2. The Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area - Implementation at the University of Copenhagen Thomas Hovmand University of Copenhagen thov@adm.ku.dk

3. Agenda QF – in a political context, European and national QF – the Danish way Brief presentation of UC and the Danish HE framework Working with QF at university level Example: Faculty of Humanities Questions?

4. Origins of QF in the Bologna Process Qualifications Framework: Berlin communiqué Member States to elaborate a framework of comparable and compatible qualifications for their higher education systems….. Elaborate an overarching framework of qualifications for the EHEA

5. Framework for EHEA The EHEA framework is an overarching framework; a meta-framework or a framework for frameworks The 44 national frameworks are linked together through an alignment to this overarching framework of the EHEA Not all national qualifications will correspond to the completion of the major cycles in the overarching framework Why an overarching framework? International transparency International recognition of qualifications International mobility of learners and graduates

6. National Qualification Frameworks Definition The single description at national level….of an education system, which is internationally understood and through which all qualifications and other learning achievements in HE may be described and related to each other in a coherent way and which defines the relationship between HE qualifications. (Mogens Berg, chairman of the Bologna WG on QF)

7. Purpose of QF Achieve increased transparency and recognition of degree structures – both at a national and international level Emphasise competence targets for each degree Real competences – to ease the transition from vocational/professional area to the university sector (horisontal mobility) Enhancing the quality of planning, approval, evaluation, accreditation and marketing of degrees

8. A change of orientation The Danish Case: Why the need for a QF? Overall a change in thinking – directing attention away from input and toward output (finishing competences) A need for clearly defined and comparable levels of education structures in various sectors within HE A need to further mobility, credit transfer and mutual recognition A focus on learning outcomes to help facilitate planning better and empower students better with tangible competences to use in the labour market QA aspect – challenge as to how to assess these competences in exams – how do we measure competence?

9. The Danish WG on QF - I A Danish Qualification Framework has been developed by the government (2003) All HE institutions to implement it at their own discretion QF to be reviewed in 2007 All qualifications must be systematically described & Internationally understood

10. The Danish WG on QF - II Results of the working group: For each degree the QF must provide a general description of the: Overall profile of the competences achieved through the studies. General competences that the graduate can be expected to possess Competences targets – divided into three subgroups. Specific competences that the graduate can be expected to possess (next slide) Formalia – entry qualifications; length and further education

11. Competence targets The three competence targets Intellectual competences: Analytical and abstract thinking and reasoning, ”knowledge-seeking” attitude and ability to structure ones own learning process Academic competences: Special competences within a specific academic area and multidisciplinary competences Practical competences: Practical skills, professional ethics and responsibility

12. Danish HE structures

13. New University Act 2003 - Education reform in Denmark Universities become self-governing institutions Managed by boards with external majority Rectors, deans and other leaders are hired QF has to be incorporated into the framework of the description of both Bachelor and Master programmes All education programmes and their sub parts must be described in terms of competence QF hence creates the frame for the entire competence work

14. University of Copenhagen Denmark’s oldest university est. in 1479 Divided into six faculties; Theology, law, Social Science, Health Science, Science and Humanities app. 5.000 employed app. 33.000 students in bachelor and master programmes – 57 % of student population female Budget app. ½ billion EUR All programmes built on the three cycle structure (3 + 2 + 3 – model) Trends, Denmark & Copenhagen in the top re. Bologna implementation We offer: 65 bachelor programmes 82 second tier programmes (kandidat) 15 master programmes (further education)

15. Actual work with QF at Copenhagen University Deans are responsible for the overall quality of the programmes The larger faculties with many programmes coordinates the project and tries to create common study structures The boards of studies are responsible for the academic performance in their own programme

16. Example: QF work at the Faculty of Humanities Implementing QF QF project initiated and controlled centrally – faculty level A Reform Secretariat has been established Initially focus was on creating common definitions of competences and the descriptions of competences Many stakeholders involved – both internal and external ones – to define competences and profiles of competences Lesson I: Things take time!

17. The concept of competence in an educational context Learning outcome: Focus away from what’s actually being taught to what students must have learned Academic competence: It’s not only about memorising a certain curricula but more about obtaining action driven academic standards: What can one actually do on the basis of what’s been taught? Example: QF work at the Faculty of Humanities

18. Qualifications and competences Qualifications are defined as the sum of knowledge, understanding and skills Competence is an ability based on academic/professional qualifications Example: QF work at the Faculty of Humanities

19. Overall profile of competences A general description of those competences a person upon completion of an educational programme should possess A summary of competence targets The profile of competences is directed at the programme at its entirety Example: QF work at the Faculty of Humanities

20. Competence targets Concrete and specific expectations to a person upon completion of an educational programme The Faculty of Humanities uses competence targets for both specific courses, modules and entire programmes Example: QF work at the Faculty of Humanities

21. Profile and targets of competences for programmes Overall profile of competences General, brief and aimed at relatively ”unknowingly” readers A summary of competence targets in a labour market perspective Competence targets Description of the academic competences acquired Relies on competence targets from courses and modules Should reflect on the courses reciprocal interconnectedness Targets of the programme

22. Working process: Formulation of overall objectives for the programme Formulation of partial objectives for concrete elements of the programme Formulation of content, forms of teaching and exams on the basis of partial objectives - What’s the content of the course? - What forms of teaching are being used? - What forms of exams are being used? How do the three points correspond with the partial objectives? Example: QF work at the Faculty of Humanities

23. What have we learned? - National QF and actual & local QF Agreement (useful): Active descriptions General targets and sub targets Use of targets and profile Intention of targeted communication to various groups Incongruity (less useful): Rather artificial division of intellectual, academic and practical competences: All competences are practical All competences are relevant to the labour market Academic competence is what intellectual competences amounts to at the level of the programme

24. It’s a large and very fundamental process to change the academic focus from curricula to competences – what actually can the student do after completion? The process in itself is a learning process – for boards of studies, faculty, students and the university There is no right way to go about this process – it really depends on: Former experiences with similar initiatives Who you are and which academic identity that you posses What group of people that you’ll be working with What have we learned? - I

25. It’s difficult to produce a common Qualification Framework that covers all programmes in one. The process is iterative and the overall Danish QF has been a productive point of exit, but it must be adapted to meet the academic needs (important to make sure that everyone involved feels that value is added). Further it should be revised on a regular basis as more experience is accumulated by the universities in the interaction with candidates, labour market and outside world. EUA/TREND IV report: Student involvement in QF – positive feedback from students What have we learned? - II