Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

River Campus Libraries Find Articles Fourth Generation Design For Federated Searching at the University of Rochester Brenda Reeb, Usability David Lindahl,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "River Campus Libraries Find Articles Fourth Generation Design For Federated Searching at the University of Rochester Brenda Reeb, Usability David Lindahl,"— Presentation transcript:

1 River Campus Libraries Find Articles Fourth Generation Design For Federated Searching at the University of Rochester Brenda Reeb, Usability David Lindahl, Digital Initiatives

2 Agenda  Serial Failure  Metasearch  User Centered Design Process  Culture and Politics  Generations of Design  Technology

3 Serial Failure  Students cannot find articles  Students overwhelmed with database names, contents, and search protocols  Students insist on search simplicity  Eliminate the complexity of information retrieval  Technologies exist to make it simpler  Politics exist to make it complex

4 Serial Failure Design Responses  Don’t make undergraduates choose anything before searching  Don’t expect users to read anything before searching  Forgiving search box tolerates single words, multiple words, Boolean, “ “ phrases.  Assume relevance ranking

5 Serial Failure “Serial Failure” The Charleston ADVISOR, Vol. 5., no. 3, 2004. Jennifer Bowen, Judi Briden, Vicki Burns, David Lindahl, Brenda Reeb, Melinda Stowe, Stanley Wilder.

6 Metasearch What is metasearch?  Federated Search  Single user interface to multiple databases  Simultaneous searching across resources  Merged results Metasearch technology:  Metasearch product with UI  Connectors  OpenURL Linking

7 Usability group Content group Design group Key tasks Test results Prototypes Issue responses Design iterations Test results User Centered Design Process

8 Usability group Design group Content group Highest. No other goal than to represent the user. Medium. Competes with standards, technology, time and money Medium. Competes with exhaustive content, complex tasks User Focus

9 User Centered Design Process Artifacts of design process  “Issue response” document  Usability results  Key task list  Regular meetings (design = usability)  Project specific meetings (usability=content and content=design)

10 Usability Group Usability Program  Began 2001  7 staff trained as usability testers  Over 20 projects, large and small  Testers volunteer for projects  Reading, conferences, practice  Vendor co-development

11 Usability Group Usability teams do this:  Define key tasks  Design and conduct tests  Report results  Maintain a “lab”  Maintain results for the public

12 Usability Group What is a key task? Key tasks are defined as frequently asked items, frequent actions or navigation to parent/child pages. Find a known article. Find a known journal. Find an article on a specific topic. Find articles on a multidisciplinary topic. Find a specific journal collection.

13 Key taskTest question Find a known journal Find an article in the Journal of Fish Biology. Find a journal collection Your friend told you there is a collection of political science journals called JSTOR. Where is it? Usability Group

14 Is based on a goal that matters to the user Covers questions important to the success of your product and business Has appropriate scope – not too broad, not too specific Has a finite and predictable set of possible solutions Has a clear end point that the user can recognize Elicits action, not just opinion Avoid red herrings – tasks with no solution. Characteristics of a task (long version) from Carolyn Snyder, Paper Prototyping Usability Group

15 Content Group  2 to 10 in number for a project  Reference staff, circulation staff, or ILL staff  Created and disbanded as needed  Observe some tests

16 Content Group Content groups do this:  Define key tasks  Select appropriate content  Apply experience and education to the iterative design process  Observe some tests  Interpret usability results  Raise issues, not design solutions

17 Design Group Perspective on Site Design  “Hide the technology”  Consistency across library website  Task-oriented pathways  Usability testing program Perspective on Page Design  Essential components  Prioritize  Simplify  Style guidelines

18  Universal Design  Section 508  Web Style Guide  Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines  Page Editors’ Checklist “Universal design is the design of products and environments to be usable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design.” Ron Mace Design Group http://www.section508.gov/ http://webstyleguide.com/ http://usability.gov/guidelines/ http://www.library.rochester.edu/index.cfm?PAGE=623 Style Guidelines

19 Knowledge of databases Partial knowledge No knowledge needed Mapping your search to a subject takes you away from your natural path Find Articles Clusters (courses) Google Databases by Subject Databases A-Z Design Group User pathways

20 Design Group Models For Finding: Google 1.Enter keywords 2.Browse results by title and snippet 3.View full text

21 Design Group Models For Finding: FRBR FRBR User Tasks  Find  Identify  Select  Acquire FRBR = Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records More information: http://www.ifla.org

22 Students say: “I need an article!” Librarians say:  “Select a database”  “This database has 435 journals in it.”  “These journals are peer reviewed.”  “Choose basic or advanced.”  “These journals predate the Civil War.” Culture and Politics

23  Balance user needs with librarian needs?  The user is always right!  Focus on user expectations  Focus on finding  Web pages that support “doing” not “telling”  Support beginners and experienced users

24 Culture and Politics  Connect at courses, not at academic disciplines  Meet them where they are  Students attend POL250 – “Conflict in Democracies”  They do not relate to Political Science.  They do not envision themselves as political scientists.  Sustainability  Distributed workload (all bibliographers participate)  Dynamic, database-driven pages

25 Culture and Politics Expect these accusations!  Simple designs dumb down the site  Testing 3 users is not enough  Students are lazy  No one told me about this  Where is your report?  This is so subjective!

26 Culture and Politics Try these responses:  Inform  Page design process document  Don’t leave home without the toolkit  Neilson’s Alert Boxes  Pages from Don’t Make Me Think  Engage  Observe tests  Publish results

27 Articles Committee  This is a title slide to be deleted

28 Generations of Design  This is a title slide to be deleted

29 Pre ERA design Circa 2002

30 Pre ERA design Circa 2002

31 Encompass UI 1.Enter keywords and select databases 2.Select databases or “SHOW ALL” 3.Select a result 4.View metadata 5.Select a full text source 6.View full text online

32 Encompass UI 1.Enter keywords and select databases 2.Select databases or “SHOW ALL” 3.Select a result 4.View metadata 5.Select a full text source 6.View full text online

33 Find Articles UI 1.Enter keywords 2.Select a result 3.View full text online

34 Mapping the Find Articles UI to FRBR Search Select Article Full Text (Gather) FRBR Tasks: Find Identify Select Acquire

35 Find Articles: Subject Clusters  Subject Clusters  Pre-selected databases  Search boxes anywhere  Course Pages  Connects undergrads to library resources  Top-5 resource  Usability success  Add Subject Clusters to Course Pages

36 Find Articles: What’s Next  Subject clusters  Testing across range of users  Direct to full text  Abstracts on selection screen  Results navigator  Shared knowledge base  Integration with catalog

37 Technology  This is a title slide to be deleted (dave)

38 Find Articles: How It Works Search Select Article Full Text (Gather) Library Web Server ERA Server Subscription Database XSLT User Page with Full Text XSLT XML HTML

39 Meta-search Issues  Speed and Reliability  Connectors  Index vs. Meta-search  Ease of use  Database selection  Abstracts on selection screen  Full text availability  One click to full text  Quality of results  How search terms are applied  Database selection  Relevance sorted results and de-duping

40 Meta-search Standards  Z39.50  SRW/SRU and CQL  OpenURL  NISO MetaSearch Initiative  OAI

41 Linking To Full Text  Use RE to test input variables  Determine full-text available  Based on item type and database  Create canned URL  Double dip  Requires published or discovered syntax

42 Standards Matter  Z39.50  SRW/SRU and CQL  OpenURL  NISO MetaSearch Initiative  OAI

43 OpenURL Fields  GENRE  ISSN or ISBN  ATITLE (journal-article title)  TITLE (book title)  JTITLE (journal title)  AUFIRST (author first name)  AULAST  VOLUME  ISSUE  DATE  SPAGE (start page)


Download ppt "River Campus Libraries Find Articles Fourth Generation Design For Federated Searching at the University of Rochester Brenda Reeb, Usability David Lindahl,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google