Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
1 Center for Workplace Development Influence and Negotiation MGMT 4000 March 23, 2010 Christina Finegold and Linda Miklas
2
2 Center for Workplace Development Influence From Stephen Covey’s, The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People Concern Influence Circle of Influence
3
3 Center for Workplace Development “All influential managers have power, but not all powerful managers have influence.” Linda Hill, “Exercising Influence”
4
4 Center for Workplace Development What Is Influence? “Reciprocity (give and take) between you and another person(s) that enables you to change or reinforce others' attitudes, opinions, or behaviors.” (Influence Without Authority, 2nd Edition, by Allan R. Cohen and David L. Bradford, 2005)
5
5 Center for Workplace Development Types of Currencies INSPIRATION: vision, excellence, morality/ethics TASK: resources, information, assistance, support POSITION: advancement, recognition, visibility, reputation, networks/contacts, importance/insiderness RELATIONSHIP: acceptance, personal support, understanding, inclusion PERSONAL: self concept, challenging, ownership, gratitude, involvement Cohen-Bradford Model
6
6 Center for Workplace Development The Influencing Mindset Assume all parties are potential allies Seed to exchange something the other person values for what you want Demonstrate confidence and competence Influence for the ultimate good of the organization Recognize that the difficulty with influence is often YOU Accept everyone is potentially more influential than they think they are Influencing uses logical argument to appeal to human emotion Blend art and science Meet once or over time through a series of discussions (Adapted from Influence Without Authority, 2nd Edition, by Allan R. Cohen and David L. Bradford, 2005)
7
7 Center for Workplace Development What is Negotiation? Meets our Interests well, theirs acceptably, and others tolerably enough to be durable. Is the best of many Options. Is better than our BATNA. Is Legitimate, supported by objective criteria. Improves, or at least does not damage the Relationship. Is based on clear Communication. Identifies Commitments that are specific, firm, & implementable. Source, Getting to Yes, Roger Fisher and William Ury
8
8 Center for Workplace Development Negotiation RelationshipsProcess Substance
9
9 Center for Workplace Development Outcomes of Negotiation Win-Win or No Deal Win-Win Win Win-Lose Lose-Win Lose-Lose Source, The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People by Stephen R. Covey
10
10 Center for Workplace Development Traditional Negotiation Commitment (extreme position) Final offer Last Offer Final last offer Commitment (extreme position) Final offer Last offer Final last offer Threat to walk Harvard University, Project on Negotiation
11
11 Center for Workplace Development Interest-Based Negotiation Communication Relationship Interests Options Legitimacy BATNA Commitment Harvard University, Project on Negotiation
12
12 Assumptions Pie is fixed Only job of negotiator is to claim value Assumptions Pie can be expanded Negotiators should look to create value before dividing it up Interests BANA Communication Commitment Options Legitimacy Relationship If “No” If “Yes”
13
13 Center for Workplace Development 7 Elements of a Negotiation DefinitionMeasure of Success Advice Interests Alternatives Options Legitimacy Communication Relationship Commitment Source, Getting to Yes, Roger Fisher and William Ury
14
14 Center for Workplace Development 7 Elements of a Negotiation DefinitionMeasure of Success Advice InterestsNeeds, concerns, goals Satisfies parties’ interests Probe for interests; ask Why/Why Not? AlternativesBATNABetter than your BATNA Improve your alternative before negotiations begin; make their alternative less appealing OptionsAll possibilitiesExpands the pieSeparate option generation from evaluation and commitment LegitimacyExternal criteriaEstablished standardsCriteria = sword/shield CommunicationExchange of info and thought Message sent = message received Tone-match to audience; advocate AND inquire RelationshipConnection between parties Relationship improves or is not harmed Be constructive; problem vs. people CommitmentAgreement to will/will not Specific, firm, implementable Use both process and substance commitments; not too early Source, Getting to Yes, Roger Fisher and William Ury
15
15 Center for Workplace Development Case Study Introduction and Instructions (5 mins) Preparation (10 mins) Negotiation (15 mins) Debrief
16
16 Center for Workplace Development Resources Fisher, Roger and Ury, William, Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (Second Edition), Penguin Books, 1991. Covey, Stephen R., The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, 1989 and 2004. Cohen, Allan R. and Bradford, David L., Influence Without Authority, 2nd Edition, 2005.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.