1. Belle results relevant to LHC Pheno-07 May 8, 2007 Madison Wisc. S.L. Olsen U of Hawai’i

2. CKM Global Fit (Sep.2006) CKM is “correct” at tree level

3. B0B0 B0B0 B0B0 V cb V tb V* V tb J/  KSKS KSKS sin2  1 from B  f CP + B  B  f CP interf.  V* 2 td  Sanda, Bigi & Carter:

4. Next step: use b  s penguins Example: no KM phase SM: sin2  1 = sin2  1 from B  J/  K S (b  c c s) unless there are other, non-SM particles in the loop eff V td + 11 B B,  ’,     11 _ * *

5. SMNP? i.e. > 0.1 for M NP accessible @ LHC ~ ~s ~ x b g ~ t

6. 2006:  1 with b  s Penguins Smaller than b  ccs in all of 9 modes Smaller than b  ccs in all of 9 modes Theory tends to predict positive shifts (originating from phase in Vts) Naïve average of all b  s modes sin2  eff = 0.52 ± 0.05 2.6  deviation between penguin and tree (b  s) (b  c) Naïve average of all b  s modes sin2  eff = 0.52 ± 0.05 2.6  deviation between penguin and tree (b  s) (b  c)

7. History of sin2  1 sin2  1 from b  ccs decays (2007) 20022003200420052006 2.6  3.1  3.9  2.8  2.6   0.15 eff sin2  1 (b  qqs decays) (Belle&BaBar average)

8. ~s ~ x How to make  small? Tune the squark mixing terms is there enough freedom to do this? Make the squark masses degenerate invoke a GIM-like mechanism Make the SUSY mass scale very high (~few TeV) not much fun for LHC experimenters b g ~

9. B  B   Decays w/ “Missing E(>1 )” B decay constant  Lattice QCD SM : BSM : sensitive to New Physics from H 

10. B   (nearly invisible decays) N= 680k eff.= 0.29% purity = 57% N= 680k eff.= 0.29% purity = 57% Charged B Tag-side: Full reconstruction 449M BB Υ(4S) e  (8GeV) e+(3.5GeV) B B   signal 4-momentum determined  B meson beam ! 4-momentum determined  B meson beam !

11. Missing momentum Missing momentum B   candidate event

12. B   results Belle Hadronic tag  e   eff           D l  tag e              First evidence, 3.5  No clear signal Belle BaBar PRL97, 251802 (2006).hep-ex/0608019

13. We measure Branching fraction Product of B meson decay constant ƒ B and CKM element |V ub | Compare with Babar preliminary

14. Constraints on H  mass r H =1.13  0.51 Use known f B and |V ub | Ratio to the SM BF. excluded

15. BXsBXs W +, H +

16. Nakao

17. NNLO calculation  (298  26) x 10 -6 M. Misiak et al, hep- ph/0609232, PRL 98,022002(2007) Theory News NNLO theory

18. Error on BF Central value of BF 95% CL lower limit on H + mass from exp and NNLO M. Misiak et al, hep-ph/0609232, PRL 98,022002 (2007) BaBar/Belle/CLEO avg  M(H + )>295 GeV 300 GeV

19. BB BXsBXs 350- Look here or here

20. Validate the E ECL simulation using double-tagged events (with on the signal side) Signal reconstruction (purity ~ 90%) Extra Calorimeter Energy MC: B + B – : 494 ± 18 B 0 B 0 : 8 ± 2 Combined: 502 ±18 Data: 458 _