1. Namibia Index of Multiple Deprivation (NIMD) By JM Ashipala National Planning Commission Ojijo Odhiambo UNDP

2. Content  Introduction  Deprivations patterns and Trends  Conclusions  Recommendations 7/3/2015Deprivations 2

3. Introduction  V2030 Target: GDP growth rate of 6%, low unemployment rate of 2.3%, Gini coefficient of 0.3.  15 years to 2030  NDP4 target: GDP growth of 6%, create 90 615 jobs, reduce extreme poverty to below 10%, reduce gini coefficient by 3% per year.  Education & health the enablers  2 years to NDP4, 2016  First NIMD created in 2010 for Khomas Region using data from the 2001 NPHC  Resource allocation within the region  Five dimensions of deprivation: material deprivation, employment deprivation, health deprivation, education deprivation and living environment deprivation.  NIMD produced at regional, constituency and datazone levels using the 2001 and 2011 NPHC. 7/3/2015Deprivation 3

4. 7/3/2015Deprivations4 REGION MaterialEmploymentEducationEnvironmentChange (2001- 2011) 20112001201120012011200120112001 Materi als Employm ent Educati on environm ent Caprivi 53.373.538.317.564.163.289.290.2-20.220.80.9-0.9 Erongo 33.027.430.334.259.363.053.056.25.6-3.8-3.7-3.2 Hardap 34.142.935.633.970.869.462.965.5-8.81.71.4-2.6 Karas 33.037.233.228.666.567.859.565.3-4.24.6-1.3-5.8 Kavango 64.475.150.820.473.372.490.495.5-10.730.40.9-5.1 Khomas 30.538.030.429.448.851.452.752.1-7.51.0-2.70.7 Kunene 63.479.436.223.581.675.284.487.8-16.012.76.3-3.4 Ohangwena 54.386.043.737.369.965.494.297.2-31.86.54.5-3.0 Omaheke 49.262.839.824.078.471.683.086.3-13.615.76.8-3.2 Omusati 58.583.242.736.563.063.192.095.1-24.66.2-0.1-3.1 Oshana 53.357.538.740.854.658.473.081.4-4.2-2.2-3.8-8.4 Oshikoto 52.983.440.645.267.665.885.888.8-30.5-4.71.8-2.9 Otjozondjupa 41.757.038.331.773.068.269.274.2-15.36.54.8-5.0 Namibia 48.164.737.531.463.5 76.481.1-16.66.1-0.1-4.7 Regional Scores and Changes over the 2001-2011 period

5. NIMD constituency 2001 - 2011 7/3/2015Deprivation 5

6. 7/3/2015Swakopmund6 ConstituencyRegionRank 2011Rank 2001 KapakoKavango124 TsumkweOtjozondjupa226 MashareKavango327 KongolaCaprivi42 KahengeKavango523 NdiyonaKavango61 OmundaungiloOhangwena714 OnesiOmusati836 LinyantiCaprivi925 MukweKavango1018 Rundu Rural EastKavango1122 SesfonteinKunene1229 EpupaKunene13 SibindaCaprivi1410 EpembeOhangwena1511 MpunguKavango1638 OtjineneOmaheke1787 OmulongaOhangwena184 Katima Mulilo RuralCaprivi1934 OndobeOhangwena2016 20 Most Deprived Constituencies overall NIMD in 2011 >50% (55%) of 20 most deprived constituencies new entrants Newly proclaimed town

7. NIMD Datazone 2001 - 2011 7/3/2015Deprivation 7 Are there are pockets of multiple deprivation within constituencies

8. Interquartile NIMD 2001 - 2011 7/3/2015Deprivation 8

9. Changes in Material Deprivation over 2001 – 2011 period by Region 0 20 40 60 80 Rate of material deprivation Caprivi Erongo Hardap Karas Kavango Khomas Kunene Ohangwena Omaheke Omusati Oshana Oshikoto Otjozondjupa Regions in Namibia Material Depriviation 2001 to 2011 20012011 Erongo an economic hub LFPR of 80% Unemployment 30%

10. 7/3/2015Swakopmund10 ConstituencyRegionRank2001Rank20112001-2011 EpupaKunene1591.3189.4-1.9 TsumkweOtjozondjupa895.3281.2-14.2 OnesiOmusati2886.4376.5-9.9 KongolaCaprivi1093.4476.3-17.1 KahengeKavango5272.3573.31.0 SesfonteinKunene696.7673.2-23.5 MpunguKavango5569.9773.03.0 OmundaungiloOhangwena298.6872.8-25.8 KapakoKavango5964.8972.88.0 EengondiOshikoto598.31071.9-26.4 EpembeOhangwena198.91170.8-28.1 MashareKavango1293.01270.7-22.3 OkankoloOshikoto398.31370.5-27.9 UukwiyuOshana6462.01470.48.4 MukweKavango2786.41569.8-16.6 SibindaCaprivi1193.31669.5-23.7 OtjombindeOmaheke4079.61768.9-10.6 LinyantiCaprivi1690.81868.2-22.6 OpuwoKunene2089.71965.8-23.9 OkakuOshana4974.72065.5-9.2 20 most material deprivation constituencies

11. Changes in Employment Deprivation over 2001 – 2011 period by region 0 10 20 30 40 50 Rate of employment deprivation Caprivi Erongo Hardap Karas Kavango Khomas Kunene Ohangwena Omaheke Omusati Oshana Oshikoto Otjozondjupa Regions in Namibia Employment Depriviation 2001 to 2011 20012011 Erongo, An increase in material but a decline in employment

12. ConstituencyRegionRank2001Rank2011Change Rundu Rural EastKavango4533.2170.837.6 OnesiOmusati4732.5259.527.1 KapakoKavango9513.5358.044.5 Rundu Rural WestKavango7823.5457.333.7 MashareKavango8023.1555.532.4 OmuthiyagwiipundiOshikoto1943.1654.711.6 Rundu UrbanKavango6328.3752.824.5 TsumkweOtjozondjupa8421.3850.729.5 Katima Mulilo UrbanCaprivi5730.1950.120.0 OtamanziOmusati1160.51049.6-10.9 OtjineneOmaheke9017.71149.231.6 OshikangoOhangwena1843.91248.95.0 Ohangwena 2838.91347.78.8 KhorixasKunene1744.21447.53.3 OkalongoOmusati9116.01547.531.5 OkatanaOshana5431.01647.416.4 OndobeOhangwena2639.51747.37.9 SesfonteinKunene6727.31847.019.8 AminuisOmaheke7026.11947.020.9 OkakararaOtjozondjupa1548.52047.0-1.5 20 most employment deprived constituencies

13. Constituency Level Health Deprivation in 2011and 2001 7/3/2015Deprivations 13

14. 7/3/2015Swakopmund14 ConstituencyRegionRank2001Rank2011Change KhorixasKunene61404.91793.1388.2 LinyantiCaprivi49551.72778.8227.1 MukweKavango42607.43758.3151.0 Ohangwena 7949.24600.1-349.0 NdiyonaKavango29691.85597.3-94.5 Rundu UrbanKavango36653.66596.8-56.7 Katima Mulilo RuralCaprivi6982.77592.9-389.8 KongolaCaprivi11374.98584.8-790.1 KapakoKavango22776.49576.2-200.2 OkakuOshana31006.710574.9-431.8 MashareKavango37634.811568.2-66.5 KahengeKavango25736.712566.4-170.3 EndolaOhangwena10910.813563.1-347.7 MpunguKavango35654.114555.6-98.5 OmulongaOhangwena8922.315540.3-382.0 BersebaKaras80322.316533.4211.1 TsumkweOtjozondjupa91259.417521.8262.3 Rundu Rural WestKavango38634.418520.1-114.2 OutjoKunene51519.819519.5-0.3 OndobeOhangwena21070.820515.6-555.2 20 Most Health Deprived Constituencies

15. Inter-quartile Range Health Deprivation by Regions in 2001 and 2011 7/3/2015Deprivation15

16. Education Deprivation Domain Erongo Oshana Khomas Karas

17. 7/3/2015Swakopmund17 ConstituencyRegionRank2001Rank2011Change EpupaKunene183.4191.17.7 TsumkweOtjozondjupa478.9285.86.9 Rehoboth RuralHardap677.1385.28.1 SteinhausenOmaheke379.3484.14.8 GuinasOshikoto280.0583.93.9 SesfonteinKunene1176.1683.57.4 KamanjabKunene2074.8782.37.6 OtaviOtjozondjupa1375.8882.16.2 OmatakoOtjozondjupa2772.2981.59.3 DauresErongo2572.81081.18.3 OtjineneOmaheke6664.61181.016.4 OtjombindeOmaheke2273.91280.97.0 OpuwoKunene2473.31380.67.2 EengondiOshikoto1076.31480.24.0 KapakoKavango1276.01580.24.2 EpukiroOmaheke6265.51679.714.2 KahengeKavango776.91779.52.5 KalahariOmaheke578.21879.20.9 NdiyonaKavango1475.71978.93.1 OutjoKunene2373.82078.64.8 20 Most Education Deprived Constituencies All 20 most education deprived constituencies registered an increase

18. Changes in Living Environment Deprivation over 2001 – 2011 period by region

19. ConstituencyRegionRank2001Rank2011Change EpembeOhangwena399.81 0.0 OkankoloOshikoto699.6299.0-0.6 KabeCaprivi999.4398.9-0.5 LinyantiCaprivi199.9498.7-1.2 OmundaungiloOhangwena1199.2598.7-0.5 KapakoKavango599.6698.6 EpupaKunene499.7798.6-1.1 KahengeKavango799.4898.4 KongolaCaprivi1698.6998.3-0.2 SibindaCaprivi299.91098.3-1.6 EengondiOshikoto1498.81198.1-0.7 Katima Mulilo RuralCaprivi2098.21298.0-0.2 OmulongaOhangwena1598.81398.0-0.8 MashareKavango1299.21497.9-1.2 OndobeOhangwena1399.01597.9-1.1 MukweKavango1798.61697.6-0.9 OtamanziOmusati2297.61797.50.0 OkongoOhangwena899.41897.3-2.1 NdiyonaKavango1099.21997.2-2.0 MpunguKavango1898.52096.3-2.2 20 most Environment deprivation constituencies

20.  Wide regional disparities with regards to multiple deprivations.  3 (5) most deprived constituencies located in Kavango while 3 (5) least deprived constituencies located in Khomas.  Kapako in Kavango, the most deprived constituency followed by Tsumkwe in Otzondjupa region, Mashare in Kavango, Kongola in Zambezi and Kehenge in Kavango.  16.6 percentage points decline on materially deprived, 2001 – 2011.  Living environment and education deprived declined by 4.7 and 0.1percentage points.  Employment deprivation increased by 6.1 percentage points at national, but in three of the regions – Erongo, Oshana and Oshikoto, it declined.  Half of the regions registered declines in people who are education deprived  All regions except Khomas, registered declines in living environment deprivation Conclusions… 7/3/2015Deprivation 1

21.  Prioritize resource allocation according to regional and constituency developmental needs  Ensure efficiency of resources allocated  Improve service delivery by targeting most deprived areas. Recommendations 7/3/2015Deprivation 1

22. Thank You