1. Linguistic Diversity Goal s &methods vary: 2 camps Generative Grammarians Few general principles Theory of universal Grammar Describe the grammar of ANY language Assume homogeneity not diversity in speech community Sociolinguists- opposite Start with empirical obs. Differentiation within speech community Methods to systematic study linguistic variation in relation to contextual factors

2. Linguist Anthropologists Similar to sociolinguists Face the complex relation between language and thought -Linguist relativity Language diversity recast as one dimension of “language ideology” Chapter draws on various traditions

3. 3.1 Language in culture: The Boasian Tradition Born 1858 Germany

4. The Boasian Tradition Based on fieldwork among Eskimos and Kwaliutls, Boas considered language essential to Practical means to understand thenological problems -- nothing to do with problems, He also considered Pure linguistic inquiry “part and parcel of a thorough investigation of the psychology of the people of the world.” (1911 n.d. 52) Recorded and transcribed what informants recalled “Salvaging anthropologist” worried about fading traditions and languages

5. 1. Hamat’sa life group, prepared by Franz Boas at the US National Museum, c.1896

6. http://blogs.nyu.edu/projects/ materialworld/2006/10/

7. 3.2 Linguistic Relativity Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis Metaphors: language as guide to the World

8. Whorf’s fire-causing example

9. Language as Objectification of the world From Von Humboldt (1767- 1835) to Cassirer (1940’s) Humboldt replaced Kant’s cognitive categories with linguistic ones. Price: from universal to highly specific Ex. Gender European vs.. Bantu What then is “freedom of expression’?

10. 3.2.2 Language as a guide to World: metaphors George Lakoff and Mark Johnson (1980) We live my more metaphors than we suspect Metaphor: see something in terms of something else ex. “head of state” “theories as buildings” “understanding as seeing” Connect experiential domains and “find” coherence Acceptable because fits other more general metaphor concepts and forms a coherent whole. (Culture as knowledge)

11. Color-terms Research and Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis Critique sociolinguists Berlin (1969) 20 languages universal constraints on –Lang. encode and organize color terms –Change over time to add color terms P. 65 figure 3.2 and Footnote Neurophysio-logical process of perception Unrelated languages code same basic colors= strong evidence against No discreet categories => Prototype theory

12. Implicational Hierarchy of basic color terms

13. 3.2.4 Language and Science Q: If language is or can be really constraining, how can describe what we or others do, believe, think and feel? 1st Solution: Turn into an artist (Cassirer) Act as creative beings. –The art of discovery.. Use “ahas” and sudden intuitions. –Art of presentation –Researchers live in market of ideas

14. 2nd Solution; study cultural products, like myths, which reveal truths about community (symbolic anthropology) Beyond descriptive statements in interviews Culture as communication: Stories, performances, everyday expressions may reveal inner motivations. (See educational forms) Dreams are smarter than dreamer (Freud)

15. 3rd Solution Study conditions under which speakers of a language can overcome limits of their own worldview or metaphysics via study of meta-pragmatics

16. 3.4 Language, Languages and Linguistic Varieties Language vs. a language –Human faculty to communicate (signs, units of of signs) –A specific Socio-historical product –From “dialect” to variety of language –Variety implies linguistic repertoire and speech community

17. Linguistic repertoire- Issues Def: “The totality of linguistic forms regularly used in the course of a socially significant interaction” Gumperz, 1964 Individual repertoire may be different from that of the speech community Social differences associated with social class- can it be treated differently Individual Freedom: can leaders affect the linguistic choices of their community?

18. Speech communities Anthropologist assume that language varieties assume a community of speakers This community is point of reference for the speaker and for the researcher

19. Speech Community: From idealization to heteroglossia Idealized homogenous speech community Example: does this sound right? Generalizations associated with “deep” structures Problems when applied “to know A language” Labov it includes what is socially acceptable

20. Multilingual Speech communities Arizona Tewa Catalan in Barcelona - maintains high status Why? Woolard: it’s not where a language is spoken but WHO speaks it. Authority inculcated in personal relationships Mexicano -- syncretic language instead of language mixing. (p.77)

21. Definitions of Speech communities Gumperz “Speech community” Labov “by participation in a set of shared norms” NYC a speech community. Key shared patters of variation or evaluation Alternative: social contract –Example exogenous marriage unintelligible languages! Vaupes. P 81

22. Duranti’s preference Speech community: the product of communicative speech activities engaged in by a give group of people P.82

23. Labov’s contributions

24. Conclusions, p 83 Language diversity ties together linguistic relativity, language contact and language mixing Language variation is the norm Implies the study language ideology and its complexities In sum, to study language requires interplay between language as human resource AND as historical product and process.