Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 1 Lecture 11 – Psyco 350, A1 Winter, 2011 N. R. Brown.

Published byAubrie Ryan Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 1 Lecture 11 – Psyco 350, A1 Winter, 2011 N. R. Brown."— Presentation transcript:

1 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 1 Lecture 11 – Psyco 350, A1 Winter, 2011 N. R. Brown

2 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 2 Outline Implicit Memory –Introduction –Dissociating Implicit & Explicit Memory –Transfer Appropriate Processing –Implicit Learning Dual Process Models –Recognition & Remember/Know –Process Dissociation Procedure Direct Tests

3 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 3 Evidence for Implicit Memory on Indirect Tests Indirect tests typically use improved performance as the measure of implicit memory Priming = the improvement in performance on a subsequent occasion due to processing on a previous occasion

4 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 4 Priming Effects Exp condition = a prior exposure to stim Control = “no” prior exposure to stim Priming: fragment, stem, anagram: dv – % complete: exp > control Perceptional Identification: dv -- % correct: exp > control Lexical Decision: dv – RT: exp < control

5 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 5 Dissociating Implicit & Explicit Memory Dissociation: One variable affects one task differently than it affects another _______________________________________ Tulving, Schacter, & Stark (1982) Design: Delay X Test Type. 1 hr fragment completion (indirect) 1 week recognition (direct)

6 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 6 Tulving, Schacter, & Stark (1982) Phase 1Intentional Study (96 words) 1 hr delay  Phase 2 Recognition 48 words Frag Completion 48 words 1 week delay  Phase 3 Frag Completion 48 words Recognition 48 words

7 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 7 Tulving, Schacter, & Stark (1982) Results: Reco  w/ dealy frag unaffected by delay Delay causes a dissociation between reco & frag tests. Implication: Test tap different “forms” of memory.

8 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 8 (Double) Dissociating Implicit & Explicit Memory Jacoby (1983) Aims: Using same materials demonstrate: explicit memory  w/ depth of processing implicit memory  w/ perceptual similarity Materials selected so that: as depth of processing , perceptual similarity 

9 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 9 Jacoby (1983) Design: Encoding Task X Test. (Antonym) Generation recognition Read (antonym in context)perceptual ID (40 ms) Read (target alone)

10 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 10 Jacoby(1983): Two perspective on Encoding Tasks Predictions: Recognition: deeper processing should produce better performance. Percp ID: priming should become stronger as study and test materials become more similar. TaskexampleLOPperc similarity Generate hot  deeplow Read in context hot – COLD mid Read no context COLD shallowhigh

11 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 11 Jacoby (1983): Results w/out prior exposure (control): perc ID = 60% In all conditions: –Perc ID > 60% –priming _________________________ Reco  with Depth of Processing Perc ID  perc similarity (Perc ID  LoP) Evidence for 2 types of memory

12 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 12 Jacoby (1983): Results w/out prior exposure (control): perc ID = 60% In all conditions: –Perc ID > 60% –priming _________________________ Reco  with Depth of Processing Perc ID  perc similarity (Perc ID  LoP) Evidence for 2 types of memory

13 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 13 Transfer Appropriate Process: Theory Assumes: Performance depends of match between processing at study and processing at test. Analogous to encoding specificity. Two-types of Processes –Data-driven (perceptual) – processing of physical features. –Conceptually-driven (semantic) – processing for meaning

14 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 14 Transfer Appropriate Processing: Two Types of Indirect Test Data-driven (Perceptual): fragment completion stem completion anagram completion lexical decision perceptual identification Conceptually-driven (Semantic): word association doctor  ?? category-instance generation “name a mammal” general knowledge “The capital of the US is …?”

15 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 15 Transfer Appropriate Process: Theory Processing-type & memory task typically confounded: Direct tests require/benefit from conceptual processing Indirect tests require/benefit from data-driven processing. However, it is possible to unconfound test-type from process-type (e.g.): Fragment-cued, recall test – data-driven, direct general knowledge test – conceptual, indirect

16 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 16 Transfer Appropriate Processing: Blaxton (1989) Goal to demonstrate; –data-driven processing can affect direct tests –data-driven processing do not necessarily affect indirect tests Design: TEST TYPE Study Mode X Explicitness X Level. visual direct data-driven auditory indirect conceptually-driven

17 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 17 Blaxton (1989): Four Types of Memory Test Data-drivenConceptually-driven DirectGraphic-cued Recall Free Recall IndirectFragment Completion General Knowledge Target word: bashful graphic-cued recall: looks like “bushful” free recall frag completion: b_sh_u_ General knowledge: “Name one of the 7 dwarfs”

18 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 18 Blaxton (1989): Competing Predictions Data-drivenConceptually-driven Directno modality effect Indirectvisual > auditory Standard view: modality match should affect only indirect tests  for both implicit tests: visual > auditory  for both explicit test: visual = auditory

19 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 19 Competing Predictions Data-drivenConceptually-driven Directvisual > auditoryno modality effect Indirectvisual > auditoryno modality effect TAP View: modality match should affect data-driven tasks only. priming depends on match between study/test processing match & not on test instructions:  for both data-driven tests: visual > auditory  for both conceptually-driven tests: visual = auditory

20 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 20 Blaxton (1989): Results Priming Effect (v > a) for data- driven tasks only: indirect: frag completion direct: graphemic-cued recall Not all indirect tests display priming effect. Gen Know (indirect, conceptual): v = A graphemic-cued recall fragment completion free recall General knowledge

21 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 21 Transfer Appropriate Processing: Conclusions It is the match between processing at study and processing at test that produces priming effects. Priming can affect performance on both indirect tests and direct tests. Implication: at least for direct tests, performance reflects both implicit and explicit memory Question: Is it also the true that indirect tests reflect both implicit and explicit memory?

22 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 22 Implicit Learning Learning w/out intention or awareness Covariation (required for use of availability/familiarity in judgment) Frequency-of-occurrence Sequence Learning –Fixed sequences –Rule-based sequences

23 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 23 Fixed Sequence Learning: Nissen & Bullemer (1987) Task: Press button under 1 of 4 lights Sequence Type: Repeating– same pattern reports every across every 10 trials Random – lights presented at random (no sequence). Details: 800 10-trial sequences (!)

24 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 24 On each trial a light goes on Just press corresponding button

25 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 25 Nissen and Bullemer (1987): Results: Repeated: RT rapidly  over blocks Random: RT little changed over block Repeat-condition Ps unable to report sequence Conclusion: Sequence learning/use was unconscious/implicit

26 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 26 Rule governed Another N & B (1987) Exp. Subjects are sensitive to the presence of the sequence even when they deny knowing that there was a sequence Violates rules

27 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 27 Rule-based Sequence Learning (Reber) Artificial Grammars – General Approach Use Artificial Grammar to define/generate “grammatical sequences”

28 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 28 Example of an Artificial Grammar

29 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 29 Aim: Can people learn “grammatical” rules w/out intention: Two Groups: Grammatical– (implicitly) learn sets of grammar- generated letter sequences Random – learn sets of randomly generated letter sequences Test: Grammatically judgment: 50% grammatical 50% ungrammatical Reber (1967)

30 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 30 Results: Phase-1Learning: grammatical faster than random Phase-2 Grammatical-judgment task: –Grammatical group: 79% –Random group: chance Grammatical group could not state the rules explicitly Conclusion: Grammatical group (implicit) learned the rules/grammar during Task 1 Rules: facilitated string learning; enabled classification Reber (1967)

31 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 31 Approaches to Implicit Learning Rules (Reber) Instance Based (Brooks) –Encode examples/instances –assess similarity between target and stored instances Fragment-based (Perruchet) –Learn string fragments (bigrams, trigrams) –reject strings lacking learned fragments Problem – knowledge might be explicit.

32 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 32 Dual-Process Accounts General View – two sources of info  analytic, explicit, controlled  nonanalytic, implicit, automatic Assumption – “no process pure tasks” Interpretation problem for Indirect Tests: contamination Issue generalizes to: direct tests judgments tasks

33 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 33 Recognition: Background Recognition Task (Radvansky, pp. 55-56) Process of list of items: STIM 1 …. STIM n Test:“Was STIM x on prior list?” STIM x on list  “OLD” STIM x not on list  “NEW”

34 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 34 Dual-Process Account of Recognition: Mandler (1980) Reco judgments based on 2 types of information: Recollection: –Judgment based on successful retrieval of information about the study episode Familiarity: –Judgment based on assessed familiarity (fluency). Evidence: –Remember/Know Judgments –Process Dissociations

35 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 35 Remember/Know Two memory processes  2 phenomenal experiences remember = successful recollect of details of prior episode know = high levels familiarity, in the absence of recollection remember  R know  A

36 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 36 Remember/Know: General Method @ study: manipulate some factor likely to manipulate recollection @ test: recognition “yes” “no” r/k

37 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 37 Remember/Know: An Example – Rajaram (1993) Exp 1. Levels of Processing R: semantic > rhyme; K: deep = shallow Exp 2. Pictures vs words R: picture > words; K: picture = word

38 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 38 Remember/Know (Radvansky, pp 307-308) General Findings: factors  recollection,  “remember” LOP, repetition, short (vs long) delay Problems: poor terminology

39 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 39 Remember/Know Instructions: Rajaram (1993)

40 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 40 Remember/Know General Findings: factors  recollection,  “remember” LOP, repetition, short (vs long) delay Problems: poor terminology judgmental criteria r/k as confidence judgment Converging Evidence: Process dissociation studies

41 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 41 Process Dissociation; Jacoby (1991) Two Independent Process: recollective (R) automatic (A) Strategy: set processes in opposition  manipulate factor(s) affecting recollection  2 tests: recollection  yes (Inclusion) recollection  no (Exclusion)

42 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 42 Process Dissociation 2 tests: recollection  yes (Inclusion) recollection  no (Exclusion) Goal: Compute values for R & A Data: Inclusion = R + A(1-R) Exclusion = A(1-R) Parameter Estimates R = Inclusion – Exclusion A = Exclusion / (1-R)

43 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 43 Process Dissociation Evidence for the role of Dual-Processes in two classes of memory test 1.A Direct Test (recognition) 2.An Indirect Task (fragment completion)

44 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 44 Process Dissociation: Direct Test Read a list of words – List 1 Hear a list of words – List 2 Two recognition tests: –Both tests include List 1, List 2 and novel words. –Inclusion test: Respond “old” if word was on either list. –Exclusion test: Respond “old” only if word was on List 2.

45 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 45 Inclusion test Inclusion test: Respond “old” if word was on either list. –Intentional (recollective) process will have a certain probability of concluding “old” for List 1 words – R –Automatic process will also have a certain probability of concluding “old” for List 1 words – A –If either process concludes “old”, the subject will respond “old” P(old) = R + A (1-R)

46 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 46 Inclusion Condition List 1 Word “OLD R ” Recollected NOT Recollected High Familiarity “OLD A ” “New” Low Familiarity P(OLD) = P(OLD R ) + P(OLD A ) R% 1-R% 1-A% A%

47 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 47 Exclusion test Exclusion test: Respond “old” only if word was on List 2. –Subject will only respond “old” to List 1 words if two things happen: The automatic process responds “old” due to a feeling of familiarity – A The intentional process fails to recognise the word (if it had, it would recall it was from List 1) – (1-R) P(old ) = A(1-R)

48 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 48 Exclusion Condition List 1 Word “NEW” Recollected NOT Recollected High Familiarity “OLD A ” “New” Low Familiarity P(OLD) = P(OLD A ) R% 1-R% 1-A% A%

49 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 49 Dissociating the processes Data: Inclusion: P(old) = R + (1- R) Exclusion: P(old) = A(1-R)

50 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 50 Inclusion Condition List 1 Word “OLD R ” Recollected NOT Recollected High Familiarity “OLD A ” “New” Low Familiarity P(OLD) = P(OLD R ) + P(OLD A ) R% 1-R% A% 1-A%

51 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 51 Exclusion Condition List 1 Word “NEW” Recollected NOT Recollected High Familiarity “OLD A ” “New” Low Familiarity P(OLD) = P(OLD A ) R% 1-R% 1-A% A%

52 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 52 Dissociating the processes Data: Inclusion: P(old) = R + (1- R) Exclusion: P(old) = A(1-R) Parameter Estimates Inclusion – Exclusion = R A = Exclusion / (1-R)

53 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 53 Jacoby (1991) Materials: List 1: READ words List 2: HEAR words Tests: Inclusion –List 1  “OLD” –List 2  “OLD” Exclusion –List 1  “NEW” –List 2  “OLD”

54 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 54 Jacoby (1991; Exp 3) Two recognition tests (% “OLD” for READ words): Inclusion testP(old) = 0.48 Exclusion testP(old) = 0.37* –R = Inclusion – Exclusion = 0.11 –A = Exclusion / (1-R) = 0.37 / 0.89 = 0.42 *in exclusion condition, “OLD” are errors

55 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 55 Jacoby (1991; Exp 3) Two recognition tests (% “OLD” for READ words): Inclusion testP(old) = 0.48 Exclusion testP(old) = 0.37* –R = Inclusion – Exclusion = 0.11 –A = Exclusion / (1-R) = 0.37 / 0.89 = 0.42 *in exclusion condition, “OLD” are errors

56 Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 56 Jacoby (1991; Exps 2 & 3) Implication: When recollection is knocked out, P(OLD) in exclusion condition should equal A Exclusion test w/ digit monitoring task (monitor for 3 odd digits in a row). Expectation: Recollection eliminated by divided attention (digit task) – R = 0 Prediction: Exclusion = A(1-R) = 0.42 (1-0) = 0.42 Results: Exclusion w/ divided attention: Prob(Old) = 0.43

Download ppt "Psyco 350 Lec #11– Slide 1 Lecture 11 – Psyco 350, A1 Winter, 2011 N. R. Brown."

Similar presentations

All slides © S. J. Luck, except as indicated in the notes sections of individual slides Slides may be used for nonprofit educational purposes if this copyright.

All slides © S. J. Luck, except as indicated in the notes sections of individual slides Slides may be used for nonprofit educational purposes if this copyright.
Psyco 350 Lec #4 – Slide 1 Lecture 4 – Psyco 350, A1 Winter, 2011 N. R. Brown.

Psyco 350 Lec #4 – Slide 1 Lecture 4 – Psyco 350, A1 Winter, 2011 N. R. Brown.
Experimental Psychology PSY 433 Chapter 10 Memory.

Experimental Psychology PSY 433 Chapter 10 Memory.
Benjamin Allred 벤자민 알레드 Contents  Questions to Think About  Definitions  Recognition Versus Recall  Single Process Models  Generate-Recognize Models.

Benjamin Allred 벤자민 알레드 Contents  Questions to Think About  Definitions  Recognition Versus Recall  Single Process Models  Generate-Recognize Models.
Psyco 350 Lec #10– Slide 1 Lecture 10 – Psyco 350, B1 Fall, 2011 N. R. Brown.

Psyco 350 Lec #10– Slide 1 Lecture 10 – Psyco 350, B1 Fall, 2011 N. R. Brown.
Artificial Grammar Learning (AGL) First developed by Reber in 1967 Standard procedure: Subjects are shown a series of letter strings that follow particular.

Artificial Grammar Learning (AGL) First developed by Reber in 1967 Standard procedure: Subjects are shown a series of letter strings that follow particular.
Lecture 6 – Long Term Memory (2)1 1. Do we learn only with intention – or also without intention? We learn with and without intention. 2.Is learning influenced.

Lecture 6 – Long Term Memory (2)1 1. Do we learn only with intention – or also without intention? We learn with and without intention. 2.Is learning influenced.
Episodic Memory (memory for episodes; also called autobiographical memory) Encoding Retrieval Encoding x Retrieval interactions Amnesia/Implicit memory.

Episodic Memory (memory for episodes; also called autobiographical memory) Encoding Retrieval Encoding x Retrieval interactions Amnesia/Implicit memory.
Inductive reasoning and implicit memory: evidence from intact and impaired memory systems Authors: Luisa Girelli, Carlo Semenza and Margarete Delazer.

Inductive reasoning and implicit memory: evidence from intact and impaired memory systems Authors: Luisa Girelli, Carlo Semenza and Margarete Delazer.
Psyco 350 Lec #2 – Slide 1 Lecture 2 – Psyco 350, A1 Winter, 2011 N. R. Brown.

Psyco 350 Lec #2 – Slide 1 Lecture 2 – Psyco 350, A1 Winter, 2011 N. R. Brown.
Psyco 350 Lec #3 – Slide 1 Lecture 3 – Psyco 350, A1 Winter, 2011 N. R. Brown.

Psyco 350 Lec #3 – Slide 1 Lecture 3 – Psyco 350, A1 Winter, 2011 N. R. Brown.
Subliminal Perception Zoltán Dienes Conscious and unconscious mental processes.

Subliminal Perception Zoltán Dienes Conscious and unconscious mental processes.
Unconscious memory Zoltán Dienes Conscious and unconscious mental processes.

Unconscious memory Zoltán Dienes Conscious and unconscious mental processes.
Implicit learning Zoltán Dienes Conscious and unconscious mental processes.

Implicit learning Zoltán Dienes Conscious and unconscious mental processes.
The Contribution of Perceptual Mechanisms to the Spacing Effect Jason Arndt & Julie Dumas Middlebury College Abstract Recent explanations of the spacing.

The Contribution of Perceptual Mechanisms to the Spacing Effect Jason Arndt & Julie Dumas Middlebury College Abstract Recent explanations of the spacing.
Memory Chapter 6.

Memory Chapter 6.
Unconscious memory Zoltán Dienes Conscious and unconscious mental processes.

Unconscious memory Zoltán Dienes Conscious and unconscious mental processes.
Memory I Explicit/Implicit Memory Amnesia Encoding Specifity Principle.

Memory I Explicit/Implicit Memory Amnesia Encoding Specifity Principle.
 The misinformation effect refers to incorrect recall or source attribution of an item presented after a to-be-remembered event as having been presented.

 The misinformation effect refers to incorrect recall or source attribution of an item presented after a to-be-remembered event as having been presented.
Chapter 6 Cognitive Psychology, 2 nd Ed.. Types of Long-Term Memory Declarative memory refers to knowledge of events, facts, and concepts (knowing what).

Chapter 6 Cognitive Psychology, 2 nd Ed.. Types of Long-Term Memory Declarative memory refers to knowledge of events, facts, and concepts (knowing what).

Similar presentations

Ads by Google