1. The Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System: a Regional Component of the U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System Landry Bernard and Worth Nowlin Univ. S. Mississippi/NOAA National Data Buoy Center Texas A&M University/NOAA Coastal Services Center Petroleum Industry—GCOOS Workshop Houston, TX November 3, 2005

2. Outline Background Existing Capabilities in the Gulf of Mexico Actions to date in building the Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System Next steps in that development

3. Background: the Global Ocean Observing System and the U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System

4. Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS) GOOS is an end-to-end system of observations, data management, and production and delivery of products/services. GOOS is being coordinated by United Nation agencies with the participation of some 100 ocean nations. Together with the World Weather Watch, Global Atmospheric Watch, Global Climate Observing System and Global Terrestrial Observing System, GOOS is an element of the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS).

5. The GOOS Modules The Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS) has been designed and is being implemented in two modules: The global module is designed to monitor, predict, and understand marine surface conditions and climate variability/change; and The coastal module is designed to sustain healthy marine ecosystems, ensure human health, promote safe and efficient marine transportation, enhance national security, and predict and mitigate against coastal hazards.

6. The Ocean.US Enterprise

7. At the request of the U.S. Congress, federal agencies of the National Oceanographic Partnership Program are planning and developing a U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System focused on: Detecting and Forecasting Oceanic Components of Climate Variability Facilitating Safe and Efficient Marine Operations Ensuring National Security Managing Marine Resources Preserving and Restoring Healthy Marine Ecosystems Mitigating Natural Hazards Ensuring Public Health

8. Ocean.US is the national office for integrated and sustained ocean observing and prediction. Its Functions are: Develop & maintain strategic plan Ensure incorporation of elements into an integrated system Recommend enhancements Recommend R&D priorities Promote collaboration among participating NOPP agencies & Regional Associations Report regularly to the EXCOM which provides policy guidance, ensures sustained agency support, and approves implementing documents

9. The U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System

10. U.S. IOOS Two Interdependent Components Global Ocean Climate Component GOOS/GCOS Resolution Low High C Cal Caribbean MAB GLs NE SE Go Mex S Cal H Isl NW GoA Coastal Ocean Component National Backbone Regional Observing Systems

11. 1250 84 28 2300 27 531 7 79 79 26 923 24 497 67 79 26 497 67 77 24 370 56 975 79 27 1572 24 497 69 1250 97 45 3000 54 64 29 730 9 106 1250 119 51 3000 89 31 9 170 1250 115 51 3000 78 85 31 830 9 148 1250 104 51 3000 60 78 31 830 9 126 1250 87 34 3000 54 27 640 8 91 77 23 370 51 2000 20012002 200320042006200520072008 20092010 Initial Ocean Observing System Milestones including international contributions Tide Gauges Real-time Stations Initial GCOS Subset Surface Drifting Buoys Tropical Moored Buoys Ships of Opportunity Argo Floats Reference Stations Arctic System System Evaluation Ocean Carbon Network Dedicated Ship Time High resolution and frequently repeated lines occupied Number of floats Number of moorings Number of buoys Days at sea (NOAA contribution) Product evaluation and feedback loops implemented (NOAA contribution) Repeat Sections Committed, One inventory per 10 years Number of observatories, flux, and ocean transport stations Ice buoys, drifting and Moored stations 807 671 779787 2031 544 544 15 29 35 37 41 1 011 2 53 48 66 100 88 77 55 Total System 30 34 40 45 2000 20012002 200320042006200520072008 20092010 System % Complete 3 42 49 340 37 34 31 30302929 00 Multi-year Phased Implementation Plan (representative milestones)

12. 1250 84 28 2300 27 531 101 79 26 923 24 497 89 79 26 497 89 77 24 370 56 975 79 27 1500 24 497 91 1250 97 45 3000 54 64 29 730 125 1250 119 51 3000 89 31 170 1250 115 51 3000 78 85 31 830 155 1250 104 51 3000 60 78 31 830 140 1250 87 34 3000 54 27 640 113 77 23 370 51 2000 20012002 200320042006200520072008 20092010 Tide Gauges Real-time Stations Initial GCOS Subset Surface Drifting Buoys Tropical Moored Buoys Ships of Opportunity Argo Floats Reference Stations Arctic System Ocean Carbon Network Dedicated Ship Time High resolution and frequently repeated lines occupied Number of floats Number of moorings Number of buoys Days at sea (NOAA contribution) Repeat Sections Committed, One inventory per 10 years Number of observatories, flux, and ocean transport stations Ice buoys, drifting and Moored stations 807671 779787 2031 544 544 15 29 35 37 41 1 42 49 340 Base Budget. FY 06 President’s Budget. Planning, Unfunded at this level. 37 34 31 30 29 Global Climate Components: Multi-Year Program Plan 00

13. Coastal Component Operated by Federal Agencies EEZ & Great Lakes Core variables required by regions & Federal Agencies Networks of sentinel & reference stations Standards/Protocols Operated by Regional Associations Involve private & public sectors Inform Federal Agencies of user needs Enhance the backbone based on user needs Incorporate Sub–regional systems Regional COOSs National Backbone

14. 57 7 900 150 281 88 900 80 900 77 900 72 57 900 140 85 63 15 900 39 203 36 57 210 386 118 72 15 900 39 287 164 862 204 69 15 900 39 259 59 135 270 677 174 66 15 900 39 231 48 96 240 492 146 60 15 900 26 24 35 180 281 90 900 68 2000 20012002 200320042006200520072008 20092010 Coastal Buoys Number of moorings Coastal Stations Hurricane Buoys Voluntary Obs. Ships DART NWLON Stations PORTS Dedicated Ship Time Coastal HF Radar Reg. Assoc + Industry Low resolution wx obs. Number of tsunami stations Number of moorings Number of stations Number of platforms Days at sea (USCG + NOAA) Number of coastal radars Number of water level stations Phys. Oc. Real time data 57 0 6 175 188 12 Multi-Year Program Plan 0 Coastal Marine Components: Multi-Year Program Plan 0 68 251234237227181 Base Budget. FY 06 President’s Budget. Planning, Unfunded at this level. 25 019 3197 10 8

15. Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System Existing Capabilities

16. Many existing elements are being used as the initial building blocks for a regional ocean observing system for the Gulf of Mexico. These include continuing observations, satellite products, models, and other data products. They are supported by local, state and federal government, private industry, NGOs, and academia. They provide information that will have broader uses when they are integrated and enhanced.

17. Building Blocks 1: In situ observations

18. Gulf of Mexico observations

19. MMS current data via NDBC

20. 9of9_tabs_08262004b.gif

21. Houston/Galveston PORTS observation locations http://co-ops.nos.noaa.gov/images/hgports.gif

22. Tampa Bay PORTS observation locations http://co-ops.nos.noaa.gov/images/tbports.gif

23. http://comps.marine.usf.edu/index.html University of South Florida COMPS

25. Building Blocks 2: Remotely sensed data and products

26. Satellite Products

27. Building Blocks 3: Models and Products

28. Model Products

29. Products At present, there are only a limited number of products derived from measurements being made in the Gulf. Some were mentioned earlier. As expected, most of these products are derived from specific observations for purposes specified by the entities paying for the observations. (Exceptions include satellite products.) If the observations were combined with one another, many new data-products could be produced that would benefit additional sectors of users.

31. Actions to date in building the Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System

32. Requirements for Regional Coastal Ocean Observing Systems To be eligible for federal support, each Regional Coastal Ocean Observing System must have a Regional Association that: 1.Provides representative governance and the capability to receive and distribute funds with all approved accounting procedures; 2.Maintains a sound business plan indicating users, requirements, costs, and sources of support; and 3.Represents the regional system within the National Federation of Regional Associations.

33. Seven Gulf-wide meetings have been held: –First focused on academia –Second focused on state and federal agencies –Third focused on private sectors –Fourth focused on predicting, detecting and tracking Harmful Algal Blooms –Fifth focused on underpinning research –Sixth focused on education and outreach –Seventh focused on governance and Business Plan Actions 1

34. A GCOOS Mission Statement has been adopted. A Resolution to develop GCOOS, beginning with sharing of non-proprietary, non- commercial data, has been signed by some 60 individuals representing themselves or institutions. Actions 2

35. Mission Statement: Vision We seek to establish a sustained observing system for the Gulf of Mexico to provide observations and products needed by users in this region for the purposes of Detecting and predicting climate variability and consequences, Preserving and restoring healthy marine ecosystems, Ensuring human health, Managing resources, Facilitating safe and efficient marine transportation, Enhancing national security, and Predicting and mitigating against coastal hazards.

36. Mission Statement (continued) We envision sharing of non-commercial, non-proprietary data, models, and products via the internet for the common benefit of all participants, including industry, NGOs, academia, and federal, state, regional, and local government agencies. It is understood that this Gulf of Mexico observing system will be integrated with other regional coastal ocean observing systems, in particular to create an integrated and sustained U.S. component of the ocean observing system.

37. Mission Statement (continued) We recognize that the system will require sustained financial support from a combination of government, private, and non-governmental organizations. That will be possible only if the system is built and remains responsive to the needs of these organizations and to the public. Thus, the system will be subject to continuing oversight by representatives of such organizations and of the public. Collaboration with other nations bordering the Gulf of Mexico is to be actively sought in the design and implementation of this regional observing system.

38. Resolution The implementation sections reads: The Signatories hereby resolve to work together toward establishment of a Gulf of Mexico Regional Coastal Ocean Observing System (GCOOS); to work toward development of regional governance structures and coordination; to work towards common data management standards; and to openly share non-proprietary data and metadata, non-commercial data and products, model code, and related information. …….Signatories will actively seek collaborations with other nations bordering the Gulf of Mexico in the design and implementation of this regional observing system. The Signatories will work toward implementation of specific action items decided upon at the workshop held at Stennis Space Center, MS, January 14-15, 2003,

39. Signatories L.G. Adams, Weeks Bay NERR Kim Adams, President, Essi Corporation Vernon Asper, for College of Marine Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi Peter R. Betzer, for University of South Florida (USF) College of Marine Science John Blaha, Naval Oceanographic Office Jim Byous, Ocean Specialist Services, for Gulf Fiber Corporation Lisa Campbell, Texas A&M University Jim Cato, Florida Sea Grant Billy D. Causey, Superintendent of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Robert Cohen, Weathernews Americas Inc. H. D. Covert, Coastal Operations Institute George Crozier, for Dauphin Island Sea Lab and Mobile Bay National Estuary Program Steven F. DiMarco, Texas A&M University Richard E. Dodge, Nova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center Dean A. Dunn, for National Coastal Data Development Center (NCDDC) Wilford Gardner, Head, Department of Oceanography, Texas A&M University Bryon O. Griffith, Deputy Director, EPA Gulf of Mexico Program Office D. Jay Grimes, Provost, Gulf Coast and Director, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, The University of Southern Mississippi Norman L. Guinasso, Geochemical and Environmental Research Group, Texas A&M University, for Texas Automated Buoy System (TABS) Robert Hetland, Texas A&M University Matthew Howard, Texas A&M University Ann Jochens, Texas A&M University Gregg Jacobs, NRL Stennis Space Center Gary Jeffress, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi, for Texas Coastal Ocean Observing Network (TCOON) Mark Luther, representing both the Coastal Ocean Monitoring and Prediction System (COMPS) and the Tampa Bay Physical Oceanographic Real-Time System (TBPORTS), USF College of Marine Science Robert (Buzz) Martin, for Texas General Land Office Gil McRae, Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Marine Research Institute Douglas J. Meffert, Center for Bioenvironmental Research, Tulane and Xavier Universities, for Long-term Estuary Assessment Group (LEAG) 29.Avichal Mehra, Engineering Research Center, Mississippi State University, for DMEFS Patrick Michaud, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi Paul Moersdorf, Director, NOAA's National Data Buoy Center (NDBC) Christopher N. K. Mooers, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science Frank Muller-Karger, Institute for Marine Remote Sensing, University of South Florida Worth D. Nowlin, Jr., Distinguished Professor, Texas A&M University

40. Signatories (continued) James J. O'Brien, Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies, Florida State University John C. Ogden, as Director, Florida Institute of Oceanography Alejandro Orsi, Texas A&M University Chris Oynes, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico Region Shirley Pomponi, Vice-President and Director of Research, for Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution David Prior, Executive Vice-President and Provost for Texas A&M University Nancy N. Rabalais, Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium (LUMCON), for NGOMEX Hypoxia Studies Mary Jo Richardson, Interim Dean for the College of Geosciences, Texas A&M University Mitchell A. Roffer, President, Roffer's Ocean Fishing Forecasting Service, Inc. (ROFFS) Kerry St. Pe, Interim Administrator, for Louisiana Universities Marine Consorium (LUMCON) Ken Schaudt for Schaudt.US William Seitz, Department Head, Marine Sciences, Texas A&M University Galveston Thomas M. Soniat, Professor, Nicholls State University, for DermoWatch Robert Stewart, Department of Oceanography, Texas A&M University Robert Stickney, Director, Texas Sea Grant Program, Texas A&M University Gregory Stone, Louisiana State University LaDon Swann, Director, Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium, Auburn University Raymond F. Toll, Jr., Assistant Vice President, Earth Space and Atmospheric Sciences Operations; Space, Earth and Aviation Sciences Business Unit of the Science Applications International Corporation, Hampton, VA John W. (Wes) Tunnell, Jr., Research Scientist and Professor, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi, for Center for Coastal Studies and Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies Jan van Smirren, Fugro Global Environmental & Ocean Sciences, Inc. Nan Walker, Director, Earth Scan Laboratory, Coastal Studies Institute and Dept. of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, Louisiana State University Robert H. Weisberg, representing both the Coastal Ocean Monitoring and Prediction System (COMPS) and the Tampa Bay Physical Oceanographic Real- Time System (TBPORTS), USF College of Marine Science Chuck Wilson, Vice Provost Academic Affairs, Louisiana State University, for Louisiana Sea Grant College Program James Robert Woolsey, Director, MS Mineral Resources Institute, University of Mississippi, for Gulf of Mexico Hydrates Research Consortium and its Hydrates Sea Floor Observatory Program

41. An inventory of existing operational and product-producing components for the Gulf of Mexico, together with descriptions, costs, out-year budgets, and users is being maintained. A web portal to ongoing Gulf of Mexico activities has been created: http://www.gcoos.org Actions 3

42. Actions 4 We are working to establish a data and information management system that is –Part of a national system; integrated with other regional coastal observing systems –Coordinated with observing system elements in Mexico and Cuba –Integrated with the global observing system module Well along in dealing with real-time physical data

43. NDBC MODEM Kit (Meteorological and Oceanographic Data Exchange Module) Public NCEP NODC NCDC Global Telecommunications Service Global Telecommunications Service NWS GATEWAY NWS GATEWAY Wx. Channel Local Media Wx. Channel Local Media NWS Forecast Offices NWS Forecast Offices Observers Web-Page Observers Web-Page Regional Observatories ftp NDBC QA/QC NDBC Web-Page Dial-A-Buoy OPeNDAP Sensor / Observation

44. We have a multi-year grant from NOAA to help establish a Regional Association to manage GCOOS. We have representatives from GCOOS to the National Federation of Regional Associations: –Robert (Buzz) Martin, TX General Land Office –Raymond Toll, Science Applications International Corporation Actions 5

45. A Memorandum of Agreement has been selected as the initial governance structure for the GCOOS Regional Association. Actions 6

46. Parties to GCOOS MOA Peter Betzer, University of South Florida Kendall L. Carder, Individual Michael Dagg, Individual William Dentel, Aquatrak Corporation Richard E. Dodge, Nova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center Richard Eckenrod, Tampa Bay Estuary Program James W. Feeney, Horizon Marine George Forristall, Forristall Ocean Engineering, Inc. Wilford Gardner, Texas A&M University Sherryl Gilbert, The Alliance for Coastal Technologies, Gulf of Mexico Partner Norman Guinasso, Texas Automated Buoy System (TABS); GERG Robert Hetland, Individual Roger R. Hoffman, The Boeing Company Patrick Hogan, Naval Research Laboratory Matthew Howard, Individual Stephan Howden, Individual Ann Jochens. Individual Björn Kjerfve, Individual Harvey Knull, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi Steven E. Lohrenz, The University of Southern Mississippi Mark Luther, Tampa Bay PORTS John MacLeod, Evans Hamiltons, Inc. Kumar Mahadevan, Mote Marine Laboratory Inc. Robert “Buzz” Martin, Texas General Land Office Thomas McGee, Gulf of Mexico Hydrates Research Consortium, University of Mississippi Douglas Meffert, Tulane/Xavier Center for Bioenvironmental Research & LEAG Frank Muller-Karger, Individual Worth D. Nowlin, Jr., Individual James J. O’Brien, COAPS, Florida State University Chris C. Oynes, Minerals Management Service GoM Region Nancy Rabalais, LUMCON Sammy Ray, DermoWatch Mitchell Roffer, Roffer’s Ocean Fishing Forecasting Service Steve J. Smith, ChevronTexaco Energy Technology Company Mike Spranger, Florida Sea Grant Program Robert Stickney, Texas Sea Grant College Program Joseph W. Swaykos, Center of Higher Learning, University of Southern Mississippi Raymond F. Toll, Jr., Science Applications International Corporation Neil Trenaman, RD Instruments Jan van Smirren, Fugro GEOS Sharon Walker, J. L. Scott Marine Education Center & Aquarium William W. Walker, Mississippi Department of Marine Resources

47. A Board of Directors for the GCOOS Regional Association has been elected and as held its initial meeting in August 2005. Actions 7

48. Next Steps in Developing GCOOS

49. Next Steps 1 We are in the process of establishing: - Stakeholders Council - Education and Outreach Council - Products and Services Committee - Data Management and Communication Committee - Observing Systems Committee

50. Next Steps 2 We are working on the third draft of a Business Plan for the GCOOS-RA.

51. Next Steps 3 We are working to refine priorities and plan pilot projects.

52. Next Step 4 We are working to identify observations and products needed by users. This workshop is one effort toward that objective.

53. Invitation to Workshop Attendees Become a signatories to the Resolution to develop GCOOS Sign the Memorandum of Agreement for the GCOOS Regional Association Consider sharing through GCOOS non-proprietary, non-commercial data or products of mutual interest. Consider nominating members to the GCOOS Councils and Committees.

54. http://www.gcoos.org If you wish to become a signatory to the resolution, please send an email request to wnowlin@tamu.edu stating if you are signing as an individual or for an institution. If you wish to become a Party to the Regional Association, download the Memorandum of Agreement from the GCOOS web site, sign and fax to Worth Nowlin (979-847-8879) Thank You Please visit our web site for further information.