Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRandolf Johnston Modified over 9 years ago
1
1
2
Outline 2 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015
3
KEKB and Belle 3 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015
4
Integrated luminosities 4 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras Belle recorded more than 1 ab -1 ! 9 th June 2015 fb -1 772 X 10 6 BB pairs
5
5 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras Amplitudes and Phases in the Weak Interaction N. Cabibbo M.Kobayashi T.Maskawa L. Wolfenstein 9 th June 2015
6
6 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras Three Angles: φ 1, φ 2, φ 3 ICHEP 2014: New Belle result on π 0 π 0 Unitarity implies that the weak couplings and phases form a triangle in the complex plane. B 0 π - π + B 0 Ψ K s,Ψ K L B - D CP K - Big Questions: Are determinations of angles consistent with determinations of the sides of the triangle ? Are angle determinations from loop and tree decays consistent ? 9 th June 2015
7
Time- dependant CP Asymmetrie in decays to CP eigenstates 7 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015 ϕ1ϕ1 ϕ2ϕ2
8
Measuring the CP parameters S and A 8 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015
9
9 ~25 Institutes in India, about 100 collaborators Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras Measurement of sin(2 φ 1 ) in Charmonium K 0 modes sin(2 1 )=0.667±0.023±0.012 A f =0.006±0.016±0.012 PRL108,171802 (2012) Overpowering evidence for CP violation (matter-antimatter asymmetries). >>>> The phase of V td is in good agreement with Standard Model expectations J/ K S J/ K L 9 th June 2015
10
CP violation in B 0 D cp (*) h 0 10 D = D cp, CP eigenstates as K + K -, K s π 0, K s ω h 0 = π 0, ηω CP violation measurement performed using Indices i and j denotes the event reconstructed from BABAR and Belle data respectively. Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015 arXiv:1505.04147 Submitted to PRL
11
CP violation in B 0 D cp (*) h 0 11 Purity= 63% Purity= 55% sin(2 ϕ 1 ) = 0.66 ± 0.10 ± 0.06 The measurement is consistent with measurement from J/ K 0 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015
12
CPV in b sqq decays B 0 η ’K 0 12 JHEP 10 (2014) 165 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015
13
13 CPV in b sqq decays B 0 η ’K 0 JHEP 10 (2014) 165 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015
14
14 Process with third generation quarks and leptons New physics could change: Branching fraction Tau polarization Effect could be different for D and D * Experimental Challenge: 2 ( hadronic tau decay) or 3 (leptonic tau decay) undetected neutrinos Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015
15
Signal Reconstruction 15 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015
16
Fit Projections High M 2 miss 16 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015
17
Result 17 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015
18
How About New Physics? 18 Consistent with 2HDM of type at tan β /m H+ ≈ 0.5 c 2 /GeV Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015
19
Search for the dark photon and dark Higgs boson 19 Dark photon A’ and dark Higgs boson h’ hypothetical constituent in proposed Dark sector Models P. Fayet, Phys. Lett. B95, 285 (1980). Production and Decay: Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015
20
Candidate Selection 20 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015 and are the dark photon candidates with highest and lowest mass. Final Events summary after final selection
21
No significant Signal 21 90%CL upper limit on the product α D × ε 2 dark photon mass Dark Higgs mass Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015 α D : Dark photon coupling to dark Higgs boson: ε 2 = α ’ / α em
22
branching fraction 22 is given by From unitarity constrained B-decay constant from lattice calculation Expected to be highest for leptonic decay Eur. Phys. J. C 41, 1-131 (2005) Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015
23
Result 23 arXiv:1503.05613 arXiv:1503.05613 ) Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015
24
24 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras B π 0 π 0 Proceeds via b u tree and ( EWP + QCD ) penguin B π 0 π 0 needed to remove “penguin pollution” Theory (QCD fact.) B≤ 1×10 -6 Nucl. Phys. B675 333(2003) 9 th June 2015
25
25 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras B π 0 π 0 Results (preliminary) B ( B 0 π 0 π 0 ) = (0.90 ± 0.12 ± 0.10 ) × 10 -6 9 th June 2015
26
Conclusion 26 Measured angles and phase are consistent with SM. But 10- 20% NP effects are consistent with data. Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015
27
Conclusion 27 Consistent with 2HDM of type at tan β /m H+ ≈ 0.5 c 2 /GeV No significant signal for dark photon and dark Higgs Measured branching ratio for B decays τν is consistent with SM Measured branching ratio for B decays to π 0 π 0 is consistent with SM Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.