Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTheresa Spencer Modified over 9 years ago
1
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Nieuwenhuizen MG, de Groot S, Janssen TW, van der Maas LC, Beckerman H. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure performance scale: Validity and responsiveness in chronic pain. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(5):727–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2012.12.0221 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2012.12.0221JSP Canadian Occupational Performance Measure performance scale: Validity and responsiveness in chronic pain Mieke G. Nieuwenhuizen, MSc, PT; Sonja de Groot, PhD; Thomas W. J. Janssen, PhD; Lia C. C. van der Maas, MSc; Heleen Beckerman, PhD
2
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Nieuwenhuizen MG, de Groot S, Janssen TW, van der Maas LC, Beckerman H. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure performance scale: Validity and responsiveness in chronic pain. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(5):727–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2012.12.0221 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2012.12.0221JSP Aim – Examine construct validity and construct responsiveness of Dutch version of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure performance scale (COPM-P) in chronic pain population. Relevance – COPM-P has not yet been validated in Dutch pain population.
3
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Nieuwenhuizen MG, de Groot S, Janssen TW, van der Maas LC, Beckerman H. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure performance scale: Validity and responsiveness in chronic pain. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(5):727–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2012.12.0221 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2012.12.0221JSP Method Subjects: – Newly admitted patients with chronic pain in outpatient rehabilitation clinic. Measures at admission and 12 wk: – COPM-P, Pain Disability Index (PDI), and RAND 36-Item Health Survey (RAND-36). Construct validity: – Correlations between COPM-P, PDI, and RAND-36 at admission(n = 87). Construct responsiveness: – Correlations between change scores at 12 wk (n = 57).
4
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Nieuwenhuizen MG, de Groot S, Janssen TW, van der Maas LC, Beckerman H. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure performance scale: Validity and responsiveness in chronic pain. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(5):727–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2012.12.0221 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2012.12.0221JSP Results COPM-P did not significantly correlate with PDI or any RAND-36 subscale. Only a moderate correlation was found between change scores of COPM-P and PDI. Weak to moderate correlations were found between change scores of COPM-P and RAND-36. – Higher correlations for physical function, social functioning, and role limitations (physical) subscales.
5
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Nieuwenhuizen MG, de Groot S, Janssen TW, van der Maas LC, Beckerman H. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure performance scale: Validity and responsiveness in chronic pain. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(5):727–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2012.12.0221 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2012.12.0221JSP Conclusion For inpatients with chronic pain attending rehabilitation program, COPM-P measures something different than RAND-36 or PDI. – Therefore, construct validity of COPM-P was not confirmed by our data. We were not able to find support for COPM-P to detect changes in occupational performance.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.