1. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 1 Electron and Neutrino Interactions on Nucleons and Nuclei in the Next Decade A New International Effort led by Rochester 1. Bridging Nuclear and High Energy Physics Programs 2. Bridging the fields of Electron and Neutrino Interactions 3. Bridging QCD and Electroweak Interactions (e.g. Neutrino Oscillations) 4. Investigating Form Factors, Quark-Hadron Duality in Nucleons and Nuclei with electrons and neutrinos 5. Bridging Physics between Jlab, Fermilab and JHF-(JPARC) Principal Investigators from Rochester S. Manly -electron scattering Jlab Hall B CLAS data - Final states in quasielastic, resonance and DIS in nuclei - New Program A. Bodek, (C. Keppel) - electron scattering Jlab Hall C experiments (structure functions, form factors, resonances in nuclei, sum rules) - E94-110+ E02-109, E02-103, P03-110 - New Program K. McFarland, (C. Keppel, J. Mofin) - Neutrino scattering cross sections FNAL- MINERvA - Near Detector - New Program K. McFarland - Neutrino Oscillations (JHF-SuperK, FNAL-off axis) - New Neutrino Oscillations Program -both near and far detectors

2. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 2 US National Academy of Science National Research Council Report 2002 In the first decade of the 21st Century, new discoveries are expected in the fast growing “areas on the boundaries between the established disciplines” Examples that come to mind are: Nuclear and Particle Physics Physics/Astrophysics Astronomy Physics and Biology-Genetics-Medical Physics Physics and Computer Science Computer Science and Biology-Genetics And others…

3. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 3 Within the discipline of Physics, we can make new Discoveries by drawing the expertise of physicists Across the various disciplines of Nuclear Physics, Particle Physics, Astrophysics In 2001 The Annual NuInt conferences were started and focused on A two overlying unifying goals “Neutrino Oscillations” “QCD and Nuclear Structure” Drawing on contributions from Nuclear, Particle, and Astrophysics and To study Neutrino Oscillations Requires Understanding of non-perturbative QCD

4. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 4 Connection to Physics at Jlab - Electrons as Probes of Hadron/Nuclear Structure QCD. Connection to Astrophysics -Solar and Atmospheric Neutrinos Also : Is CP Violation (CPV) in the Lepton sector which can lead to Leptogenesis a possible origin of Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry in the Universe ?

5. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 5 SuperK Water Cerenkov Detector Atmospheric neutrinos - up down asymmetry - Discovery of muon neutrino -->  neutrino oscillations.  M 2 (2- >3) with large mixing Maximal mixing, and evidence of muon neutrinos oscillating To  neutrinos  M 2 (2->3)

6. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 6 K2K, First Accelerator Based neutrino oscillations experiment. Dip at the number of expected quasielastic events at 0.7 GeV. - low statistics Comparison of rate of muon neutrino events to prediction versus energy gives a measurement of  M 2 (2->3) "Indications of Neutrino Oscillation in a 250 km Long-baseline Experiment” The K2K collaboration, M.H. Ahn et al, hep-ex/0212007, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 041801. Expected (dashed black line =44 events, observed 29 events). Both normalization and shape indicate oscillations. Precise cross section and flux in the 0.3 to 5 GeV region needed.

7. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 7 Very low  M 2 (1->2) With large mixing.

8. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 8 GOOD NEW FOR FUTURE CPV large mixing (1->2)

9. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 9

10. 10 Next generation Neutrino experiments aim at measuring the 3x3 mixing matrix and masses. This is done by looking for transformation of muon neutrinos to electron neutrinos at the 1-3 GeV region. Expect a rate of about 3%. Present limit is about 10% at SuperK 3-generation fit not as good as CHOOZ Limit

11. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 11 Requires good knowledge of cross sections Plan for next 10 year program at JHF and Fermilab FNAL Off axis JHF to SK

12. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 12 -------- 1 Pion production/ resonances ---- Quasielastic W=Mp ------total  including DIS W>2GeV  1. Bubble Chamber language. - Exclusive final states 2. Resonance language. - Excitation Form Factors of Resonances and decays 3. Deep Inelastic Scattering -PDFs and fragmentation to excl. final states NEED to Understand Hadron/Nuclear Physics both at Low and High Energies  /E E (GeV) 0.1 1 10 Good News: Solar mixing is LARGE - GOOD FOR CPV Challenge: We Also NEED PRECISION NEUTRINO  and composition of final states

13. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 13 MIT SLAC DATA 1972 e.g. E0 = 4.5 and 6.5 GeV e-P scattering A. Bodek PhD thesis 1972 [ PRD 20, 1471(1979) ] Proton Data Electron Energy = 4.5, 6.5 GeV Data ‘ The electron scattering data in the Resonance Region is the “ Frank Hertz Experiment ” of the Proton. The Deep Inelastic Region is the “ Rutherford Experiment ” of the proton ’ SAID V. Weisskopf * (former faculty member at Rochester and at MIT when he showed these data at an MIT Colloquium in 1971 (* died April 2002 at age 93 ) What do The Frank Hertz” and “Rutherford Experiment” of the proton’ have in common? A: Quarks! And QCD

14. (e/  / -N cross sections at low energy Neutrino interactions -- Quasi-Elastic / Elastic (W=Mp)  + n -->  - + p (x =1, W=Mp) Described by form factors (And also need to account for Fermi Motion/binding effects in nucleus) e.g. Bodek and Ritchie (Phys. Rev. D23, 1070 (1981) Resonance (low Q 2, W  - + p + n   Poorly measured, Adding DIS and resonances together without double counting is tricky. 1st resonance and others modeled by Rein and Seghal. Ann Phys 133, 79, (1981) Deep Inelastic  + p -->  - + X (high Q 2, W> 2) well measured by high energy experiments and well described by quark-parton model (pQCD with NLO PDFs), but doesn ’ t work well at low Q 2 region. (e.g. SLAC data at Q 2 =0.22) Issues at few GeV : Resonance production and low Q 2 DIS contribution meet. The challenge is to describe ALL THREE processes at ALL neutrino (and electron) energies GRV94 LO 1 st resonance X = 1 (quasi)elastic F2 quasi integral=0.43 Very large e-p 

15. Intellectual Reasons: Understand how QCD works in both neutrino and electron scattering at low energies -different spectator quark effects. (There are fascinating issues ) How is fragmentation into final state hadrons affected by nuclear effects in electron versus neutrino reactions. Of interest to : Nuclear Physics/Medium Energy, QCD/ Jlab communities IF YOU ARE INTERESTED in QCD Practical Reasons: Determining the neutrino sector mass and mixing matrix precisely requires knowledge of both Neutral Current (NC) and Charged Current(CC) differential Cross Sections and Final States These are needed for the NUCLEAR TARGET from which the Neutrino Detector is constructed (e.g Water, Carbon, Iron)- of interest to Particle Physics/ HEP/ FNAL /KEK/ Neutrino communities IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN NEUTRINO MASS and MIXING. What do we want to know about low energy electron/  reactions and why Astrophysics community interested in both

16. At Rochester we have a long tradition of collaboration Between Nuclear Physics and Particle Physics, and expertise in both electron scattering and neutrino physics. PHOBOS at RHIC (Manly) - Currently Funded by DOE Nuclear Physics Division (Manly’s PhD Thesis was in neutrino physics).---> Evolving towards Jlab Hall B and Hall C expts. SLAC Experiments E139, E140, E140x - EMC Effect, precision nucleon and nuclear structure functions: Bodek (co-spokesperson) Funded by DOE Nuclear Physics Division in 1980’s-1990s (initially started as collaboration between A. Bodek and Tom Cormier). Provided the upgrades needed for the NPAS program at SLAC. Provided world’s standard data sets for F2, R, and EMC effects on nucleons and nuclei ----> Now evolving towards Jlab Hall C experiments. CCFR/NuTeV Neutrino Program (Bodek, McFarland)-funded by DOE High Energy Physics from 1977-now --> Evolving towards Neutrino Program at Fermilab (MINERvA and JHF). Phenomenological description of low energy electron and neutrino scattering (Bodek - in collaboration HEP experimenters and theorists, and nuclear community e.g. J. Arrington) More Jlab data needed

17. Proposed Rochester Program Jlab Hall C experiments (structure functions, form factors, resonances in nuclei, sum rules) - join 3 Jlab approved experiments on H and D, and propose a 4th on nuclear targets used in neutrino experiments (C, Fe, etc). E94-110 H2 Resonances F2,R- Completed -Join this experiment to participate in data analysis E02-109 D2 Resonance F2, R- Approved to run in 2004. - Join this experiment to take D2 resonance data. -- Proposed to PAC24 to run P03-110 at same time as E02-109. P03-110 - Resonance F2, R for Nuclear Targets used in Neutrino Experiments. - Leading this experiment (got favorable response from PAC24 - deferred with regret and will considered again in PAC25 to run at same time as D2 experiment E02-109) E02-103 H2, D2 High Q2 resonance data (and EMC effect in He3, He4) - approved by PAC24 to run in 2004 (J. Arrington). - Join this experiment to get H2 and D2 high Q2 data. Also include in overall analysis data from F2, R in nuclei at the DIS region from SLAC E140, E140x- high Q2 (Bodek), and Jlab 99- 118 - DIS low Q2 (A. Brull, Keppel)

18. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 18

19. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 19 Importance of Hadronic Final States in Electron And Neutrino Scattering Hall B Program

20. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 20

21. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 21

22. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 22 JHF region 0.7 GeV FNAL region 3 GeV JHF region 0.7 GeV

23. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 23 JHF region 0.7 GeV FNAL region 3 GeV

24. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 24 Start with: Quasielastic: C.H. Llewellyn Smith (SLAC).Phys.Rept.3:261,1972 Vector form factors From electron scattering Via CVC Axial form factor from Neutrino experiments Neutrino experiments use Dipole form factors with Gen=0 -Because this is what was put in the LS paper (not exactly correct) Vector Axial Updated recently By Bodek, Budd and Arrington 2003

25. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 25 What does axial form factor Fa do between 1 and 3 GeV2 ???? Budd, Bodek, Arrington BBA-2003 Form Factor Fits to SLAC/JLAB data. Vector Nucleon form factors display deviations from dipole. Controversy on Gep high Q2

26. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 26 K2K Near detector data on Water was Fit with wrong Vector Form factors. New BBA2003 form factors and updated M_A have a significant effect on Neutrino oscillations Results.

27. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 27 Updating Neutrino Axial Form Factors:--> Use new BBA-2003 Precise Vector Form Factors as input to neutrino data. With BBA-2003 Form Factors, Axial Vector M_A=1.00. However, no information on Axial form factor for Q2>1 GeV2. Future: Very High Statistics neutrino data will be available on Carbon. Need precise vector form factors, as modified in Carbon (including effect of experimental cuts) Can measure F_A(Q2)/ GM_V(Q2) at High Q2 - By combining Jlab and MINERvA data Quasielastic Old Bubble Chamber Data on D2. (Steve Manly was A member of this collaboration (as a PhD Thesis student)

28. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 28 Measure F_A(Q2)/GM_V(Q2) by comparing neutrino And electron e-e’-p data on Carbon with 1 Million events

29. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 29 One Example: Precise measurement of Axial Form factor of the Nucleon can only be done using a combined analysis (with the same cuts) of a sample of e-e’-p data from electron scattering at Jlab (on Carbon) with the Corresponding  -  ’  p data from neutrino scattering On Carbon and using same cuts (on final state proton etc). (measure F_A at high Q2 for first time). Since future high statistics neutrino data will only be done with nuclear targets (e.g. scintillator), Nuclear Effects can both be studied, as well as cancelled by performing a combined analysis of these two data sets. Goal of our program in Hall B: Produce well understood DSTs of e-e’ X on Carbon that can be used in a combined analysis with neutrino data. Start with quasielastic, and continue on to resonances, and DIS. In the process, also do physics such as nuclear transparency, modification of resonance and DIS final states in nuclei, etc.

32. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 32 Duality, QCD Sum Rules, and Current Algebra Sum Rules. Local duality and Global duality appears to work for Q 2 > 1.5 GeV 2 in electron scattering: This is basically a consequence of the fact that if target mass effects are included, higher twists are small and QCD sum rules are approximately true for Q 2 > 1.5 GeV 2. (e.g. momentum sum rule - quarks carry about 1/2 of the proton momentum) F 2 eP, F 2 eN are related to PDFs weighted by quark charges). At high Q 2, duality also seems to work for nuclear corrections. All of these break down at low Q2. A complete model which works at all energies must relate electrons to neutrino structure functions and form factors within a theoretical framework. For DIS it is parton distributions, for quasielastic it is form factors (I=1/2) and for resonances it is excitation form factors for a combination of I=1/2 and I=2/3 states. Needs to work at ALL Q2 (Also, need to add the axial vector form factors, which cannot be determined from electron scattering) What happens at low Q 2 ?

33. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 33  - = W 2 (Anti-neutrino -Proton)  + = W 2 (Neutrino-Proton ) q0= Adler Sum rule EXACT all the way down to Q 2 =0 includes W 2 quasi-elastic S. Adler, Phys. Rev. 143, 1144 (1966) Exact Sum rules from Current Algebra. Sum Rule for W2 DIS LIMIT is just Uv-Dv =1 [see Bodek and Yang hep-ex/0203009] and references therein Vector Part of W2, 0 at Q2=0, 1 at high Q2-Inelastic Adler is a number sum rule at high Q 2 DIS LIMIT is just Uv-Dv. =1 is F 2 - = F 2 (Anti-neutrino -Proton) =  W 2  F 2 + = F 2 (Neutrino-Proton) =  W 2 we use: d  q0) = d (  )d  at fixed q 2 = Q 2 Elastic Vector =1 Q2=0 Elastic Vector = 0 high Q2 Elastic g A =(-1.267) 2 Q2=0 Elastic g A = 0 high Q2 Axial W 2 = non zero at Q2=0 Axial W 2 =1 at high Q2, Inelastic + Similar sum rules for W1, W3, and strangeness changing structure functions

34. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 34 Outline of a Program in Investigating Nucleon and Nuclear Structure at all Q 2 - Starting with PR 03- 110 - Focusing on Resonance Region in Hall C in this talk and backup slides) Update Resonance Vector Form Factors and R vector of the large number of resonances in the Nucleon, e.g. within Rein-Seghal-Feynman Quark Oscillator model (and other resonance models) by fitting all NEW- F2 and R Electron Resonance data E94-110 (H, F2 and R) (just taken in 2003) (+ previous SLAC + photoproduction+ and other data) aim at adding E02-109 (D, F2 and R), E02-103 (H and D F2 at high Q2) and PR03-110 (nuclear targets in summer 04)nuclear targets at the same time as E0109 (D)] Improve on Inelastic Continuum modeling of Vector F2 and R (e.g. using a formalism like Bodek/Yang) using Jlab, SLAC, H and D data, photoproduction and HERA data - and Add neutrino data from CHORUS on Pb. (for DIS Axial scattering) Within these models, convert EM Vector Form Factor to Weak Vector Form Factors - use the Various isospin rules I=1/2 and I=3/2 of elastic, resonance and inelastic Form Factors fits to H and D data E94-110, E02-109 Investigate if the Model predictions for Vector Scattering in neutrino reactions satisfy QCD sum rules and duality at high Q 2 and Adler Vector Rum rules at ALL Q 2. Investigate if the Models predictions for Axial scattering in neutrino reactions satisfy QCD sum rules and duality at high Q 2 and Adler Axial Rum rules at ALL Q 2.

35. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 35 1. Apply nuclear corrections for DIS and resonance region to predict Neutrino and Antineutrino data on nuclei from PR 03-110 - Requires 5 days of running - Also use E99-118 and SLAC E140 and other for DIS A dependence. 2. Compare predictions to existing low statistics neutrino data and to new precise neutrino data to become available in a couple of years (MINERvA, and JHF- Japan) - Do predictions from models (which satisfy all sum rules and duality) also model the neutrino and antineutrino data well? 3. In parallel - Final states in nuclear targets to be investigated in a collaboration with Hall B experiments in electron experiments and in new neutrino experiments. Nucleon +Resonance Vector Form Factors, Vector Continuum F2 at all Q 2, R vectror =  L /  T in great details. Nuclear effects on various targets in res, and quasielastic region as a function of Q 2 Hadronic Final Stares in electron scattering Check on Current Algebra sum rules and understanding duality - Axial vector contribution to F2 at low Q 2 Different nuclear effects in neutrino scatt. Account for R axial different from R vector Hadronic final states in neutrino scattering Things can be learned from electron scatteringThings that are learned in neutrino scattering Collaborative approach between High Energy and Nuclear Physics community High x and low Q 2 PDFs for e/neutrino, Resonance form factors, nuclear corrections 1.Electron scattering exp.starting with JLAB P03-110 - with investigation of final states 2.New Near Detector neutrino exp. at Fermilab-NUMI/JHF - -->Years of data e.g. MINERvA + JHF

36. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 36 We will be submitting a proposal to DOE Nuclear Physics Division to fund a Rochester group at Jlab (building on the Rochester SLAC E140 nuclear physics group group and the Rochester PHOBOS nuclear physics group). Rochester will be a Liaison between Electron Scattering and Neutrino Scattering communities, and lead several effort (a) A combined analysis of electron and neutrino data (in collaboration with other high energy and nuclear experimentalists and theorists). (b) A program of measurement and analysis of cross sections, form factors and structure functions on nuclear targets in Hall C. Hall C experimenters are enthusiastic about this collaboration - Bodek is leading this effort by joining E02- (c) A program of measurement and analysis of hadronic final states in Hall B - CLAS collaboration is enthusiastic about this participation - Here the CLAS collaboration (and not the PAC) approves the program. Professor Manly will be leading this effort. Participants A. Bodek, S. Manly, K. McFarland - Experimental faculty Also (D. Koltun, L. Orr, S. Rajeev - Collaborating theory faculty) 2 students, J. Chovjka, G.B. Yu- Experimental PhD students) - to be stationed at Jlab 2 postdocs to be stationed at Jlab (1 for Hall C and one for Hall B)

37. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 37 Some relevant results from previous DOE-Nuclear Funded Program at Rochester (SLAC E139, E140, E140x)

38. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 38 Correct for Nuclear Effects measured in e/  expt. In DIS and resonance region Fe/D data Comparison of Fe/D F2 data In resonance region (JLAB) Versus DIS SLAC data In  TM (C. Keppel 2002). DIS Region  TM Red Jlab Resonance Green DIS Data E87, E139, E140 MUST USE  TM These results are from Rochester Results of SLAC E87, E139, E140

39. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 39

40. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 40

41. Initial quark mass m I and final mass,m F =m * bound in a proton of mass M -- Summary: INCLUDE quark initial Pt) Get  scaling (not x=Q 2 /2M ) for a general parton Model  Is the correct variable which is Invariant in any frame : q3 and P in opposite directions.  P= P 0 + P 3,M P F = P I 0,P I 3,m I P F = P F 0,P F 3,m F =m * q=q3,q0 Most General Case: (Derivation in Appendix)  ‘ w = [Q’ 2 +B] / [ M (1+(1+Q 2 / 2 ) ) 1/2 +A] (with A=0, B=0)<<<<<<<< where2Q’ 2 = [Q 2 + m F 2 - m I 2 ] + { ( Q 2 +m F 2 - m I 2 ) 2 + 4Q 2 (m I 2 +P 2 t) } 1/2 Bodek-Yang 2002-2003: Add B and A to account for effects of additional  m 2 from NLO and NNLO (up to infinite order) QCD effects. Special cases: (1) Bjorken x, x BJ =Q 2 /2M , -> x For m F 2 = m I 2 =0 and High 2, (2) Numerator m F 2 : Slow Rescaling  as in charm production (3) Denominator : Target mass term  =Nachtman Variable  =Light Cone Variable  =Georgi Politzer Target Mass var. ( all the same  ) Please derive this on the plane

42. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 42  2 = 1268 / 1200 DOF Dashed=GRV98LO QCD F 2 =F 2QCD (x,Q 2 ) Solid=modified GRV98LO QCD F 2 = K(Q 2 ) * F 2QCD (  w, Q 2 ) Bodek/Yang Modified GRV98 PDFs To DIS Data Fit to electron And muon Scattering DIS data. Predict reson. Photo and Neutrino data

43. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 43 Predict Resonance, Neutrino And photoproduction data How well does it work?

44. Steve Manly and Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester 44