Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Llad Phillips1 Jobs and Crime
2
Llad Phillips2 A theme for this course US and CA criminal justice systems will be case studies, but are there larger issues about the public sector? US and CA criminal justice systems will be case studies, but are there larger issues about the public sector?
3
Llad Phillips3
4
4
5
5 Public Sector Health Safety Civics Education
6
Llad Phillips6 What determines the quality of life in a nation, a state or a locality? The distribution of GDP between the public and private sectors?
7
Llad Phillips7 Total Tax Burden As % of GDP, 2004 Google Forbes overall tax burden CountryTotal Tax burden Sweden50.7% France43.7 UK36.1 Germany34.8 Canada33.0 Switzerland29.4 USA25.5 Mexico18.5
8
Llad Phillips8 Public Vs. Private Goods Labor for Public Goods Labor for Private Goods Contraint Labor, Private Private Goods Production Function
9
Llad Phillips9 L, public Output, Public L, Private Output, Private Production Possibility Frontier
10
Llad Phillips10 L, public Output, Public L, Private Output, Private Production Possibility Frontier
11
Llad Phillips11 Private Public Sweden UK US Mexico Canada
12
Llad Phillips12 Production Possibility Frontier PRIVATE PUBLIC Inefficient Does the global economy Cause a bias towards Private instead of public Goods and services?
13
Llad Phillips13 Production Possibility Frontier Public Goods: Defense Public Goods: Health Inefficient Does being the world’s Policeman cause a bias Away from other public Goods and services?
14
Llad Phillips14 Expenditures Per Pupil FiscalYear70-7180-8190-9100-0103-0405-06 CARank141928252835 Nominal $, CA 90224384595698676738607 US84223074902737383109576
15
Llad Phillips15 Production Possibility Frontier Public Goods: Prison Operation Public Goods: education Inefficient Which would you rather do (1) keep the 30% of state prisoners who are pot-heads locked up, or (2) educate your kids?
16
Llad Phillips16 US Politics “It’s the economy stupid!” “It’s the economy stupid!” Issues in 2008 Issues in 2008 Human capital and education The family and social conservatives Huck & Chuck Mitt
17
Llad Phillips17 31.0% 7.3% 31.0/33.8~8.6 decline
18
Llad Phillips18 33.8% 5.8% 7.3/5.8 ~ 26% rise
19
Llad Phillips19 The Economy and Crime Is crime affected by the business cycle? Is crime affected by the business cycle? Do economic factors cause crime? Do economic factors cause crime?
20
Llad Phillips20 Where is the economy headed? Survey of Professional Forecasters http://www.phil.frb.org/files/spf/survq407.h tml
21
Llad Phillips21 Governor’s Budget Summary 2008-09 Jan 1990 Jan 2007
22
Llad Phillips22 California Forecasts & Record: Umemployment rate: CA Dept. of Finance Year2004200520062007200820092010 CA6.2%5.4%4.9%5.3%5.7%5.6%5.5% US5.5%5.1%4.6%4.6%5.0%5.0%4.8%
23
Llad Phillips23 Outline Seriousness Survey Seriousness Survey What can we learn from the survey? Crime File Crime File Victims Jobs and Crime Jobs and Crime Jobs and Crime Why do some people get involved with crime?
24
Llad Phillips24 Class Survey 2009 Vs. Sample 2008 Scoring Ten Behaviors Scoring Ten Behaviors 103 responses in ’09, 97 responses in ‘08 103 responses in ’09, 97 responses in ‘08
25
Llad Phillips25 SERIOUSNESS SURVEY RATE THE SERIOUSNESS OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING BEHAVIORS ON A SCALE FROM ZERO( LEAST SERIOUS) TO TEN( MOST SERIOUS): MEDIAN ‘08 ‘09 1. HOMICIDE _10 10__ 2. MASS POISONING ( e.g. TYLENOL) _ 9 10__ 3. FORCIBLE RAPE _ 10 10__ 4. ARSON: SET FIRE TO A GARAGE _ 8 7__ 5. SELLING HEROIN _ 7 7__ 6. AUTO THEFT _ 6 6__ 7. EMBEZZLEMENT OF $1,000 _ 5 6__ 8. PROSTITUTE IN A HOUSE OF PROSTITUTION _ 4 4__ 9. POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA _ 2 1__ 10. SNIFFING GLUE _ 1 1__
26
Llad Phillips26 Conclusions Consistency from year to year Triage is possible: we can separate the more serious behaviors from the less serious behaviors
27
Llad Phillips27 Distribution of Homicide Scores One 1 One 6 One 7 Six 8’s Four 9’s Median: 52 nd Person 90
28
Llad Phillips28 Mode = 10, most likely number Median = 10, score of 49 th or middle person
29
Llad Phillips29
30
Llad Phillips30 Conclusions Consistency from year to year Triage is possible: we can separate the more serious behaviors from the less serious behaviors For serious behaviors, a clear majority view For example, for homicide 102 out of 103 score it between 6 and 10, while 100 out of 103 score it between 8 and 10
31
Llad Phillips31 Central Limit theorem in Action 6 12 25 50 103
32
Llad Phillips32 2.5% mean
33
Llad Phillips33 59 25
34
Llad Phillips34 Mode: 10 Median: 10
35
Llad Phillips35 3 1 5 4 3 The Vocal Minority: sixteen score Pot high
36
Llad Phillips36 Mode: 1 Median: 2
37
Llad Phillips37 Center of the Scores Distribution Mode: most likely Mode: most likely Median: middle person Median: middle person Average: sum of scores divided by total number of people Average: sum of scores divided by total number of people
38
Llad Phillips38 John Tukey: Box Plot for Sniffing Glue Econ 160 W 2009 Smallest = 0 Q1 = 0 Median = 1 Q3 = 3 Largest = 10 IQR = 3 Outliers: 10, 10, 10, 9, 8, 8, 8, Median 16 folks score as 4 or above 73 folks score as 2 0r below Fight for 14 3’s
39
Llad Phillips39 Conclusions Consistency from year to year Triage is possible: we can separate the more serious behaviors from the less serious behaviors For serious behaviors, a clear majority view For example, for homicide 102 out of 103 score it between 6 and 10, while 100 out of 103 score it between 8 and 10 The less serious behaviors are more controversial!
40
Llad Phillips40 Dispersion of Scores Distribution Measures of dispersion Measures of dispersion Standard deviation Inter-quartile range Range: Maximum - Minimum
41
Llad Phillips41 SERIOUSNESS SURVEY RATE THE SERIOUSNESS OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING BEHAVIORS ON A SCALE FROM ZERO( LEAST SERIOUS) TO TEN( MOST SERIOUS): Minimum, Maximum 1. HOMICIDE _2,10 10 2. MASS POISONING ( e.g. TYLENOL) _0, 10 3. FORCIBLE RAPE _6,10 4. ARSON: SET FIRE TO A GARAGE _2, 10 5. SELLING HEROIN _0, 10 6. AUTO THEFT _3, 10 7. EMBEZZLEMENT OF $1,000 _0, 9 8. PROSTITUTE IN A HOUSE OF PROSTITUTION _0, 10 9. POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA _0, 10 10. SNIFFING GLUE _0, 8
42
Llad Phillips42 The more serious the behavior, the less disagreement about policy
43
Llad Phillips43 Policy is easier Policy is more difficult
44
Llad Phillips44 Bureau of Justice Statistics, Report to the Nation The Alternative p.170 One more step: converting seriousness scores to a metric (years of sentence or Loss rate of $) The Economics of Crime Control, Ch. 4
45
Llad Phillips45 Source: $ 1.54 Million (1990), Orley Ashenfelter, Princeton, Based on highway safety
46
Llad Phillips46 Types of Crime Motivation: self-interest, greed Motivation: self-interest, greed Street Crimes: robbery, burglary, auto theft, larceny White Collar: embezzlement, tax evasion, check fraud, telephone fraud Status Offenses: runaway, truant, vagrant, beyond control of parents Black Market: gambling, prostitution,drugs
47
Llad Phillips47 Types of Crime Motivation: Hate, Rage Motivation: Hate, Rage Street Crimes: homicide, aggravated assault, rape Crimes Against Public Order: vandalism, terrorism Hate Crimes Columbine High James Byrd: dragging death in Texas Jewish Community Center in Granada Hills
48
Llad Phillips48 Jobs and Crime
49
Llad Phillips49
50
Llad Phillips50 Questions About Crime Does the Business Cycle Affect Crime Rates? Does the Business Cycle Affect Crime Rates? Does an Individual’s Life Cycle Affect Crime Rates? Does an Individual’s Life Cycle Affect Crime Rates? Why do some people live socially unproductive lives? Why do some people live socially unproductive lives?
51
Llad Phillips51 Two Points About Economic Conditions and Crime Relationship of Crime to the Business Cycle Relationship of Crime to the Business Cycle Short Run: Business Cycle Is Phil Cook wrong? California: the misery index and crime misery index = unemployment rate + inflation rate Relationship of Crime to the Life Cycle Relationship of Crime to the Life Cycle Long Run Investment in Education Role of the Family
52
Llad Phillips52
53
Llad Phillips53
54
Llad Phillips54 CA Crime Index(t) = a +b*Misery Index(t)
55
Llad Phillips55 2002 1952 1980 1954
59
Llad Phillips59 Why do people work in labor market? Tastes? Assume everybody has the same tastes! Human capital: earning power Education Work experience Health
60
Llad Phillips60 An Individual’s Life Cycle for a Socially Productive Life Learning over the life cycle Learning over the life cycle Accumulating earning power or human capital Accumulating earning power or human capital Earnings depend upon Earnings depend upon ability knowledge work experience
61
Llad Phillips61 Productive Life Cycle Social Institution Family - PreSchool - School - College - Job - Retirement Function Learning: Accumulating Human Capital - Earning - Spending Age Line 0 4 6 18 23 65
62
Llad Phillips62 Accumulating Human Capital InflowOutflow Stock
63
Llad Phillips63 Accumulating Human Capital Stock Inflow + - Outflow Net Inflow
64
Llad Phillips64 Accumulating Human Capital Human Capital Learning + - Depreciation Investment
65
Llad Phillips65 Allocation of Your Time Human Capital Build Capital by Learning Use Capital for Earning
66
Llad Phillips66 Time Endowment 24 hours
67
Llad Phillips67 24 hours0 hours Leisure (learning)
68
Llad Phillips68 Allocation of Your Time Human Capital Build Capital by Learning Use Capital for Earning
69
Llad Phillips69 24 hours0 hours Leisure (learning) Earnings $480 Opportunities for trading leisure for earnings (income) at a rate, $20 per hour, determined by your stock of human capital $ 0
70
Llad Phillips70 Salaries by Education Level, CA Full Time* Workers *Full Time: >35 hrs/wk, >48 wks/yr.; Source: LA Times, 1-10-93
71
24 hours0 hours Leisure (learning) Earnings $480 $ 0 $240 dropout college grad
72
Llad Phillips72 Economists Assume You Can make Comparisons For example: you can compare a high level of your income and a low level of your leisure with a low level of your income and a high level of your leisure For example: you can compare a high level of your income and a low level of your leisure with a low level of your income and a high level of your leisure
73
24 hours0 hours Leisure (learning) Earnings $480 $ 0 Iso-Preference Curves: You value all points on a curve equally high low value high value
74
24 hours0 hours Leisure (learning) Earnings $480 $ 0 high low value high value Optimum 15 hours of leisure $180 for 9 hrs of work
75
24 hours0 hours Leisure (learning) Earnings $480 $ 0 high low value slope of the iso-preference curve through the 24 hour endowment is the lowest wage at which you are willing to work
76
24 hours0 hours Leisure (learning) Earnings $480 $ 0 high low value slope of the iso-preference curve through the 24 hour endowment is the lowest wage at which you are willing to work $96 dropout is unwilling to work for $4/hr
77
Llad Phillips77 Participation in the Labor Force: Willing to look for work If your market wage exceeds your reservation wage If your market wage exceeds your reservation wage college grad, @$20/hr, participates the junior high dropout, @ $4/hr, does not We assumed the college grad and the dropout both have the same values for income and leisure We assumed the college grad and the dropout both have the same values for income and leisure Only their learning histories differ Only their learning histories differ
78
24 hours0 hours Leisure (learning) Earnings $480 $ 0 high low value slope of the iso-preference curve through the 24 hour endowment is the lowest wage at which you are willing to work $96 dropout is unwilling to work for $4/hr
79
Llad Phillips79 Hazards to Personal Success Dropping out Dropping out Joining gangs Joining gangs Anti-social behavior Anti-social behavior
81
Llad Phillips81 Productive Life Cycle Social Institution Family - PreSchool - School - College - Job - Retirement Function Learning: Accumulating Human Capital - Earning - Spending Age Line 0 4 6 18 23 65
82
Legal Work or Illegal Work? Choice with Uncertain Outcomes Choice Legal work Illegal work
83
Legal Work or Illegal Work? Choice with Uncertain Outcomes Choice Legal work Illegal work Unemployed (fail) Employed (succeed) Apprehended (fail) Not Apprehended (succeed)
84
Legal Work or Illegal Work? Choice with Uncertain Outcomes Choice Legal work Illegal work Unemployed (fail) Employed (succeed) Apprehended (fail) Not Apprehended (succeed) 0.1 0.9 $0 $12,000/yr 0.2 0.8 $0 $14,000
85
Expected legal Income = 0.9*$12,000 = $10,800 Legal Work or Illegal Work? Choice with Uncertain Outcomes Choice Legal work Illegal work Unemployed (fail) Employed (succeed) Apprehended (fail) Not Apprehended (succeed) 0.1 0.9 $0 $12,000/yr 0.2 0.8 $0 $14,000/yr Expected illegal income = 0.8*$14,000 = $11,200
86
Expected legal Income = 0.95*$12,000 = $11,400 Legal Work or Illegal Work? Choice with Uncertain Outcomes Choice Legal work Illegal work Unemployed (fail) Employed (succeed) Apprehended (fail) Not Apprehended (succeed) 0.1 0.9 $0 $12,000/yr 0.2 0.8 $0 $14,000/yr Expected illegal income = 0.8*$14,000 = $11,200 0.05 0.95
87
Llad Phillips87 Social Measures to Reduce Crime Maintain a full-employment economy Maintain a full-employment economy
88
Expected legal Income = 0.9*$12,000 = $10,800 Legal Work or Illegal Work? Choice with Uncertain Outcomes Choice Legal work Illegal work Unemployed (fail) Employed (succeed) Apprehended (fail) Not Apprehended (succeed) 0.1 0.9 $0 $12,000/yr 0.2 0.8 $0 $14,000/yr Expected illegal income = 0.7*$14,000 = $9,800 0.3 0.7
89
Llad Phillips89 Social Measures to Reduce Crime Maintain an Effective Criminal Justice System Maintain an Effective Criminal Justice System keep the probability of apprehension high
90
Expected legal Income = 0.9*$12,000 = $10,800 Legal Work or Illegal Work? Choice with Uncertain Outcomes Choice Legal work Illegal work Unemployed (fail) Employed (succeed) Apprehended (fail) Not Apprehended (succeed) 0.1 0.9 $0 $12,000/yr 0.2 0.8 -$3,000 (fine) $14,000/yr Expected illegal income = 0.8*$14,000 - 0.2*$3,000 = $10,600 $0
91
Llad Phillips91 Social Measures to Reduce Crime Punish the criminal Punish the criminal make crime less attractive
92
Llad Phillips92 Social Measures to Reduce Crime Maintain a full-employment economy Maintain a full-employment economy Maintain an Effective Criminal Justice System Maintain an Effective Criminal Justice System keep the probability of apprehension high Punish the criminal Punish the criminal make crime less attractive
93
Llad Phillips93 Summary Your economic status affects your probable behavior: work or crime Your economic status affects your probable behavior: work or crime Earning power affects your probable behavior Earning power affects your probable behavior When you are are a young teen you need a parent or role model to motivate you to stay in school and keep learning When you are are a young teen you need a parent or role model to motivate you to stay in school and keep learning
94
Llad Phillips94
95
Llad Phillips95 2003
96
Llad Phillips96 Class Survey 2003 Scoring Ten Behaviors Scoring Ten Behaviors 113 Responses 113 Responses No two are the same No two are the same Two most similar responses Two most similar responses Two most different responses Two most different responses
97
Llad Phillips97 Similar Scorings
98
Llad Phillips98 Different Scorings
99
Llad Phillips99 2003
100
Llad Phillips100
101
Llad Phillips101 Mean Rating
102
Llad Phillips102 SERIOUSNESS SURVEY RATE THE SERIOUSNESS OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING BEHAVIORS ON A SCALE FROM ZERO( LEAST SERIOUS) TO TEN( MOST SERIOUS): MEDIAN ‘03 ‘05 1. HOMICIDE _10 10__ 2. MASS POISONING ( e.g. TYLENOL) _ 9 8__ 3. FORCIBLE RAPE _ 9 9__ 4. ARSON: SET FIRE TO A GARAGE _ 7 7__ 5. SELLING HEROIN _ 6 6__ 6. AUTO THEFT _ 5.5 6__ 7. EMBEZZLEMENT OF $1,000 _ 4 4__ 8. PROSTITUTE IN A HOUSE OF PROSTITUTION _ 3 3__ 9. POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA _ 2 2__ 10. SNIFFING GLUE _ 1 1__
103
Llad Phillips103 Misery Index, California 1952-2003 -5.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 1950196019701980199020002010 year Rate unemployment rate inflation rate misery index
104
Llad Phillips104
106
Llad Phillips106 How best to Learn in a Lecture class That does not Have a Section? We Recommend Going to class. The questions On the exams Are from topics Discussed in Class. How much math does 160 require? 1.Descriptive Graphs 2. Analytical Graphs (exams) 3. Notation e.g OF=f(CR,SE,SV)
107
Llad Phillips107 Mode = 10, largest number of responses Median = 10, score of 31st person
108
Llad Phillips108 Mode = 10, largest number of responses Median = 10, score of 49 th person
109
Llad Phillips109 1 13 14 73
110
Llad Phillips110 Mode = 9 Median = 9
111
Llad Phillips111 Mode = 1 Median = 1
112
Llad Phillips112 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 23 31 27 10 7 4 4 5 2 0 0 0 5 15 20 25 30 35 Frequency Score Number of Responses Vs. Possession of Pot Score ‘02
113
Llad Phillips113 Disagreement Versus Seriousness, 02 Arson Selling Heroin Auto Theft Embezzle Mass Poisoning Rape Homicide Prostitute Possess Pot Sniff Glue 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 024681012 Score Dispersion (Standard Deviation) Homicide 2004
114
Embezzlement Standard Deviation or Dispersion
115
Llad Phillips115 John Tukey: Box Plot for Pot ‘09 Smallest = 0 Q1 = 1 Median = 1 Q3 = 3 Largest = 8 IQR = 2 Outliers: 8, 8, 8, 7,
116
Llad Phillips116
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.