Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byErick Hart Modified over 9 years ago
1
ATLAS muon chambers heat transfer efficient description RFNC – VNIITF SUE «Strela» Snezhinsk, 2003 t.v.lebedeva@vniitf.ru
2
Contents Basic problems Approaches to designing simplified thermal models for muon chambers Simplified thermal models 1 and 2 Chambers as homogeneous objects to simulate heat transfer across them Multilayers and End plugs as homogeneous components to simulate heat transfer along chambers MDT tubes heating of BIS chambers
3
Basic problems to be solved Simplified thermal models for typical muon chambers Heat transfer across chambers Heat transfer along chambers Free-convection heat exchange inside the fragments of ATLAS facility for the most heat loaded chambers Air flow blocking between the MDT chambers
4
The chambers under consideration BIS, BIL without RPC; BMS, BML with RPC on both sides of the chamber; BOL, BOS with RPC on one side of the chamber General scheme of chamber
5
Studied problems Heat transfer across chambers to evaluate temperature gradients between outer surfaces of the multilayers Heat transfer along the BIS chambers with the source in Faraday Cage (FC)
6
Approaches to design simplified thermal models From simple to complex Actual structure is divided into fragments to enable direct simulation of heat transfer Fragment is replaced with homogeneous material having parameters equivalent to those of the initial fragment Set of fragments is replaced with homogeneous material
7
Simplified thermal model (Model 1) for BМS, BМL chambers
8
Simplified thermal model (Model 1) for BOS, BOL chambers
9
Simplified thermal model (Model 1) for BIS chamber
10
Simplified thermal model (Model 1) for BIL chamber
11
Materials of simplified thermal models 1, 3-have specific thermal characteristics and replace the layers of aluminum tubes, RPC, gas-filled gaps, and heat-isolation 2-corresponds to "air" and cross plates. Heat transfer in the material 2 is caused by heat conduction, convection and radiation
12
Simplified thermal models for 2D calculations based on Model 1 The highlighted areas are the heat sources
13
Heat sources RPC releases heat along the perimeter of structure equal to 0.07W/4cm (1.75W/m) Power/mezz board for all types of chambers 1.62 W
14
Thermal model 2 Structure elements treated separately RPC Air gaps and heat-shielding (space between RPC and multilayer) Multilayer, Faraday cage, End plug Space between multilayers (Air + Cross plates)
15
Model 2. BML, BMS chambers
16
Model 2. BOL, BOS chambers
17
Model 2. BIL chamber
18
Model 2. BIS chamber
19
CHAMBERS AS EFFICIENT HOMOGENEOUS OBJECTS TO SIMULATE HEAT TRANSFER ACROSS THE CHAMBERS
20
Multilayer of tubes presented as homogeneous object
21
2D problems in YZ plane Left and right sides are adiabatic walls Temperature values are given (T2>T1)on the bottom and upper surfaces Heat transfer in gas and in air is caused by heat conduction and convection Radiative heat transfer is not taken into account Direction of gravity force is varied
22
Presentation of multilayers as homogeneous objects Convection inside the tubes has almost no effect on transverse heat transfer for temperature gradients studied Estimated efficient thermal conductivity across multilayers For 3-layers set: æeff =2.00W/(mK) For 4-layers set: æeff =1.76W/(mK)
23
The effecient heat conductivity for the air gap between multilayers depends on the chamber orientation Each muon chamber has its own component of vector g g
24
Components of gravity g
25
The effective heat conductivity for air gap between multilayers Heat transfer between multilayers is caused by heat conductivity convection radiation
26
Heat transfer due to heat conduction and convection T2=290.1, 290.2, 290.5, 291, 292 T1=290 0.2 1/3
27
Simulated values (markers) of efficient heat conductivity and analytical curves for BIL and BML chambers
28
Simulated values (markers) of efficient heat conductivity and analytical curves for BMS and BOL chambers
29
Simulated values (markers) of efficient heat conductivity and analytical curves for BOS chambers
30
Velocity field for chamber BIL01
31
Velocity field for chamber BIL05
32
Velocity field for chamber BMS04
33
Velocity field for chamber BOS04
34
Velocity field for chamber BOL05
35
Velocity field for chamber BML05
36
Cross-plates influence on heat transfer between the mulilayers BIL: BMS: BML: BOS: BOL : æ eff (cond.+conv.+cross_plate) = + æ eff (cond.+conv.)
37
Heat transfer by radiation Radiative heat transfer between the multilayers treated as heat exchange between two parallel planes and described by
38
This technology is applied to calculate the value of efficient heat conductivity for specific chamber by means of Selection of parameters , Estimation of average temperatures at the internal surfaces of the multilayers (values of T1, T2) Selection of , corresponded to chosen chamber And on a final stage estimation of the value of heat conductivity with the help of above expression Calculations of the effective coefficient of heat conductivity for air gap between multilayers
39
Presenting RPC as homogeneous objects For BOS, BMS,BML æ eff =0.0291W/(mK) For BOL æ eff =0.0288W/(mK)
40
Simplified heat models of the BIS chambers MaterialρCæ 19411950.0265 21299381.76 32429509500.054 41339830.1135 51269830.11
41
Simplified thermal models of the BIL chamber s MaterialΡCæ 115011100.027 21299381.76 313990 0.083+0.9953 | T| δ + 0.17٠4εσ T 3 /(2- ε) 41319620.2
42
Simplified thermal models of the BMS and BML chambers Materialæ for BMSæ for BML 10.028 20.027 32.00 4 0.072+0.996 | T| δ +0.17٠4εσT 3 /(2- ε) 0.103+0.9965 | T| δ +0.317٠4εσT 3 /(2- ε) 50.0279 60.0430.044
43
Simplified thermal models of the BOS and BOL chambers Materialæ for BOSæ for BOL 10.028 20.027 32.00 4 0.097+0.9967 | T| δ +0.317٠4εσT 3 /(2- ε) 0.073+0.9975 | T| δ +0.317٠4εσT 3 /(2- ε) 50.163 60.044
44
Temperature gradients across chambers for BIS, BIL
45
Temperature gradients across the chambers BMS, BML
46
Temperature gradients across chambers BOS and BOL
47
MULTILAYER AND END PLUGS AS HOMOGENEOUS OBJECTS TO SIMULATE HEAT CONDUCTION ALONG CHAMBERS
48
Single MDT-tube presented as a homogeneous cylinder
49
Dependence of æ eff on tube length, chamber position and temperature gradients æ eff =6.32W/(mK)
50
Presenting a set of MDT-tubes as homogeneous object Fragment of multilayer consisted of 4 monolayers æ=5.44W/(mK) Tube block Fragment of multilayer consisted of 3 monolayers æ=5.51W/(mK)
51
End Plug
52
Simplified model of End Plug for simulations
53
Simplified model of End Plug with indicated materials for calculations
54
Simplified model for End Plug
55
HEATING OF MDT TUBES FOR THE BIS CHAMBER
56
2D model of a BIS chamber
57
Ventilation of ATLAS cavern Air velocity around the muon chambers
58
Airflow around chambers BIS16 (left), BIS10 (right)
59
Temperature fields in the Faraday Cage of BIS chamber, located in the air cavern Problem statement Inlet KB – 0.03 m/c Inlet AB– 0.06 m/c Outlet DE (0.13m length) 100% of flow Boundaries – adiabatic walls Energy source 5.0676E4 [W/m3]
60
Velocity field for Faraday Cage RO (BIS10)
61
Velocity fields for two regions of Faraday Cage RO (BIS10)
62
Temperature fields for two regions of Faraday Cage RO (BIS10)
63
Temperature field for fragment of BIS10
64
Fragments of BIS10 chamber Temperature in the lower multilayer of tubes Temperature in the upper multilayer of tubes
65
Fragment of velocity field around of BIS16 chamber
66
Temperature field for BIS16 chamber
67
Fragment of velocity field for chamber BIS16
68
Temperature distribution for chamber BIS16
69
Faraday Cage, BIS16 chamber Velocity in the left sub-domain of Faraday Cage Velocity in the right sub-domain of Faraday Cage
70
Conclusion Two type of simplified thermal models were created to be used in the global simulations Simplified thermal models were developed to describe heat transfer across the chambers Heat release in Faraday Cage was simulated and results were applied to describe heat transfer along the BIS chambers.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.