “feed” an animal it can be used to feed a another animal but not a vehicle.) Using Concepts to make Inferences

4. Language Concepts Language could not be learned without concepts (how would we know how to generalize word meanings?) Language can serve to point out NEW concepts (e.g. Xu and Carey--individuation) Pragmatics of language can emphasize importance or add weight to concepts (e.g. “carrot-eaters” versus people who eat carrots)

5. Time: Order of events Knowing what happened first, next, and so on… 3-month-olds can detect the order of events in a repetitive sequence. –Pictures are shown alternately at A and B. –Over time, infants start to anticipate the new picture. By 12 months, they can detect the order after only a single exposure to the sequence. (Baby) Mom AB Haith, Wentworth, & Canfield, 1993; Bauer, 1995

6. Time 4-year-olds can report that an event (e.g. birthday) that occurred a week ago was more recent than an event that happened 7 weeks ago (e.g. Christmas) If event happened more than 2 mths ago, they aren’t very accurate until age 9 By age 5, children can accurately estimate durations up to about 30 seconds Even young infants possess mechanisms for measuring the duration of arbitrary intervals (e.g., the duration of a tone)

7. Duration discrimination 6-month-old infants discriminate between tones of differing lengths at a 1:2 ratio, but not a 2:3 ratio. Expt. 1 -- 2 vs. 4 sec –Success Expt. 2 -- 3 vs. 4.5 sec –Failure Expt. 3 --.5 vs. 1 sec –Success Expt. 4 --.67 vs. 1 sec –Failure Wynn & vanMarle, 2003

9. Space Infants tend to use egocentric representations Can use allocentric system but early in development landmarks must be obvious and right next to object (~9mths) Concepts like “next to” or “in between” emerge ~11 mths

10. Spatial Representation Self-locomotion is important for understanding spatial relations Examples: Visual cliff studies (understanding of depth) Gap studies crawlers or infants using walkers remember objects’ locations better than non crawlers of same age. toy hidden in 1 of 2 wells babies who crawled to the other side did better than those carried. Driver vs. Passenger in a car analogy!

11. Hermer & Spelke, 1994, 1996 2-year-olds encoded geometric landmarks but not featural ones even though featural information is more informative. Even rats and adults seem to have a preference for geometric cues over featural cues. A = ~ 41%B = ~ 7% D = ~ 45% C = ~ 7% Spatial Representation

12. Dead Reckoning and ‘Mental Maps’ The ability to keep track of one’s location relative to the starting point and return directly back to it. Rats, ants, and geese (and humans to some degree) can do it 2-year-olds show some dead reckoning abilities--if led on circuitous routes they can return to the starting point more often than chance (this typically increases over development somewhat)

13. Same/Mirror Image Tasks Dead Reckoning and Other Spatial Skills Sociocultural factors influence these abilities (e.g. aboriginal desert dwellers over city-dweller, video gamers) Gender differences favoring males (e.g. waterline on cup task)

14. Causality Kotovsky & Baillargeon, 1994 By 11 months, infants expect the size of an object to be related to the amount of force it can exert on another object. OR Habituation Test

15. Causality (con’t) Causal Relations 2 1/2 year-olds select the appropriate tool for retrieving the toy more frequently than 1 1/2 year-olds. Tool Use –structural properties are causally related to tool’s function (Chen & Seigler, 2000) Figure 7.8, from text

16. Cause–effect relations Hearing that wugs are well prepared to fight and gillies to flee helped preschoolers categorize novel pictures like these as wugs or gillies (Krascum & Andrews, 1998). In general, understanding cause–effect relations helps people of all ages learn and remember. It’s easier to remember concepts and order of events if they are causally connected

17. Causality (con’t) Causal Relations Magic tricks - searching for causes –Most 3- and 4-year-olds do not understand the point of magic tricks. By age 5 fascinated by magic tricks because causal mechanism is hidden. (Rosengren & Hickling, 1994) –4- and 5-year-olds, but not 3-year-olds, will actively search for the cause of an apparent magic trick. The “Why” stage begins…

18. Number is... not a directly perceivable property of any individual object. an abstract concept that applies to sets of items. Numerical equality: realization that all sets of a certain number of objects have something in common is the most basic numerical understanding.

19. Numerical Discrimination 5-month-old infants can discriminate between pictures containing 1, 2, or 3 items. –They fail to discriminate larger sets in this way unless the difference between the sets is large enough. Habituation … and so on Test Starkey, Spelke, & Gelman, 1990; Van Loosbroek & Smitsman, 1990) or … and so on or

20. Two core systems of number Core System 1 –Object tracking: up to 3 or 4 objects Core System 2 –Approximate representations of large numerosities

21. Infants’ Arithmetic infants of 5 months seems to have a basic understanding of arithmetic.

22. Large number discrimination 6-month-old infants discriminate: –4 vs. 8, 8 vs. 16, 16 vs. 32 –BUT NOT: 8 vs. 12, 16 vs. 24 For larger sets (more than 4 items): –Infants can discriminate values that differ by a 1:2 ratio, but not a 2:3 ratio. (Xu, in press; Xu & Spelke, 2000; Xu, Spelke, & Goddard, 2000)

23. Habituation Test

24. Habituation Test.........................................................................................................................................................................

25. += or Number vs. Continuous Extent Pitting number against continuous extent by manipulating the size of the objects in the outcomes. wrong # right # right amount wrong amount (Feigenson, Carey, & Spelke, 2002)

26. Counting Some facts… –Most children can count to 10 by age 3 –Most 5-year-olds can count to 100 –Most children do not understand relative magnitudes (i.e., ordinality) of the different numbers between 1 and 10 until age 5. e.g. that 6 apples is more than 4 apples. –Most children do not understand cardinality until age 5. e.g. Give-a-number task 2-year-olds:1 (and more than 1) 2 and a half-year-olds: 1, 2, (and more than 2) 3-year-olds: 1, 2, 3, (and more than 3) 3.5- to 4-year-olds: all numbers

27. Gelman and Gallistel’s (1978) 5 Counting Principles One-to-one correspondence - each object receives a single number label Stable order - number list is always said in same order Cardinality - total number corresponds to last number word said Order irrelevance - objects can be counted in any order Abstraction - any set of individuals can be counted