Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Faculty Participation in Open Archives: A Discussion John Schumacher SUNY System Administration Office of Library and Information Services
2
For Discussion... 1) How have internet, computer capabilities & interoperability standards changed the way scholarly communication is conducted?
3
For Discussion... 2) What comments do you have on the following? Participation in new forms of scholarly communication vary by discipline
4
For Discussion... 3) Many publishers allow various forms of “self-archiving”. Do you think faculty members are aware of this?
5
For Discussion... 4) What, if any, changes should be made to the promotion and tenure process to take into account new forms of scholarly communication?
6
For Discussion... 5) What do you see as impediments to faculty posting to the SUNY Digital Repository?
7
For Discussion... 6) What services would reduce impediments to participation in the SUNY Digital Repository?
8
For Discussion... 7) In your view, is there a crisis in scholarly communication?
9
For Discussion... 8) Please comment on: when envisioning the classroom of tomorrow, do open repositories of scholarly information have a role?
10
Faculty Participation in Open Archives: A Discussion Background Key Concepts Author’s Rights SUNY Digital Repository Discussion
11
Responses to Changes in Scholarly Communication Open Archives Initiative Open Access Journals Open Archives –Discipline-based –Institution-based
12
Open Archives Initiative http://www.openarchives.org/
13
OAI-PMH Service Provider http://oaister.umdl.umich.edu/o/oaister /
14
Open Access Journals http://www.doaj.org
15
Open Access Journals http://www.biomedcentral.com/
16
Open Archives - Discipline- based http://www.arxiv.org/ http://www.repec.org/ http://cogprints.org/
17
Open Archives - Institution- based http://dspace.sunyconnect.suny.edu/
18
SUNY Digital Repository
19
Institutional Repositories “An institutional repository is a digital archive of the intellectual product created by the faculty, research staff, and students of an institution and accessible to end users both within and outside of the institution, with few if any barriers to access. In other words, the content of an institutional repository is: Institutionally defined; Scholarly; Cumulative and perpetual; and Open and interoperable” Crow, Raym. “The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper”. The Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition, 2002. http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/ir.html http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/ir.html
20
Publisher’s Policies http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo.php
21
Publisher’s Policies
22
Author’s Addendum http://www.arl.org/sparc/author/addendum. html Retain rights to self-archive, etc.
23
SUNY Digital Repository ETDs Visual Resources Scholarly Content
24
Resources Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition http://www.arl.org/sparc/index.html SUNY Digital Repository http://dspace.sunyconnect.suny.edu/ Directory of Open Access Journals http://www.doaj.org/ BioMed Central http://www.biomedcentral.com Open Archives Initiative http://www.openarchives.org/
25
Resources continued Publisher’s Policies on Self-Archiving http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo.php Creative Commons http://creativecommons.org/ Open Access News http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/fosblog.html The effect of open access and downloads ('hits') on citation impact: a bibliography of studies http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html John.Schumacher@SUNY.EDU 518-443-5577
26
Faculty Participation Increased impact for research Fixed URL for the work One stop shopping Backups / maintenance, etc. Preservation Participation in new forms of communication
27
Faculty Participation Nurture faculty/admin. champions Via library faculty liaisons Elevator pitch Brown bag programs Newsletter promotion, etc. Archiving services Mandate
28
Discussion...
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.