Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SIMD, Associative, and Multi-Associative Computing Computational Models and Algorithms.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SIMD, Associative, and Multi-Associative Computing Computational Models and Algorithms."— Presentation transcript:

1 SIMD, Associative, and Multi-Associative Computing Computational Models and Algorithms

2 2 SIMD Review Remarks Recall that all active processors of a SIMD computer must simultaneously access the same memory location. These locations can be viewed as components of a vector. SIMD machines are sometimes called vector computers [Jordan,et.al.] or processor arrays [Quinn 94,04] based on their ability to execute vector and matrix operations efficiently.

3 3 SIMD Review Remarks (cont) SIMD computers that focus on vector operations usually –support some vector and possibly matrix operations in hardware, and –limit or provide less support for non-vector type operations The inner loops of some sequential algorithms consist only of performing the same operation on a set of independent data items. –These are easy to parallelize using a SIMD by assigning each data item to a different processor and having each operation performed simultaneously.

4 4 SIMD Execution Style The traditional SIMD (or vector computer, processor array) execution style: References: [Quinn 94, pg 62] & [Quinn 2004, pgs 37-43]: The sequential processor that broadcasts the commands to the rest of the processors is called the front end or control unit. The front end is a general purpose CPU that stores the program and the “scalar data” –I.e., the data that is not manipulated in parallel. The front end normally executes the sequential portions of the program.

5 5 SIMD Execution Style (cont) Each processing element has a local memory that can not be directly accessed directly by the host or other processing elements. Collectively, the individual memories of the processing elements (PEs) store the vector data that is processed in parallel. –Collective PE memory is called the array memory When the front end encounters an instruction whose operand is a vector, it issues a command to the PEs to perform the instruction in parallel. Although the PEs execute instructions in parallel, some units can be allowed to skip any particular instruction.

6 6 Possible Architecture for a Generic SIMD

7 7 Real SIMD Architectures An early SIMD computer designed for vector and matrix processing was the Illiac IV computer built at the University of Illinois. [Jordan et. al., pg 7]. The CRAY-1 and the Cyber-205 use pipelined arithmetic units to support vector operations and are viewed as pipelined SIMDs ([Jordan, et al, p7], [Quinn 94, pg 61-2], [Quinn 2004, pg37).

8 8 Real SIMD Architectures Goodyear Aerospace’s STARAN, MPP, and ASPRO; Thinking Machine’s CM-1, CM-2, and CM200; ATP’s (or Cambridge Parallel Processing’s) DAP; and MasPar’s MP-1 and MP-2 are examples of SIMD computers. –CM is an acronym for “Connection Machine” and DAP is an acronym for “Data Array Processor”. –Information on these can be found in parallel architecture books and also on the web. Quinn [1994, pg 63-67] discusses the CM-200 (a smaller & updated CM-2) as well as several of above. Professor Batcher at Kent State was the chief architect for the STARAN and the MPP (Massively Parallel Processor) and an advisor for the ASPRO (a very small, second generation STARAN)

9 9 Today’s SIMDs Many SIMDs are being embedded in SISD machines. Others are being build as part of hybrid architectures. Others are being build as special purpose machines, although some of them could classify as general purpose. Much of the recent work with SIMD architectures is proprietary.

10 10 A Company that Builds an Inexpensive SIMD WorldScape is building a COTS SIMD. The architecture is changing rapidly as they are in development. See http://www.wscapeinc.com/http://www.wscapeinc.com/ There is quite a bit of information about their work on the above site.

11 11 An Example of a Hybrid SIMD Embedded Massively Parallel Accelerators –Fuzion 150: 1536 processors on a single chip –Other accelerators: Decypher, Biocellerator, GeneMatcher2, Kestrel, SAMBA, P-NAC, Splash-2, BioScan (This and the next two slides are due to Prabhakar R. Gudla (U of Maryland) at a CMSC 838T Presentation, 4/23/2003.) –Systola 1024: PC add- on board with 1024 processors

12 12 Hybrid Architecture High speed Myrinet switch Systola 1024 Hybrid Computer –combines SIMD and MIMD paradigm within a parallel architecture  Hybrid Computer

13 13 SIMDs Embedded in SISDs Intel's Pentium 4 includes what they call MMX technology to gain a significant performance boost IBM and Motorola incorporated the technology into their G4 PowerPC chip in what they call their Velocity Engine. Both MMX technology and the Velocity Engine are the chip manufacturer's name for their proprietary SIMD processors and parallel extensions to their operating code. This same approach is used by NVidia and Evans & Sutherland to dramatically accelerate graphics rendering.

14 14 Special Purpose SIMDs in the Bioinformatics Market Paracel, Inc. (acquired by Celera Genomics for $283 million in March of 2000) –Paracel's systems are based on a proprietary SIMD processor packaged as an integrated system with proprietary software algorithms. –One of their machines is called GeneMatcher. TimeLogic, Inc –Has DeCypher, a reconfigurable SIMD.

15 15 Associative Computing Topics Introduction –References for Associative Computing –Motivation for the MASC model –The MASC and ASC Models –A Language Designed for the ASC Model –Two ASC Algorithms and Programs ASC and MASC Algorithm Examples –ASC version of Prim’s MST Algorithm –ASC version of QUICKHULL –MASC version of QUICKHULL.

16 16 Associative Computing References Note: Below KSU papers are available on the website: http://www.cs.kent.edu/~parallel/ (Click on the link to “papers”) Maher Atwah, Johnnie Baker, and Selim Akl, An Associative Implementation of Classical Convex Hull Algorithms, Proc of the IASTED International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing and Systems, 1996, 435-438 Johnnie Baker and Mingxian Jin, Simulation of Enhanced Meshes with MASC, a MSIMD Model, Proc. of the Eleventh IASTED International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing and Systems, Nov. 1999, 511-516.

17 17 Associative Computing References Mingxian Jin, Johnnie Baker, and Kenneth Batcher, Timings for Associative Operations on the MASC Model, Proc. of the 15th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, (Workshop on Massively Parallel Processing, San Francisco, April 2001. Jerry Potter, Johnnie Baker, Stephen Scott, Arvind Bansal, Chokchai Leangsuksun, and Chandra Asthagiri, An Associative Computing Paradigm, Special Issue on Associative Processing, IEEE Computer, 27(11):19-25, Nov. 1994. (Note: MASC is called ‘ASC’ in this article.) –First reading assignment Jerry Potter, Associative Computing - A Programming Paradigm for Massively Parallel Computers, Plenum Publishing Company, 1992.

18 18 Associative Computers Associative Computer: A SIMD computer with a few additional features supported in hardware. These additional features can be supported (less efficiently) in traditional SIMDs in software. The name “associative” is due to its ability to locate items in the memory of PEs by content rather than location.

19 19 Associative Models The ASC model (for ASsociative Computing) gives a list of the properties assumed for an associative computer. The MASC (for Multiple ASC) Model Supports multiple SIMD (or MSIMD) computation. Allows model to have more than one Instruction Stream (IS) –The IS corresponds to the control unit of a SIMD. ASC is the MASC model with only one IS. –The one IS version of the MASC model is sufficiently important to have its own name.

20 20 ASC & MASC are KSU Models Several professors and their graduate students at Kent State University have worked on models The STARAN and the ASPRO fully support the ASC model in hardware. The MPP supports it partly in hardware and partly in software. –Prof. Batcher was chief architect or consultant Dr. Potter developed a language for ASC Dr. Baker works on algorithms for models and architectures to support models Dr. Walker is working with the hardware design of the machine. Dr. Batcher and Dr. Potter are currently advisors

21 21 Motivation The STARAN Computer (Goodyear Aerospace, early 1970’s) and later the ASPRO provided an architectural model for associative computing embodied in the ASC model. ASC extends the data parallel programming style to a complete computational model. ASC provides a practical model that supports massive parallelism. MASC provides a hybrid data-parallel, control parallel model that supports associative programming. Descriptions of these models allow them to be compared to other parallel models

22 22 The ASC Model IS C E L L N E T W O R K PEMemory Cells    PEMemory PEMemory

23 23 Basic Properties of ASC Instruction Stream –The IS has a copy of the program and can broadcast instructions to cells in unit time Cell Properties –Each cell consists of a PE and its local memory –All cells listen to the IS –A cell can be active, inactive, or idle Inactive cells listen but do not execute IS commands until reactivated Idle cells contain no essential data and are available for reassignment Active cells execute IS commands synchronously

24 24 Basic Properties of ASC Responder Processing –The IS can detect if a data test is satisfied by any of its responder cells in constant time (i.e., any-responders?). –The IS can select an arbitrary responder in constant time (i.e., pick-one).

25 25 Constant Time Global Operations (across PEs) –Logical OR and AND of binary values –Maximum and minimum of numbers –Associative searches Communications –There are at least two real or virtual networks PE communications (or cell) network IS broadcast/reduction network (which could be implemented as two separate networks) Basic Properties of ASC

26 26 Basic Properties of ASC –The PE communications network is normally supported by an interconnection network E.g., a 2D mesh –The broadcast/reduction network(s) are normally supported by a broadcast and a reduction network (sometimes combined). See posted paper by Jin, Baker, & Batcher (listed in associative references) Control Features –PEs and the IS and the networks all operate synchronously, using the same clock

27 27 Non-SIMD Properties of ASC Observation: The ASC properties that are unusual for SIMDs are the constant time operations: –Constant time responder processing Any-responders? Pick-one –Constant time global operations Logical OR and AND of binary values Maximum and minimum value of numbers Associative Searches These timings are justified by implementations using a resolver in the paper by Jin, Baker, & Batcher (listed in associative references and posted).

28 28 Dodge Ford Make Subaru Color PE1 PE2 PE3 PE4 PE5 PE6 PE7 red blue white red Year 1994 1996 1998 1997 Model Price On lot 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 Busy- idle 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 IS Typical Data Structure for ASC Model Make, Color – etc. are fields the programmer establishes Various data types are supported. Some examples will show string data, but they are not supported in the ASC simulator.

29 29 Dodge Ford Make Subaru Color PE1 PE2 PE3 PE4 PE5 PE6 PE7 red blue white red Year 1994 1996 1998 1997 Model Price On lot 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 Busy- idle 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 IS The Associative Search IS asks for all cars that are red and on the lot. PE1 and PE7 respond by setting a mask bit in their PE.

30 30 MASC Model Basic Components –An array of cells, each consisting of a PE and its local memory –A PE interconnection network between the cells –One or more Instruction Streams (ISs) –An IS network MASC is a MSIMD model that supports –both data and control parallelism –associative programming Memory PE Interconnection Network IS Network PE Instruc- tion Stream (IS) Instruc- tion Stream (IS) Instruc- tion Stream (IS)

31 31 MASC Basic Properties Each cell can listen to only one IS Cells can switch ISs in unit time, based on the results of a data test. Each IS and the cells listening to it follow rules of the ASC model. Control Features: –The PEs, ISs, and networks all operate synchronously, using the same clock –Restricted job control parallelism is used to coordinate the interaction of the multiple ISs.

32 32 Characteristics of Associative Programming Consistent use of style of programming called data parallel programming Consistent use of global associative searching and responder processing Usually, frequent use of the constant time global reduction operations: AND, OR, MAX, MIN Broadcast of data using IS bus allows the use of the PE network to be restricted to parallel data movement.

33 33 Characteristics of Associative Programming Tabular representation of data – think 2D arrays Use of searching instead of sorting Use of searching instead of pointers Use of searching instead of the ordering provided by linked lists, stacks, queues Promotes an highly intuitive programming style that promotes high productivity Uses structure codes (i.e., numeric representation) to represent data structures such as trees, graphs, embedded lists, and matrices. We’ll see examples of the above. –Ref: Nov. 1994 IEEE Computer article. –Also, see “Associative Computing” book by Potter.

34 34 Languages Designed for the ASC Professor Potter has created several languages for the ASC model. ASC is a C-like language designed for ASC model ACE is a higher level language that uses natural language syntax; e.g., plurals, pronouns. Anglish is an ACE variant that uses an English-like grammar (e.g., “their”, “its”) An OOPs version of ASC for the MASC was discussed (by Potter and his students), but never designed. Language References: –ASC Primer – Copy available on parallel lab website www.cs.kent.edu/~parallel/ www.cs.kent.edu/~parallel/ –“Associative Computing” book by Potter [11] – some features in this book were never fully implemented in ASC Compiler

35 35 Algorithms and Programs Implemented in ASC A wide range of algorithms implemented in ASC without the use of the PE network: –Graph Algorithms minimal spanning tree shortest path connected components –Computational Geometry Algorithms convex hull algorithms (Jarvis March, Quickhull, Graham Scan, etc) Dynamic hull algorithms

36 36 ASC Algorithms and Programs (not requiring PE network) –String Matching Algorithms all exact substring matches all exact matches with “don’t care” (i.e., wild card) characters. –Algorithms for NP-complete problems traveling salesperson 2-D knapsack. –Data Base Management Software associative data base relational data base

37 37 ASC Algorithms and Programs (not requiring a PE network) –A Two Pass Compiler for ASC – not the one we will be using. This compiler uses ASC parallelism. first pass optimization phase –Two Rule-Based Inference Engines for AI An Expert System OPS-5 interpreter PPL (Parallel Production Language interpreter) –A Context Sensitive Language Interpreter (OPS-5 variables force context sensitivity) –An associative PROLOG interpreter

38 38 Associative Algorithms & Programs (using a network) There are numerous associative programs that use a PE network; –2-D Knapsack ASCAlgorithm using a 1-D mesh –Image processing algorithms using 1-D mesh –FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) using 1-D nearest neighbor & Flip networks –Matrix Multiplication using 1-D mesh –An Air Traffic Control Program (using Flip network connecting PEs to memory) Demonstrated using live data at Knoxville in mid 70’s. All but first were developed in assembler at Goodyear Aerospace

39 39 Example 1 - MST A graph has nodes labeled by some identifying letter or number and arcs which are directional and have weights associated with them. Such a graph could represent a map where the nodes are cities and the arc weights give the mileage between two cities. A B C D E 3 52 5 4

40 40 The MST Problem The MST problem assumes the weights are positive, the graph is connected, and seeks to find the minimal spanning tree, – i.e. a subgraph that is a tree 1, that includes all nodes (i.e. it spans), and –where the sum of the weights on the arcs of the subgraph is the smallest possible weight (i.e. it is minimal). Why would an algorithm solving this problem be useful? Note: The solution may not be unique. 1 A tree is a set of points called vertices, pairs of distinct vertices called edges, such that (1) there is a sequence of edges called a path from any vertex to any other, and (2) there are no circuits, that is, no paths starting from a vertex and returning to the same vertex.

41 41 An Example DE HI FC G BA 8 6 5 3 3 2 2 2 1 6 1 4 2 47 As we will see, the algorithm is simple. The ASC program is quite easy to write. A SISD solution is a bit messy because of the data structures needed to hold the data for the problem

42 42 An Example – Step 0 DE HI FC G BA 8 6 5 3 3 2 2 2 1 6 1 4 2 47 We will maintain three sets of nodes whose membership will change during the run. The first, V1, will be nodes selected to be in the tree. The second, V2, will be candidates at the current step to be added to V1. The third, V3, will be nodes not considered yet.

43 43 An Example – Step 0 DE HI FC G BA 8 6 5 3 3 2 2 2 1 6 1 4 2 47 V1 nodes will be in red with their selected edges being in red also. V2 nodes will be in light blue with their candidate edges in light blue also. V3 nodes and edges will remain white.

44 44 An Example – Step 1 DE HI FC G BA 8 6 5 3 3 2 2 2 1 6 1 4 2 47 Select an arbitrary node to place in V1, say A. Put into V2, all nodes incident with A.

45 45 An Example – Step 2 DE HI FC G BA 8 6 5 3 3 2 2 2 1 6 1 4 2 47 Choose the edge with the smallest weight and put its node, B, into V1. Mark that edge with red also. Retain the other edge-node combinations in the “to be considered” list.

46 46 An Example – Step 3 DE HI FC G BA 8 6 5 3 3 2 2 2 1 6 1 4 2 47 Add all the nodes incident to B to the “to be considered list”. However, note that AG has weight 3 and BG has weight 6. So, there is no sense of including BG in the list.

47 47 An Example – Step 4 DE HI FC G BA 8 6 5 3 3 2 2 2 1 6 1 4 2 47 Add the node with the smallest weight that is colored light blue and add it to V1. Note the nodes and edges in red are forming a subgraph which is a tree.

48 48 An Example – Step 5 DE HI FC G BA 8 6 5 3 3 2 2 2 1 6 1 4 2 47 Update the candidate nodes and edges by including all that are incident to those that are in V1 and colored red.

49 49 An Example – Step 6 DE HI FC G BA 8 6 5 3 3 2 2 2 1 6 1 4 2 47 Select I as its edge is minimal. Mark node and edge as red.

50 50 An Example – Step 7 DE HI FC G BA 8 6 5 3 3 2 2 2 1 6 1 4 2 47 Add the new candidate edges. Note that IF has weight 5 while AF has weight 7. Thus, we drop AF from consideration at this time.

51 51 An Example – after several more passes we have … DE HI FC G BA 8 6 5 3 3 2 2 2 1 6 1 4 2 47 Note that when CH is added, GH is dropped as CH has less weight. Also, BC is dropped for the same type of reasoning (i.e., it would form a back edge between two nodes already in the MST). When there are no more nodes to be considered, i.e. no more in V3, we obtain the final solution.

52 52 An Example – the final solution DE HI FC G BA 8 6 5 3 3 2 2 2 1 6 1 4 2 47 The subgraph is clearly a tree – no cycles and connected. The tree spans – i.e. all nodes are included. While not obvious, it can be shown that this algorithm always produces a minimal spanning tree. The algorithm is known as Prim’s Algorithm for MST.

53 53 The ASC Program vs a SISD solution in, say, C, C++, or Java First, think about how you would write the program in C or C++. The usual solution uses some way of maintaining the sets as lists using pointers or references. –See solutions to MST in Algorithms texts by Baase listed in the posted references. In ASC, pointers and references are not even supported as they are not needed and their use is likely to result in inefficient SIMD algorithms The implementation of MST in ASC, basically follows the outline I provided to the problem, but first, we need to learn something about the language ASC. The ASC manual (or a pointer to it) will be posted on the course web site.

54 54 ASC-MST Algorithm Preliminaries Next, a “data structure” level presentation of Prim’s algorithm for the MST is given. The data structure used is illustrated in the next two slides. –This example is from the Nov. 1994 IEEE Computer paper cited in the references. There are two types of variables for the ASC model, namely –the parallel variables (i.e., ones for the PEs) –the scalar variables (ie., the ones used by the IS). –Scalar variables are essentially global variables. Can replace each with a parallel variable with this scalar value stored in each entry.

55 55 ASC-MST Algorithm Preliminaries (cont.) In order to distinguish between them here, the parallel variables names end with a “$” symbol. Each step in this algorithm takes constant time. One MST edge is selected during each pass through the loop in this algorithm. Since a spanning tree has n-1 edges, the running time of this algorithm is O(n) and its cost is O(n 2 ). –Definition of cost is (running time)  (number of processors) Since the sequential running time of the Prim MST algorithm is O(n 2 ) and is time optimal, this parallel implementation is cost optimal. –Cost & optimality will be covered in parallel algorithm performance evaluation chapter (See Ch 7 of Quinn)

56 56 Graph used for Data Structure Figure 6 in [Potter, Baker, et. al.] a bc d e f 2 8 9 6 3 3 4 7 2

57 57 Data Structure for MST Algorithm

58 58 Algorithm: ASC-MST-PRIM(root) 1.Initialize candidates to “waiting” 2.If there are any finite values in root’s field, 3. set candidate$ to “yes” 4. set parent$ to root 5. set current_best$ to the values in root’s field 6. set root’s candidate field to “no” 7.Loop while some candidate$ contain “yes” 8. for them 9. restrict mask$ to mindex(current_best$) 10. set next_node to a node identified in the preceding step 11. set its candidate to “no” 12. if the value in their next_node’s field are less than current_best$, then 13. set current_best$ to value in next_node’s field 14. set parent$ to next_node 15. if candidate$ is “waiting” and the value in its next_node’s field is finite 16. set candidate$ to “yes” 17. set parent$ to next_node 18. set current_best to the values in next_node’s field

59 59 Comments on ASC-MST Algorithm The three preceding slides are Figure 6 in [Potter, Baker, et.al.] IEEE Computer, Nov 1994]. Figure 6c gives a compact, data-structures level pseudo-code description for this algorithm –Pseudo-code illustrates Potter’s use of pronouns (e.g., them) and possessive nouns. –The mindex function returns the index of a processor holding the minimal value. –This MST pseudo-code is much shorter and simpler than data-structure level sequential MST pseudo- codes e.g., see one of Baase’s textbook cited in references Algorithm given in Baase’s books is essentially the same as this parallel algorithm Next, a more detailed explanation of the algorithm in preceding slide will be given.

60 60 Algorithm: ASC-MSP-PRIM Initially assign any node to root. All processors set –candidate$ to “waiting” –current-best$ to  –the candidate field for the root node to “no” All processors whose distance d from their node to root node is finite do –Set their candidate$ field to “yes –Set their parent$ field to root. –Set current_best$ = d.

61 61 Algorithm: ASC-MSP-PRIM (cont. 2/3) While the candidate field of some processor is “yes”, –Restrict the active processors whose candidate field is “yes” and (for these processors) do Compute the minimum value x of current_best$. Restrict the active processors to those with current_best$ = x and do –pick an active processor, say one that contains node y. »Set the candidate$ value of node y to “no” –Set the scalar variable next-node to y.

62 62 Algorithm: ASC-MSP-PRIM (cont. 3/3) –If the value z in the next_node column of a processor is less than its current_best$ value, then »Set current_best$ to z. »Set parent$ to next_node For all processors, if candidate$ is “waiting” and the distance of its node from next_node is not , then –Set candidate$ to “yes” –Set current_best$ to the distance of its node from next_node. –Set parent$ to next-node

63 63 Quickhull Algorithm for ASC Reference: –[Maher, Baker, Akl, “An Associative Implementation of Classical Convex Hull Algorithms” ] Review of Sequential Quickhull Algorithm –Suffices to find the upper convex hull of points that are on or above the line Select point h so that the area of triangle weh is maximal. Proceed recursively with the sets of points on or above the lines and. w e h

64 64 Previous Illustration w e h

65 65 Example for Data Structure p1, w p7 p2 P3, e p4 p5 P6, h

66 66 Data Structure for Preceding Example

67 67 ASC Quickhull Algorithm (Upper Convex Hull) ASC-Quickhull( planar-point-set ) 1.Initialize: ctr = 1, area$ = 0, hull$ = 0 2.Find the PE with the minimal x-coord$ and let w be its point$ a)Set its hull$ value to 1 3.Find the PE with the PE with maximal x-coord$ and let e be its point$ a)Set its hull$ to 1 4.All PEs set their left-pt to w and right-pt to e. 5.If the point$ for a PE lies above the line a)Then set its job$ value to 1 b)Else set its job$ value to 0

68 68 ASC Quickhull Algorithm (cont) 6.Loop while parallel job$ contains a nonzero value a)The IS makes its active cell those with a maximal job$ value. b)Each (active) PE computes and stores the area of triangle (left-pt$, right-pt$, point$ ) in area$ c)Find the PE with the maximal area$ and let h be its point. Set its hull$ value to 1 d)Each PE whose point$ is above sets its job$ value to ++ctr e)Each PE whose point$ is above sets its job$ to ++ctr f) Each PE with job$ < ctr -2 sets its job$ value to 0

69 69 Performance of ASC-Quickhull  0 4 6 5 1 2 3

70 70 Performance of ASC-Quickhull (cont) Average Case: Assume –Roughly 1/3 of the points above each line being processed are eliminated. –O(lg n) points are on the convex hull. Shown to be true for randomly generated points Then the average running time is O(lg n) The average cost is O(n lg n) Worst Case: Running time is O(n). Cost is O(n 2 ) –Definition of cost is (running time)  (nr. of processors)

71 71 MASC Quickhull Algorithm Algorithm: Use IS 1 to execute the first loop of ASC- Quickhull When an IS completes computing the loop in ASC-Quickhull, Idle ISs request problems from busy ISs who have inactive jobs on their job$ list. Control of the PEs for an inactive job is transferred to the idle IS. The control of these PEs is returned to original IS after the job is finished.

72 72 ASC Quickhull Algorithm (cont)  0 1 2 2 1 2 2

73 73 Analysis for MASC Quickhull Average Case: Assumptions: –roughly 1/3 of the points above each line being processed are eliminated. –O(lg n) Instruction Streams are available. –There are O(lg n) convex hull points The average running time is O(lg lg n) Essentially constant time for real world problems. Worst Case O(n)

74 74 MASC Quickhull for a Limited Number of ISs A manager IS is used to control the interactions of the ISs and the task workpool. The manager assigns IS 1 to execute the first loop of ASC-Quickhull When an IS completes the execution of a loop, –If two jobs are created, it gives one to the manager IS to place on the workpool and then executes the remaining IS – If only one job is created, it executes this job next. –If no new job is created, this IS requests a new job from the manager IS.

75 75 Additional Comments on MASC Quickhull For one million points this algorithm would require  lg n  = 20. –Note that increasing the ISs by only 5 (to 25) would allow 33.5 million points to be processed. Even if  (lg n) ISs are available for this algorithm, the actual number of ISs would likely to still be less than lg n. –It would be inefficient to assume that every time a new task is created, an idle IS would be available to execute it. However, this algorithm should also provide a speedup, even if only a small number k of ISs are available. –The complexity of the running time will still be O(lg n). –The actual running time could be up to k times faster than for one IS. There will be some loss of efficiency due to IS interactions. –This is probably a more practical approach.

76 76 Additional Comments on ASC and MASC Algorithms The full “convex hull” algorithm requires that an order (e.g., clockwise) list of convex hull points be returned. –Preceding algorithms for ASC and MASC can be extended to handle this. This detail is omitted here to keep the algorithms simpler. –More information can be found in the paper “An Associative Implementation of Classical Convex Hull Algorithms” by Atwah, Baker, and Akl and in Maher Atwah’s master’s thesis at KSU.


Download ppt "SIMD, Associative, and Multi-Associative Computing Computational Models and Algorithms."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google