Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWillis Allison Modified over 9 years ago
1
Mean-Variance Mapping Optimization Current developmental status and application to power system problems Dr. –Ing. José L. Rueda 9 September 2014 1
2
Rationale behind MVMO 2 Introduced by I. Erlich (University Duisburg- Essen, Germany ) in 2010 Internal search range of all variables restricted to [0, 1]. Solution archive: knowledge base for guiding the searching direction. Mapping function: Applied for mutating the offspring on the basis of the mean and variance of the n-best population attained so far.
3
The hybrid variant: MVMO-SH 3
4
MVMO-SH: launching local search 4 (1) : local search probability, e.g. Local search performed according to Different methods can be used: Classical: Interior-Point Method (IPM) Heuristic: Hill climbing, evolutionary strategies where D: Problem dimension
5
MVMO-SH: solution archive 5
6
MVMO-SH: parent selection 6
7
MVMO-SH: selection of dimensions for mutation 7 8 Two different strategies are available: a)The full range corresponds with the number of mutated variables, e.g. m =7 b)The number of mutated variables estimated randomly in the given range, e.g. m = irand(7)
8
MVMO-SH: selection of dimensions for mutation 8 8 Random-sequential selection mode
9
MVMO-SH: mutation based on mapping function 9 8 0 1 01 x i x i * 10 (2)(2) (3)(3) (4)(4)
10
MVMO-SH: mapping function features 10
11
MVMO-SH: assignment of shape and d-factors 11 d r is always oscillating around the shape s r and is set to 1 in the initialization stage d 0 0.4 d = The d-factors remain dynamic with the mapping even the corresponding shape doesn’t change (5)(5)
12
MVMO-SH: assignment of shape and d-factors 12 (5)(5) CEC2013 function F1, single particle MVMO without local search, fs=1.0, d 0 =0.15
13
Application to power system problems 13 1.Optimal reactive power dispatch 2.Identification of power system dynamic equivalent 3.Online optimal control of reactive sources
14
Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch 14 Minimize (16) (17) (19) Losses subject to (18) (20) (21) (22) (23) Operational constraints
15
Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch 15 IEEE 118 bus system 77 dimensions (54 gen, 9 OLTCs, 14 compensators)
16
Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch 16 IEEE 118 bus system : Average convergence performance
17
Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch 17 IEEE 118 bus system : Statistics of active power losses P loss (MW) Algorithms MVMO S MVMOCLPSOSPSOUPSOFDRPSO DMS- PSO-HS DEJADE-vPS Min 117.0802117.0074120.2117121.8049123.1174119.1387123.4717118.7199118.1047 Max 118.1662125.1501132.0461125.4654130.2011123.5461128.5504121.1128120.2177 Mean 117.4251119.3353122.2499123.6784125.6709121.6536125.0562119.7737118.9533 Std. 0.22851.93862.05330.91451.76631.05011.20330.62890.5321
18
Identification of dynamic equivalent 18 Ecuador-Colombia interconnected system 320 buses -- 64 generators 3.23 GW installed capacity 2.66 GW peak load Ecuador (study area) 1729 buses -- 109 generators 11.08 GW installed capacity 8.78 GW peak load Colombia (external area) 22 dimensions (reactances, gains, time constants) Opt. problem
19
Identification of dynamic equivalent 19 Dynamic equivalent for Colombia 22 dimensions (Reactances, gains, time constants) Optimization problem - Sixth order generator model - AVR model - Governor model
20
Identification of dynamic equivalent 20 Optimization & Dynamic simulation
21
Identification of dynamic equivalent 21 Parameter identification problem statement Minimize subject to From PMU or simulations System with component model to be identified Parameters of the model
22
Identification of dynamic equivalent 22 DE for Colombia: comparison of heuristic methods
23
Identification of dynamic equivalent 23 DE for Colombia: comparison of dynamic responses Fault 1 Fault 2 Full system model With DE
24
Online optimal control of reactive sources 24
25
Online optimal control of reactive sources 25
26
Other applications to power system problems 26 1.Active-reactive power dispatch 2.Short-term transmission planning 3.Location and tuning of damping controllers 4.Optimal transmission pricing 5.Optimal allocation and sizing of dynamic Var sources
27
Highlights 27 1.Winner of the competition on Expensive optimization at CEC-2014, Beijing, PR-China, 6-11 July 2014. 2.4 th out of 17 place in the competition on real-parameter single Objective optimization at CEC-2014, Beijing, PR-China, 6-11 July 2014. 3.6 th out of 21 place in the real-parameter single Objective optimization at CEC-2013, Cancun, Mexico 21-23 June 2013. 4.Used for benchmarking in 2014 Competition on OPF problems organized by the Working Group on Modern Heuristic Optimization (WGMHO) under the IEEE PES Power System Analysis, Computing, and Economics Committee (https://www.uni-due.de/ieee-wgmho/)https://www.uni-due.de/ieee-wgmho/
28
28 Thanks! Dr. José L. Rueda J.L.RuedaTorres@tudelft.nl http://www.uni-due.de/mvmo/
29
MVMO-SH: parent selection 29 GoodBad All particles ranked according to their local best (2)(2) (3) (4)(4)
30
MVMO-SH: parent selection 30 (6)(6) (5) Alternatively: (7)(7) (8)(8)
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.