1. Mark Williams, CU-Boulder Using isotopes to identify source waters: mixing models

4. MWL (  18 O-  D) graph can tell us: Sources of groundwater recharge:  Average annual precipitation  Summer rain  Winter rain/snow  Very old water, eg “Pleistocene age” Recharge flowpaths  Piston flow  Exponential flow

5. Problem: Regional groundwater vs South Platte river water as recharge to wells New well users near the South Platte River do not have water rights to Colorado River water Sued because downstream water users with senior water rights say that the wells are pumping their water What can the state engineer do? What can a consultant do for their client (on either side of the debate) Isotopes to the rescue!

9. 2-component mixing models We can go from these simple examples to a general equation that works for almost all systems We assume our “sample” (well-water, streamflow, etc) is a mixture of two sources We can “unmix” the sample to calculate the contribution of each source Either as a mass of water or percentage

10. 2 Component hydrograph separation Source 2 (Groundwater) Source 1 (River water) Well ? % Tracer =  18 O

11. Groundwater River water Mixing line that connects the two end-members: a) sample must plot between the two end-members b) sample must plot on or near the mixing line. Well 1 Well 2 X

12. MIXING MODEL: 2 COMPONENTS One Conservative Tracer Mass Balance Equations for Water and Tracer

13. Groundwater River water Let’s put in some actual tracer concentrations. Well -20‰ -15‰ -10‰

14. Calculate the fraction contribution of groundwater and river water to our well Groundwater (g); River water (r), Well (w) Percent river water contribution to the well is: C w – C g / C r – C g Sampling only for the tracer concentration (c) allows us to calculate the fraction contribution of each end- member to our mixture We need only three samples! No water flow measurements

15. 2-component mixing model: calculation Cw – Cg Cr – Cg = percent contribution of river water -15 – (-20) = +5 -10 – (-20) = +10 = 50%

16. 2-component mixing model: assumptions Only 2 components in mixture (groundwater well in this example) Mixing is complete Tracer signal is distinct for each component No evaporation or exchange with the atmosphere Concentrations of the tracer are constant over time or changes are known

17. Case Study: Hydrograph separation in a seasonally snow-covered catchment Liu et al., 2004

18. Green Lake 4 catchment, Colorado Rockies

19. 2 Component hydrograph separation “Old” Water (Groundwater) “New” Water (Snowmelt) Streamflow ? % Tracer =  18 O

20. Temporal Hydrograph Separation Solve two simultaneous mass-balance equations for Q old and Q new 1. Q stream = Q old + Q new 2. C stream Q stream =C old Q old +C new Q new Yields the proportion of “old” or “new” water for each time step in our hydrograph for which we have tracer values

21. GL4 Dataset Soil Water Stream Water Snowmelt

22. Event formula (D10-B10)/(D10-C10) Pre-event formula (B10-C10)/(D10-C10) Data Hydrograph fractions

23. Green Lake 4 hydrograph separation

24. Life is often complicated:  18 O not distinct

25. Fractionation in Percolating Meltwater    ‰    ‰ Difference between maximum 18 O values and Minimum 18 O values about 4 ‰ Snow surface Ground

26. VARIATION OF  18 O IN SNOWMELT  18 O gets enriched by 4% o in snowmelt from beginning to the end of snowmelt at a lysimeter; Snowmelt regime controls temporal variation of  18 O in snowmelt due to isotopic fractionation b/w snow and ice; Given f is total fraction of snow that have melted in a snowpack,  18 O values are highly correlated with f (R 2 = 0.9, n = 15, p < 0.001); Snowmelt regime is different at a point from a real catchment; So, we developed a Monte Carlo procedure to stretch the dates of  18 O in snowmelt measured at a point to a catchment scale using the streamflow  18 O values.

28. Summary/Review Isotopes can quantify the contribution of different source waters to wells, etc. 2-component separation assumes that the sample lies on a line between 2 end-members Assumptions in hydrograph separations  Not always met Can extend to 3 or more end-members Simple diagnostic tool that should be consider as one of your first field measurements