1. Kyoto Protocol Bill Menke, December 6, 2005

2. Summary Milestones 1972 Stockholm Declaration 1988 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 1992 UN Framewor Convention on Climate Change 1997 Byrd-Hagel Resolution 1997 Kyoto Protocol 2005 Kyoto Rulebook Statistics Reactions

3. United Nations Conference on the Human Environment Stockholm Declaration of 1972

4. Some Highlights protection and improvement of the human environment is a major issue developing countries must direct their efforts to development, bearing in mind their priorities and the need to safeguard and improve the environment natural growth of population continuously presents problems for the preservation of the environment

5. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change established 1988 joint program of the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Programme

6. Mandate Assess scientific, technical and socio- economic information relevant for the understanding of climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation

7. This group publishes the IPCC Reportrs that we have used previously in this class

8. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 1992

9. Highlight Ultimate objective: stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous interference with the climate system Commitments of states – publish inventories of sources & sinks –formulate & implement mitigation plans –promote scientific exchanges United States is a signatory

11. Byrd-Hagel Resolution US Senate, 1997 (non-binding, but passed 95-0) The U.S. will not enter into an agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that will be detrimental to the economy of the U.S. The U.S. will not enter into an agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that does not require "meaningful involvement" on the part of developing nations.

12. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change negotiated in 1997 open for signature in 1998 came into force February 16, 2005

13. The Kyoto Protocol is a agreement under which industrialized countries will reduce their collective emissions of greenhouse gases by 5.2% compared to the year 1990 Compared to the emissions levels that would be expected by 2010 without the Protocol, this target represents a 29% cut. The goal is to lower overall emissions from six greenhouse gases - carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, sulfur hexafluoride, HFCs, and PFCs - calculated as an average over the five-year period of 2008-12. National targets range from 8% reductions for the European Union and some others to 7% for the US, 6% for Japan, 0% for Russia, and permitted increases of 8% for Australia and 10% for Iceland.“ Sinks can be used to offset emission and emission credits can be traded. IPPC analyses used in assessments of sources and sinks Highlights

14. Why 10% increase for Iceland? In October, 2000 I (B. Menke) participated in a discussion with President Grimsson of Iceland, who was visiting LDEO. He said that because of Iceland’s heavy reliance on geothermal and hydroelectric energy, its per-capita emissions were low. Even opening one new factory would represent an increase that would be hard to offset.

15. US and Kyoto US signed in 1998 (Clinton) but withdrew in in 2001 "The Kyoto Protocol was fatally flawed in fundamental ways, but the process used to bring nations together to discuss our joint response to climate change is an important one …“ George W. Bush June 11, 2001

16. Bush’s Criticisms emissions targets arbitrary and not based on science protocol's binding limits on emissions could harm the U.S. economy Several big emitter countries, such as China (the number 2 emitter) and India (number 6) are totally exempt.

17. Kyoto Rule Book December 2, 2005 Defines how each country’s emissions and sinks (e.g. reforestation) are accounted Developed countries can invest in other developed countries and earn carbon allowances Establishes the Clean Development Mechanism which allows developed countries to invest in sustainable development projects (excl. nukes) in developing countries

18. Status and Projections

24. Various Reactions to Kyoto

25. Although every European country says that it supports ratification of Kyoto, none have explained what ratification means for their citizens and their economies. If they were so confident that these targets could be achieved at low cost with no serious economic consequences, they would be more forthcoming with their plans and analyses. William O'Keefe Marshall Institute

26. The arguments for and against nuclear power have changed somewhat over the years. Finland’s Minister of Trade and Industry, Ms Sinikka Mönkäre, who is a Social Democrat and a physician, argues for the building of a new nuclear power plant because of Finland's climate commitments under the Kyoto protocol, and the price and availability of energy.

27. Why Greenpeace supports Kyoto The Kyoto Protocol is the only global action plan against climate change. It's just the first step but the way forward is for countries to get on board and negotiate the next round of emissions reduction targets. From the GreenPeace website

28. The president's decision to pull out of the Kyoto Protocol is going to cost U.S. energy technology companies millions of dollars. The international agreement will create a multibillion dollar market in the developing world for renewable energy technologies, and the Germans and the Japanese, participants in Kyoto, are going to have a leg up in that market. Philip Clapp National Environment Trust

29. Independent of politics, going after reducing CO 2 makes real business sense because it usually means going after energy use. Kristen Zimmerman Spokesperson for General Motors Corporation

30. The expansion of palm oil production* is one of the leading causes of rainforest destruction in south-east Asia. It is one of the most environmentally damaging commodities on the planet. Once again it appears we are trying to solve our environmental problems by dumping them in developing countries, where they have devastating effects on local people. Simon Counsell Rainforest Foundation * due to a European Union laws requiring conventional fuels to be blended with biofuels