1. 國立清華大學資訊工程系 資訊安全實驗室 孫宏民 hmsun@cs.nthu.edu.tw Phone: 03-5742968 Network Security --- Network Security --- Key Establishment Protocols

2. 第 2 頁 Outline  Basic Cryptographic Concept  Symmetric Encryption  Asymmetric Encryption  Digital Signature  Encrypted Key Exchange (EKE)  Conclusions

3. 第 3 頁 Cryptographic System

4. 第 4 頁 1. Confidentiality (Secrecy): The intruder cannot read the encrypted message from the ciphertext. 2. Authentication: It should be possible for the receiver of a message to ascertain its origin; an intruder should not be able to masquerade as someone else. 3. Integrity: It should be possible for the receiver of a message to verify that it has not been modified in transit; an intruder cannot substitute a false message for a legitimate one. 4. Nonrepudiation: A sender should not be able to falsely deny later that he sent a message. Four Basic Services of Cryptography :

5. 第 5 頁 Plaintext(M) M Ciphertext(C) K1K1 K2K2 Encryption Decryption Cryptanalyst  Symmetric Cryptosystem: The encryption & decryption keys are the same. (E K (M)= C & D K (C)= M).  Asymmetric Cryptosystem: Encryption & decryption keys are different. (E K1 (M)=C & D K2 (C)=M) The encryption key is public, while the decryption key can not be calculated from the public key. Cryptographic System

6. 第 6 頁 Symmetric Cryptosystem  DES (1977)  IDEA (1992)  RC5 (1994)  AES (2001)

7. 第 7 頁 Security Service: Confidentiality Authentication  Integrity Advantage ： High Speed Disadvantages ：  how to obtain a common secret key between two parities, the number of secret keys is too big, can not achieve nonrepudiation. Symmetric Cryptosystem

8. 第 8 頁 Asymmetric Cryptosystem RSA (1978) El-Gamal (1984) McEliece (1978) Knapsack (1978)

9. 第 9 頁 Security Service: Confidentiality Integrity Authentication (by Signature) Nonrepudiation (by Signature) Advantage ： a pair of keys for each user Disadvantages ： Slow speed Public key need to be authenticated by CA Asymmetric Cryptosystem

10. 第 10 頁 RSA (Encryption & Decryption) Public key: n = pq, p and q are large primes (512 bit), e ( gcd (e, (p-1)(q-1)) =1) Private key: d, where ed = 1 mod (p-1)( q-1) Encryption: C=M e mod n Decryption: M= C d mod n p=47, q=71, => n=3337 e=79, => d = 1019 M=688 Encryption: C=M e mod n = 688 79 mod 3337 = 1570 Decryption: M= C d mod n =1570 1019 mod 3337 = 688

11. 第 11 頁 One-way hash function  Input: X (unlimited length) Output: Y=H(X) (fixed length, e.g., 160 bit) Given X, it is easy to compute Y. Given Y, and H( ), it is computational infeasible to compute X.  Given X and Y, it is computational infeasible to find X’ such that Y=H(X’).

12. 第 12 頁 Message Signature(S) M Signer AVerifier B Signature Generation Private Key Signature Verification Public Key Ture or False Digital Signature

13. 第 13 頁 Hash Functions : SHA MD5 FFT Snefru N Hash Hash Signature Functions : RSA DSA El-Gamal Elliptive Curve LUC Digital Signature M h(M) S S M

14. 第 14 頁 Public key: n = pq, p and q are large primes (512 bit), e ( gcd (e, (p-1)(q-1)) =1), h is a hash function. Private key: d, where ed = 1 mod (p-1)( q-1) Sign: S= h(M) d mod n Verify: h(M) = S e mod n RSA Digital Signature

15. 第 15 頁 Secure Communication between Client and Server  Using Symmetric Cryptosystem: Each client and the server share a common secret key. Disadvantages: 1. Secret key must be strong 2. If the secret key is revealed, the messages in the past will also be revealed. ClientServer E k (M’) ID c, E k (M)

16. 第 16 頁 Secure Communication between Client and Server  Using Asymmetric Cryptosystem: Encryption + Signature (See next page) Disadvantages: 1. Public keys need to be authenticated by a CA. 2. Private key must be strong. 3. If the server’s private key is revealed, the messages in the past will also be revealed.

17. 第 17 頁 Secure Communication between Client and Server

18. 第 18 頁 User Authentication in general  Based on one or more of: something a user has (smart card/token card) something a user is (fingerprint/voiceprint/retinal scan) something a user knows (password/short secret)  What’s a popular user authentication system based on three of these?

19. 第 19 頁 Secure Password Authentication  Remote user access  Goal: to be secure without requiring the user to carry/remember anything except password Remote clientFirewall protected domain VPN traffic (authenticated using password)

20. 第 20 頁 Dictionary Attacks (Password Guessing Attacks)  An off- line, brute force guessing attack conducted by an attacker on the network.  Attacker usually has a “dictionary” of commonly-used passwords to try  People pick easily remembered passwords  “Easy- to- remember” is also “easy- to- guess”

21. 第 21 頁 Password-based protocols  Telnet, FTP are insecure Client Server ID c, Password Client Server ID c, h(Password)  Hash function is still insecure.

22. 第 22 頁 Password-based Protocol with Challenge  Insecure against the dictionary attacks. Client Server h(Cha,Password) Cha ID

23. 第 23 頁 We need.............. a password-based authentication protocol which is secure against dictionary attacks.

24. 第 24 頁  What to do after authentication?  We need a common session key to protect our communication.  Diffie-Hellman key agreement provides two parties to share a common session key. Secure Communication between Client and Server

25. 第 25 頁 Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement  Goal : to provide two parties share a common session key  p : large prime, g : generator g Ra mod p g Rb mod p K= (g Rb ) Ra mod p K= (g Ra ) Rb mod p ClientServer

26. 第 26 頁 Man-in-the-middle attack

27. 第 27 頁 Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement  Diffie-Hellman key agreement is vulnerable to the man-in- the-middle attack; it does not reach authentication  How about Diffie-Hellman key agreement using public key?  Problem: (1) does not provide forward secrecy, (2) hard to remember (not a password). Client Server

28. 第 28 頁 Research Goal  To design a user authentication and key agreement protocol via password.  The protocol must satisfy the following requirements: 1. based on password only, 2. password may be weak, 3. be secure against the dictionary attack, 4. can provide perfect forward secrecy.

29. 第 29 頁 Encrypted Key Exchange (EKE) [Bellovin and Merritt, 1992]  Two parties share a common password  EKE can withstand dictionary attack P P Generate encrypt/decrypt keys Generate R R(Cha) R(Cha||Chb) R(Chb) ServerClient

30. 第 30 頁 DHEKE [Bellovin and Merritt, 1992]

31. 第 31 頁 Conclusions  Password authentication and key agreement protocols are widely used. EX ： Electronic Commerce, Electronic Stock Trading  Two-party protocols are suitable for client/server environment. EX ： Telnet, FTP  Three-party protocols are suitable for single server and multiple clients environment. Any two clients can authenticate each other and reach secure communication.

32. 第 32 頁 Three-Party Key Exchange Protocol  Each client shares an easy-to-remember password with the server.  The protocol is responsible for establishing secure communication between two clients via the help of the server.  Application: E.g., ICQ, or mobile users

33. 第 33 頁 STW-3PEKE [Steiner, Tsudik, and Waidner, 1995] ASBASB

34. 第 34 頁 Undetectable On-line guessing attack (I) [Ding and Horster, 1995] ASBASB record guess get

35. 第 35 頁 Undetectable On-line guessing attack (II) [Ding and Horster, 1995] SBSB guess compute

36. 第 36 頁 Off-line Guessing Attack on STW-3PEKE [Lin, Sun, and Hwang, 2000] A*S*B

37. 第 37 頁 LSH-3PEKE (with server’s public key) [Lin, Sun, and Hwang, 2000] ASBASB

38. 第 38 頁 LSSH-3PEKE (without server’s public key) [ Lin, Sun, Steiner, and Hwang, 2001] ASBASB A,B

39. 第 39 頁 Performance Comparison

40. 第 40 頁 Verifier-based Protocol  A server does not store plain password directly.  Instead of storing a plain password, a server stores a verifiable text (called verifier).  It provides higher security level: an attacker must perform dictionary attack when the server is corrupted.  Furthermore, a verifier-based protocol can withstand the stolen verifier attack.

41. 第 41 頁 1. Bellovin, S. Merritt, M., 1992, “Encrypted key Exchange: Password-based Protocols Secure against Dictionary Attacks. Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Research in Security and privacy, Oakland. 2. Steiner, M. Tsudik G. and Waidner, M., 1995, “Refinement and Extension of Encrypted Key Exchange,” ACM Operating Systems Review, Vol.29, Issue 3, pp. 22-30. 3. Ding, Y. and Horster, P., 1995, “Undetectable On-line Password Guessing Attacks”, Technical Report, TR-95-13-F, July. 4. C. L. Lin, H. M. Sun, and T. Hwang, 2000, Three-Party Encrypted Key Exchange: Attacks and a Solution,” ACM Operating Systems Review, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 12-20. 5. C. L. Lin, H. M. Sun, M. Steiner, and T. Hwang, 2001, "Three-party Encrypted Key Exchange Without Server Public-Keys," IEEE Communications Letters, Vol. 5, No. 12, pp. 497-499. 6. C. L. Lin, H. M. Sun, and T. Hwang, 2001, “Efficient and Practical DHEKE Protocols,” ACM Operating Systems Review, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 41-47. References