1. NAVFAC – Contingency Response 23 July 2014
For SAME Jacksonville presentation on Wednesday 23 July 2014

2. Agenda for SAME Jacksonville brief
Who we are: NAVFAC Southeast overview
NAVFAC Global Contingency Contracts and other contracting options (existing local, etc.)
Contingency Engineer Response Teams (CERTs)
Mobile Utilities Support Equipment (MUSE)
Individual Personal Preparedness
Short duration for GCCC & GCSC (due to cost), then transition to more traditional contract vehicles: IDIQ (paving, roofing, refuse, etc.); JOC; MACC
Audit trail very important on both of the following:
Decision to use Cost Plus
Award fee

3. The NAVFAC Mission and Vision
Our Mission
NAVFAC is the Navy’s Systems Command that builds and maintains sustainable facilities, delivers utilities and services, and provides Navy expeditionary combat force capabilities
(unlike USACE, NAVFAC has no civil-works mission)
Our Vision
Our expertise enables mission success.
Unlike USACE, NAVFAC has no civil-works mission – supports DoD Warfighters

4. 6 States, 4 Installations, 11 NOSCs, 71 Special Areas
CNIC CONUS Today (FY14)
CNR Northwest
6 States, 4 Installations, 11 NOSCs, 71 Special Areas
CNR Midwest
16 States, 3 Installations
35 NOSCs, 60 Special Areas
CNR Mid-Atlantic
14 States, 12 Installations
31 NOSCs, 137 Special Areas
CNR NDW
6 Installations
1 NOSCs
63 Special Areas
CNR Hawaii
2 Installations
1 NOSC
8 Special Areas
Old CNIC and NAVFAC organization, with CNR MidWest and NAVFAC MidWest
CNR Southwest
6 States, 10 Installations
18 NOSCs, 175 Special Areas
CNR Southeast
7 States, 17 Installations
28 NOSCs, 154 Special Areas
NOTES
NRNW includes FEMA Regions VIII, X
NRMA includes FEMA Region I, II, III
NRSE includes FEMA Regions IV, VI

5. CNIC CONUS after Redistribution
CNR Northwest
11 States (+5), 4 Installations, 16 NOSCs, 79 Special Areas (+5 NOSCs / +8 Special Areas)
CNR Mid-Atlantic
20 States (+6), 14 Installations (+2, NSGL & NSA Crane
50 NOSCs, 168 Special Areas (+19 NOSCs / +31 Special Areas)
CNR Southwest
6 States, 10 Installations
18 NOSCs, 175 Special Areas
(No Changes)
CNR NDW
6 Installations
1 NOSCs
63 Special Areas
(No Changes)
New CNIC and NAVFAC organization, with CNR MidWest and NAVFAC MidWest AORs absorbed into CNR SouthEast and NAVFAC SouthEast (and 2 other NRs and NAVFAC FECs)
CNR SouthEast and NAVFAC SouthEast will pick up:
1 Naval Installation, plus TACAMO;
5 states,
11 NOSCs,
21 Special Areas
NOTES
No more than two hour difference in AOR
Restructured NRNW includes FEMA Regions V*, VII*, VIII, X
Restructured NRMA includes FEMA Region I, II, III, IV*, V*
Restructured NRSE includes FEMA Regions IV, VI, VII*
(* Indicates a new FEMA Region)
CNR Southeast
12 States (+5), 18 Installations (+1, NSA Mid-South & TACAMO)
39 NOSCs, 175 Special Areas (+11 NOSCs / +21 Special Areas)

6. NAVFAC Southeast AOR in FY15
TACAMO
Midsouth
Charleston/ Shaw
Beaufort NH
Meridian
Barksdale
Kings Bay
Pensacola
Keesler
Mayport/ Blount Island
Fort Worth
Gulfport
Jacksonville
CNR SouthEast and NAVFAC SouthEast AORs will include:
18 Naval Installations, plus TACAMO and others;
12 states,
39 NOSCs,
175 Special Areas
New Orleans
Panama City
Orlando
Whiting Field
Corpus Christi
Kingsville
Key West
12 States, 18 Installations, 39 NOSCs
175 Special Areas
Executive agent for NORTHCOM and SOUTHCOM Caribbean AOR
Guantanamo Bay

7. Contingency Contracting & Response
Global Contingency Construction Contract (GCCC)
Global Contingency Services Multiple Award Contract (GCSMAC)
Existing local contracts
Contingency Engineer Response Teams (CERTs)
Mobile Utilities Support Equipment (MUSE)
Short duration for GCCC & GCSC (due to cost), then transition to more traditional contract vehicles: IDIQ (paving, roofing, refuse, etc.); JOC; MACC
Audit trail very important on both of the following:
Decision to use Cost Plus
Award fee

8. Global Contingency Contracts (GCC)
17 April 2017
Global Contingency Contracts (GCC)
3-Part Criteria for Cost-Plus instead of Fixed-Price Contracting
Emergency or contingency situation/conditions
--Mission demands exceed normal acquisition timing parameters
--Austere/contingency environment
Element of significant uncertainty as to scope, schedule, time, supporting cost plus contract use
--Requirements not well defined
Work is predominantly facilities engineering related activities
Not equipped to carry out military defense or offense, not intended to replace all of the functions and capabilities of the military engineer.
One set of tools in NAVFAC’s toolbox primarily used for response for emergency or contingency operations…but not the only choice.
Supports NAVFAC’s facilities engineering mission; some logistics capabilities…≠ Army’s LOGCAP or Air Force AFCAP Contracts.
First Bullet on bottom - Civilian Construction Capability ONLY! No Combat Engineering.
Second Bullet– GCC/GCS contracts are but one set of tools in a large toolkit available to NAVFAC. Stand alone contracts, other MACs, mods to existing contracts, letter contracts, etc. are other viable options, which can be less costly to execute.
Third Bullet– GCC/GCS are not Civilian Augmentation Programs like AFCAP and LOGCAP. They fulfill NAVFAC’s unique mission for construction and facilities service contracting. Also are much smaller in capacity ~1/5 the size.
Blue box on top: This is our “litmus” test for use. Basically, the conditions in which we feel Cost-Plus is favorable over Fixed Price. 8

9. Global Contingency Contracts (GCC)
Global Contingency Construction Contract (GCCC)
$800M capacity (awarded June 2013)
~$700M remaining capacity
Facility Construction or Engineering, with incidental services
IDIQ MAC contract
Cost Plus Award Fee or Firm Fixed Price task orders
Administered by NAVFAC Atlantic
Global Contingency Services Multiple Award Contract (GCSMAC)
$900M capacity (awarded Nov 2011)
~$875M remaining capacity
Facility Support Services, with incidental construction
IDIQ MAC contract
Cost Plus Award Fee or Firm Fixed Price task orders
Administered by NAVFAC Pacific
2 contracts:
IDIQ MAC
Cost-Plus Award Fee
Each primarily for:
Construction or Engineering (GCCC)
NAVFAC Atlantic
Facilities Support Services (GCSMAC)
NAVFAC Pacific
Provides worldwide rapid civilian construction, engineering, and facility support services for:
Disaster recovery
Military conflict
Military Operations Other Than War
Humanitarian Assistance
Or projects with similar characteristics

10. Global Contingency Construction Contract (GCCC)
Cost Plus Award Fee, Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) – PCO: NAVFAC LANT
Total Capacity: $800M over 5 years
4 Contractors (CH2M Hill, ECC, KBR, URS)
Award Date: June 2013
Criteria for use:
Emergency/Contingency situation
Element of significant uncertainty to the scope, schedule or time supporting use of cost-plus contract
Work is predominately facilities/engineering related
Purpose:
Provide worldwide rapid civilian construction and engineering services response for:
Disaster Recovery, Military Conflict, Military Operations Other Than War, Humanitarian Assistance.
Capabilities
Horizontal/Vertical Construction
Runways Roads
Bridges/Causeways Piers
Demo/Cleanup Housing Repairs
Depot/Warehouses Clinics & Field Hospitals
Operation / Maintenance Communication Facilities
Facilities Ammunition storage facilities
Berthing / messing facilities
Specialty Construction
Engineering
Dredging
POL Facilities
Aerial Photography
Soils Engineering
Environmental Restoration
CBRN / WMD Recovery (non-first responder)
Operation of Power generation, concrete & asphalt plants
Project Planning
Staffing for varying sizes of operations
Material Management Capabilities
Material Liaison Support for NCF
More details on GCCC

11. Global Contingency Services Multiple Award Contract (GCSMAC)
Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity,
Cost Plus Award Fee or Fixed Price,
Task Order contract
PCO: NAVFAC PAC
Total Capacity: $900M over 5 years
6 Contractors:
KBR, IAP-ECC, GRS, PCS, Flour, URS Group
Award Date: SEP/NOV 2011
Criteria for use:
Emergency/Contingency situation
Work is predominately facilities/engineering related
Purpose:
To quickly provide short-term facilities support services, with incidental construction, in support of …:
Natural disasters; humanitarian efforts; the full range of military actions; and incumbent breaks in service.
… at various worldwide locations (including remote locations)
Capabilities
Installation Management Accounting
Core Business Model Functions
Air Operations
Port Operations
Range Operations
Moral, Welfare & Recreation Support
Base Support Vehicles & Equipment
Housing
Environmental
Public Safety
Ordnance
Galley
Utilities Operations Support
Facility Support
Health Care Support
Personnel Support
More details on GCSC/GCSMAC (can be used for turn-key beddown camps, since construction would be incidental to services)

12. Global Contingency Contracts NAVFAC–Contractor Team
GCCC Contractors (IDIQ, MAC)
CH2M Hill Constructors
Environmental Chemical Corp (ECC)
Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR) Services Inc
URS Group, Inc
GCSC/GCSMAC Contractors (IDIQ, MAC)
IAP-ECC, LLC
Global Response Services (GRS), LLC
Pacific Contingency Services (PCS), LLC
Fluor International, Inc
4 Contractors for GCCC
6 Contractors for GCSC/GCSMAC

13. Challenges with Cost-Plus Contracts
17 April 2017
Challenges with Cost-Plus Contracts
Scrutiny
Ensuring sufficient documentation to satisfy follow-on auditing agencies (GAO/ IG)
Cost Control
Maintaining visibility in a high burn-rate (possibly $100K-$1M/day) environment
Definitization of Scope and Cost Estimating
Aggressive execution in the face of ill-defined and evolving tasking
Quality Assurance
No compromise on oversight and safety despite speed of execution and environment
Scrutiny – We never complain about IGs but Cost Plus contracting has been under the microscope. We have improved our paperwork but feeding an IG is a time drain on scarce resources.
Cost Control – Always an issue. Need tight controls and continuous review. During hurricanes we normally require a daily cost report from the contractor until the situation stabilizes. Burn rates can be enormous! ($1M a day!)
Government Estimates are still necessary as well as approved/reviewed ROMs from the contractor. Huge, difficult task with an evolving, ill-defined scope.
Many think this is contracting in the Wild West and the contractors run wild. We still have to QA, sometimes when the scope is poorly defined it takes more Government presence than a FFP. Hurricane response is such a case. 13

14. Contingency Engineering Response Teams (CERT)
Standing Capacity for Contingency Response
Damage Assessment
Contract Administration
Other Technical Requirements (Planning, Environmental, Utilities)
Support Facilities Contingency Response Needs of CNIC, CFFC, COCOMs and other Navy/Marine Corps Clients
Flexible and Scalable Capability Sets, Task Tailored to Event
Organic Capability at NAVFAC FE (MIL and CIV)
CERTs help NAVFAC administer GCCC and GCSMAC task orders in the field of disaster-stricken areas
Hurricanes
Earthquakes
Volcanic Eruptions
Floods
Fire
Explosions
Air or Rail Accident
Environmental Spill
GWOT Support
Response for Wide Range of Events

15. CERT - Elements and Composition (typical)
Damage Assessment Team (DAT) – 4 Personnel
Architect
Structural Engineer
Civil Engineer
1 Mechanical or Electrical Engineer
Construction Support Team (CST) – 3 Personnel
Construction Manager (CM) and/or AROICC
2 Engineering Technicians (ideally with CM experience)
Team Leaders
O4/5 CEC or GS13/14, capable of leading multiple teams
Contingency Contracting Officers
Warranted CEC Officer or 1102
Business/Support Line Support Team
Business/Support Line Specific (PW, EV, AM, …)
Particularly PWBL UEM (IRT power outages, etc)
Assigned and maintained by FEC
CERTs are made up of multiple, scalable cells within an overall deployment team.
Assigned and maintained by BLM (ex: PWST)
4/17/2017

16. NEXWC Mobile Utilities Support Equipment (MUSE)
Provide portable diesel engine driven generators, substations and switchgear, and Low-NOx boilers to meet utility shortcomings
Provide technical expertise and operators
Equipment includes
200 kW to 2500 kW diesel driven electrical generators
1500 kVA to 5000 kVA electrical substations
12 kPPH to 20 kPPH Low-NOx boilers plants
MUSE from NEXWC

17. Individual Personal Preparedness
Be Informed
Know what emergencies are most likely to affect you & your family
Know local emergency warning system in your area, and what actions to take if there is an emergency
Make a Plan
Plan reactions to various emergencies
Plan how your family can stay in touch
Practice your plan
Build a Kit
Assemble emergency supplies in your home, car, and workplace
Be ready in case you must evacuate quickly
CNICs 3-part mantra for Individual Personal Preparedness for sailors/civilians on Naval shore installations:
Be Informed
Make a Plan
Build a Kit
More detailed info available in annual Individual Preparedness for Hurricane Season guides, available at:
First Coast News (on-line)
Jacksonville.com (Florida Times-Union)(on-line)
Power companies (Clay Country – July)(mailings)
4/17/2017

18. Atlantic Tropical Cyclone Forecast for 2014
On 22 May, NOAA released their annual 2014 Atlantic Hurricane Season Forecast (frequency and intensity of Atlantic storms).
Forecast factors: “El Nino” (Warmer equatorial Pacific sea surface temps)
More wind shear, and Lower Atlantic seas surface temperatures
Likely Below-Average Activity. But:
Wrong past 2 years, and others (Hurricane Andrew in 1992)
Can’t predict landfall locations/probabilities
If just 1 hurricane landfall in SE region, then it’s an above-average season for NAVFAC SE AOR.
Named Storms: 8-13 is average)
Hurricanes: 3-6 is average)
Major Hurricanes (Category 3/4/5): 1-2 is average)
Average for last century:
52% chance of U.S. hit
31% chance of East Coast landfall (including Florida peninsula)
30% chance of Gulf Coast landfall (Florida westcoast/panhandle to SE TX)
Meteorology conditions don’t predict impact to US and other lands:
1992 was a light year from a meteorological standpoint, but Hurricane Andrew.
2010 was 2nd busiest year on record from a meteorological standpoint, but very few landfalls (none major).
52% chance of U.S. hit, 31% chance of East Coast/Florida Peninsula hit, and 30% chance of Gulf Coast hit (Florida Panhandle to Brownsville TX)
4/17/2017

19. Remember: NAVFAC SE/CNRSE is the FEC/Region within NAVFAC/CNIC whose installations/PWDs have the most likely chance of disaster strike, particularly from Tropical Cyclones (Hurricanes and Tropical Storms).
52% chance of U.S. hit, 31% chance of East Coast/Florida Peninsula hit, and 30% chance of Gulf Coast hit (Florida Panhandle to Brownsville TX)
4/17/2017

20. NAVFAC Southeast Disaster Prep/Response
Questions?
Questions?
4/17/2017
UNCLASSIFIED