1. State of Academic Integrity at UC San Diego A CUE Presentation Thursday, February 24 th, 2011 Tricia Bertram Gallant, Ph.D.

2. Types of Violations Reported

3. Reported by Division

4. Estimated Actual vs. Reported

5. Faculty Decline in Reporting

6. Reported Reasons Why Faculty May Not Report Belief that they have “insufficient proof” Perceived bureaucracy of the system Do not want to “ruin the student’s life” Unrewarded Fear of being perceived as a bad teacher Fear of conflict/legal complications Do not want to go to Academic Integrity Review Board

7. Why Faculty Should Report To stop students from potentially “cheating” their way through the UCSD degree Students can learn from ethical failure Helps to create an academic integrity culture Reduces future cheating in their classes

8. What is the AI Office Doing? Academic Integrity Advisory Council Education/Outreach to Faculty – Department presentations – AIM Student Organization Petition – Faculty Newsletter (quarterly education) – CTD Workshops (quarterly) Education/Outreach to Students – F2F with Academic Integrity – Newsletter (quarterly education) – AI Tutorial (freshmen)

9. How CUE Members Can Help Influence faculty to follow Policy and report suspected cheating Encourage faculty to serve on AIRB Invite me to a faculty meeting Reach out to me re: faculty complaints and concerns

10. For More Information…. Tricia Bertram Gallant, Ph.D. Academic Integrity Office 858-822-2163 aic@ucsd.edu http://academicintegrity.ucsd.edu