Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 FONT@ESA (T-488) Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University EM Background Tests of Feedback BPM
2
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Reminder of IP feedback system BPM measures deflection of outgoing bunches Kicker steers incoming bunches into collision Feedback system: BPM signal processor digital FB board drive amplifier x, y: intra-train (3MHz) + 5 Hz
3
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Intra-train y + y’ IP feedback simulations y position FB: restore collisions within 100 bunches 1 seed: post-BBA + GM + wakes y position scan: optimise signal in pair monitor y angle scan OPTIMAL LUMINOSITY
4
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Overview of fast beam feedback R&D UK LCABD: Oxford, Daresbury Lab. Collaborators: SLAC, KEK, DESY, CERN Prototype + test beam-based (intra-train) FB system Completed: ultra-fast analogue feedback prototypes FONT1 / NLCTA: 67 ns latency (2002) FONT2 / NLCTA: 54ns latency (2003/4) FONT3 / ATF: 23ns latency (2005) Ongoing: ILC digital feedback prototypes FONT4 / ATF: 1 st digital FB processor FONT@ESA: EM background impact on FB BPM
5
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 UK group Faculty/PI: Philip Burrows RAs: Glen White Glenn Christian Tony Hartin Electronic engineers: Colin Perry Hamid Dabiri Khah Alexander Kalinin Students: Christine Clarke, Christina Swinson
6
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Nominal IP feedback hardware locations Engineering details TBD!
7
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Nominal IP feedback hardware locations Engineering details TBD!
8
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Nominal IP feedback hardware locations Engineering details TBD!
9
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Pair-induced EM backgrounds BPM e+e- pairs Low Z mask
10
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Beam Parameters SchemeNumber of Pair ParticlesAverage Energy (GeV)BPM hits Scheme 1 19565210.85141 Scheme 2 16437010.62894497 Scheme 3 12196610.89473057 Scheme 4 4972012.34211074 Scheme 5 1242739.583012321 Scheme 6 27221810.66369686 Scheme 7 32035210.980912314 Scheme 8 19316611.28265127 Scheme 9 23774911.53178758 Scheme 10 19297611.30836399 Scheme 11 8521812.80342623 Scheme 12 24768310.12129287 Scheme 13 50045713.854925016 Scheme 14 67881115.584580443 500 GeV 1 TeV Pair counts + hits at FB BPM
11
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Primary pair counts Beam Parameters SchemeNumber of Pair ParticlesAverage Energy (GeV)BPM hits Scheme 1 19565210.85141 Scheme 2 16437010.62894497 Scheme 3 12196610.89473057 Scheme 4 4972012.34211074 Scheme 5 1242739.583012321 Scheme 6 27221810.66369686 Scheme 7 32035210.980912314 Scheme 8 19316611.28265127 Scheme 9 23774911.53178758 Scheme 10 19297611.30836399 Scheme 11 8521812.80342623 Scheme 12 24768310.12129287 Scheme 13 50045713.854925016 Scheme 14 67881115.584580443 500 GeV 1 TeV
12
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Secondary hits at FB BPM Beam Parameters SchemeNumber of Pair ParticlesAverage Energy (GeV)BPM hits Scheme 1 19565210.85141 Scheme 2 16437010.62894497 Scheme 3 12196610.89473057 Scheme 4 4972012.34211074 Scheme 5 1242739.583012321 Scheme 6 27221810.66369686 Scheme 7 32035210.980912314 Scheme 8 19316611.28265127 Scheme 9 23774911.53178758 Scheme 10 19297611.30836399 Scheme 11 8521812.80342623 Scheme 12 24768310.12129287 Scheme 13 50045713.854925016 Scheme 14 67881115.584580443 500 GeV 1 TeV
13
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Effect of hits on BPM performance? Charge-asymmetry between strips at 10**6 level will cause micron-level degradation of resolution (S. Smith) Our estimates of # hits are 10-100X below this level BUT: No cause for complacency – backgrounds always worse Need to model stripline response explicitly (in progress) Noise and/or long-term radiation effects? Experimental tests desirable to add confidence
14
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Origin of BPM hit primaries outgoing beamline r=12mm Max. density of primary pairs 100-1000 / mm^2
15
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Test beam experiment request at ESA SLAC Test Beam Request Title: FONT@ESA (FESA)Date: 24 May 2006 Address: John Adams Institute, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Rd., Oxford, OX1 3RH, UK. PIs: P.N. BurrowsTelephone: +44 1865 273451 Email: p.burrows@physics.ox.ac.uk Approved + assigned T-488 Burrows, Christian, Clarke, Hartin, Swinson, White (Oxford University) Kalinin (Daresbury Laboratory) Arnold, Hast, Smith, Woods (SLAC)
16
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 FONT Test Module for ESA
17
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 FONT Test Module for ESA Material model of ILC outgoing beamline
18
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 FONT Test Module for ESA low Z mask beamcal BPM QFEX1 Material model of ILC outgoing beamline
19
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 FONT Test Module
20
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 T-488 beam test location in ESA
21
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 T-488 beamline
22
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Beam test outline Recreate ILC-like primary e- flux on front face of module 1) 30 GeV main beam: create diffuse beam with total charge 10**6 -> 10**10 by varying transmission at slits 2) ‘spray beam’: put main beam through Be radiator, select momentum bites + transport degraded beam to A-line Main problem is to measure flux at low intensity
23
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 First beam tests (July 12 2006) 10**10 primary beam position scan for reference Blew up beam to 1mm**2, sequentially decreased charge: 10**8 10**7 10**6 Scanned beam across front face of FONT module; recorded BPM waveforms Have not produced spray beam yet
24
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Reference BPM waveforms 10**10 beam through middle of beampipe
25
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 1mm sigma beam, 10**7 e-, viewed on screen 5mm fiducial box
26
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Projection of FONT test module at screen r=20mm 3C1 collim. r=12mm inner edge of low-Z mask
27
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Beam scan across module Preliminary (12 Jul 06) Noticeable degradation of signals 10**7 beam
28
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Comparison of beam charges 10**8 10**7 qualitatively similar
29
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 Status Built test module of first few m of ILC extraction line Installed in ESA First beam run of T-488 completed July 18 Succeeded in producing and characterising wide primary e- beam with charge down to 10**6 Scanned beam across test module See definite effect on BPM waveforms when beam hits low- Z mask Need to analyse data + compare w. simulations Possible next run in January/February 2007
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.