1. 1 T. Fornek tomf@slac.stanford.edu 1 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 Thomas Fornek Project Manager June 17, 2009 LUSI X-Ray Correlation Spectroscopy Instrument Final Instrument Design Review INTRODUCTION

2. 2 T. Fornek tomf@slac.stanford.edu 2 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 LUSI WBS Organization WBSTITLE 1.1Project Management 1.2.X-ray Pump Probe Instrument (XPP) 1.3Coherent X-ray Imaging Instrument (CXI) 1.4X-ray Correlation Spectroscopy Instrument (XCS) 1.5Diagnostics and Common Optics (DCO) 1.6Controls and Data Acquisition (CDA)

3. 3 T. Fornek tomf@slac.stanford.edu 3 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 6 1 2 3 4 5 LCLS LUSI H6 Offset Monochromator Exp. Chamber Detector Beam Transport Near Experimental Hall Far Experimental Hall XPP XCSCXI AMO H6 Part of LCLS FES ARRA Funds SXR Installation Part of LCLS Project description (1) XCS Mono X-ray Transport LUSI is Providing Instruments for Three of the Six LCLS Instrument Hutches

4. 4 T. Fornek tomf@slac.stanford.edu 4 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 Project description (2) XPP WBS 1.2 LCLS AMO XCS Offset Monochromator WBS 1.5 X-ray transport tunnel (200 m) XCS WBS 1.4 H6 CXI WBS 1.3 LCLS SXR

5. 5 T. Fornek tomf@slac.stanford.edu 5 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 Project Status (1) LUSI Baseline Performance (through Apr09) TPC = $60M (MIE = $55.1M, OPC = $4.9M) CD-4 = August 2012 TPC >26% Complete, TEC >18% Complete Contingency on MIE = $11.8M 33.2% on remaining work OPC is complete $50K remaining for close-out ARRA Funds ($33.6M) Received in April Part of the $60M TPC Most recent added scope to enhance LUSI science program Large Offset Monochromator for XPP Focusing lens for CXI

6. 6 T. Fornek tomf@slac.stanford.edu 6 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 Project Status (2) Design Completion XPP Instrument Design through FIDR CD-3 Ready CXI Instrument FIDR Held June 3 CD-3 Ready Now - Solid Instrument Configuration XCS Instrument FIDR in June 90% CD-3 Ready Now - Instrument configuration is solid Diagnostics and Common Optics Design 90% CD-3 Ready Now Harmonic Rejection Mirror PDR held June 15 Controls and Data Acquisition 100% CD-3 Ready Now Inherited Designs from LCLS comprise many items

7. 7 T. Fornek tomf@slac.stanford.edu 7 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 Project Status (3) Final DOE-IPR Status Review Report Received Responses have been prepared to the report recommendations Preparing for the July 15, 2009 CD-3 Review The XCS FIDR is the final pre-requisite for this milestone Held in Germantown LUSI PM, Instrument Scientists and Controls Rep to travel Working on the second part of the Baseline Change to incorporate ARRA effects into the baseline This change incorporates two L2 milestones into schedule One of these milestones is XCS “Early Science” Instrument Complete First month of reporting on ARRA accounts has been completed Some corrections are needed to the baseline – These are nearing completion

8. 8 T. Fornek tomf@slac.stanford.edu 8 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 April Milestone Status

9. 9 T. Fornek tomf@slac.stanford.edu 9 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 Schedule Advancement XCS “Early Science” allows for a functioning XCS instrument one year earlier than original schedule MilestoneCurrent Baseline Advanced Baseline CD-3April 2010October 2009 XPP Early ScienceOctober 2010 CXI Early ScienceAugust 2011June 2011 XCS Early Science (New)NAAugust 2011 Project Ready for CD-4 (New)NAMarch 2012 CD-4August 2012

10. 10 T. Fornek tomf@slac.stanford.edu 10 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 April Status

11. 11 T. Fornek tomf@slac.stanford.edu 11 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 Project Risks and Mitigation LUSI Follows the LCLS Risk Management Plan and uses the LCLS Risk Registry LCLS Project Management Document 1.1-002 Risk Registry Updated May, 2009 Major Risks Do something to cause loss or suspension of ARRA funds Annual funding - Continuing Resolutions (Retired) Foreign procurements – Dollar fluctuation, sole source Loss and/or availability of critical personnel (Exercised) Ability to place procurements in a timely manner CXI mirror delivery, performance XPP, XCS Monochromator delivery, performance XPP, XCS Detector delivery, performance

12. 12 T. Fornek tomf@slac.stanford.edu 12 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 Part of an Advance Procurement Review

13. 13 T. Fornek tomf@slac.stanford.edu 13 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 LCLS Directorate – Detail 1/2009 LCLS Directorate Dale Knutson Mark Reichanadter, Deputy Business Office Cindy Lowe TBD - Deputy Accelerator Systems Division John Seeman TBD - Deputy P. Miller, Accelerator Safety Officer Engineering & Physics Division Dave Schultz James Krebs, Deputy TBD – ES&H Coordinator Experimental Facilities Division Jochen Schneider TBD - Chief Operating Officer TBD – Beam Line Safety Officer Strategic Projects Division John Galayda M. Scharfenstein – Construction Safety ESH / Work Planning & Control Michael Scharfenstein Richard Hislop Special Projects Richard M. Boyce Uli Wienands Administration Helen O’Donnell, LA De Wan, B. Espiritu, D. Ford, S. Matni, R. Matter, D. Mitchell, P. Tank

14. 14 T. Fornek tomf@slac.stanford.edu 14 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 Strategic Projects Division (SPD) John Galayda M. Scharfenstein, Construction Safety LCLS Construction Project J. Galayda M. Reichanadter, Deputy J. Albino, AD, Civil Const. Project Org = 83 FTEs LUSI MIE Project T. Fornek TBD, Deputy Project Org = 27 FTEs RSB J. Albino G. Herman, K. Chan-Hui Project Org = 7 FTEs PULSE D. Rich Project Org = 10 FTEs Future Upgrades J. Galayda

15. 15 T. Fornek tomf@slac.stanford.edu 15 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 LUSI Project’s Integrated Project Team DOE-HQ Harriet Kung, Acquisition Executive T.E. Kiess, Program Manager DOE-SSO H. Joma DOE Federal Project Director SLAC T. Fornek LUSI Project Manager RM Boyce - Deputy WBS 1.2 XPP IIT D. Fritz (Instr. Scientist) WBS 1.3 CXI IIT S. Boutet (Instr. Scientist) WBS 1.4 XCS IIT A. Robert (Instr. Scientist) WBS 1.5 Diagnostics & Common Optics Y. Feng (Lead Scientist) Instrument Team Leaders DOE-SSO Support WBS 1.6 Data Acquisition & Controls G. Haller (Lead) LCLS Directorate Support Engineering, Procurement, QA, ES&H, Finance & Budget, PMCS Technical Configuration Control Committee. Installation Manager B. Poling

16. 16 T. Fornek tomf@slac.stanford.edu 16 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 CHARGE - 1 Technical Scope Is the design of the partial instrument mature and technically sound to enable early scientific experiments at LCLS? Have all of the major interfaces been identified and incorporated in the design? Have design reviews been performed? Is the design likely to meet performance expectations? Management Is the instrument team organized and staffed to successfully achieve the milestone? Have all the major risks been identified and effectively managed? Are procurements appropriately planned for the partial instrument?

17. 17 T. Fornek tomf@slac.stanford.edu 17 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 CHARGE - 2 Cost and Schedule Are the cost and schedule reasonable to achieve the planned scope? Have the XCS cost and schedule been recently updated? Is there sufficient cost and schedule contingency to ensure successful completion of the partial instrument on schedule? ES&H Are all related ES&H aspects being properly addressed? Overall Readiness Is XCS ready to begin fabrication and installation at LCLS to begin conducting early scientific experiments?