1. Computer Assisted Learning The Essentials Shlomi Codish Computer Assisted Learning unit Ben Gurion University of the Negev

2. Outline The rationale for CAL The implementation of CAL Hardware infrastructure Manpower Computer literacy Software Location and purchase Vs development Implementation Evaluation Demonstration of software for physiology SimBioSys Synapse

3. The rationale for CAL - pro Multimedia capabilities Consistent educational content Interactive learning Self paced learning Relatively pressure free High accessibility Motivational Different learning methods available Non linear presentation of data Computer managed learning (e.g. HighLearn)

4. The Rationale for CAL - con Expensive Dependent on technology Time consuming Computerphobia Lack of adequate compensation Fear of redundancy Does CAL work?

5. ~200 studies (software/medschool) 12 prospective randomized studies Most show “as good as” results Some show CAL is better: Takes less time Better test scores Better diagnostic abilities (same test scores) Better scores but only for 1 year “Burden of proof” not yet met Need to utilize other CAL benefits

6. Implementation Hardware The basics: computer lab, server, network Accessibility – best is 24/7, the more the better Manpower Computer lab personnel CAL unit personnel (or equivalent) Specific support for CAL activities Educational design and evaluation Computer literacy Faculty, students

7. Implementation - software Location of software Internet Catalogs Marketing Academic activities (conferences, journals, etc.) Word of mouth

8. Implementation - software

9. Purchasing Vs Development Consortia development Factors to consider when purchasing software Adaptability Cost and type of license Internet connectivity Interface

10. Implementation - software Types of licensing Site license – software Site license – network only Site license – internet access IP limited Password protected Limited number – software copies Limited number – internet access

11. Implementation - software It is not enough to give the software to the students! Need to create structured approach Define what you want to achieve Adapt software as needed Create “lab books” for students Dedicate time in the frame of the course Constantly evaluate and fine tune the use of the software Formal assessment of effectiveness in achieving goals

12. Evaluation Methodology has been flawed Control group use problematic Statistical power/small group sizes Selection bias – multiple confounders Durability of effect unclear Various effects need to be evaluated – knowledge, manual skills, other (i.e. auscultatory) skills Enthusiastic student acceptance does not necessarily match objective outcome data

13. Demonstration SimBioSys Synapse