Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Discussion #23 1/32 Discussion #23 Relational Algebra.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Discussion #23 1/32 Discussion #23 Relational Algebra."— Presentation transcript:

1 Discussion #23 1/32 Discussion #23 Relational Algebra

2 Discussion #23 2/32 Topics Algebras Relational Algebra –use of standard notation –set operators , ,  –renaming  –selection  –projection  –cross product  –join |  | Queries (from English) Query optimization SQL

3 Discussion #23 3/32 Relational Algebra What is an algebra? –a pair: (set of values, set of operations) –  ADT  type  Class  Object e.g. stack: (set of all stacks, {pop, push, top, …}) integer: (set of all integers, {+, -, *,  }) What is relational algebra? –(set of relations, set of relational operators) –{ , , , , , , , |  |}

4 Discussion #23 4/32 Relational Algebra is Closed Closed: all operations produce values in the value set –(reals, {+, *,  })  closed –(reals, {+, *, ,  })  not closed (divide by 0) –(reals, {+, *, >})  not closed (T/F not in value set) –(computer reals, {+, *,  })  not closed (overflow, roundoff) –(relations, relational operators)  closed Implication: we can always nest relational operators; can’t for algebras that are not closed. –e.g. after overflow, can do nothing –e.g. can’t always nest: (2 < 3) + 5 = ?

5 Discussion #23 5/32 Set Operations: , , and  Relations are sets; thus set operations should work. Examples: R = A B 1 2 2 2 2 3 S = A B 2 2 2 3 4 2 5 5 R  S = A B 1 2 2 2 2 3 4 2 5 5 R  S = A B 2 2 2 3 R  S = A B 1 2 S  R = A B 4 2 5 5

6 Discussion #23 6/32 Set Operations (continued …) Definition: schema(R) = {A, B} = AB, i.e. the set of attributes We sometimes write R(AB) to mean the relation R with schema AB. Definition: union compatible –schema(R) = schema(S) –required precondition for , ,  Definitions: –R  S = { t | t  R  t  S} –R  S = { t | t  R  t  S} –R  S = { t | t  R  t  S}

7 Discussion #23 7/32 Tuple Restriction: [X] Restriction is a tuple operator (not a relational operator). t[X] restricts tuple t to the attributes in X. A B C t = 1 2 3 t[ A ] = (1) t[ AC ] = (1,3) t= (1,2,3) t[A]= (1,2,3)[A] = {(A,1), (B, 2), (C,3)}[A] = {(A,1)} = (1)

8 Discussion #23 8/32 Renaming:   A  B R renames attribute A to be B. –A must be in schema(R) –B must not be in schema(R) Example: let  C  B Q = A B 2 2 3 2 R  C  B Q = A B 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 R = A B 1 2 2 2 2 3 Q = A C 2 2 3 2 But with  : R  Q = ? Not union compatible

9 Discussion #23 9/32 Renaming (continued…) Q =  A  B R renames attribute A to B; the result is Q. Precondition: –A  schema(R) –B  schema(R) Postcondition: –schema(Q) = (schema(R)  {A})  {B} –Q = {t' |  t (t  R  t' = (t – {(A, t[A])})  {(B, t[A])})} R = {{(A,1), (C,2)} {(A,2), (C,2)}} Q =  A  B R = {{(B,1), (C,2)} {(B,2), (C,2)}}

10 Discussion #23 10/32 Selection:  The selection operation selects the tuples that satisfy a condition.  A=1 R = A B 1 2  B=2 R = A B 1 2 2 2  A=2  B  2 R = A B 2 2 2 3  A=3 R = A B Note: empty, but still retain the schema  P R = { t | t  R  P(t) } Precondition: each attribute mentioned in P must be in schema(R). Postcondition:  P R = { t | t  R  P(t) } schema(  P R) = schema(R) Meaning: apply predicate P to tuple t by substituting into P appropriate t values. R = A B 1 2 2 2 2 3

11 Discussion #23 11/32 Projection:  The projection operation restricts tuples in a relation to those designated in the operation. R = A B 1 2 2 2 2 3 Q = A B C 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 4 5  A R = A 1 2  B R = B 2 3  BC Q = B C 1 1 4 5  AB R = R =  A,B R =  {A,B} R Precondition: X  schema(R) Postcondition:  X R = { t' |  t (t  R  t' = t[ X ]) } schema(  X R) = X

12 Discussion #23 12/32 Cross Product:  Standard cartesian product adapted for relational algebra R = A B 1 2 2 2 S = C D 1 1 2 2 3 3 R  S = A B C D 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 3 3 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3

13 Discussion #23 13/32 Cross Product (continued…) R = A B 1 2 = t' 2 2 S = C D 1 1 2 2 3 3 = t'' Precondition: schema(R)  schema(S) =  Postcondition: R  S = { t |  t'  t''(t'  R  t''  S  t = t'  t'')} schema(R  S) = schema(R)  schema(S) t' = { (A,1), (B,2) } t'' = { (C,3), (D,3) } t'  t'' = { (A,1), (B,2), (C,3), (D,3) }

14 Discussion #23 14/32 Cross Product (continued…) R = A B 1 2 = t' = { (A,1), (B,2) } 2 2 S = C A 1 1 = t'' = { (C,1), (A,1) } 2 2 3 3 = t''' = { (C,3), (A,3) } t'  t'' = { (A,1), (B,2), (C,1), (A,1) } What if R and S have the same attribute, e.g. A? Can’t do cross product Solution: Rename  A  A S R   A  A S = A B C A 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 3 3 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3

15 Discussion #23 15/32 Natural Join: |  | R = A B 1 2 2 2 S = B C 1 2 2 1 3 2 R |  | S = A B C 1 2 1 2 2 1 (R  ) Cross Product A B 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 3 2 R |  | S =  ABC Projection  B=B' Selection Renaming  B  B' S B' C 1 2 2 1 3 2 1 2 2 1 1

16 Discussion #23 16/32 Join (continued …) In general, we can equate 0, 1, 2, or more attributes using |  |. A join is defined as: schema ( R |  | S ) = schema( R )  schema( S ) R |  | S = {t | t[schema( R) ]  R  t[schema( S) ]  S} There are no preconditions  join always works.

17 Discussion #23 17/32 Join (continued…) R = A B 1 1 2 3 4 1 S = C D 1 1 1 5 R |  | S = A B C D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 5 4 1 1 1 4 1 1 5 R = A B 1 2 2 2 2 3 S = B C 1 1 2 2 3 3 R |  | S = A B C 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 R = A B C 1 2 3 2 2 4 2 3 5 S = A B D 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 R |  | S = A B C D 2 2 4 2 2 2 4 1 0 attributes in common (full cross product) 1 attribute in common 2 attributes in common

18 Discussion #23 18/32 Join (continued…) We can use renaming to control the |  | R = A B 1 2 2 2 S = B C 1 2 2 1 3 2 R |  |  C  A S = A B 1 2 S' = B A 1 2 2 1 3 2 = A B 2 1 1 2 2 3 R |  | S' = A B 1 2 BTW, observe equivalence with intersection

19 Discussion #23 19/32 Relational Algebra Expressions Relational operators are closed. Thus we can nest expressions: R = A B 1 2 3 4 S = B C D 2 5 1 2 7 2 3 2 3 4 5 4  D  C=5 (R |  | S) = A B C D 1 2 5 1 1 2 7 2 3 4 5 4 Unary operators have precedence over binary operators; binary operators are left associative. We can now do something very useful: ask and answer with relational algebra (almost) any query we can dream up. = D 1 4

20 Discussion #23 20/32 Relational Algebra Queries List the prerequisites for EE200.  Prerequisite  Course='EE200' cp = Prerequisite EE005 CS100 When does CS101 meet?  Day,Hour  Course='CS101' cdh = Day Hour M 9AM W 9AM F 9AM When and where does EE200 meet?  Day,Hour,Room  Course='EE200' (cdh |  | cr) = Day Hour Room Tu 10AM 25 Ohm Hall W 1PM 25 Ohm Hall Th 10AM 25 Ohm Hall  Our answers are in (cdh |  | cr).  We select Course to be EE200.  Then, project on Day, Hour, Room.

21 Discussion #23 21/32 Queries (continued…) Can we rewrite the query more optimally? What rules should we use? –Associativity and commutivity of join –Distributive laws for select and project What strategy should we use? –Eliminate unnecessary operations –Make joins as small as possible before execution  Room  Name='Snoopy'  Day='M'  Hour='9AM' (snap |  | csg |  | cr |  | cdh) StudentID Name 'Snoopy' Address Phone Course StudentID Grade Course Room* Course Day 'M' Hour '9AM' = Room Turing Aud. Where can I find Snoopy at 9 am on Monday?

22 Discussion #23 22/32 Query Optimization “Intuitively” we can write  Room (  Name='Snoopy' snap |  | csg |  | cr |  |  Day='M'  Hour='9AM' cdh) Why does this execute faster? What laws hold that will let us do this? R |  | S = S |  | R  P1  P2 E =  P1  P2 E  P (R |×| S) = R |  |  P S (if all the attributes of P are in S) How do we know they hold?  Room  Name='Snoopy'  Day='M'  Hour='9AM' (snap |  | csg |  | cr |  | cdh) as

23 Discussion #23 23/32 Proofs for Laws To prove  P1  P2 E =  P1  P2 E, we need to prove that two sets are equal. We prove A = B by showing A  B  B  A. We show that A  B by showing that x  A  x  B. Thus, we can do two proofs to prove  P1  P2 E =  P1  P2 E as follows: 1.t   P1  P2 E premise 2.t  E  (P1  P2)(t) def.:  P R = {t | t  R  P(t)} 3.t  E  P1(t)  P2(t) identical substitutions & operations 4.t  E  P2(t)  P1(t) commutative 5.t   P2 E  P1(t) def. of  6.t   P1  P2 E def. of  1.t   P1  P2 E premise 2.… just go backwards from 6 to 1 in the proof above

24 Discussion #23 24/32 Alternate Proof Thus, we can prove  P1  P2 E =  P1  P2 E as follows:  P1  P2 E = {t | t  E  (P1  P2)(t)} def.:  P R = {t | t  R  P(t)} = {t | t  E  P1(t)  P2(t)} identical substitutions & operations = {t | t  E  P2(t)  P1(t)} commutative = {t | t   P2 E  P1(t)} def. of  = {t | t   P1  P2 E} def. of  =  P1  P2 E def. of a relation (Derive the right-hand side from the left-hand side.)

25 Discussion #23 25/32 Proofs for Laws (continued …) To prove  P (R |  | S) = R |  |  P S, where all attributes of P are in S, we again need to prove that two sets are equal. As before, we can convert the lhs to the rhs.  P (R |  | S) = {t | t   P (R |  | S)} def. of a relation = {t | t  R |  | S  P(t)} def.:  P R={t | t  R  P(t)} = {t | t[schema(R)]  R  t[schema(S)]  S  P(t)} def.: R|  |S={t | t[schema(R)]  R  t[schema(S)]  S} = {t | t[schema(R)]  R  t[schema(S)]  S  P(t[schema(S)])} all attributes of P are in S = {t | t[schema(R)]  R  t[schema(S)]   P S} def. of  = {t | t  R |  |  P S} def. of |  | = R |  |  P S def. of a relation

26 Discussion #23 26/32 SQL Correspondence with Relational Algebra select A from R where B = 1 Assume we have relations R(AB) and S(BC). select B from R except select B from S select A, R.B, C from R, S where R.B = S.B  A  B = 1 R  B R   B S  A, R.B, C  R.B = S.B (R  S) = R |  | S

27 Discussion #23 27/32 SQL Correspondence with Relational Algebra select A from R where B = 1 Assume we have relations R(AB) and S(BC). select R.B from R where R.B not in (select S.B from S) select * from R natural join S  A  B = 1 R  B R   B S R |  | S

28 Discussion #23 28/32 SQL Queries List the prerequisites for EE200. select PrerequisitePrerequisite from cp EE005 where Course='EE200'CS100 When does CS101 meet? select Day, HourDay Hour from cdhM 9AM where Course= 'CS101'W 9AM F 9AM When and where does EE200 meet? select cdh.Course, Day, Hour, Room Course Day Hour Room from cdh, cr EE200 Tu 10AM 25 Ohm Hall where cdh.Course= 'EE200' EE200 W 1PM 25 Ohm Hall and cdh.Course=cr.Course EE200 Th 10AM 25 Ohm Hall

29 Discussion #23 29/32 SQL Queries List the prerequisites for EE200. select PrerequisitePrerequisite from cp EE005 where Course='EE200'CS100 When does CS101 meet? select Day, HourDay Hour from cdhM 9AM where Course= 'CS101'W 9AM F 9AM When and where does EE200 meet? select Course, Day, Hour, Room Course Day Hour Room from cdh natural join cr EE200 Tu 10AM 25 Ohm Hall where cdh.Course= 'EE200' EE200 W 1PM 25 Ohm Hall EE200 Th 10AM 25 Ohm Hall

30 Discussion #23 30/32 SQL Queries List all prerequisite courses. select PrerequisitePrerequisite from cp CS100 EE005 CS100 CS101 CS120 CS101 CS121 CS205 select distinct PrerequisitePrerequisite from cpCS100 CS101 CS120 CS121 CS205 EE005

31 Discussion #23 31/32 SQL Queries Where can I find Snoopy at 9 am on Monday? List all prereqs of CS750 (including prereqs of prereqs.) Not possible with standard SQL (unless nesting depth is known) Is possible with Datalog Rules:prereqOf(x, y) :- cp(y, x). prereqOf(x, y) :- prereqOf(x, z), cp(y, z). Query:prereqOf(x, 'CS750')? To gain more power and flexibility, we typically embed SQL in a high-level language. select RoomRoom from snap, csg, cr, cdhTuring Aud. where Name='Snoopy' and Day='M' and Hour='9AM' and snap.StudentID=csg.StudentID and csg.Course=cr.Course and cr.Course=cdh.Course

32 Discussion #23 32/32 SQL Queries List all prereqs of CS750 (including prereqs of prereqs.) select cp.Prerequisite from cp where cp.Course = 'CS750' union select cp1.Prerequisite from cp cp1, cp cp2 where cp1.Course = cp2.Prerequisite and cp2.Course = 'CS750' union …


Download ppt "Discussion #23 1/32 Discussion #23 Relational Algebra."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google