Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

KINETIC MODEL RESULTS FOR HEAVY-QUARK COALESCENCE R. L. THEWS UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA Characterization of the Quark Gluon Plasma with Heavy Quarks 25-28.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "KINETIC MODEL RESULTS FOR HEAVY-QUARK COALESCENCE R. L. THEWS UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA Characterization of the Quark Gluon Plasma with Heavy Quarks 25-28."— Presentation transcript:

1 KINETIC MODEL RESULTS FOR HEAVY-QUARK COALESCENCE R. L. THEWS UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA Characterization of the Quark Gluon Plasma with Heavy Quarks 25-28 JUNE 2008 Physikzentrum Bad Honnef

2 IN THE BEGINNING THERE WERE MATSUI & SATZ

3 IN-MEDIUM FORMATION (REGENERATION) HIGH ENERGY EVOLUTION OF MATSUI-SATZ: R plasma screening < R quarkonium SUPPRESSION in a static medium, or KHARZEEV-SATZ: Ionization with deconfined gluons Charm pair diffuse away, will not recombine during deconfinement phase or at hadronization NEW SCENARIO AT COLLIDER ENERGIES

4 Multiple ccbar pairs in high energy AA Collisions 10-15 from extrapolation of low energy 20 from PHENIX electrons 40 from STAR electrons and K  CENTRAL VALUES AT RHIC: AND AT LHC: 100-200??

5 PROBE REGION OF COLOR DECONFINEMENT WITH MULTIPLE PAIRS OF HEAVY QUARKS Two Distinct Physical Scenarios: (1) Form Quarkonium in the Medium, where it competes with Suppression, and/or (2) Form Quarkonium during the Hadronization Transition

6 QUARKONIUM FORMATION MODELS IN REGION OF COLOR DECONFINEMENT STATISTICAL HADRONIZATION: P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel, Phys. Lett B490 (2000) 196 [nucl-th/0007059]. KINETIC IN-MEDIUM FORMATION: R. L. Thews, M. Schroedter, J. Rafelski, Phys. Rev. C63 (2001) 054905 [hep-ph/0007323].

7 COLOR DECONFINEMENT ALLOWS THE INCOHERENT RECOMBINATION OF ALL PAIRS OF HEAVY QUARKS

8 MANY THEORETICAL INPUT PARAMETERS

9

10

11 Gold-plated signature for Regeneration SEARCH FOR J/PSI with x F > 1

12 OFF-DIAGONAL PAIRS POPULATE X_F > 1.0

13 FORMED J/PSI ALSO POPULATES X_F > 1.0

14 THE P_T DISTRIBUTION IS PEAKED NEAR ZERO

15 BUT THEY ONLY APPEAR NEAR THE RAPIDITY BOUNDARY

16 R. L. Thews and M. L. Mangano Phys. Rev. C73, 014904 (2006) [nucl-th/0505055] 1.Generate sample of ccbar pairs from NLO pQCD (smear LO q t ) 2.Supplement with k t to simulate initial state and confinement effects 3.Integrate formation rate using these events to define particle distributions (no cquark-medium interaction) 4.Repeat with cquark thermal+flow distribution (maximal cquark-medium interaction) CAN Y AND P T SPECTRA ALONE PROVIDE SIGNATURES OF IN- MEDIUM FORMATION?

17 All combinations of c and cbar contribute Total has expected (N ccbar ) 2 / V behavior Prefactor is integrated flux per ccbar pair Do the J/Psi spectra retain a memory of the underlying charm quark spectra?

18

19

20 No REGENERATION FOR pp  J/Psi, DIAGONAL PAIRS ALONE SHOULD FIT SPECTRA

21

22 EXTRACT ALLOWED =.75 GeV 2

23 DIAGONAL PAIRS – NO EXTRA PARAMETERS

24 Use dAu broadening to determine nuclear k t (Minimum Bias)

25 Central rapidity data exhibits anti-broadening!

26 S. Gavin and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Lett. B214 (1988) Nuclear broadening from Initial state parton scattering, extract   0.56 +/- 0.08 GeV 2 for Au-Au at RHIC, compare with 0.12 +/-.02 GeV 2 at fixed-target energy. Note:  and n are correlated within given nuclear geometry. Proceed with analysis for muon data only: Collision numbers nbar correlated with centrality

27 Initial lambda estimate disfavors Direct Production

28 Revised lambda value allows 100% Direct Production

29 Regeneration is almost independent of centrality and lambda, and magnitude consistent with initial PHENIX data.

30 Comparison with Thermal + Transverse Flow c-Quark Distributions (Blast Wave) K.A.Bugaev, M. Gazdzicki, M.I.Gorenstein, Phys.Lett.B544,127(2002) S.Batsouli, S.Kelly, M.Gyulassy, J.L.Nagle, Phys.Lett.B557,26 (2003)

31

32

33

34

35

36

37 Determine fraction of regeneration using y=0 data

38

39

40

41 Consider combination of Direct and Regeneration (pQCD) with weights (1-  and  match data at y = 0

42 Predict p T Spectra which are in agreement with Data

43

44

45

46 Comparison with coalescence model: V Greco, C. M. Ko, R. Rapp, Phys. Lett. B595:202 (2004)

47 WHERE IS FORMATION FROM THERMAL CHARM?

48 In-Medium Formation (AKA regeneration, coalescence, recombination) as a mechanism for J/  production in central Au-Au at RHIC must reflect the underlying charm quark distributions. We find that normalized p T and y spectra alone can provide signatures of in-medium formation, independent of the absolute magnitude of recombination processes. We show that variation of with centrality provides characteristic signals. Baseline tests using pp and pA collisions provides a connection with initial pQCD charm quark distributions. SUMMARY

49 Centrality dependence and shapes of spectra are consistent with a 10 – 20% fraction produced in-medium from recombination of pQCD charm quarks. PHENIX measurements of y spectra in AA collisions now exhibit some narrowing as predicted for in-medium formation. p T spectra do not indicate an obvious contribution from recombination of thermalized charm Robust predictions require complete set of constraints from pp and pA.


Download ppt "KINETIC MODEL RESULTS FOR HEAVY-QUARK COALESCENCE R. L. THEWS UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA Characterization of the Quark Gluon Plasma with Heavy Quarks 25-28."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google