1. Figure 1: Task 2 Predictions as a Function of Proxy’s Task 1 Performance Inferior Proxy Similar Proxy Superior Proxy Predicted Performance Relative to Proxy (Worse than Proxy)(Better than Proxy) F(2,114) = 46.75, p <.001

2. Figure 2: Task 2 Predictions as a Function of Proxy’s Related Attributes Inferior Proxy Similar Proxy Superior Proxy without Related Attributes Predicted Performance Relative to Proxy (Worse than Proxy)(Better than Proxy) F(3,149) = 11.49, p <.001

3. Figure 3: Task 2 Predictions as a Function of Proxy’s Related Attributes & Effort Inferior Proxy Similar & No RA Proxy Superior Proxy Predicted Performance Relative to Proxy (Worse than Proxy)(Better than Proxy) F(2,104) = 3.15, p <.05

4. Figure 4: Comparison Selections for Preference vs. Belief Assessment Note: Ratings were made on 7-point scales ranging from 1 (no interest) to 7 (very interested).

5. Figure 5: Predicted Reaction to New Stimulus as a Function of the Proxy’s Past Preference Pattern and Reaction to New Stimulus Note: Ratings were made on 11-point scales ranging from 1 (not at all) to 11 (enjoyed film very much).