Download presentation
1
The Use of Audit Sampling Attribute Sampling
Section 2 The Use of Audit Sampling Attribute Sampling
2
Definition of Audit Sampling
The application of an audit procedure to less than 100% of the items within an account balance or class of transactions for the purpose of evaluating some characteristic of the balance or class. Extrapolation
3
Representative sample
Sample projection Aggregate all projected misstatements
4
Audit Risk and Sampling
Determine minimum sample need to control audit risk How does this relate to sampling?
5
Defining the Population
First step Restricted to items in the balance or class of transactions
6
Sampling risk When an audit test is restricted to a sample For testing controls or account balances this means Sampling risk inversely related to sample size
7
Nonsampling risk Covers all risks that are not specifically the result of sampling i.e. any factor other than sample size
8
Determinants of Sample Size
Three factors Acceptable level of sampling risk How much deviation can be accepted How much deviation there might be in the population
9
Acceptable Level of Sampling Risk
Must consider evidence from other procedures Example 1: Low control risk Example 2: High control risk
10
Tolerable misstatement amount
Tolerable Deviation Rate/Tolerable Misstatement Rate of deviation from a prescribed control that can be found to exist, without causing a revision in the assessed level of control risk Tolerable misstatement amount
11
Cannot be larger than the smaller of :
The materiality amount for the individual item or The F/S taken as a whole As tolerable rate or misstatement increases
12
Suggested range of TDR No such guidelines for substantive testing
Usually done judgmentally based on: Overall materiality Account balance materiality Type and amount of individual item in the account balance
13
Designing a sample with high tolerable rate or misstatement
A large sample vs. a small sample Highly material accounts or accounts with high likelihood of misstatement
14
Commonly use prior years tests of controls
Expected Deviation Rate/ Misstatement Amount Impact on sample size Commonly use prior years tests of controls
15
Estimate need not be exact
Unless deviation rate is low for tests of controls, what is the alternative?
16
Statistical Tests of Controls
Attribute Sampling Used to estimate the rate of occurrence of a specific quality or attribute in a population Primarily used for
17
E.g. Estimating the percentage of shipments not billed
Thus testing to see if the item was processed correctly or incorrectly What about dollar value?
18
For Attribute Sampling there is no CICA pronouncement
Three areas to look at: Planning the sample Selecting the sample and performing the tests Evaluating the results
19
Audit Sampling Steps Three sections Plan the sample
Select the sample and perform audit procedures Evaluate the results
20
(a) Planning the Sample
9 steps involved State the objectives of the test Consider the Revenue Cycle
21
Decide if audit sampling applies
Is the population appropriate? Sampling applies when?
22
3. Define attributes and error conditions
Specific statement of what contributes an attribute must be made in advance E.g.1 A copy of a shipping document is attached to a duplicate sales invoice E.g.2 A foreman initials the hourly payroll time cards
23
4. Define the population Must be defined in advance E.g.1 A copy of a shipping document is attached to a duplicate sales invoice Population? E.g.2 A foreman initials the hourly payroll time cards
24
5. Define the sampling unit
What dictates the sampling unit? E.g.1 Valid sales Sampling unit? E.g.2 Valid time cards
25
6. Specify Tolerable Deviation Rate
What does this mean? E.g. With time cards, auditor decides that 5% is the TDR. This means? - As TDR Sample size?
26
7. Specify the acceptable risk of over reliance (ARO)
Over reliance on what? The ARO is the risk the auditor is willing to take of: accepting the control procedure as effective when the true population deviation rate is greater than the TDR An alternative understanding
27
Control Risk ARO Significance of T/A’s TDR Low 5% Highly significant
Illustrative Guidelines for TDR and ARO Control Risk ARO Significance of T/A’s TDR Low 5% Highly significant 4% Medium 10% Significant High 20% Less significant 6% Thus what does it mean if control risk is high?
28
8. Estimate the expected population deviation rate (EPDR)
An advanced estimate What is typically used? If this estimate is not available?
29
9. Determine the initial sample size
Why look at the initial sample size? Will look at an illustrative example.
30
Lentner Supply Corp. Lentner Supply Corp. is a medium sized distributor of wholesale hardware supplies in southern Manitoba. It has been a client of yours for several years and has instituted excellent internal control for the control of sales, at your recommendation. In providing control over shipments, the client has prenumbered “warehouse removal slips” that are used for every sale. It is company policy never to remove goods from the warehouse without an authorized warehouse removal slip. After shipment, two copies of the warehouse removal slip are sent to billing for the computerized preparation of a sales invoice. One copy is stapled to the duplicate copy of the prenumbered sales invoice, and the other copy is filed numerically. In some cases more than one warehouse removal slip is used for billing one sales invoice. The smallest warehouse removal slip number for the year is and the largest is The smallest invoice number is and the largest is In the audit of sales, one of the major concerns is the effectiveness of the control in making sure all shipments are billed. The auditor has decided to use attribute sampling in testing internal control.
31
State an effective audit procedure for testing whether shipments have been billed. What is the sampling unit for the audit procedure? Assuming the auditor expects no deviations in the sample but is willing to accept a TDR of 3%, at a 10% risk of over reliance, what is the appropriate sample size? TDR = 3% ARO = 10% EPDR = ?
32
TOLERABLE DEVIATION RATE (IN PERCENTAGE) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20
EXPECTED POPULATION DEVIATION RATE (IN PERCENTAGE) TOLERABLE DEVIATION RATE (IN PERCENTAGE) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 5 PERCENT RISK OF OVER RELIANCE 0.00 149 99 74 59 49 42 36 32 29 19 14 0.25 236 157 117 93 78 66 58 51 46 30 22 0.50 . 0.75 208 1.00 156 1.25 124 1.50 192 103 1.75 227 153 88 77 2.00 181 127 68 2.25 61 2.50 150 109 2.75 173 95 3.00 195 129 84 3.25 148 112 3.50 167 76 40 3.75 185 100 4.00 146 89 5.00 158 116 6.00 179 50 7.00 37
33
10 PERCENT RISK OF OVER RELIANCE
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 10 PERCENT RISK OF OVER RELIANCE 0.00 114 76 57 45 38 32 28 25 22 11 0.25 194 129 96 77 64 55 48 42 18 0.50 0.75 265 1.00 . 176 1.25 221 132 1.50 105 1.75 166 88 2.00 198 75 2.25 65 2.50 158 110 58 2.75 209 94 52 3.00 3.25 153 113 82 3.50 73 3.75 131 98 4.00 149 4.50 218 130 87 34 5.00 160 115 78 5.50 142 103 6.00 182 116 7.00 199 7.50 8.00 60 8.50 68
34
Effect of population size
-Initial sample size only -Possible to make adjustment to initial sample size based on overall population size -Finite correction factor n = revised sample size n’ = initial sample size N = population size n = n’ 1 + n’/N
35
From the problem 12-32 Population is n = Thus revised sample size is ?
36
(b) Select sample and perform audit procedures
Two Steps involved 10. Randomly select the sample (Requirement c of 12-32) Use of a random number table A one-to-one correspondence between warehouse removal slip How is this correspondence achieved?
37
Population of Warehouse Removal Slips 14,682 – 37,521
37039 97547 64673 31546 99314 66854 97855 25145 84834 23009 51584 66754 77785 52357 98433 54725 18864 65866 76918 78825 58210 97965 68548 81545 82933 93545 85959 63282 78049 67830 14624 17563 25697 07734 48243 50203 25658 91478 08509 23308 48130 65047 40059 67825 18934 64998 49807 71126 77818 84350 67241 54031 34535 04093 35062 58163 30954 51637 91500 48722 60988 60029 60873 86723 36464 98305 08009 00666 29255 18514 50188 22554 86160 92250 14021 65859 16237 50014 00463 13906 35936 71761 95755 87002 66023 21428 14742 94874 58533 26507 04458 61862 63119 09541 01715 87901 91260 57510 36314 30452 09712 37714 95482 30507 43373 58939 95848 28288 60341 52174 11879 61500 12763 64433 02268 57905 72347 49498 78938 71312 99705 71546 42274 23915 38405 64257 93218 35793 43671 64055 88729 11168 56864 21554 70445 24841 04779 56774 96129 35314 29631 06937 54545 04470 75463 77112 40704 48823 65963 39359 12717 56201 22811 07318 44623 02843 33299 59872 86774 06926 94550 23299 45557 07923 75126 00808 01312 34348 81191 21027 77087 10909 03676 97723 92277 57115 50789 68111 75305 53289 39751 56093 58302 52236 65756 50273 61566 61962 16623 17849 96701 94971 94758 08845 32260 50848 93982 66451 32143 05441 10399 17775 48006 58200 58367 66577 68583 21108 41361 56640 27890 28825 96509 21363 53657 60119 Population of Warehouse Removal Slips 14,682 – 37,521 Random Stab Random Number Table
38
11. Perform the audit procedures
Requirement a of already done Requirement d of 12-32 Other audit procedures
39
(c) Evaluating the results
Three steps involved Generalize from the sample to the population (12) Analyze deviations (13); and Decide the acceptability of the population (14)
40
12. Generalize from the sample to the population
Need to calculate the sample deviation rate SDR = Actual number of deviation Sample size Assume in problem that there was 1 deviation in the sample of 76
41
Sampling risk prevent auditor from
Note: ARO was 10%, and n = 76 Calculation of CUDR
42
ACTUAL NUMBER OF DEVIATIONS FOUND 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SAMPLE SIZE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DEVIATIONS FOUND 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5 PERCENT RISK OF OVER RELIANCE 25 11.3 17.6 . 30 9.5 14.9 19.5 35 8.2 12.9 16.9 40 7.2 18.3 45 6.4 10.1 13.3 16.3 19.2 50 5.8 9.1 12.1 14.8 17.4 19.9 55 5.3 8.3 11.0 13.5 15.9 18.1 60 4.9 7.7 12.4 14.6 16.7 18.8 65 4.5 7.1 9.4 11.5 15.5 19.3 70 4.2 6.6 8.7 10.7 12.6 14.4 16.2 18.0 19.7 75 3.9 6.2 10.0 11.8 15.2 18.4 20.0 80 3.7 11.1 12.7 14.3 15.8 17.3 90 3.3 5.2 6.8 8.4 9.9 14.1 16.8 100 3.0 4.7 7.6 8.9 10.2 14.0 16.4 125 2.4 6.1 9.3 10.3 12.2 13.2 150 2.0 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.0 6.9 8.6 200 1.5 2.3 3.8 6.5
43
10 PERCENT RISK OF OVER RELIANCE
20 10.9 18.1 . 25 8.8 14.7 19.9 30 7.4 12.4 16.8 35 6.4 10.7 14.5 40 5.6 9.4 12.8 15.9 19.0 45 5.0 8.4 11.4 14.2 17.0 19.6 50 4.5 7.6 10.3 12.9 15.4 17.8 55 4.1 6.9 11.7 14.0 16.2 18.4 60 3.8 6.3 8.6 10.8 14.9 16.9 18.8 70 3.2 5.4 9.3 11.1 14.6 17.9 19.5 80 2.8 4.8 6.5 8.3 9.7 11.3 14.3 15.7 17.2 18.6 90 2.5 4.3 5.8 7.3 8.7 10.1 12.7 15.3 16.6 100 2.3 5.2 6.6 7.8 9.1 11.5 13.8 15.0 120 1.9 4.4 5.5 9.6 10.6 11.6 12.5 160 1.4 2.4 3.3 4.9 5.7 7.2 8.0 9.5 200 1.1 2.6 4.0 4.6 7.0 . Over 20 percent
44
This measure of CUDR means:
But true deviation rate is not 5.1 Revised CUDR = (CUDR-SDR) x N – n N + SDR
45
13. Analyze deviations or errors
Why? What could have caused the deviation?
46
14. Decide the acceptability of the population
When can the population be considered acceptable? From TDR = 3% and CUDR = 5.1%
47
Four courses of action can now be followed
Revise TDR or ARO 2. Expand sample size If n CUDR
48
3. Revise assessed control risk
4. Write a letter to management
49
Problem 1. 12-33: The following is a partial audit program for the audit of cash receipts
Review the cash receipts journal for large and unusual transactions. Trace entries from the prelisting of cash receipts to the cash receipts journal to determine if each is recorded. Compare customer name, date, and amount on the prelisting with the cash receipts journal. Examine the related remittance advices for entries selected from the prelisting to determine if cash discounts were approved. Trace entries from the prelisting to the deposit slip to determine if each has been deposited. Required: Identify which audit procedures could be tested using attribute sampling. What is the appropriate sampling unit for the tests in part (a)? List the attributes for testing in part (a). Assume an ARACR of 5 percent and a TER of 8 percent for tests of controls. The estimated population deviation rate for tests of controls is 2 percent. What is the initial sample size for each attribute?
50
Problem The following questions concern the determination of the proper sample size in attributes sampling using the following table: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ARACR (in percentage) 10 TER (in percentage) 20 EPER (in percentage) 8 Population size 1,000 100,000 6,000 500 1,000,000
51
Required: For each of the columns numbered 1 through 7, decide the initial sample size using nonstatistical methods. For each of the columns numbered 1 through 7, determine the initial sample size needed to satisfy the auditor’s requirements using attribute sampling from Table 12-8. Using your understanding for the relationship between the following factors and sample size, state the effect on the initial sample size (increase or decrease) of changing each of the following factors while the other three are held constant. An increase in ARACR. An increase in the TER. An increase in the EPER. An increase in the population size. Explain why there is such a large difference in the column sizes for columns 3 and 6. Compare your answers in part (b) with the results in part (a). Which of the four factors appears to have the greatest effect on the initial sample size? Which appears to have the least effect? Why is the sample size referred to as the initial sample size?
52
Problem 3. Computed Upper Deviation Rate: The questions below relate to the upper deviation rate for the following six tests of controls using attribute sampling. Control ARO TDR EDR n Deviations Found CUDR 1 10 8 50 2 3 70 4 5 150 6
53
Required: For each control from 1 through 6, determine the computed upper deviation rate. For which controls does the result suggest that the control risk is higher than the auditor has assessed? Explain the effect on the CUDR of changing each of the following three factors while holding the other factors constant: Decreasing the risk of assessing control risk too low. Increasing the deviations found in the sample. Increasing the sample size.
54
Problem 4. Attributes in Tests of Controls
Problem 4. Attributes in Tests of Controls. In auditing the December 31, 200X, financial statements of the Henderson Company, Jenny Starr, CA, is applying attribute sampling in the tests of controls for sales transactions. Based on her knowledge of Henderson Company’s internal control, she estimated that the population deviation rate was 2 percent, and she was willing to accept a 5 percent risk of assessing control risk at a lower level than it actually is. She believes that if the maximum deviation rate is 6 percent, her assessment of control risk at less than maximum is appropriate. Jenny selected a random sample of 200 shipping documents from the 5,500 prepared during the year and audited them. She noted the following matters in the working papers. Invoice 1-422: The signature that would indicate that the shipping clerk recounted the quantity of goods before making shipment was missing from sales order The accounts receivable record indicates that the customer paid for the quantity listed on the sales order and sales invoice. Invoice 2-631: Bill of lading No (indicated on the invoice) could not be located. The accounts receivable record indicates that the customer paid for the quantity listed on the customer’s purchase order and sales invoice. Invoice 3-249: The date that goods were shipped according to the attached bill of lading was four days earlier than the date indicated on the sales invoice and sales journal.
55
Invoice 4-395: The bill of lading No
Invoice 4-395: The bill of lading No indicated that six pairs of R327 flanges were shipped, and the sales invoice and sales journal indicated that only six R327 flanges were shipped. The flanges cost $2.02 each.. Invoice 5-422: Bill of lading No indicated that the customer order number was LO5992, but the attached order number was PO6884.. Invoice 6-837: Bill of lading No indicated that a dozen hammers were shipped. The sales journal and sales invoice indicated that 12 dozen hammers were shipped. Invoice 7-012: Invoice was voided. Invoice 8-318: A signature was not recorded on the invoice copy indicating that math had been checked before the invoice was mailed to the customer. A mathematical error was not made in calculating the total invoice price. Required: What attribute(s) did jenny test? Which items listed above should she treat as a deviation? Is it appropriate for Jenny to combine the results of her testing and make an overall statement about internal control? State the statistical conclusions Jenny should reach. What conclusions should Jenny reach about the company’s internal control?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.