Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Cost 297 HAPCOS Meeting, Friedrichshafen, Germany Oct. 8 – 10, 2008 Communications to and from HAPs – with laser beams? Walter Leeb walter.leeb@tuwien.ac.at Vienna University of Technology Institute of Communications and Radio-Frequency Engineering Gusshausstrasse 25/389, 1040 Vienna
2
Oct. 8, 2008 2 W. Leeb Overview Introduction Building blocks PAT Influence of channel (= atmosphere) Bandwidth offered by optical and microwave links Summary
3
Oct. 8, 2008 3 W. Leeb Motivation for optical links transmission bandwidth f (small) percentage of carrier frequency f f = 200 to 350 THz f 300 GHz beam divergence proportional to 1/f (antenna gain G proportional to f 2 ) 10 rad, G 130 dB small antenna diameter expecting: low terminal mass low power consumption
4
Oct. 8, 2008 4 W. Leeb Basic differences to microwave links so far no frequency regulations no electromagnetic interference difficult eavesdropping quantum nature dominates (hf >> kT) dimension of devices (D >> ) antenna pointing, terminal acquisition, mutual tracking (PAT) ( two-way optical link) influence of atmosphere background radiation (Sun, Moon, etc.) h... Planck's constant k... Boltzmann's constant T... system temperature
5
Oct. 8, 2008 5 W. Leeb Scenarios GEO... geostationary orbit LEO... low earth orbit ISS... International Space Station distance L = 45 000 to 83 000 km data rate R = 3 Gbit/s distance L > 1 000 000 km data rate R = 2 Mbit/s
6
Oct. 8, 2008 6 W. Leeb HAP – HAP – GEO Scenario GEO... geostationary orbit HAP... high altitude platform HAP HAP L = 5... 100 km HAP GEO L = 50 000 km R = 1 Gbit/s
7
Oct. 8, 2008 7 W. Leeb LEO-GEO link 2001 European Space Agency ARTEMIS (GEO) SPOT-4 (LEO) mean distance: 40 000 km = 0.85 µm R = 50 Mbit/s [2 Mbit/s] 2005 ARTEMIS OICETS (LEO, Japan) SILEX... Semiconductor Laser Intersatellite Link Experiment ARTEMIS SPOT 4
8
Oct. 8, 2008 8 W. Leeb Balloon-to-ground link 2005 German Aerospace Centre (EU project CAPANINA) STROPEX balloon (at 22 km) to ground, distance = 64 km = 1.5 µm (InGaAs diode laser) R = 622 Mbit/s and 1.25 Gbit/s
9
Oct. 8, 2008 9 W. Leeb Airplane to GEO satellite 2006 European Space Agency, France "LOLA" airplane (10 km height) to ARTEMIS (GEO) = 0.85 µm, diode laser successful pointing and tracking, video transmission
10
Oct. 8, 2008 10 W. Leeb LEO-LEO link 2008 intersatellite laser communication: TerraSAR-X (LEO, Germany) NFIRE (LEO, USA), 5 000 km = 1.06 µm (Nd:YAG laser) coherent receiver (homodyne) BPSK (binary phase shift keying) R = 5.5 Gbit/s
11
Oct. 8, 2008 11 W. Leeb Overview Introduction Building blocks PAT Influence of channel (= atmosphere) Bandwidth offered by optical and microwave links Summary
12
Oct. 8, 2008 12 W. Leeb Optical transceiver for space missions
13
Oct. 8, 2008 13 W. Leeb TX, RX for = 0.85 µm direct modulation APD... avalanche photodiode
14
Oct. 8, 2008 14 W. Leeb TX, RX for = 1.5 µm EDFA... Erbium doped fiber amplifier
15
Oct. 8, 2008 15 W. Leeb Input-output multiplexing (1) duplexing: spectrally, or via polarization, or both to keep crosstalk TX RX low: high isolation within duplexer (e.g. P T = 1 W, P R = 10 nW) 95 dB duplex operation between two moving terminals required, at least for acquisition and tracking single antenna for RX and TX
16
Oct. 8, 2008 16 W. Leeb Input-output multiplexing (2) simple duplexing scheme increased telescope diameter shared antenna aperture
17
Oct. 8, 2008 17 W. Leeb Overview Introduction Building blocks PAT Influence of channel (= atmosphere) Bandwidth offered by optical and microwave links Summary
18
Oct. 8, 2008 18 W. Leeb PAT e.g.: = 1.55 µm, D T = 20 cm 2 T = 10 µrad satellite position uncertainty and vibrations ( > 2 T ) require: initial pointing of transmit and receive antenna mutual search and acquisition of terminal position closed loop tracking of antenna direction (accuracy: 1 µrad!) beam divergence 2 T (antenna directivity) PAT possibly: extra acquisition laser separate tracking beam and tracking sensor (CCD)
19
Oct. 8, 2008 19 W. Leeb Overview Introduction Building blocks PAT Influence of channel (= atmosphere) Bandwidth offered by optical and microwave links Summary
20
Oct. 8, 2008 20 W. Leeb Influence of atmosphere absorption by molecules attenuation scattering (molecules, waterdroplets, fog, snow) attenuation pronounced influence within first 15 km above the Earth's surface, but relatively small influence above 15 km turbulence (random variation of index of refraction) increased beam divergence ("beam spread" & "breathing" of beam) attenuation, fading random beam deflection ("beam wander") fading phase front distortion fading, scintillation
21
Oct. 8, 2008 21 W. Leeb Beam spread r 0... Fried-Parameter... wavelength diffraction limited beam divergence in vacuum beam divergence including influence of turbulence far field:
22
Oct. 8, 2008 22 W. Leeb Fried parameter Fried parameter r 0 characterises the degree of turbulence, integrated over beam path large r 0 means little influence of turbulence examples (medium turbulence, = 1.5 m): - HAP(at 17 km)-to-satellite link r 0 = 10 m - ground-to-satellite link r 0 = 15 cm for a transmit antenna diameter D T equal to the Fried parameter r 0, the turbulence causes an increase of the divergence by a factor of, i.e. a gain reduction by 3 dB - downlink (satellite to HAP): in general negligible influence of turbulence - uplink: typically < 0.1 dB additional loss due to turbulence-induced beam spread
23
Oct. 8, 2008 23 W. Leeb Beam wander caused by large-scale turbulence near the transmitter, leading to deflection of entire beam
24
Oct. 8, 2008 24 W. Leeb Scintillation caused by small-scale turbulence, leads to interference between parts of the beam, disturbance of intensity profile ("speckle") distortion of beam phasefront, mode de-composition ( reduced coupling into single-mode receiver) scintillation index 2 characterises the temporal behaviour of intensity (I) fluctuations (normalized variance of I(t)) typically 2 < 0.025 for HAP-to-satellite link temporal mean
25
Oct. 8, 2008 25 W. Leeb Overview Introduction Building blocks PAT Influence of channel (= atmosphere) Bandwidth offered by optical and microwave links Summary
26
Oct. 8, 2008 26 W. Leeb Sensitivity of receivers rule of thumb for detecting one bit of information: required is an energy of either 10 hf or 10 kT, whatever is larger 10 hf10 kT optical = 1 µm, T = 300 K 2 10 -18 Ws4 10 -20 Ws microwave f = 10 GHz, T = 300 K 7 10 -23 Ws4 10 -20 Ws h... Planck`s constant k... Boltzmann`s constant T... system temperature optical regime requires 100 times larger input power! Optical on-off keying: BEP = 10 -9 requires an average of 10 photons per bit (absolute physical limit)
27
Oct. 8, 2008 27 W. Leeb Background radiation sources: Sun, Moon, planets (including Earth), scattering atmosphere received background power P B = N back B o m Optical links: noise increase due to background N back... power density (in one spatial mode) e.g. at = 1.5 m - N back,Sun = 4 10 -20 W/Hz - N back,Earth = 4 10 -25 W/Hz - N back,atm@20 km = 10 -27 W/Hz B o... bandwidth of optical filter [Hz] m... number of modes accepted by receiver
28
Oct. 8, 2008 28 W. Leeb Transmission bandwidth - examples HAP (20 km) GEO satellite (36 000 km) distance L = 50 000 km (zenith angle 45°) TX: GaAs laser diode RX: avalanche photodiode TX: InGaAs laser diode RX: EDFA reamplifier RF in K-band wavelength0.85 µm1.55 µm1.76 cm carrier frequency353 THz194 THz17 GHz achievable bandwidth B for optical and RF links = ?
29
Oct. 8, 2008 29 W. Leeb Link geometry variable parameters: antenna diameters, transmit power... wavelength T, R... terminal troughput SNR... signal-to-noise ratio B... bandwidth
30
Oct. 8, 2008 30 W. Leeb Bandwidth P T = 10 W L = 50 000 km, SNR = 16 dB RF: f = 17 GHz, R R = 0.35, noise figure 3 dB, P T = 10 W e.g. D T = 2.8 m D R = 2.0 m = 1 W
31
Oct. 8, 2008 31 W. Leeb Bandwidth P T = 10 W Optical: = 0.85 µm, R R = 0.25, M APD,opt, i n.el = 12 pA/ Hz, N back = 2·10 -25 W/Hz, B opt = 1nm RF: f = 17 GHz, R R = 0.35, noise figure 3 dB, P T = 10 W e.g. D T = 2.8 m D R = 2.0 m = 1 W P T = 0.1 W L = 50 000 km, SNR = 16 dB
32
Oct. 8, 2008 32 W. Leeb Bandwidth P T = 10 W Optical: = 0.85 µm, R R = 0.25, M APD,opt, i n,el = 12 pA/ Hz, N back = 2·10 -25 W/Hz, B opt = 1nm RF: f = 17 GHz, R R = 0.35, noise figure 3 dB, Optical: = 1.55 µm, R R = 0.25, i n,el = 12 pA/ Hz, N back = 4·10 -25 W/Hz, B opt = 0.5 nm P T = 10 W e.g. D T = 2.8 m D R = 2.0 m e.g. D T = 14 cm D R = 23 cm = 1 W = 0.3 W P T = 0.1 W P T = 1 W L = 50 000 km, SNR = 16 dB
33
Oct. 8, 2008 33 W. Leeb Antenna gain and beam spread loss HAP(at 20 km)-to-GEO uplink, = 1.5 µm antenna gain antenna gain minus beam spread loss, h HAP = 20 km antenna gain minus beam spread loss, h HAP = 1 km
34
Oct. 8, 2008 34 W. Leeb Sun as background SNR degradation due to sun as background [dB] APD receiver (large field-of-view) 15 10 5 0 16 dB EDFA receiver (single transverse mode) 0.7 dB N back = 4 10 -20 W/Hz
35
Oct. 8, 2008 35 W. Leeb Beam spread loss ( bs ) for HAP-to-HAP links = 1.55 µm, D T = D R = 13,5 cm bs = 0.3 dB... up, medium turbulence bs = 0.7 dB... down, medium turbulence bs = 0.3 dB... weak turbulence bs = 0.7 dB... strong turbulence bs with D T , because ratio D T /diameter of turbulent eddies ... but much less than antenna gain!
36
Oct. 8, 2008 36 W. Leeb Entangled photons for cryptography AliceBob aim: global distribution of cryptographic keys using a source of entangled photons onboard the International Space Station (ISS) or on a HAP?
37
Oct. 8, 2008 37 W. Leeb Summary large bandwidth obtainable with low antenna diameter small prime power (?) compact terminal (?) challenges mutual acquisition, tracking of terminals strategies towards implementation adapt demonstrated systems and technologies systems should have potential for further development very small disturbance by atmosphere for HAP GEO link (zenith angle < 45°) HAP HAP link (h HAP = 20 km)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.