Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Querying XML: XPath, XQuery, and XSLT Zachary G. Ives University of Pennsylvania CIS 550 – Database & Information Systems October 27, 2005 Some slide content courtesy of Susan Davidson, Dan Suciu, & Raghu Ramakrishnan
2
2 Reminders Homework 4 due 11/3 XQuery Project plan due 11/3 Milestones Division of responsibilities For non-RSS projects: proposal including scope, milestones, and what you plan to demonstrate Recitation: Friday 11:30-12:30, Levine 512
3
3 Talks of Interest Today: Anastassia Ailamaki, CMU, “FATES: Automatically-tuned Database Storage Management”, IRCS (3401 Walnut) Room 470 @ 3PM Tomorrow as part of “DB & Information Retrieval Day”: Anastassia Ailamaki, CMU, “StagedDB: Designing Database Servers for New Hardware Trends”, Wu and Chen @ 11AM Sam Madden, MIT, “Data Management for Next Generation Wireless Sensor Networks”, Wu and Chen @ 12:30PM Andrei Broder, Yahoo!, “The next stage in Web IR: From query based Information Retrieval to context driven Information Supply ”, Wu and Chen @ 2:30PM
4
4 Querying XML How do you query a directed graph? a tree? The standard approach used by many XML, semistructured-data, and object query languages: Define some sort of a template describing traversals from the root of the directed graph In XML, the basis of this template is called an XPath
5
5 XPaths In its simplest form, an XPath is like a path in a file system: /mypath/subpath/*/morepath The XPath returns a node set representing the XML nodes (and their subtrees) at the end of the path XPaths can have node tests at the end, returning only particular node types, e.g., text(), processing-instruction(), comment(), element(), attribute() XPath is fundamentally an ordered language: it can query in order-aware fashion, and it returns nodes in order
6
6 Sample XML Kurt P. Brown PRPL: A Database Workload Specification Language 1992 Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison Paul R. McJones The 1995 SQL Reunion Digital System Research Center Report SRC1997-018 1997 db/labs/dec/SRC1997-018.html http://www.mcjones.org/System_R/SQL_Reunion_95/
7
7 XML Data Model Visualized Root ?xml dblp mastersthesis article mdate key authortitleyearschool editortitleyearjournalvolumeee mdate key 2002… ms/Brown92 Kurt P…. PRPL… 1992 Univ…. 2002… tr/dec/… Paul R. The… Digital… SRC… 1997 db/labs/dec http://www. attribute root p-i element text
8
8 Some Example XPath Queries /dblp/mastersthesis/title /dblp/*/editor //title //title/text()
9
9 Context Nodes and Relative Paths XPath has a notion of a context node: it’s analogous to a current directory “.” represents this context node “..” represents the parent node We can express relative paths: subpath/sub-subpath/../.. gets us back to the context node By default, the document root is the context node
10
10 Predicates – Selection Operations A predicate allows us to filter the node set based on selection-like conditions over sub-XPaths: /dblp/article[title = “Paper1”] which is equivalent to: /dblp/article[./title/text() = “Paper1”]
11
11 Axes: More Complex Traversals Thus far, we’ve seen XPath expressions that go down the tree (and up one step) But we might want to go up, left, right, etc. These are expressed with so-called axes: self::path-step child::path-stepparent::path-step descendant::path-stepancestor::path-step descendant-or-self::path-stepancestor-or-self::path-step preceding-sibling::path-stepfollowing-sibling::path-step preceding::path-stepfollowing::path-step The previous XPaths we saw were in “abbreviated form”
12
12 Querying Order We saw in the previous slide that we could query for preceding or following siblings or nodes We can also query a node for its position according to some index: fn:first(), fn:last()return index of 0 th & last element matching the last step: fn:position()gives the relative count of the current node child::article[fn:position() = fn:last()]
13
13 Users of XPath XML Schema uses simple XPaths in defining keys and uniqueness constraints XQuery XSLT XLink and XPointer, hyperlinks for XML
14
14 XQuery A strongly-typed, Turing-complete XML manipulation language Attempts to do static typechecking against XML Schema Based on an object model derived from Schema Unlike SQL, fully compositional, highly orthogonal: Inputs & outputs collections (sequences or bags) of XML nodes Anywhere a particular type of object may be used, may use the results of a query of the same type Designed mostly by DB and functional language people Attempts to satisfy the needs of data management and document management The database-style core is mostly complete (even has support for NULLs in XML!!) The document keyword querying features are still in the works – shows in the order-preserving default model
15
15 XQuery’s Basic Form Has an analogous form to SQL’s SELECT..FROM..WHERE..GROUP BY..ORDER BY The model: bind nodes (or node sets) to variables; operate over each legal combination of bindings; produce a set of nodes “FLWOR” statement [note case sensitivity!]: for {iterators that bind variables} let {collections} where {conditions} order by {order-conditions}(older version was “SORTBY”) return {output constructor}
16
16 “Iterations” in XQuery A series of (possibly nested) FOR statements assigning the results of XPaths to variables for $root in document(“http://my.org/my.xml”)http://my.org/my.xml for $sub in $root/rootElement, $sub2 in $sub/subElement, … Something like a template that pattern-matches, produces a “binding tuple” For each of these, we evaluate the WHERE and possibly output the RETURN template document() or doc() function specifies an input file as a URI Old version was “document”; now “doc” but it depends on your XQuery implementation
17
17 Two XQuery Examples { for $p in document(“dblp.xml”)/dblp/proceedings, $yr in $p/yr where $yr = “1999” return {$p} } for $i in document(“dblp.xml”)/dblp/inproceedings[author/text() = “John Smith”] return { $i/title/text() } { $i/@key } { $i/crossref }
18
18 Nesting in XQuery Nesting XML trees is perhaps the most common operation In XQuery, it’s easy – put a subquery in the return clause where you want things to repeat! for $u in document(“dblp.xml”)/universities where $u/country = “USA” return { $u/title } { for $mt in $u/../mastersthesis where $mt/year/text() = “1999” and ____________ return $mt/title }
19
19 Collections & Aggregation in XQuery In XQuery, many operations return collections XPaths, sub-XQueries, functions over these, … The let clause assigns the results to a variable Aggregation simply applies a function over a collection, where the function returns a value (very elegant!) let $allpapers := document(“dblp.xml”)/dblp/article return { fn:count(fn:distinct-values($allpapers/authors)) } {for $paper in doc(“dblp.xml”)/dblp/article let $pauth := $paper/author return {$paper/title} { fn:count($pauth) } }
20
20 Collections, Ctd. Unlike in SQL, we can compose aggregations and create new collections from old: { let $avgItemsSold := fn:avg( for $order in document(“my.xml”)/orders/order let $totalSold = fn:sum($order/item/quantity) return $totalSold) return $avgItemsSold }
21
21 Distinct-ness In XQuery, DISTINCT-ness happens as a function over a collection But since we have nodes, we can do duplicate removal according to value or node Can do fn:distinct-values(collection) to remove duplicate values, or fn:distinct-nodes(collection) to remove duplicate nodes for $years in fn:distinct-values(doc(“dblp.xml”)//year/text() return $years
22
22 Sorting in XQuery SQL actually allows you to sort its output, with a special ORDER BY clause (which we haven’t discussed, but which specifies a sort key list) XQuery borrows this idea In XQuery, what we order is the sequence of “result tuples” output by the return clause: for $x in document(“dblp.xml”)/proceedings order by $x/title/text() return $x
23
23 What If Order Doesn’t Matter? By default: SQL is unordered XQuery is ordered everywhere! But unordered queries are much faster to answer XQuery has a way of telling the query engine to avoid preserving order: unordered { for $x in (mypath) … }
24
24 Querying & Defining Metadata – Can’t Do This in SQL Can get a node’s name by querying node-name(): for $x in document(“dblp.xml”)/dblp/* return node-name($x) Can construct elements and attributes using computed names: for $x in document(“dblp.xml”)/dblp/*, $year in $x/year, $title in $x/title/text(), element node-name($x) { attribute {“year-” + $year} { $title } }
25
25 XQuery Summary Very flexible and powerful language for XML Clean and orthogonal: can always replace a collection with an expression that creates collections DB and document-oriented (we hope) The core is relatively clean and easy to understand Turing Complete – we’ll talk more about XQuery functions soon
26
26 XSL(T): The Bridge Back to HTML XSL (XML Stylesheet Language) is actually divided into two parts: XSL:FO: formatting for XML XSLT: a special transformation language We’ll leave XSL:FO for you to read off www.w3.org, if you’re interestedwww.w3.org XSLT is actually able to convert from XML HTML, which is how many people do their formatting today Products like Apache Cocoon generally translate XML HTML on the server side
27
27 A Different Style of Language XSLT is based on a series of templates that match different parts of an XML document There’s a policy for what rule or template is applied if more than one matches (it’s not what you’d think!) XSLT templates can invoke other templates XSLT templates can be nonterminating (beware!) XSLT templates are based on XPath “match”es, and we can also apply other templates (potentially to “select”ed XPaths) Within each template, we describe what should be output (Matches to text default to outputting it)
28
28 An XSLT Stylesheet This is DBLP …
29
29 Results of XSLT Stylesheet Paper1 Smith Chakrabarti Gray Paper2 This Is DBLP Paper1 Smith Paper2 Chakrabarti Gray
30
30 What XSLT Can and Can’t Do XSLT is great at converting XML to other formats XML diagrams in SVG; HTML; LaTeX … XSLT doesn’t do joins (well), it only works on one XML file at a time, and it’s limited in certain respects It’s not a query language, really … But it’s a very good formatting language Most web browsers (post Netscape 4.7x) support XSLT and XSL formatting objects But most real implementations use XSLT with something like Apache Cocoon You may want to use XSL/XSLT for your projects – see www.w3.org/TR/xslt for the spec www.w3.org/TR/xslt
31
31 Querying XML We’ve seen three XML manipulation formalisms today: XPath: the basic language for “projecting and selecting” (evaluating path expressions and predicates) over XML XQuery: a statically typed, Turing-complete XML processing language XSLT: a template-based language for transforming XML documents Each is extremely useful for certain applications!
32
32 Views in SQL and XQuery A view is a named query We use the name of the view to invoke the query (treating it as if it were the relation it returns) SQL: CREATE VIEW V(A,B,C) AS SELECT A,B,C FROM R WHERE R.A = “123” XQuery: declare function V() as element(content)* { for $r in doc(“R”)/root/tree, $a in $r/a, $b in $r/b, $c in $r/c where $a = “123” return {$a, $b, $c} } SELECT * FROM V, R WHERE V.B = 5 AND V.C = R.C for $v in V()/content, $r in doc(“r”)/root/tree where $v/b = $r/b return $v Using the views:
33
33 What’s Useful about Views Providing security/access control We can assign users permissions on different views Can select or project so we only reveal what we want! Can be used as relations in other queries Allows the user to query things that make more sense Describe transformations from one schema (the base relations) to another (the output of the view) The basis of converting from XML to relations or vice versa This will be incredibly useful in data integration, discussed soon… Allow us to define recursive queries
34
34 Materialized vs. Virtual Views A virtual view is a named query that is actually re-computed every time – it is merged with the referencing query CREATE VIEW V(A,B,C) AS SELECT A,B,C FROM R WHERE R.A = “123” A materialized view is one that is computed once and its results are stored as a table Think of this as a cached answer These are incredibly useful! Techniques exist for using materialized views to answer other queries Materialized views are the basis of relating tables in different schemas SELECT * FROM V, R WHERE V.B = 5 AND V.C = R.C
35
35 Views Should Stay Fresh Views (sometimes called intensional relations) behave, from the perspective of a query language, exactly like base relations (extensional relations) But there’s an association that should be maintained: If tuples change in the base relation, they should change in the view (whether it’s materialized or not) If tuples change in the view, that should reflect in the base relation(s)
36
36 View Maintenance and the View Update Problem There exist algorithms to incrementally recompute a materialized view when the base relations change We can try to propagate view changes to the base relations However, there are lots of views that aren’t easily updatable: We can ensure views are updatable by enforcing certain constraints (e.g., no aggregation), but this limits the kinds of views we can have! AB 12 22 BC 24 23 R S ABC 124 123 224 223 R⋈SR⋈S delete?
37
37 Next Time Can we have views in XML over tables in relations? … Or vice versa? What other things can we use views for
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.