Intangibles.

Intangibles

Typical coverage of US GAAP
Characteristics Types of intangibles Acquisition of intangibles: Purchased intangibles Internally created intangibles Periodic valuation Carrying value Impairment Definition of impairment indicators Recognition Frequency of testing Testing and measurement Cost allocation Research and development costs Other costs

Executive summary IFRS permits periodic revaluation of intangible assets (except for goodwill) to fair value US GAAP does not allow revaluation. IFRS has a one-step approach for determining the impairment of intangible assets while US GAAP varies its approach by type of intangible asset as follows: Definite-lived intangible assets and goodwill: two-step approach indefinite-lived intangibles other than goodwill: one-step approach The calculations to measure the impairment are different between IFRS and US GAAP. For indefinite-lived intangibles including goodwill, US GAAP allows a company an option to bypass the quantitative impairment testing by performing a qualitative assessment as long as this assessment indicates impairment is not likely. IFRS does not permit this option. IFRS allows for the reversal of impairment losses on intangible assets (except for goodwill) while this is prohibited using US GAAP. IFRS requires that development costs are to be capitalized when technical and economic feasibility of a project can be demonstrated in accordance with specific criteria. Using US GAAP, most types of development costs are expensed as incurred.

Primary pronouncements
US GAAP ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other ASC 730, Research and Development ASC , Software-Costs of Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Marketed ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment IFRS IAS 38, Intangible Assets IAS 36, Impairment of Assets IFRS 3, Business Combinations

Progress on convergence
Impairment is one of the short-term convergence projects agreed to by the Boards in their Memorandum of Understanding. However, since that time, both the FASB and IASB have independently issued additional guidance that does not further converge the standards. FASB: Issued guidance on impairment testing for indefinite-lived intangible assets, including goodwill, to address concerns about the recurring cost and complexity of performing the quantitative impairment test. This new guidance permits companies an option to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether the quantitative assessment testing must be performed. This new guidance does not advance convergence with IAS 36 as this option is not permitted under IFRS. In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU , Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. This amendment was effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU , Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. This amendment was effective for annual periods beginning after September 15, 2012.

Progress on convergence (continued)
IASB: Issued an amendment to IAS 38, Clarification of Acceptable Methods of Depreciation and Amortisation, in May The guidance states there is a rebuttable presumption that it is inappropriate to use an amortization method that is based on revenue generated from an intangible asset because the use of an intangible asset is not generally directly linked to the consumption of benefits from the intangible asset. This results in divergence from current US GAAP.

Characteristics US GAAP IFRS
The definition of intangible assets is non-monetary assets without physical substance. Similar The recognition criteria require there be probable future economic benefits and costs that can be reliably measured. Similar

Types of intangibles US GAAP IFRS Market-related intangible assets.
Similar Customer-related intangible assets. Similar Artistic-related intangible assets — these ownership rights are protected by copyrights. Similar Contract-related intangible assets — a common form is a franchise. Similar Similar Technology-related intangible assets. Similar Business combination intangible assets.

Acquisition of intangibles Purchased intangibles
US GAAP IFRS In general, intangible assets that are acquired outside of a business combination are recognized at fair value at the time of acquisition. Similar Direct costs of securing a patent, including an acquisition from others, are included in the cost. Similar Goodwill is recognized only as a result of a business combination. For a 100% acquisition, the acquirer recognizes the acquiree’s net identifiable assets (including any intangible assets) at fair value at the acquisition date and recognizes goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the acquirer’s interest in the fair value of the identifiable net assets of the acquiree. Negative goodwill is recognized immediately as income (after reassessing the purchase price allocation) as per ASU and IFRS 3, paragraph 34). Similar

Acquisition of intangibles Purchased intangibles
US GAAP Permits certain costs incurred subsequent to its initial recognition (e.g., legal costs to defend a patent infringement) to be capitalized. IFRS These costs would be expensed, except in the rare circumstance that they improve future economic benefit.

Acquisition of intangibles Internally-created intangibles
US GAAP IFRS Internally generated assets other than goodwill, brands, mastheads, publishing titles, newspapers and customer lists may be recognized as assets if certain additional criteria are met. These additional criteria will be discussed in research and development. Similar

Periodic revaluation Carrying value
US GAAP IFRS Assuming no impairment, intangible assets are valued using the cost method at cost less any accumulated amortization. Use of this model is permitted.

Periodic valuation Carrying value
US GAAP Revaluation is not permitted. IFRS Revaluation to the fair value of intangible assets other than goodwill is an allowable alternative treatment: Because this requires reference to an active market for the specific type of intangible, it is relatively uncommon in practice. Increases in value should be credited to the account “revaluation surplus.” Revaluation surplus is an account that is included in accumulated OCI. Increases in value are not recorded in the revaluation surplus account if the increase reverses a loss that was previously expensed; that portion may be credited to an unrealized gain account which will flow through net income. Any decrease in value should be included as an unrealized loss in income unless it reverses the revaluation surplus relating to the same asset; that portion can be debited to revaluation surplus (OCI).

US GAAP Revaluation is not permitted. IFRS Revaluation (continued): If the revalued basis of an asset exceeds the cost basis, there will be an increase in the annual amortization. To the extent there is an increase in amortization expense, per IAS 38, paragraph 87, an entity may reverse the portion of reserve surplus related to this increase by debiting revaluation surplus and crediting retained earnings. Alternatively, this transfer may be completed upon disposal of the asset. When an asset is disposed of, any remaining revaluation surplus related to that asset can be transferred to retained earnings.

US GAAP Revaluation is not permitted. IFRS Revaluation (continued): If an intangible asset is revalued, an entity can account for the accumulated amortization at the date of revaluation by: Amortization elimination method: the accumulated amortization can be eliminated against the intangible asset itself. Proportionate restatement method: the accumulated amortization can be restated proportionately with the change in the gross carrying amount of the asset so that the carrying amount of the asset after revaluation equals its revalued amount. The proportionate restatement method is rarely used in practice, thus no example is provided.

Carrying value example Revaluation
Intangibles Inc. owns a freely transferable bus operator’s license, which it acquired on January 1, 2014 at an initial cost of $100,000. The useful life of the license is five years (based on the date until which it is valid). The entity uses the straight-line method to amortize the intangible. Such licenses are frequently traded between existing operators. At the balance sheet date, December 31, 2014, due to a government-permitted increase in fixed bus fares, the traded value of such a license was $130,000. The accumulated amortization on December 31, 2014, amounted to $40,000. What journal entries are required on December 31, 2014, to reflect the change in carrying value (cost or revalued amount less accumulated amortization) on the revaluation of the operating license using US GAAP and IFRS? What journal entries are required on December 31, 2015, using US GAAP and IFRS?

Example 1 solution: 2014 US GAAP: Revaluation is not permitted. IFRS: Accumulated amortization $ 40,000 Intangible asset $ 40,000 Intangible asset $ 70,000 Revaluation surplus – intangibles (OCI) $ 70,000 The net result is that the asset has a revised carrying amount of $130,000 ($100,000 – $40,000 + $70,000). The accumulated amortization may alternatively be restated proportionately. 2015 US GAAP: Amortization expense $ 20,000 Accumulated amortization $ 20,000 Amortization expense $ 43,333 Accumulated amortization $ 43,333 Revaluation surplus – intangibles (OCI) $ 23,333 Retained earnings $ 23,333 Note that this journal entry is optional.

Peter’s Photography, Inc. (PPI) reports using IFRS and acquires the ownership rights to a celebrity photograph on December 1, 2010, for $530. PPI accounts for these rights under the revaluation model. Assume, for the sake of simplicity, that there is no amortization recognized on this asset. The fair value of the asset changes as follows: December 1, 2014 $530 December 31, 2014 $550 December 31, 2015 $520 December 31, 2016 $510 December 31, 2017 $565 What are the balances in revaluation surplus at the end of each year? How much revaluation is recognized through OCI each year? How much revaluation is recognized in income each year?

Example 2 solution: The upward revaluation at A is accounted for in revaluation surplus through OCI. The downward revaluation at B first reduces revaluation surplus for that asset to zero and the excess of $10 is recognized as a loss in income. The second downward revaluation at C is recognized as a loss in income. The upward revaluation at D first reverses the cumulative loss recognized in income and the excess of $35 is accounted for through OCI in revaluation surplus. Value of asset End-of-year balance in the revaluation surplus account Annual effect on OCI Annual effect on net income December 1, 2014 $530 – A – December 31, 2014 550 $20 B – December 31, 2015 520 (20) $(10) C – December 31, 2016 510 (10) D – December 31, 2017 565 35 20

Carrying value example Restatement of accumulated amortization at revaluation
The Boston Commons Company (BCC) reports using IFRS and owns a franchise of tea shops in the Boston area named Tea Party. BCC currently carries the franchise rights for Tea Party at $120,000. In this last year, Tea Party’s business has been quite successful due to the demand for its English tea products. This success resulted in an increase in the market value of the franchise rights to $150,000. Accordingly, BCC has revalued these rights. The original cost basis of the rights is $280,000, and the current accumulated amortization is $160,000. Please provide the journal entries to record the revaluation of these franchise rights.

Carrying value example Restatement of accumulated amortization at revaluation
Example 3 solution: Amortization elimination: Accumulated amortization $160,000 Franchise rights $160,000 Franchise rights $30,000 Revaluation surplus – franchise (OCI) $30,000

Impairment Definition of impairment indicators
US GAAP IFRS Impairment indicators for an asset include such items as significant change in its use, projected losses related to its use and a significant decline in its market value. Similar

Impairment Recognition
US GAAP IFRS Similar, although an exception exists where an intangible asset has been revalued and the impairment loss is reversing an accumulated revaluation surplus balance for that asset. In that case, the portion of impairment that is reversing a prior increase in valuation may be debited to revaluation surplus (thus decreasing accumulated OCI). An impaired asset must be written down and the write-down should be recorded in net income.

Impairment – frequency of testing Indefinite-lived intangible assets including goodwill
US GAAP IFRS Indefinite-lived intangible assets including goodwill must be reviewed annually for impairment and when impairment indicators exist. Similar

Impairment – frequency of testing Finite-lived intangible assets
US GAAP Assets are tested whenever impairment indicators exist. A review is performed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. IFRS The existence of impairment indicators must be assessed annually.

Impairment testing and measurement Qualitative testing
US GAAP IFRS A qualitative assessment testing option is not permitted for finite-lived intangible assets. Similar

Impairment testing and measurement Qualitative testing
US GAAP For indefinite-lived intangible assets, including goodwill, a company may elect the option to perform a qualitative assessment to test for impairment rather than directly performing quantitative testing. If the qualitative assessment indicates that it is more likely than not (more than a 50% likelihood) that the carrying value is more than the fair value, the company must still perform quantitative testing. Note that for goodwill, these values are determined at the reporting unit (RU), which is typically thought of as an operating segment or one step below an operating segment. Qualitative factors include consideration of many factors including: Macroeconomic conditions Industry and market considerations Cost factors having a negative impact on earnings or cash flows Overall financial performance Relevant company specific events A prolonged decrease in share price (goodwill only) Events impacting the reporting unit (goodwill only) IFRS Not permitted.

Impairment testing and measurement Quantitative testing – general
If the calculation to test for and measure impairment is the same, this is referred to as a one-step approach to determining impairment. If the calculation to test for impairment is different than the calculation to measure the impairment, it is referred to as a two-step process to determining impairment.

Impairment testing and measurement Quantitative testing: finite-lived intangible assets
US GAAP A two-step approach: 1. A recoverability test is performed by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the sum of the future undiscounted cash flows generated through use and eventual disposition. If it is determined that the asset is not recoverable, the impairment is measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds its fair value. Note that per ASC , transaction costs (selling costs) are not included in the determination of fair value; however, these costs would be used to help determine the most advantageous market per ASC to then determine the appropriate fair value for that market. IFRS A one-step approach: The impairment is the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of: The fair value less costs to sell. The value in use (the present value of future cash flows in use, including disposal value).

Impairment testing and measurement Quantitative testing: indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill. US GAAP A one-step approach: The impairment is the amount by which the carrying value exceeds its fair value. Note that per ASC , transaction costs (selling costs) are not included in the determination of fair value; however, these costs would be used to help determine the most advantageous market per ASC to then determine the appropriate fair value for that market. IFRS A one-step approach: The impairment is the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of: The fair value less costs to sell. The value in use (the present value of future cash flows in use, including disposal value).

Impairment testing and measurement Quantitative testing – goodwill
US GAAP A two-step approach: A recoverability test is performed by comparing the carrying amount (including goodwill) of the RU to the fair value of the RU. If it is determined that the asset is not recoverable, the impairment is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill within its RU (the fair value of the RU less the fair value of the net assets (excluding goodwill) of the RU). IFRS A one-step approach: The impairment is the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount as previously described and is measured at the cash generating unit (CGU) level. A CGU is defined in IAS 36.6 as “... the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or group of assets.” The impairment amount is first allocated to reduce goodwill to zero, then to the other assets in the CGU pro rata on the basis of the carrying value of each asset.

Impairment testing and measurement example Finite-lived intangible asset
The Corporate Protection Company (CPC) has a patent on new fingerprint security technology. The fair value of the patent is $18 million, excluding selling costs of $3 million. The present value of future cash flows is $16 million The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows is $19 million CPC currently carries the patent at a value of $20 million. What journal entries would CPC prepare to record an impairment of the patent using both US GAAP and IFRS?

Example 4 solution: US GAAP Recoverability test: is the carrying value greater than the sum of the future undiscounted cash flows? Yes, since $20 million is greater than $19 million. Calculation of the impairment: Carrying value - fair value = $20 million - $18 million Journal entry to record the impairment: Impairment loss $2 million Patent $2 million

Example 4 solution (continued): IFRS Test for impairment: does the carrying amount exceed the recoverable amount? Yes, the carrying amount of $20 million is higher than the recoverable amount of $16 million. The recoverable amount is calculated as the higher of the fair value less the selling costs ($18 million - $3 million = $15 million), and the value in use (present value of future cash flows = $16 million) Calculation of the impairment (note that the determination and calculation of impairment are the same step): Carrying value - recoverable amount = $20 million - $16 million = $4 million Journal entry to record the impairment: Impairment loss $4 million Patent* $4 million *Note that the credit could be recorded to an accumulated impairment loss account instead of being recorded directly to the asset account. This would allow management to easily track accumulated impairment losses for potential reversal as discussed in example 8.

Fountain of Youth Incorporated (FYI) has a patent for some revolutionary new skin care products. The fair value of the patent is $16 million with selling costs of $2 million. The present value of the future cash flows is $14 million. The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows is $15 million. FYI currently carries the patent at a value of $10 million. What journal entries would FYI prepare to record an impairment of the patent using both US GAAP and IFRS?

Example 5 solution: US GAAP: Recoverability test: is the carrying value greater than the sum of the future undiscounted cash flows? No, since $10 million is less than $15 million; therefore, no impairment loss needs to be calculated. IFRS: Test for impairment: does the carrying amount exceed the recoverable amount? No, the carrying amount of $10 million is less than the recoverable amount of $14 million. The recoverable amount is calculated as the higher of fair value less selling costs ($16 million - $2 million = $14 million), and the value in use (present value of future cash flows = $14 million). As there is no impairment, no journal entry is required.

Impairment testing and measurement example Indefinite-lived intangible asset other than goodwill
The KCH&H Company (KCH&H) has a trademark that it expects to have an indefinite life with a carrying value of $750,000. As part of its 2012 annual impairment testing, KCH&H decides not to use the qualitative assessment option under US GAAP and moves forward to performing its quantitative assessment impairment testing for both US GAAP and IFRS. In this process, it is determined that the fair value of the trademark is $600,000. The present value of the future cash flows is $630,000 and the undiscounted summation of the future cash flows is $700,000. The costs to sell the trademark would be insignificant. What journal entries would KCH&H prepare to record an impairment of the trademark using both US GAAP and IFRS? KCH&H

Impairment testing and measurement example Indefinite-lived intangible asset other than goodwill
Example 6 solution: US GAAP: There is not a separate recoverability test for indefinite-lived intangible assets. The fair value test is used. Since the carrying value of the trademark ($750,000) is greater than the fair value ($600,000), KCH&H would writedown the trademark by $150,000. Journal entry to record the impairment: Impairment loss $150,000 Trademark $150,000 IFRS: The impairment loss is calculated as the carrying value ($750,000) less the recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the greater of the fair value less selling costs ($600,000) and the value in use ($630,000). Therefore, KCH&H would writedown the trademark by $120,000. Impairment loss $120,000 Trademark* $120,000 *Note that the credit could be recorded to an accumulated impairment loss account instead of being recorded directly to the asset account. This would allow management to easily track accumulated impairment losses for potential reversal as discussed in example 8.

Impairment testing and measurement example Goodwill
The Caring Card Company (CCC) has goodwill recorded in two CGUs, as defined using IFRS. These two CGUs make up one reporting unit (RU), as defined using US GAAP. In its annual impairment testing, CCC decides not to use the qualitative assessment option under US GAAP and moves forward to performing the quantitative assessment impairment testing for both US GAAP and IFRS. In this process, CCC gathers the following information: CCC carries the first CGU at a value of $2 million, which includes $500,000 of goodwill. The fair value is $4 million and the recoverable amount of the unit is $4 million. CCC carries the second CGU at a value of $3.5 million, which includes $750,000 attributable to goodwill. The fair value of the CGU is $3 million and the recoverable amount of the unit is $3 million. The fair value of the net assets of the RU excluding goodwill is $6 million. Compute the amount of impairment CCC should record using US GAAP and provide any necessary journal entries. Compute the amount of impairment CCC should record using IFRS and provide any necessary journal entries.

Example 7 solution: Carrying value of unit (including goodwill) Carrying value of goodwill Fair value of unit Recoverable amount of unit Fair value of net assets of unit excluding goodwill CGU 1 $2,000,000 $ 500,000 $4,000,000 CGU 2 3,500,000 750,000 3,000,000 RU $5,500,000 $1,250,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000

Example 7 solution (continued): US GAAP: Recoverability test: does the carrying value of the RU exceed the fair value of the RU? No, since $5.5 million is less than $7 million. Note that if CCC did need to compute an impairment amount, the amount would be determined as the carrying amount of goodwill of $1,250,000 less the implied fair value of goodwill of $1,000,000, which is the fair value of the RU ($7,000,000) less the fair value of the net assets of the RU excluding goodwill ($6,000,000). IFRS: Test of impairment: does the carrying value of the CGU exceed the recoverable amount of the CGU? CGU 1 – No, since $2 million is less than $4 million. CGU 2 – Yes, since $3.5 million is greater than $3 million by $500,000. Journal entry to record the impairment: Impairment loss $500,000 Goodwill $500,000

Impairment reversal US GAAP IFRS
A reversal of an impairment loss for goodwill is prohibited. Similar

Impairment reversal US GAAP
Reversal of impairment losses is prohibited for all intangible assets. IFRS Finite and indefinite-lived intangible assets (other than goodwill) must be reviewed annually for reversal indicators. If appropriate, a loss may be reversed up to the newly estimated recoverable amount, not to exceed the initial carrying amount adjusted for amortization. This amount is recorded in income.

Impairment reversal example Indefinite-lived intangible asset
In addition to the information from example 6, in the following year, KCH&H reviewed its trademark for impairment reversal indicators. Upon review of these indicators, KCH&H determined that reversal of the impairment was appropriate. The fair value of the trademark and the present value of future cash flows is both $800,000. The costs to sell the trademark continue to be insignificant. What journal entries would KCH&H prepare to record the reversal of the impairment loss for the trademark using both US GAAP and IFRS? KCH&H

Impairment reversal example Indefinite-lived intangible asset
Example 8 solution: US GAAP: No reversal of impairment losses is permitted. IFRS: An impairment loss may be reversed up to the newly estimated recoverable amount ($800,000), not to exceed the initial carrying amount adjusted for amortization ($750,000). As this asset has an indefinite life, amortization is not a factor. As the initial carrying amount is less than the newly estimated recovery amount, the reversal is limited to the initial loss that was recorded. The reversal is recorded into income. Journal entry to reverse the impairment losses: Trademark* $120,000 Impairment loss $120,000 *Note that if the impairment was initially credited to an accumulated impairment loss account instead of being recorded directly to the asset account , the accumulated impairment loss account would be debited instead of the asset account.

Summary of impairment of intangible assets
Type of intangible asset Frequency of impairment testing Qualitative impairment testing option? Quantitative impairment testing and measurement Reversal of impairment? US GAAP IFRS US GAAP US GAAP Finite-lived When impairment indicators exist Annually Yes No Two step Recoverability test (1) Carrying value less fair value One step Carrying value less recoverable amount(4) Indefinite-lived, other than goodwill Yes(5) Goodwill Fair value test on RU(2) Carrying value less implied fair value (3) Carrying value of CGU less recoverable amount of CGU(4) Compare the carrying value to the sum of undiscounted cash flows. Compare the carrying value of the reporting unit to the fair value of the RU(including goodwill). The implied fair value of goodwill equals the fair value of the RU less the fair value of the net assets (excluding goodwill) of the RU. Recoverable amount is the higher of: (1) the fair value less selling costs and (2) the present value of future discounted cash flows. Companies have the option of assessing qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value is greater than the carrying value. If not, a quantitative test is not required. For goodwill, this is performed at the RU level.

Cost allocation Finite-lived intangible assets
US GAAP IFRS Amortization of intangible assets over their estimated useful lives is generally required. Similar

Cost allocation Finite-lived intangible assets
US GAAP Under ASC , capitalized software costs are amortized on a product-by-product basis: The annual amortization is the greater of the amount computed using: (a) the ratio that current gross revenues for a product bear to the total of the current and anticipated future gross revenues for that product; or (b) the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life of the product, including the period being reported. IFRS An amendment to IAS 38, Clarification of Acceptable Methods of Depreciation and Amortisation, was issued in May The guidance states there is a rebuttable presumption that it is inappropriate to use an amortization method that is based on revenue generated from an intangible asset, because the use of an intangible asset is not generally directly linked to the consumption of benefits from the intangible asset. This results in divergence from current US GAAP.

Cost allocation Indefinite-lived intangible assets
US GAAP IFRS If there is no foreseeable limit to the period during which an intangible asset is expected to generate net cash inflows to the entity, the useful life is considered to be indefinite and is not amortized. Similar

Research and development
US GAAP IFRS Internal costs related to the research phase of research and development are expensed as incurred under both accounting models. Similar Under converged standards, in-process research and development is to be recognized as an indefinite-lived intangible asset separately from goodwill at its acquisition-date fair value. Similar

Research and development
US GAAP Development costs are expensed as incurred, unless addressed by a separate standard. IFRS Development costs are capitalized when technical and economic feasibility of a project can be demonstrated in accordance with specific criteria. Some of the criteria include: demonstrating technical feasibility, intent to complete the asset and ability to sell the asset in the future, as well as others.

Research and development example
Example 9 – Internet Imaging Inc. (Triple I), is working on a project to create a database of picture images which it intends to sell over the internet. Triple I has identified the following stages and costs incurred in its project: Research stage This stage included identifying the system requirements, searching for an appropriate database and other system materials and images to purchase, gaining the technical knowledge necessary to collect and transfer the images and overall project feasibility. Costs incurred were $50,000 during the period of January 1, 2014 through March 31, On April 1, 2014, Triple I determined that it would complete the intended project. Additional research costs of $75,000 were incurred during the period of April 1, 2014 through June 30, 2014. Development stage This stage included performing market analysis to identify potential demand, acquiring system materials and images to populate the database; designing the website; and testing a system prototype. During the period of May 1, 2014 through August 31, 2014, Triple I incurred development costs of $100,000. On August 31, 2014, Triple I determined that its project was technically feasible. During the period of September 1, 2014 through October 31, 2014, Triple I incurred development costs of $50,000. On October 31, 2014, Triple I received its results from its market study and determined that the project was economically feasible. Additional development costs of $200,000 were incurred during the period of November 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014. Production stage Triple I will launch its imaging database on the internet on January 1, 2015.

Example 9 continued: Complete the diagram below by inputting the research and development costs for 2012 in the appropriate periods based on the information above. Based on the diagram, determine which research and development costs Triple I can capitalize related to this project during 2012 using US GAAP and IFRS? Research phase Development phase $ January 1, 2012 March 31, 2012 April 1, 2012 May 1, 2012 June 30, 2012 August 31, 2012 September 1, 2012 October 31, 2012 November 1, 2012 December 31, 2012 Research Initiated Decision to complete the project Development initiated Research completed Technical feasibility reached Economic feasibility reached Development completed

Example 9 solution: Using US GAAP, Triple I cannot capitalize any research and development costs. Using IFRS, Triple I cannot capitalize any research costs, similar to US GAAP; however, Triple I may capitalize development costs when technical and economic feasibility of a project can be demonstrated in accordance with specific criteria. Some of the stated criteria include: demonstrating technical feasibility, intent to complete the asset and ability to sell the asset in the future, as well as others. As shown in the diagram below, Triple I met these criteria on October 31, 2014; therefore, the $200,000 incurred from November 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, prior to the product launch on January 1, 2015, may be capitalized. Research phase Development phase $50,000 $75,000 $100,000 $200,000 January 1, 2014 March 31, 2014 April 1, 2014 May 1, 2014 June 30, 2014 August 31, 2014 September 1, 2014 October 31, 2014 November 1, 2014 December 31, 2014 Research Initiated Decision to complete the project Development initiated Research completed Technical feasibility reached Economic feasibility reached Development completed

Other costs US GAAP IFRS
Start-up costs, including initial operating losses, cannot be capitalized. Similar

Other costs US GAAP Advertising and promotional costs are either expensed as incurred or expensed when the advertising takes place for the first time under US GAAP. Direct-response advertising may be capitalized if the specific criteria in ASC , Other Assets and Deferred Costs-Capitalized Advertising Costs-Recognition, are met. IFRS Advertising and promotional costs are expensed as incurred. A prepayment may be recognized as an asset only when payment for the goods or services is made in advance of the entity having access to the goods or receiving the services.

Disclosures US GAAP IFRS
The disclosure requirements under US GAAP and IFRS for intangible assets are, in most respects, similar. Similar

Disclosures US GAAP IFRS
GAAP does not, within a single standard, address comprehensive disclosure requirements for intangible assets: Under SEC rules, SEC registrants are required to disclose identifiable intangible assets separately from unidentifiable intangible assets and goodwill, along with the method of determining their respective amounts. Despite the additional disclosures required by SEC rules, it is likely that there will be more disclosures for intangible assets under IAS 38 than under US GAAP IFRS IAS 38 includes a long list of general disclosures for each class of intangible asset: Internally generated intangible assets must be distinguished from other intangible assets. Separate disclosure is required for intangible assets being amortized over more than 20 years, for intangible assets being carried under the allowed alternative treatment at revalued amounts, and for research and development expenditures. IAS 38 encourages disclosure of a description of any fully amortized intangible asset that is still in use and disclosure of a description of any intangible asset that did not meet the recognition criteria.

Disclosures US GAAP Requires disclosures about impairment losses and the circumstances giving rise to those losses. However, detailed disclosures by individual asset or CGU are not required. Because ASC does not permit the revaluation of assets, it does not provide guidance on revaluation. IFRS Requires disclosures about impairment losses in the aggregate and by class of asset and reportable segment and, if material, by individual asset or CGU. IAS 36 specifies additional reporting requirements for impairment losses and the reversal of those impairment losses for revalued assets.

Disclosures US GAAP If a surrogate for fair value is developed by discounting an enterprise’s estimates of an asset’s future cash flows, ASC 360 requires disclosure of that fact, but not of the discount rate or the key assumptions used. IFRS If an asset’s recoverable amount is measured as its value in use, IAS 36 requires disclosure of the discount rate used in calculating that measure and encourages, but does not require, disclosure of the key assumptions used.

EY | Assurance | Tax | Transactions | Advisory
About EY EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities. EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com. About the Ernst & Young Academic Resource Center The Ernst & Young Academic Resource Center (EYARC) is an innovative collaboration between faculty and professionals to support higher education. The EYARC develops and provides free curriculum resources and other educational support to address leading-edge issues impacting the accounting profession. The EYARC is yet another example of the commitment of the global EY organization and the Ernst & Young Foundation to the academic community. The Ernst & Young Foundation is a 501(c)(3) tax exempt corporation associated with Ernst & Young LLP, which funds the Foundation, together with its present and former partners, principals and staff. © 2014 Ernst & Young Foundation (US). All Rights Reserved. SCORE No. MM4163C.

Intangibles.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Intangibles."— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

Intangibles.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Intangibles."— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback