1. NEEO Workpackage 5 NEEO WorkPackage Leader Meeting - 2 Sciences Po, Paris January 16th, 2009 Benoit PAUWELS Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Brussels

2. Revised planning for WP5 Total budget for WP5 remains unchanged Approved by PMB [Brainstorming] meetings @TU with EUR, ULB -- 15/9: –EUR explains findings and first results wrt automated JEL classification of publications –First agreement on metadata enrichment infrastructure; we agree to publish an article on this @ULB – WP6/MLIA -- with KULeuven, ULB, Prof. Bouillon –Results of student thesis @Skype – WP6/MLIA – with KULeuven, TU, ULB –conclusion on the way forward for implementation and integration of MLIA solution in the EO Gateway General coordination

3. DIDL/MODS –Implementations available Dspace (4), Arno (2), Eprints (1) –New DP: Kiel, Columbia University –Overview of status of implementation Worrying –Implementations from non-core partners come in late –Also need to implement usage metadata by 31/8/2009 Adaptation IR solution

4. DIDL/MODS: Overview of status of implementation Available –CERGE: 4/2009 –Sciences Po: 4/2009 –CarlosIII: 6/2009 –UCL: 8/2009 Start implementing –Dauphine: not before 3/2009 –UCD: unclear –Warwick: unclear –Oxford: no answer –Toulouse: unclear Other NEEO institutions –Columbia University: done –Geneva, UCLouvain, Monash, EUI, Konstanz: what is expected? Adaptation IR solution

6. Annex 3 (Admin file) -- version 1.2 integration of « RePEc story » Specify which Repec series to feed from EO Specify which Repec series not to harvest into EO Outstanding issues: Needs clear decision on publication types nomenclature –In contact with M. Vanderfeesten (SURF and Driver) DAI: don’t use « authority » attribute ? Review of DAI schema –Include multiple identifiers of an author (e.g. needed for « proper » Repec upload) Technical guidelines

7. Technical guidelines version 1.0 – proposal of SWUP Alpha implementation on DSpace Needs more discussion and reflection before implementation can start on other partners platforms Usage metadata

8. Meresco supports Implement now RSS

9. Specifications –Full-text search engine Agreement between TU and CQ2: Meresco will support; first version should be available early february 2009 Worrying: OCR –Usage metadata database Massaging raw data through off-line processes, so that easily usable within portal and usage reports –MLIA related issues Automated translation of metadata –Integration of enriched metadata Brainstorming done -- ideas are in our heads Detailed report needed –1st version promised by BP for 12/2008; not done –Publish article on this SSRN upload? Disseminate towards SSRN? EO Gateway

10. EO Portal version 1 –Features still to be implemented in first phase version of portal identified and planned –Status of implementation: still on track for launch 2/2/2009 Design of final version of portal –Advanced functionality needs to come in: Full-text searching: flag that permits to switch on/off Enriched metadata: search/display references, original/auto-generated JEL codes Usage metadata: most read, relevance ranking, number of downloads per item MLIA: automated translation of query, at request of user Multilingual JEL Datasets –Interface re-design Worrying: not many resources available for re- design EO portal

11. Design of usage reports EO usage reports

12. Version 1 exists –PDF, RTF –Grouped and sorted on type of publication and date Design of final version of publication lists EO publication lists

13. Agreement from RePEc people on amendment to ReDIF exchange format « proposal is sensible » not all of the RePEc service providers are too happy having to implement this As part of plan: ULB started implementation; will be finalized by 23/1/2009 Complete (ECO-) IR of ULB will be made available to RePEc service providers to play around with in their interfaces Outstanding issue: « RePEc ID » of author Start implementation of EO RePEc archive EO RePEc archive

14. JEL enrichment: first implementation results reported from EUR Not visible yet Make JEL enrichment visible Start implementation of tools for extraction and transformation of bibliographic references Worrying: OCR Metadata enrichment

15. Allow for harvesting and integration of NEEO enriched metadata into local IR Integration with Copyright Knowledge Bank Version signposting tool Optional actions? Other local IR adaptations

16. Finalize DIDL/MODS guidelines  Publication types, DAI, RePEc ID Continue reflection on usage metadata guidelines Implement usage metadata guidelines (core partners) Testing SOA architecture Specifications for gateway with advanced features  full-text, MLIA, usage metadata, enriched metadata, multilingual JEL Design and integration of advanced functionality in the portal Design of publication lists, usage reports Metadata enrichment  Show JEL enrichment results  Make progress on references extraction and transformation Implement:  RSS  EO RePEc archive  Full-text indexing  Usage metadata database Worrying: available technical resources at TU Overview of upcoming actions

17. Local : DIDL/MODS implementations lagging behind Optional status of 3 local developments Available technical resources at TU OCR Re-design of portal: limited resources SSRN: upload, disseminate Overview of current worries