Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Global Climate Change What Must We Do Now?* James Hansen 1 February 2010 University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC * Statements relating to policy are personal opinion
2
Global Warming Status 1. Knowledge Gap Between - What is Understood (scientists) - What is Known (public) 2. Planetary Emergency - Climate Inertia Warming in Pipeline - Tipping Points Could Lose Control 3. Bad News & Good News - Safe Level of CO 2 < 350 ppm - Multiple Benefits of Solution
3
Climate Tipping Points 1. Ice Sheet Disintegration - Ocean Warming Ice Shelves Melt Ice Streams Surge Disintegration 2. Species Extermination - Shifting Climate Zones, Multiple Stresses, Species Interdependencies 3. Methane Hydrate ‘frozen methane’ - In Tundra & On Continental Shelves - Depends On Ocean & Ice Sheets
4
First grandchild, Sophie – at age almost two years
5
Analysis of global surface temperature change. Green vertical bar is estimated 95 percent confidence range. Base period = 1951-1980.
6
60-month (5-year) and 132-month (11-year) mean temperature anomaly relative to 1951-1980 mean. Input data extend through December 2009. Source: Hansen et al., GISS analysis of surface temperature change. J. Geophys. Res.104, 30997-31022, 1999.
7
Surface temperature anomalies in (a) Dec and (b) Jun-Jul-Aug 2009 relative to 1951-1980 Source: Hansen et al., GISS analysis of surface temperature change. J. Geophys. Res.104, 30997-31022, 1999.
8
Positive AO: low pressure in Arctic, strong zonal winds keep cold air confined to Arctic. Negative AO: high pressure in Arctic, weak zonal winds facilitate cold air outbreaks. December 2009
12
Basis of Understanding 1. Earth’s Paleoclimate History 2. On-Going Global Changes 3. Climate Models (note: modeling #3, but aids other two)
13
50 million years ago (50 MYA) Earth was ice-free. Atmospheric CO 2 amount was of the order of 1000 ppm 50 MYA. Atmospheric CO 2 imbalance due to plate tectonics ~ 10 -4 ppm per year.
14
Cenozoic Era End of Cretaceous (65 My BP)Present Day
15
50 million years ago (50 MYA) Earth was ice-free. Atmospheric CO 2 amount was of the order of 1000 ppm 50 MYA. Atmospheric CO 2 imbalance due to plate tectonics ~ 10 -4 ppm per year.
16
Summary: Cenozoic Era 1. Dominant Forcing: Natural ΔCO 2 - Rate ~100 ppm/My (0.0001 ppm/year) - Human-made rate today: ~2 ppm/year Humans Overwhelm Slow Geologic Changes 2. Climate Sensitivity High - Antarctic ice forms if CO 2 < ~450 ppm - Ice sheet formation reversible Humans Could Produce “A Different Planet”
17
Earth’s history provides important information on global warming. Recorded human history occurs within the Holocene warm period.
19
CO 2,CH 4 and estimated global temperature (Antarctic ΔT/2 in ice core era) 0 = 1880-1899 mean. Source: Hansen, Clim. Change, 68, 269, 2005.
20
Source: Earth's energy imbalance: Confirmation and implications. Science 308, 1431, 2005. (A) Forcings used to drive climate simulations. (B) Simulated and observed surface temperature change.
21
(B) Ocean heat gain in the top 750 m of world ocean. Source: Hansen et al., Science, 308, 1431, 2005. (A) Net Radiation at top of atmosphere in climate simulations.
22
Levitus et al. heat storage in upper 700 meters of ocean
23
Heat storage in upper 2000 meters of ocean during 2003-2008 based on ARGO data (Schuckmann et al. J. Geophys. Res. 114, C09007, doi:10.1029/2008JC005237, 2009)
24
Implications of Planet’s Imbalance 1. Humans are Driving Climate Change GHG forcing + Ocean inertia Imbalance 2. Additional Warming in Pipeline ¾ W/m 2 imbalance >0.5°C warming 3. Accelerating Ice Sheet Disintegration Ocean heat is melting ice shelves, which buttress the ice sheets
26
Melt descending into a moulin, a vertical shaft carrying water to ice sheet base. Source: Roger Braithwaite, University of Manchester (UK) Surface Melt on Greenland
27
Jakobshavn Ice Stream in Greenland Discharge from major Greenland ice streams is accelerating markedly. Source: Prof. Konrad Steffen, Univ. of Colorado
28
Gravity Satellite Ice Sheet Mass Measurements Greenland Ice SheetAntarctic Ice Sheet Source: Velicogna, I. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L19503, doi:10.1029/2009GL040222, 2009.
29
Arctic sea ice area at warm season minimum. Data Source: National Snow and Ice Data Center
30
Subtropics are expected to expand with global warming. Observations show, on average, 4 degrees of latitude expansion. Pier on Lake Mead
31
Fires Are Increasing World-Wide Source: Westerling et al. 2006 Western US area burned Wildfires in Western US have increased 4-fold in 30 years.
32
Rongbuk Glacier Rongbuk glacier in 1968 (top) and 2007. The largest glacier on Mount Everest’s northern slopes feeds Rongbuk River.
33
Coral Reef off Fiji (Photo credit: Kevin Roland) Stresses on Coral Reefs
34
Assessment of Target CO 2 Phenomenon Target CO 2 (ppm) 1. Arctic Sea Ice300-350 2. Ice Sheets/Sea Level300-350 3. Shifting Climatic Zones300-350 4. Alpine Water Supplies300-350 5. Avoid Ocean Acidification300-350 Initial Target CO 2 = 350* ppm *assumes CH 4, O 3, Black Soot decrease
35
Target CO 2 : < 350 ppm To preserve creation, the planet on which civilization developed
36
Scenarios assume no “Other” = Tar Sands, Oil Shale, Methane Hydrates Coal phase-out by 2030 peak CO 2 ~400-425 ppm, depending on oil/gas. Faster return below 350 ppm requires additional actions Source: Hansen et al., Target atmospheric CO 2 : where should humanity aim? Open Atmos. Sci. J., 2, 217-231, 2008.
37
Initial Target CO 2 : 350 ppm Technically Feasible Quick Coal Phase-Out Necessary No new coal w/o CO 2 capture All coal phased out within 20 years No Unconventional Fossil Fuels Tar Sands, Oil Shale, Methane Hydrates
38
What’s Really Happening (USA) 1. Tar Sands agreement with Canada Pipeline planned to transport oil 2. Oil Shale under development Twice CO 2 /energy of conventional oil 3. New Coal-fired power plants Rationalized by ‘Clean Coal’ mirage 4. Mountaintop removal proceeds Destroys wind potential of mountains
39
Global Action Status 1.Huge Gap: Rhetoric & Reality - Rhetoric: Planet in Peril - Reality: Small Perturbations to BAU 2. Greenwash/Disinformation Winning - Appeasement of Fossil Interests - Still Waiting for a Winston Churchill 3. Kyoto & Copenhagen Fiascos - Kyoto accelerating emissions - Copenhagen same “indulgences”
40
Problem & Solution 1.Fossil Fuels are Cheapest Energy - Subsidized & Do Not Pay Costs - Solution: Rising Price on Carbon 2. Regulations also Required - Efficiency of Vehicles, Buildings,e.g. - Carbon Price Provides Enforcement 3. Technology Development Needed - Driven by Certainty of Carbon Price - Government Role Limited
41
Fee & Dividend 1. Fee Applied at First Sale/Port of Entry Covers all Oil, Gas, Coal No Leakage 2. Fee Specified: No Speculation, No Volatility No Wall Street Millionaires at Public Expense 3. Fee & Dividend (vs. Cap-and-Trade) Not One Dime to Goldman-Sachs et al. Can be Implemented in Months Market Chooses Technology Winners British Columbia Example: Public Likes It
42
Carbon Fee & 100% Dividend (consider: $115/ton CO 2 = $1/gal. gas) 1. Yield ~ $670B (U.S. example) 2. Dividend (bank acct or debit card) Adult Legal Resident ($250/month = $3000/year) Family with 2 Children ($750/month = $9000/year)
43
Fee & Dividend Addresses 1. Economy: Stimulates It Puts Money in Public’s Hands– A Lot! 2. Energy: Fossil Fuel Addiction Fastest Route to Clean Energy Future 3. Climate Only Internationally Viable Approach - - Zero Chance of China/India Accepting a Cap Would Result in Most Coal & Unconventional Fossil Fuels, some Oil left in the Ground
44
Universality, Fairness 1. Fees almost Universally Beneficial No Country Covets Fossil Fuel Addiction 2. Duties on Products from no-fee Areas Use for Mitigation/Adaptation Aid 3. Fairness: Reward Best Practices Use Duties preferentially for Countries that address Population (e.g., women’s education)
45
So What’s the Problem Today? 1. Fossil Fuels Still Priced Lowest Fossil Fuels Subsidized No Charge for Damages (Health, etc.) 2. Governments Under Fossil Thumbs Greenwash Instead of Leadership 3. Revolving Door in Washington Hatch Schemes for Business-as-Usual Favoring Big Banks, Fossil Fuel Industry
46
Cap-and-Trade-and-Offsets 1. Cap Approach Can’t Go Global China & India will never accept caps 2. Cap Dishonest: Pretends at Low Cost Actually expensive (very inefficient) 3. Cap Comes with Offsets Actual GHG reductions small 4. Cap causes Volatile Carbon Price Discourage business/consumer investing
47
Cap-and-Trade: Why??? 1. C&T Designed for Big Banks Top Two: JP MorganChase, Goldman Sachs 2. C&T Designed for Special Interests 2000-Page Bills Written by Special Interests Why??? Revolving Door Between Wall St. & Washington Revolving Door Between Lobbyists & Congress That’s the way the system seems to work now.
48
caption
49
Jake: You’re on your own baby – Good Luck!
50
Intergenerational Justice Jefferson to Madison: …self-evident that “the Earth belongs in usufruct to the living”* Native Americans: obligation to 7 th generation Larry King: “nobody cares about 50 years from now” Governments (with fossil interests): we can set emissions at whatever level we choose Public: when will it become involved? * Legal right to use something belonging to another
51
Strategic Options 1. Dialogue with Governments, but: Their Perspective is Short-Term Undue Sway of Money (lobbyists) 2. Courts Common law – We are enjoying use of property that belongs to others 3. Public Protests and Actions Seem Necessary, Are Growing But Public has Other Concerns
52
Web Site www.columbia.edu/~jeh1 includes Target Atmospheric CO 2 : Where Should Humanity Aim? Global Warming Twenty Years Later: Tipping Points Near In Defence of Kingsnorth Six
53
“Free Will” Alternative 1. Phase Out Coal CO 2 Emissions - by 2025/2030 developed/developing countries 2. Rising Carbon Price - discourages unconventional fossil fuels & extraction of every last drop of oil (Arctic, etc.) 3. Soil & Biosphere CO 2 Sequestration - improved farming & forestry practices 4. Reduce non-CO 2 Forcings - reduce CH 4, O 3, trace gases, black soot
54
Technical Priorities 1. Energy Efficiency Standards & Carbon Tax Needed 2. Renewable Energies Solar, Wind, Geothermal, Biomass… 3. Next Generations of Nuclear Power 3 rd Gen.: increased safety 4 th Gen.: burns waste, efficiency X 100 4. Carbon Capture & Sequestration Cost, Coal Problems Remain, Use w Biofuels? http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/2009/ECWorkshop_report.pdf
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.