Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBonnie Newton Modified over 9 years ago
1
Zoledronate does not reduce the risk of treatment failure in osteosarcoma: results of the French multicentre OS2006 randomised trial L Brugières, MC Le Deley, F Rédini, P Marec-Bérard, H Pacquement, C Lervat, JC Gentet, N Entz-Werlé, B Bui, N Corradini, G de Pinieux, P Petit, K Buffard, JY Blay, S Piperno-Neumann 15-18 October 2014, Berlin
2
Disclosure s Novartis Chugaï 15-18 October 2014, Berlin
3
Zoledronate in osteosarcoma Preclinical models Rat -transplantable model of osteosarcoma - Z prevents the formation of bone osteolytic lesions and reduces local tumor growth - IFO+Z enhances tumor regression and tissue repair Lung metastases model in mice (IV injection of POS-1 murine osteosarcoma cells) - Z suppresses lung mets in vivo and prolongs overall survival of osteosarcoma-bearing mice - Z has a direct antitumoral effect on POS-1 cells in vitro Ory et al, Cancer (2005) implantation Z OL (100 µg/kg) sacrifice J0 J7 J14 J21 J28 J35 CZ I I+Z 15-18 October 2014, Berlin
4
OS2006 trial Randomised phase III trial involving all French paediatric oncology and most adult sarcoma centres (overall 48 centres) Objective: To evaluate the impact of the addition of a 10-month Zoledronate treatment to chemotherapy and surgery on the event-free survival of osteosarcoma patients Primary endpoint : EFS 15-18 October 2014, Berlin
5
OS2006 - Inclusion criteria All newly diagnosed high grade osteosarcoma except : Small cell osteosarcoma Maxillary osteosarcoma Extra-osseous osteosarcoma Patients with primary resection multiple metastases for whom complete removal was not expected to be feasible even after shrinkage with chemotherapy Age > 5 years and < 50 years 15-18 October 2014, Berlin
6
OS2006 - Chemotherapy MTX-ETO-IFO according to OS94 protocol API-AI according to FSG protocol <18 years18-25 years > 25 years left to the choice of each center (Assi et al Curr Oncol 2010, Piperno-Neumann et al ASCO 2006) (Le Deley et al Eur J Cancer 2007) 15-18 October 2014, Berlin
7
OS2006 - Treatment plan 15-18 October 2014, Berlin MTX-ETO-IFO API-AI Lenograstim 263 µg D6-D12
8
Zoledronate Randomisation at diagnosis between 2 arms with or without zoledronate Dose of Zoledronate 10 monthly IV infusions: 4 before/ 6 after surgery Dose >25 years: 4 mg <18 years : 0.05 mg/kg (max 4 mg/ dose) 18-25 y: 0.05 mg/kg for the first 2 courses, then 4 mg Dose reduction if gr 3-4 hypocalcemia Vitamin D3 and calcium supplementation in both arms 15-18 October 2014, Berlin
9
Statistical considerations Randomisation stratified on: age and type of chemotherapy => 4 strata risk group : non metastatic and resectable versus metastatic or not resectable centre Sample size : 470 patients required to achieve a 80%-power to detect a 13% improvement of 3 y-EFS (from 55% to 68%) in the Zoledronate arm (HR=0.65), with a two-sided log-rank test (alpha=5%) and 3 interim analyses This is the results of the second interim analysis performed after the inclusion of 318 pts 15-18 October 2014, Berlin
10
Participant flow (Apr 2007-Feb 2014) Did not meet eligibility criteria N=70 No zoledronate (Z-) N=158 zoledronate (Z+) N=160 Suspension of randomisation N=17 Not included in the randomised trial N = 116 including 69 refusal Assessed for eligibility N=521 Included in the randomised trial N=318 (73%) Potentially eligible N=434 15-18 October 2014, Berlin
11
Z-Z+Total N=158N=160N=318% Age and planned chemotherapy 10911021969 Less than 18y – MTX-Eto-Ifo 18-25 years – MTX-Eto-Ifo 18193712 18-25 years – API-AI 1211237 > 25 years – API-AI 19203912 Risk group 13212926182 Non metastatic and primary resectable Non metastatic and primary non resectable 1341 Metastatic disease 25285317 Site of the primary (MD=33) Limb 13013226292 Axial 1310238 Size of the primary (MD=44) <10 cm 765813449 >10 cm 627814051 Alkaline phosphatases (MD=41) Normal level 807315355 Above the upper limit (> 1xULN) 596512445 LDH (MD=58) Normal level 787915760 Above the upper limit (> 1xULN) 544910340 Baseline characteristics
12
Zoledronate - Total administration In Zoledronate arm: 55 patients had an omission of >1 injection, including 4 patients with no Zoledronate injection 4 patients who stopped Zoledronate after 1 st injection Zoledronate dose = protocol dose (+/-10%) for 851/1013 injections (84%) No patient allocated to Z- arm received Zoledronate 15-18 October 2014, Berlin
13
Toxicity during treatment 15-18 October 2014, Berlin No significant increase of toxicity regarding the most frequent expected toxicities (i.e. hematotoxicity, infection, transfusion, ASAT/ALAT elevation, mucositis…) Hypocalcemia grade 2-4 significantly more frequent in Z+ arm per course: OR = 7.2, 95%CI, 4.9 – 10.6, p<0.001 decreasing risk over time
14
Surgery and histological analysis of the primary tumour 15-18 October 2014, Berlin
15
OS2006 Event-Free (EFS) and Overall Survival (OS) 3-y OS= 78.3% 3-y EFS= 60.3% 15-18 October 2014, Berlin Median follow-up 3.1 years
16
Z+, 3-y EFS=58.3% (49-67) Z-, 3-y EFS= 62.3% (53-71) Z-, 3-y OS= 83.3% (75-89) Z+, 3-y OS=73.2% (64-81) Impact of Zoledronate on outcome Z-, N=158 Z+, N=160Total, N=318 Number of events4957106 Local progression/relapse4610 Metastatic progression/relapse283462 Combined161531 Progression/relapse NOS112 Death as 1st event011 HR=1.31 (CI: 0.79-2.18) p=0.17 15-18 October 2014, Berlin HR=1.42 (CI: 0.70-2.88), p=0.21
17
15-18 October 2014, Berlin Impact of Zoledronate on EFS Stability of the results Age and chemotherapy group GroupNo. Events / No. Entered Z+Z- Hazard RatioHR [95% CI] Z+ better | Z- better <18y – MTX-Eto-Ifo38/11131/1091.29 [0.70;2.38] 18-25y – MTX-Eto-Ifo6/196/180.99 [0.19;5.08] 18-25y – API-AI6/116/122.35 [0.44;12.6] >25y – API-AI7/206/191.17 [0.28;4.92] Risk group Non metastatic41/12933/1321.50 [0.82;2.73] Metastatic or non resectable16/3216/260.94 [0.36;2.45] Histologic response Good responder26/8421/881.62 [0.73;3.58] Poor responder23/4422/451.20 [0.55;2.61] Overall57/16149/1581.31 [0.79;2.18] 0.11.014.0 Interaction P=0.80 P=0.30 P=0.49
18
OS 2006 Futility analysis Probability of demonstrating a benefit with zoledronate after inclusion of the 470 pts initially planned <0.0001 Decision to close the trial and to release the results Final analysis in a few months after updating follow-up of all patients 15-18 October 2014, Berlin
19
OS 2006 - Conclusion Zoledronate in association with chemotherapy did not reduce the risk of treatment failure There was no safety concern apart from the expected higher incidence of hypocalcemia Overall results (EFS, OS) are consistent with previous studies both in children and adult patients Translational studies on going to try to understand these unexpected clinical results 15-18 October 2014, Berlin
20
Thanks To patients and families To Unicancer, SFCE and FSG To French National Cancer Institute (INca) and La Ligue contre le Cancer To Novartis, Chugaï To investigators, and data managers 15-18 October 2014, Berlin
21
Backslides 15-18 October 2014, Berlin
22
Outcome of patients with a localised disease, by chemotherapy group and histological response EFS MTX GR versus PR OS MTX GR versus PR EFS API-AI GR versus PR OS API-AI GR versus PR 15-18 October 2014, Berlin
23
Second interim analysis (26 MARCH 2014) Trend for a harmful effect of Zoledronate On EFS and OS Stable results after exclusion of the 8 patients allocated to Z+ who received 0 to 1 Zoledronate injection No heterogeneity across the different strata at the time of randomisation Boundaries defining a significant harm not crossed Recommendation of early stopping for futility Probability of demonstrating a benefit <0.0001 (even under H1) current statistic test 15-18 October 2014, Berlin Stop for efficacy Stop for harm Stop for futility
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.