1. Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School February 6, 2008 Intent to Use

2. Bases for Registration Lanham Act §1 (15 U.S.C. 1051): –(a) (1) The owner of a trademark used in commerce may request registration... –(b) (1) A person who has a bona fide intention … to use a trademark in commerce may apply to register the trademark … (3) … no mark shall be registered until the applicant has met the requirements for subsection[] … (d) of this section.

3. Intent to Use Lanham Act §1 (15 U.S.C. 1051): –(d) (1) Within six months after the date on which the notice of allowance … is issued …, the applicant shall file … a verified statement that the mark is in use in commerce …

4. Intent to Use Procedure ITU Application Filed Initial PTO Review PTO Publishes Notice of Allowance 30-Day Period for Opposition Statement of Use Filed 6-Month Period (Extendable) Second PTO Review Trademark Registered Actual Use in Commerce

5. Lanham Act Lanham Act §7(c) (15 U.S.C. 1057(c)): –Contingent on the registration of a mark …, the filing of the application … shall constitute constructive use of the mark, conferring a right of priority, nationwide in effect

6. WarnerVision v. Empire Sep. 23, 1994: TLV Files ITU App. For REAL WHEELS EmpireWarnerVision Actual Use of REAL WHEELS Notice of Allowance Statement of Use Filed 6-Month Period (Extendable) Second PTO Review Trademark Registered Actual Use in Commerce Jan. 3, 1995: Files Use App. For REAL WHEELS Sues to Enjoin Empire from Using Term

7. Eastman Kodak v. B&H Oct. 12, 1990: Files ITU App. For 6200, 6800, 8100 Kodak Opposes: Descriptive B&HKodak Notice of Allowance Statement of Use Filed 6-Month Period (Extendable) Second PTO Review Trademark Registered Actual Use in Commerce Initial PTO Review PTO Publishes

8. Advantages of Registration Nationwide constructive use - priority Nationwide constructive notice Possibility of achieving incontestability Presumption of validity at trial Right to sue in federal court Availability of extra remedies (e.g. attorney fees, treble damages, border exclusion …)

9. Registration Process Clearing the trademark Start use or have bona fide intent to use File application Examination by PTO Publication in Official Gazette Registration –Or if intent to use, notice of allowance and later filing of statement of use; then registration

10. Additional Issues Principal v. Supplemental Register Foreign registrations Trademark registration maintenance

11. Bars to Registration Lanham Act §2: –(a) Immoral, scandalous, deceptive; disparages –(b) Flag, coat of arms, insignia of U.S., state, etc. –(c) Name, portrait, signature of living individual –(d) Likely to cause confusion with other mark –(e) Consists of mark that is: (1) merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive (2) primarily geographically descriptive (3) primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive (4) primarily a surname (5) functional

12. Bars - Immoral, Scandalous Lanham Act §2: –Shall register mark unless it: “(a) Consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter, or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt or disrepute”

13. In re Bad Frog Brewery

14. Scandalous or Immoral? Yes –MADDONA (wine) –MESSIAS (wine) –BUBBY TRAP (bras) –BULLSHIT (briefcase) –Picture of defecating dog (t-shirts) No –BUDDA (beachwear) –BIG PECKER (t-shirt) –WEEK-END SEX (magazine) –BLACK TAIL (adult magazine)

15. Harjo v. Pro-Football, Inc.

16. Other Examples

17. Bars to Registration Lanham Act §2: –(a) Immoral, scandalous, deceptive; disparages –(b) Flag, coat of arms, insignia of U.S., state, etc. –(c) Name, portrait, signature of living individual –(d) Likely to cause confusion with other mark –(e) Consists of mark that is: (1) merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive (2) primarily geographically descriptive (3) primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive (4) primarily a surname (5) functional

18. Bars - Flags, Individuals Lanham Act §2: –Shall register mark unless it: “(b) Consists of or comprises the flag or coat of arms or other insignia of the United States, or of any State or municipality, or of any foreign nation … “(c) Consists of or comprises a name, portrait, or signature identifying a particular living individual except by his written consent …”

19. Bars - Likely to Cause Confusion Lanham Act §2: –Shall register mark unless it: “(d) consists of or comprises a mark which so resembles a mark registered … or a mark or trade name previously used in the United States by another and not abandoned, as to be likely … to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive.”

20. Bars to Registration Lanham Act §2: –(a) Immoral, scandalous, deceptive; disparages –(b) Flag, coat of arms, insignia of U.S., state, etc. –(c) Name, portrait, signature of living individual –(d) Likely to cause confusion with other mark –(e) Consists of mark that is: (1) merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive (2) primarily geographically descriptive (3) primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive (4) primarily a surname (5) functional

21. Bars to Registration Lanham Act §2: –(f) Except as expressly excluded in subsections (a), (b), (c), (d), (e)(3), and (e)(5) of this section, nothing herein shall prevent the registration of a mark used by the applicant which has become distinctive of the applicant’s goods in commerce. The Director may accept as prima facie evidence that the mark has become distinctive … upon proof of substantially exclusive and continuous use thereof as a mark by the applicant in commerce for the five years before the date on which the claim of distinctiveness is made ….

22. Lanham Act §2(e) Descriptive –“ORGANIC” for organically grown oranges Deceptive –“ORGANIC” for non-organic oranges Deceptively misdescriptive –“JOE’S FAVORITE” for oranges that aren’t Joe’s favorite Nondeceptively misdescriptive (arbitrary) –“ATOMIC” for oranges Geographically descriptive –“FLORIDA” for Florida oranges Geographically deceptive –“FLORIDA” for Georgia oranges Geographically deceptively misdescriptive –“FLORIDA” for auto parts from New Jersey Geographically nondeceptively misdescriptive (arbitrary) –“ANTARCTIC” for Georgia oranges

23. Examples, Redux Geographic Descriptive Florida (Florida Oranges) Misdescriptive Nondeceptively Antarctic (Florida Oranges) Deceptively Florida (Georgia Oranges) (NJ Auto Parts) §2(e)(2) - Can register if Secondary Meaning §2(e)(3) - Cannot register Arbitrary or suggestive - Can register

24. Examples ARIZONA (ice tea, not made in Arizona) NANTUCKET (fruit drinks made in Nantucket) CORNING (glassware products made in Corning, NY) HERSHEY (chocolate made in Hershey, PA and elsewhere) PARK AVENUE (luxury car, not made on Park Avenue) SWISS ARMY KNIFE (pocket knife, not made in Switz.)

25. Bars to Registration Lanham Act §2: –(a) Immoral, scandalous, deceptive; disparages –(b) Flag, coat of arms, insignia of U.S., state, etc. –(c) Name, portrait, signature of living individual –(d) Likely to cause confusion with other mark –(e) Consists of mark that is: (1) merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive (2) primarily geographically descriptive (3) primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive (4) primarily a surname (5) functional

26. Administrative Details Next Assignment –V.A – Genericity –V.B – Abandonment