Download presentation
1
Enclosure Fire Dynamics
Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: Qualitative description of enclosure fires Chapter 3: Energy release rates, Design fires Chapter 4: Plumes and flames Chapter 5: Pressure and vent flows Chapter 6: Gas temperatures (Chapter 7: Heat transfer) Chapter 8: Smoke filling (Chapter 9: Products of combustion) Chapter 10: Computer modeling Each course unit represents breaking down the problem into individual pieces
2
Overview General on smoke control in buildings
Examples of applications Derivation of conservation equations Smoke filling in small room with small opening: Zukoski method Smoke filling in large room with large opening: Steady-state method Natural ventilation Mechanical ventilation Pressurization of lower layer EFD simply provides a bunch of equations. This lecture will go into detail at the beginning on what we are trying to do with smoke filling. It’s fine to calculate smoke filling, but you also need to know how to do something about it.
3
How do people die in fires? MGM Grand Hotel
Many fire deaths far away from fire
4
Reasons for smoke control
Life safety – maintain the escape path as long as possible Firefighter safety – improve visibility Firefighter operations – reduce time to put out fire Property protection – reduce smoke damage Property protection – reduce temperature and external radiation to fuel packages Continuity of operations = Open for business sooner
5
Smoke management – preventing smoke spread
Smoke control Use of mechanical fans for pressurization Smoke and heat venting Natural (link operated vents) Mechanical
6
Locations for smoke control
Atria Warehouses (rack storage) High rise buildings (stairwells) Shopping malls Performance based designs Increase travel distance Substitute for rated construction (smoke barriers) Elevators for egress
7
Example: Atria Atrium – singular (one) Atria – plural (many)
Opening through floors
8
Example: Atrium
9
Example: Preventing smoke spread
10
Example: Smoke management-pressure
Compartmentation with pressurization We can calculate required pressure difference
11
Example: Single injection point
Fail with door open near injection point Limit to 8 stories (Klote and Milke)
12
Example: Multiple injection points
More injection points limits local loss of pressure Determining the design number of open doors can be difficult Is it better to remove smoke high or low in the stairway?
13
Example: Smoke control by air flow
Airflow without barriers can control smoke if the air velocity is sufficient Not usually a recommended method (expensive) Airflow can enhance burning rate
14
Example: Mechanical exhaust from a large volume space
15
Example: Balcony spill plume
In many cases, the mass flow rate is larger than from an axi-symmetric plume
16
Example: Roof vents
17
Example: Natural smoke venting
Reduced flow due to obstructions, wind and sprinklers Makeup (replacement) air required
18
Example: Venting of fire gases
19
Activation of smoke control system
Smoke detector Thermal detector Smoke density detector Specified optical density/obscuration Beam detectors Avoid manual activation, but provide manual activation for fire department
20
Overview General on smoke control in buildings
Examples of applications Derivation of conservation equations Smoke filling in small room with small opening: Zukoski method Smoke filling in large room with large opening: Steady-state method Natural ventilation Mechanical ventilation Pressurization of lower layer EFD simply provides a bunch of equations. This lecture will go into detail at the beginning on what we are trying to do with smoke filling. It’s fine to calculate smoke filling, but you also need to know how to do something about it.
21
Conservation equations
Conservation of mass (C of M) Conservation of energy (C of E) Conservation of momentum Conservation of species (O2, CO2, H2O, soot, fuel)
22
Compartment Fire Environment
23
Finite Control Volume
24
Infinitesimal Control Volume
All four give the same result, but just in a different form
25
Control volume could be one of two layers
Hand calculations Two-zone computer models
26
Or the control volume could be one small piece of the overall enclosure
Computational Fluid Dynamics or CFD models
27
Control surface Surface defining a control volume
Mass, energy etc. pass through the control surface
28
Overview General on smoke control in buildings
Examples of applications Derivation of conservation equations Smoke filling in small room with small opening: Zukoski method Smoke filling in large room with large opening: Steady-state method Natural ventilation Mechanical ventilation Pressurization of lower layer EFD simply provides a bunch of equations. This lecture will go into detail at the beginning on what we are trying to do with smoke filling. It’s fine to calculate smoke filling, but you also need to know how to do something about it.
29
Smoke filling in a room with a small opening (vent)
Conservation of mass CV is lower layer Plume is ignored or could be included in upper layer Mass leaves CV through plume and vent (positive)
30
Smoke filling in a room with a small opening (vent)
Remember the Zukoski plume equation Use the energy equation to find Substitute and into C of M equation
31
Smoke filling in a room with a small opening (vent)
A numerical/graphical solution is possible Generalize results by using dimensionless numbers
32
Non-dimensional smoke filling equation
Dimensionless height: Dimensionless HRR: Dimensionless time: Dimensionless form of smoke filling equation
33
Result of numerical solution by Zukoski (ceiling and floor leaks)
34
Limitations of Zukoski model
Small room and small opening Zukoski plume equation Valid for weak sources No heat loss No pressure change with time Uniform pressure throughout room Expect approximate results only
35
Overview General on smoke control in buildings
Examples of applications Derivation of conservation equations Smoke filling in small room with small opening: Zukoski method Smoke filling in large room with large opening: Steady-state method Natural ventilation Mechanical ventilation Pressurization of lower layer EFD simply provides a bunch of equations. This lecture will go into detail at the beginning on what we are trying to do with smoke filling. It’s fine to calculate smoke filling, but you also need to know how to do something about it.
36
Steady state smoke control
Spaces are typically large (tall) Openings are large, so there is little (no) pressure buildup inside enclosure Flow rates through vents are a function of hydrostatic pressure differences Pressure difference varies over height of opening Two direction vent flow More directions possible with smoke filling in second compartment C of M and C of E equations coupled Must solve at the same time
37
Steady state smoke control
Now do something to stop the upper layer from descending (moving) Rate of smoke venting (exhaust) equals rate of smoke production (entrainment in plume) Steady state Conditions no longer changing with time Method of Tanaka and Yamana
38
Steady state smoke control
Mass conservation for upper layer Conservation of energy for upper layer Heat loss to walls now important
39
Steady state smoke control
We already solved this energy equation in Chapter 6 But now we know z’, so we know the area of the wall being heated, Aw Semi-infinite solid with Tg=Ts
40
Look at three cases for removing smoke
Natural ventilation Mechanical ventilation Pressurization of lower layer
41
Steady state smoke control natural ventilation from upper layer
Mass and energy equations are coupled Should solve both at same time Pressure difference at top of layer moves smoke Thicker layer = greater mass flow Look at solution by trial and error
42
Steady state smoke control natural ventilation from upper layer
Trial and error solution Guess a layer height Solve mass and energy balances Correct layer height guess and density Resolve mass and energy balance
43
Steady state smoke control mechanical ventilation from upper layer
A fan is now placed at the top of the compartment to remove smoke Generally know the fan exhaust rate [m3/s]
44
Steady state smoke control mechanical ventilation from upper layer
45
Steady state smoke control pressurization of lower layer
A few cautions about pressurization of the lower layer by mechanical ventilation
46
Full scale test results
47
Some final cautions There is not universal agreement by fire researchers on these equations Some, but not much, full scale testing Fire model results versus correlations Sometimes easier to just use a fire model Some models have been validated (tested) under smoke control conditions
48
Any questions?
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.