Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Llad Phillips1 Jobs and Crime. Llad Phillips2 A theme for this course US and CA criminal justice systems will be case studies, but are there larger issues.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Llad Phillips1 Jobs and Crime. Llad Phillips2 A theme for this course US and CA criminal justice systems will be case studies, but are there larger issues."— Presentation transcript:

1 Llad Phillips1 Jobs and Crime

2 Llad Phillips2 A theme for this course US and CA criminal justice systems will be case studies, but are there larger issues about the public sector? US and CA criminal justice systems will be case studies, but are there larger issues about the public sector?

3 Llad Phillips3

4 4

5 5 Public Sector Health Safety Civics Education

6 Llad Phillips6 What determines the quality of life in a nation, a state or a locality? The distribution of GDP between the public and private sectors?

7 Llad Phillips7 Total Tax Burden As % of GDP, 2004 Google Forbes overall tax burden CountryTotal Tax burden Sweden50.7% France43.7 UK36.1 Germany34.8 Canada33.0 Switzerland29.4 USA25.5 Mexico18.5

8 Llad Phillips8 Public Vs. Private Goods Labor for Public Goods Labor for Private Goods Contraint Labor, Private Private Goods Production Function

9 Llad Phillips9 L, public Output, Public L, Private Output, Private Production Possibility Frontier

10 Llad Phillips10 L, public Output, Public L, Private Output, Private Production Possibility Frontier

11 Llad Phillips11 Private Public Sweden UK US Mexico Canada

12 Llad Phillips12 Production Possibility Frontier PRIVATE PUBLIC Inefficient Does the global economy Cause a bias towards Private instead of public Goods and services?

13 Llad Phillips13 Production Possibility Frontier Public Goods: Defense Public Goods: Health Inefficient Does being the world’s Policeman cause a bias Away from other public Goods and services?

14 Llad Phillips14 Expenditures Per Pupil FiscalYear70-7180-8190-9100-0103-0405-06 CARank141928252835 Nominal $, CA 90224384595698676738607 US84223074902737383109576

15 Llad Phillips15 Production Possibility Frontier Public Goods: Prison Operation Public Goods: education Inefficient Which would you rather do (1) keep the 30% of state prisoners who are pot-heads locked up, or (2) educate your kids?

16 Llad Phillips16 US Politics “It’s the economy stupid!” “It’s the economy stupid!” Issues in 2008 Issues in 2008  Human capital and education  The family and social conservatives  Huck & Chuck  Mitt

17 Llad Phillips17 31.0% 7.3% 31.0/33.8~8.6 decline

18 Llad Phillips18 33.8% 5.8% 7.3/5.8 ~ 26% rise

19 Llad Phillips19 The Economy and Crime Is crime affected by the business cycle? Is crime affected by the business cycle? Do economic factors cause crime? Do economic factors cause crime?

20 Llad Phillips20 Where is the economy headed? Survey of Professional Forecasters http://www.phil.frb.org/files/spf/survq407.h tml

21 Llad Phillips21 Governor’s Budget Summary 2008-09 Jan 1990 Jan 2007

22 Llad Phillips22 California Forecasts & Record: Umemployment rate: CA Dept. of Finance Year2004200520062007200820092010 CA6.2%5.4%4.9%5.3%5.7%5.6%5.5% US5.5%5.1%4.6%4.6%5.0%5.0%4.8%

23 Llad Phillips23 Outline Seriousness Survey Seriousness Survey  What can we learn from the survey? Crime File Crime File  Victims  Jobs and Crime Jobs and Crime Jobs and Crime  Why do some people get involved with crime?

24 Llad Phillips24 Class Survey 2009 Vs. Sample 2008 Scoring Ten Behaviors Scoring Ten Behaviors 103 responses in ’09, 97 responses in ‘08 103 responses in ’09, 97 responses in ‘08

25 Llad Phillips25 SERIOUSNESS SURVEY RATE THE SERIOUSNESS OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING BEHAVIORS ON A SCALE FROM ZERO( LEAST SERIOUS) TO TEN( MOST SERIOUS): MEDIAN ‘08 ‘09 1. HOMICIDE _10 10__ 2. MASS POISONING ( e.g. TYLENOL) _ 9 10__ 3. FORCIBLE RAPE _ 10 10__ 4. ARSON: SET FIRE TO A GARAGE _ 8 7__ 5. SELLING HEROIN _ 7 7__ 6. AUTO THEFT _ 6 6__ 7. EMBEZZLEMENT OF $1,000 _ 5 6__ 8. PROSTITUTE IN A HOUSE OF PROSTITUTION _ 4 4__ 9. POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA _ 2 1__ 10. SNIFFING GLUE _ 1 1__

26 Llad Phillips26 Conclusions Consistency from year to year Triage is possible: we can separate the more serious behaviors from the less serious behaviors

27 Llad Phillips27 Distribution of Homicide Scores One 1 One 6 One 7 Six 8’s Four 9’s Median: 52 nd Person 90

28 Llad Phillips28 Mode = 10, most likely number Median = 10, score of 49 th or middle person

29 Llad Phillips29

30 Llad Phillips30 Conclusions Consistency from year to year Triage is possible: we can separate the more serious behaviors from the less serious behaviors For serious behaviors, a clear majority view   For example, for homicide 102 out of 103 score it between 6 and 10, while 100 out of 103 score it between 8 and 10

31 Llad Phillips31 Central Limit theorem in Action 6 12 25 50 103

32 Llad Phillips32 2.5% mean

33 Llad Phillips33 59 25

34 Llad Phillips34 Mode: 10 Median: 10

35 Llad Phillips35 3 1 5 4 3 The Vocal Minority: sixteen score Pot high

36 Llad Phillips36 Mode: 1 Median: 2

37 Llad Phillips37 Center of the Scores Distribution Mode: most likely Mode: most likely Median: middle person Median: middle person Average: sum of scores divided by total number of people Average: sum of scores divided by total number of people

38 Llad Phillips38 John Tukey: Box Plot for Sniffing Glue Econ 160 W 2009 Smallest = 0 Q1 = 0 Median = 1 Q3 = 3 Largest = 10 IQR = 3 Outliers: 10, 10, 10, 9, 8, 8, 8, Median 16 folks score as 4 or above 73 folks score as 2 0r below Fight for 14 3’s

39 Llad Phillips39 Conclusions Consistency from year to year Triage is possible: we can separate the more serious behaviors from the less serious behaviors For serious behaviors, a clear majority view   For example, for homicide 102 out of 103 score it between 6 and 10, while 100 out of 103 score it between 8 and 10 The less serious behaviors are more controversial!

40 Llad Phillips40 Dispersion of Scores Distribution Measures of dispersion Measures of dispersion  Standard deviation  Inter-quartile range  Range: Maximum - Minimum

41 Llad Phillips41 SERIOUSNESS SURVEY RATE THE SERIOUSNESS OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING BEHAVIORS ON A SCALE FROM ZERO( LEAST SERIOUS) TO TEN( MOST SERIOUS): Minimum, Maximum 1. HOMICIDE _2,10 10 2. MASS POISONING ( e.g. TYLENOL) _0, 10 3. FORCIBLE RAPE _6,10 4. ARSON: SET FIRE TO A GARAGE _2, 10 5. SELLING HEROIN _0, 10 6. AUTO THEFT _3, 10 7. EMBEZZLEMENT OF $1,000 _0, 9 8. PROSTITUTE IN A HOUSE OF PROSTITUTION _0, 10 9. POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA _0, 10 10. SNIFFING GLUE _0, 8

42 Llad Phillips42 The more serious the behavior, the less disagreement about policy

43 Llad Phillips43 Policy is easier Policy is more difficult

44 Llad Phillips44 Bureau of Justice Statistics, Report to the Nation The Alternative p.170 One more step: converting seriousness scores to a metric (years of sentence or Loss rate of $) The Economics of Crime Control, Ch. 4

45 Llad Phillips45 Source: $ 1.54 Million (1990), Orley Ashenfelter, Princeton, Based on highway safety

46 Llad Phillips46 Types of Crime Motivation: self-interest, greed Motivation: self-interest, greed  Street Crimes: robbery, burglary, auto theft, larceny  White Collar: embezzlement, tax evasion, check fraud, telephone fraud  Status Offenses: runaway, truant, vagrant, beyond control of parents  Black Market: gambling, prostitution,drugs

47 Llad Phillips47 Types of Crime Motivation: Hate, Rage Motivation: Hate, Rage  Street Crimes: homicide, aggravated assault, rape  Crimes Against Public Order: vandalism, terrorism  Hate Crimes  Columbine High  James Byrd: dragging death in Texas  Jewish Community Center in Granada Hills

48 Llad Phillips48 Jobs and Crime

49 Llad Phillips49

50 Llad Phillips50 Questions About Crime Does the Business Cycle Affect Crime Rates? Does the Business Cycle Affect Crime Rates? Does an Individual’s Life Cycle Affect Crime Rates? Does an Individual’s Life Cycle Affect Crime Rates? Why do some people live socially unproductive lives? Why do some people live socially unproductive lives?

51 Llad Phillips51 Two Points About Economic Conditions and Crime Relationship of Crime to the Business Cycle Relationship of Crime to the Business Cycle  Short Run: Business Cycle  Is Phil Cook wrong?  California: the misery index and crime  misery index = unemployment rate + inflation rate Relationship of Crime to the Life Cycle Relationship of Crime to the Life Cycle  Long Run  Investment in Education  Role of the Family

52 Llad Phillips52

53 Llad Phillips53

54 Llad Phillips54 CA Crime Index(t) = a +b*Misery Index(t)

55 Llad Phillips55 2002 1952 1980 1954

56

57

58

59 Llad Phillips59 Why do people work in labor market? Tastes? Assume everybody has the same tastes! Human capital: earning power   Education   Work experience   Health

60 Llad Phillips60 An Individual’s Life Cycle for a Socially Productive Life Learning over the life cycle Learning over the life cycle Accumulating earning power or human capital Accumulating earning power or human capital Earnings depend upon Earnings depend upon  ability  knowledge  work experience

61 Llad Phillips61 Productive Life Cycle Social Institution Family - PreSchool - School - College - Job - Retirement Function Learning: Accumulating Human Capital - Earning - Spending Age Line 0 4 6 18 23 65

62 Llad Phillips62 Accumulating Human Capital InflowOutflow Stock

63 Llad Phillips63 Accumulating Human Capital Stock Inflow + - Outflow Net Inflow

64 Llad Phillips64 Accumulating Human Capital Human Capital Learning + - Depreciation Investment

65 Llad Phillips65 Allocation of Your Time Human Capital Build Capital by Learning Use Capital for Earning

66 Llad Phillips66 Time Endowment 24 hours

67 Llad Phillips67 24 hours0 hours Leisure (learning)

68 Llad Phillips68 Allocation of Your Time Human Capital Build Capital by Learning Use Capital for Earning

69 Llad Phillips69 24 hours0 hours Leisure (learning) Earnings $480 Opportunities for trading leisure for earnings (income) at a rate, $20 per hour, determined by your stock of human capital $ 0

70 Llad Phillips70 Salaries by Education Level, CA Full Time* Workers *Full Time: >35 hrs/wk, >48 wks/yr.; Source: LA Times, 1-10-93

71 24 hours0 hours Leisure (learning) Earnings $480 $ 0 $240 dropout college grad

72 Llad Phillips72 Economists Assume You Can make Comparisons For example: you can compare a high level of your income and a low level of your leisure with a low level of your income and a high level of your leisure For example: you can compare a high level of your income and a low level of your leisure with a low level of your income and a high level of your leisure

73 24 hours0 hours Leisure (learning) Earnings $480 $ 0 Iso-Preference Curves: You value all points on a curve equally high low value high value

74 24 hours0 hours Leisure (learning) Earnings $480 $ 0 high low value high value Optimum 15 hours of leisure $180 for 9 hrs of work

75 24 hours0 hours Leisure (learning) Earnings $480 $ 0 high low value slope of the iso-preference curve through the 24 hour endowment is the lowest wage at which you are willing to work

76 24 hours0 hours Leisure (learning) Earnings $480 $ 0 high low value slope of the iso-preference curve through the 24 hour endowment is the lowest wage at which you are willing to work $96 dropout is unwilling to work for $4/hr

77 Llad Phillips77 Participation in the Labor Force: Willing to look for work If your market wage exceeds your reservation wage If your market wage exceeds your reservation wage  college grad, @$20/hr, participates  the junior high dropout, @ $4/hr, does not We assumed the college grad and the dropout both have the same values for income and leisure We assumed the college grad and the dropout both have the same values for income and leisure Only their learning histories differ Only their learning histories differ

78 24 hours0 hours Leisure (learning) Earnings $480 $ 0 high low value slope of the iso-preference curve through the 24 hour endowment is the lowest wage at which you are willing to work $96 dropout is unwilling to work for $4/hr

79 Llad Phillips79 Hazards to Personal Success Dropping out Dropping out Joining gangs Joining gangs Anti-social behavior Anti-social behavior

80

81 Llad Phillips81 Productive Life Cycle Social Institution Family - PreSchool - School - College - Job - Retirement Function Learning: Accumulating Human Capital - Earning - Spending Age Line 0 4 6 18 23 65

82 Legal Work or Illegal Work? Choice with Uncertain Outcomes Choice Legal work Illegal work

83 Legal Work or Illegal Work? Choice with Uncertain Outcomes Choice Legal work Illegal work Unemployed (fail) Employed (succeed) Apprehended (fail) Not Apprehended (succeed)

84 Legal Work or Illegal Work? Choice with Uncertain Outcomes Choice Legal work Illegal work Unemployed (fail) Employed (succeed) Apprehended (fail) Not Apprehended (succeed) 0.1 0.9 $0 $12,000/yr 0.2 0.8 $0 $14,000

85 Expected legal Income = 0.9*$12,000 = $10,800 Legal Work or Illegal Work? Choice with Uncertain Outcomes Choice Legal work Illegal work Unemployed (fail) Employed (succeed) Apprehended (fail) Not Apprehended (succeed) 0.1 0.9 $0 $12,000/yr 0.2 0.8 $0 $14,000/yr Expected illegal income = 0.8*$14,000 = $11,200

86 Expected legal Income = 0.95*$12,000 = $11,400 Legal Work or Illegal Work? Choice with Uncertain Outcomes Choice Legal work Illegal work Unemployed (fail) Employed (succeed) Apprehended (fail) Not Apprehended (succeed) 0.1 0.9 $0 $12,000/yr 0.2 0.8 $0 $14,000/yr Expected illegal income = 0.8*$14,000 = $11,200 0.05 0.95

87 Llad Phillips87 Social Measures to Reduce Crime Maintain a full-employment economy Maintain a full-employment economy

88 Expected legal Income = 0.9*$12,000 = $10,800 Legal Work or Illegal Work? Choice with Uncertain Outcomes Choice Legal work Illegal work Unemployed (fail) Employed (succeed) Apprehended (fail) Not Apprehended (succeed) 0.1 0.9 $0 $12,000/yr 0.2 0.8 $0 $14,000/yr Expected illegal income = 0.7*$14,000 = $9,800 0.3 0.7

89 Llad Phillips89 Social Measures to Reduce Crime Maintain an Effective Criminal Justice System Maintain an Effective Criminal Justice System  keep the probability of apprehension high

90 Expected legal Income = 0.9*$12,000 = $10,800 Legal Work or Illegal Work? Choice with Uncertain Outcomes Choice Legal work Illegal work Unemployed (fail) Employed (succeed) Apprehended (fail) Not Apprehended (succeed) 0.1 0.9 $0 $12,000/yr 0.2 0.8 -$3,000 (fine) $14,000/yr Expected illegal income = 0.8*$14,000 - 0.2*$3,000 = $10,600 $0

91 Llad Phillips91 Social Measures to Reduce Crime Punish the criminal Punish the criminal  make crime less attractive

92 Llad Phillips92 Social Measures to Reduce Crime Maintain a full-employment economy Maintain a full-employment economy Maintain an Effective Criminal Justice System Maintain an Effective Criminal Justice System  keep the probability of apprehension high Punish the criminal Punish the criminal  make crime less attractive

93 Llad Phillips93 Summary Your economic status affects your probable behavior: work or crime Your economic status affects your probable behavior: work or crime Earning power affects your probable behavior Earning power affects your probable behavior When you are are a young teen you need a parent or role model to motivate you to stay in school and keep learning When you are are a young teen you need a parent or role model to motivate you to stay in school and keep learning

94 Llad Phillips94

95 Llad Phillips95 2003

96 Llad Phillips96 Class Survey 2003 Scoring Ten Behaviors Scoring Ten Behaviors 113 Responses 113 Responses No two are the same No two are the same Two most similar responses Two most similar responses Two most different responses Two most different responses

97 Llad Phillips97 Similar Scorings

98 Llad Phillips98 Different Scorings

99 Llad Phillips99 2003

100 Llad Phillips100

101 Llad Phillips101 Mean Rating

102 Llad Phillips102 SERIOUSNESS SURVEY RATE THE SERIOUSNESS OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING BEHAVIORS ON A SCALE FROM ZERO( LEAST SERIOUS) TO TEN( MOST SERIOUS): MEDIAN ‘03 ‘05 1. HOMICIDE _10 10__ 2. MASS POISONING ( e.g. TYLENOL) _ 9 8__ 3. FORCIBLE RAPE _ 9 9__ 4. ARSON: SET FIRE TO A GARAGE _ 7 7__ 5. SELLING HEROIN _ 6 6__ 6. AUTO THEFT _ 5.5 6__ 7. EMBEZZLEMENT OF $1,000 _ 4 4__ 8. PROSTITUTE IN A HOUSE OF PROSTITUTION _ 3 3__ 9. POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA _ 2 2__ 10. SNIFFING GLUE _ 1 1__

103 Llad Phillips103 Misery Index, California 1952-2003 -5.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 1950196019701980199020002010 year Rate unemployment rate inflation rate misery index

104 Llad Phillips104

105

106 Llad Phillips106 How best to Learn in a Lecture class That does not Have a Section? We Recommend Going to class. The questions On the exams Are from topics Discussed in Class. How much math does 160 require? 1.Descriptive Graphs 2. Analytical Graphs (exams) 3. Notation e.g OF=f(CR,SE,SV)

107 Llad Phillips107 Mode = 10, largest number of responses Median = 10, score of 31st person

108 Llad Phillips108 Mode = 10, largest number of responses Median = 10, score of 49 th person

109 Llad Phillips109 1 13 14 73

110 Llad Phillips110 Mode = 9 Median = 9

111 Llad Phillips111 Mode = 1 Median = 1

112 Llad Phillips112 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 23 31 27 10 7 4 4 5 2 0 0 0 5 15 20 25 30 35 Frequency Score Number of Responses Vs. Possession of Pot Score ‘02

113 Llad Phillips113 Disagreement Versus Seriousness, 02 Arson Selling Heroin Auto Theft Embezzle Mass Poisoning Rape Homicide Prostitute Possess Pot Sniff Glue 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 024681012 Score Dispersion (Standard Deviation) Homicide 2004

114 Embezzlement Standard Deviation or Dispersion

115 Llad Phillips115 John Tukey: Box Plot for Pot ‘09 Smallest = 0 Q1 = 1 Median = 1 Q3 = 3 Largest = 8 IQR = 2 Outliers: 8, 8, 8, 7,

116 Llad Phillips116


Download ppt "Llad Phillips1 Jobs and Crime. Llad Phillips2 A theme for this course US and CA criminal justice systems will be case studies, but are there larger issues."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google