Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ISBN 0-321-33025-0 Chapter 8 Statement-Level Control Structures.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ISBN 0-321-33025-0 Chapter 8 Statement-Level Control Structures."— Presentation transcript:

1 ISBN 0-321-33025-0 Chapter 8 Statement-Level Control Structures

2 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-2 Chapter 8 Topics Introduction Selection Statements Iterative Statements Unconditional Branching Guarded Commands Conclusions

3 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-3 Levels of Control Flow –Within expressions (chapter 7) –Among program units (chapters 9 - subprograms and 13-threads) –Among program statements

4 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-4 Control Statements: Evolution FORTRAN I control statements were based directly on IBM 704 hardware Much research and argument in the 1960s about the issue –One important result: It was proved that all algorithms represented by flowcharts can be coded with only two control statements: two- way selection and logically controlled iteration –BUT, writability can be enhanced by including more control options.

5 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-5 Control Structure A control structure is a control statement and the statements whose execution it controls Design question: Should a control structure have multiple entries? –Generally believed now that multiple entries add little to flexibility relative to decrease in readability. –Multiple exits not as big an issue because all exits have same target (instruction following structure).

6 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-6 Two-Way Selection Statements Selection: choose between 2 or more paths, may be two-way or multiple-way General form: if control_expression then clause else clause Design Issues: –What is the form and type of the control expression? –How are the then and else clauses specified? –How should the meaning of nested selectors be specified? Boolean? Ada, Java, Ruby, C# Arithmetic? C, C++, Python Parentheses required? Often depends on whether then required, e.g., Ruby

7 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-7 Clause Form In many languages then and else can be single or compound statements. In Perl, must be compound statements C-based, Perl, JavaScript and PHP use {} for compound. Fortran, Ada and Ruby use keywords Python uses indentation if x > y : x = y print “case 1”

8 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-8 Two-Way Selection: Examples FORTRAN: IF (boolean_expr) statement Problem: can select only a single statement; to select more, a GOTO must be used, as in the following example IF (.NOT. condition) GOTO 20... 20 CONTINUE Negative logic is bad for readability This problem was solved in FORTRAN 77 Most later languages allow compounds for the selectable segment of their single-way selectors

9 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-9 Two-Way Selection: Examples ALGOL 60: if (boolean_expr) then statement (then clause) else statement (else clause) The statements could be single or compound

10 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-10 Nesting Selectors Java example if (sum == 0) if (count == 0) result = 0; else result = 1; Which if gets the else ? Java's static semantics rule: else matches with the nearest if Disadvantage of rule vs. syntax: compiler applies rule but may not be known to user

11 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-11 Nesting Selectors (continued) To force an alternative semantics, compound statements may be used: if (sum == 0) { if (count == 0) result = 0; } else result = 1; The above solution is used in C, C++, and C# Perl requires that all then and else clauses to be compound. Which do you prefer, Perl requirement or C-based option?

12 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-12 Nesting Selectors (continued) Another alternative is to require an end: if a > b then sum = sum + a acount = acount + 1 else sum = sum + b bcount = bcount + 1; end Used in Fortran 95, Ada and Ruby

13 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-13 Multiple-Way Selection Statements Allow the selection of one of any number of statements or statement groups Design Issues: 1.What is the form and type of the control expression? 2.How are the selectable segments specified? 3.Is execution flow through the structure restricted to include just a single selectable segment? 4.What is done about unrepresented expression values?

14 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-14 Multiple-Way Selection: Examples Early multiple selectors: –FORTRAN arithmetic IF (a three-way selector) IF (arithmetic expression) N1, N2, N3 –Segments require GOTO s –Not encapsulated (selectable segments could be anywhere)

15 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-15 Multiple-Way Selection: Examples Modern multiple selectors –C’s switch statement (also C++, Java, JavaScript): switch (expression) { case const_expr_1: stmt_1; … case const_expr_n: stmt_n; [default: stmt_n+1] }

16 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-16 Multiple-Way Selection: Examples Design choices for C’s switch statement 1.Control expression can be only an integral type 2.Selectable segments can be statement sequences, blocks, or compound statements 3.Any number of segments can be executed in one execution of the construct (there is no implicit branch at the end of selectable segments). C# requires either break; or goto. 4.default clause is for unrepresented values (if there is no default, the whole statement does nothing)

17 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-17 Multiple-Way Selection: Examples The Ruby case statement case when count < 10 then bag1 = True when count < 100 then bag2 = True when count < 1000 then bag3 = True end More reliable than C’s switch (once a stmt_sequence execution is completed, control is passed to the first statement after the case statement Neither Perl nor Python has a multiple-selection construct How important is this feature in a language?

18 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-18 Multiple-Way Selection Using if Multiple Selectors can appear as direct extensions to two-way selectors, using else-if clauses, for example in Python: if count < 10 : bag1 = True elif count < 100 : bag2 = True elif count < 1000 : bag3 = True

19 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. And now… Time for some PERL!

20 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-20 Iterative Statements The repeated execution of a statement or compound statement is accomplished either by iteration or recursion First iterative constructs related to arrays General design issues for iteration control statements: 1. How is iteration controlled? (logical or count- controlled) 2. Where is the control mechanism in the loop?

21 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-21 Counter-Controlled Loops A counting iterative statement has a loop variable, and a means of specifying the initial and terminal, and stepsize values Design Issues: 1.What are the type and scope of the loop variable? 2.What is the value of the loop variable at loop termination? 3.Should it be legal for the loop variable or loop parameters to be changed in the loop body, and if so, does the change affect loop control? 4.Should the loop parameters be evaluated only once, or once for every iteration?

22 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-22 Iterative Statements: Examples FORTRAN 90 syntax DO label var = start, finish [, stepsize ] Stepsize can be any value but zero Parameters can be expressions Design choices: 1. Loop variable must be INTEGER 2. Loop variable always has its last value 3. The loop variable cannot be changed in the loop, 4. The parameters can change; because they are evaluated only once, it does not affect loop control

23 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-23 Iterative Statements Pascal’s for statement for variable := initial (to|downto) final do statement Design choices: 1.Loop variable must be an ordinal type of usual scope 2.After normal termination, loop variable is undefined 3.The loop variable cannot be changed in the loop 4.The loop parameters can be changed, but they are evaluated just once, so it does not affect loop control

24 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-24 Iterative Statements: Examples C’s for statement for ([expr_1] ; [expr_2] ; [expr_3]) statement The expressions can be whole statements, or even statement sequences, with the statements separated by commas –The value of a multiple-statement expression is the value of the last statement in the expression There is no explicit loop variable Everything can be changed in the loop The first expression is evaluated once, but the other two are evaluated with each iteration

25 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-25 Iterative Statements: Examples C++ differs from C in two ways: 1.The control expression can also be Boolean 2.The initial expression can include variable definitions (scope is from the definition to the end of the loop body) 3.Can also be used for a logical loop – but not recommend for readability Java and C# –Differs from C++ in that the control expression MUST be Boolean

26 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-26 Iterative Statements: Examples Python's for statement: for count in [2, 4, 6] print count –displays 2 4 6 for count in range(5) print count –displays 0 1 2 3 4 for count in range(2, 7) print count –displays 2 3 4 5 6

27 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-27 Iterative Statements: Logically- Controlled Loops Repetition control is based on a Boolean Design issues: –Pre-test or post-test? –Should the logically controlled loop be a special case of the counting loop statement ? General forms: while (ctrl_expr)do loop body loop body while (ctrl_expr)

28 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-28 Iterative Statements: Logically- Controlled Loops: Examples Pascal has separate pre-test and post-test logical loop statements ( while-do and repeat-until ). Perl and Ruby are similar. C and C++ also have both, but the control expression for the post-test version is treated just like in the pre-test case ( while-do and do- while ) – both continue while condition is true, repeat-until stops when condition is true. Java is like C, except the control expression must be Boolean (and the body can only be entered at the beginning -- Java has no goto) repeat-until doesn’t provide new capability, but closer match to the way we express some situations

29 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-29 Iterative Statements: User-Located Loop Control Mechanisms Sometimes it is convenient for the programmers to decide a location for loop control (other than top or bottom of the loop) Simple design for single loops (e.g., break ) Design issues for nested loops 1.Should the conditional be part of the exit? (i.e., does this force an exit or a retest of condition?) 2.Should control be transferable out of more than one loop?

30 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-30 Iterative Statements: User-Located Loop Control Mechanisms break and continue C, C++, and Java: break statement –Unconditional; for any loop or switch ; one level only –Java and C# have a labeled break statement: control transfers to the label An alternative in C, C++ and Python: continue statement; it skips the remainder of this iteration, but does not exit the loop Java and Perl have labeled exits

31 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-31 Continue and break examples while (sum < 1000) { getnext(value); if (value < 0) continue; // just skips negatives sum += value; } while (sum < 1000) { getnext(value); if (value < 0) break; // ends when find negative sum += value; }

32 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-32 Another break example (Java) outerLoop: for (row=0; row<numRows; row++) for (col=0; col < numCols; col++) { sum += mat[row][col]; if (sum > 1000.0) break outerLoop; } // when sum >1000, goes immediately to // outerLoop, then continues after loop // label is part of the construct – can’t just put it anywhere in the source

33 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-33 Iterative Statements: Iteration Based on Data Structures Number of elements of in a data structure control loop iteration Control mechanism is a call to an iterator function that returns the next element if there is one; else loop is terminated Perl, JavaScript, PHP, Java and C# include C's for can be used to build a user-defined iterator: for (p=root; p!=NULL; advance(p)){ }

34 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-34 Iterative Statements: Iteration Based on Data Structures (continued) C#’s foreach statement iterates on the elements of arrays and other collections: String[] strList = {“Bob”, “Carol”, “Ted”}; foreach (String name in strList) Console.WriteLine (“Name: {0}”, name); The notation {0} indicates the position in the string to be displayed

35 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-35 Iterative Statements: Iteration Based on Data Structures (continued) Enhanced for added to Java 5.0: for (Type variable : collection) statement for (double e : myList) sum += e; Ruby includes iterators for its predefined container classes PHP provides iterators for arrays: reset $list; while ($current_val = next($list)) print(“Val: “ + $current_val + “ ”);

36 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-36 Unconditional Branching Transfers execution control to a specified place in the program Represented one of the most heated debates in 1960’s and 1970’s Well-known mechanism: goto statement Major concern: Readability Some languages do not support goto statement (e.g., Module-2, Java, Python, Ruby) C# offers goto statement (can be used in switch statements) Loop exit statements are restricted and somewhat camouflaged goto ’s

37 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-37 Guarded Commands Suggested by Dijkstra Purpose: to support a new programming methodology that supported verification (correctness) during development Basis for two linguistic mechanisms for concurrent programming (in CSP and Ada) Basic Idea: if the order of evaluation is not important, the program should not specify one

38 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-38 Selection Guarded Command Form if -> [] ->... [] -> fi Semantics: when construct is reached, –Evaluate all Boolean expressions –If more than one are true, choose one non- deterministically –If none are true, it is a runtime error (so forced to consider all possibilities)

39 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-39 Selection Guarded Command: Illustrated

40 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-40 Loop Guarded Command Form do -> [] ->... [] -> od Semantics: for each iteration –Evaluate all Boolean expressions –If more than one are true, choose one non- deterministically; then start loop again –If none are true, exit loop

41 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-41 Loop Guarded Command: Illustrated

42 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-42 Guarded Commands: Rationale Connection between control statements and program verification is intimate Verification is impossible with goto statements Verification is possible with only selection and logical pretest loops Verification is relatively simple with only guarded commands http://people.csail.mit.edu/gregs/ll1-discuss- archive-html/msg00707.html

43 Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. And now… Time for some PERL!


Download ppt "ISBN 0-321-33025-0 Chapter 8 Statement-Level Control Structures."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google