1. One-to-One Programs a Report to National Directors – CoSN – 2009 National Perspectives & Overview Current Practice, Issues & the Future Leslie Wilson One-to-One Institute Michigan

2. Survey Demographics 152 total survey recipients 17 survey respondents Respondent representation: 18% represented an entire state, 29% represented a school district, 53% represented a school building Number of districts in their 1:1 programs: 76% have 1 district, 24% have more than 1 district

3. 2008 Results: Why did you start your 1:1 program?

4. 2009 Results: Why did you start your 1:1 program?

5. 2008 Results: Grade Level(s) of Students in 1:1 Programs

6. 2009 Results: Grade Level(s) of Students in 1:1 Programs

7. 2008 Results: How do programs pay for 1:1 devices? 25%

8. 2009 Results: How do programs pay for 1:1 devices?

9. 2008 Results: Special Areas of Interest and Need Regarding 1:1 Teaching and Learning Programs Area of InterestLevel 1Level 2Level 3 Financial Sustainability65%20%15% Teacher Professional Development65%25%10% Teacher and Staff Motivation55%40%5% Leadership/Administrative Support50%25%5% Teacher Technology Skills45% 10% Public Support (Government/Legislative)40%30%10% Hardware and Network Maintenance40%30%20% Technology Staff Support40% 10% Please note that Level 1 is the highest rank/most important item, followed by Levels 2 and 3, respectively.

10. 2008 Results: Special Areas of Interest and Need Regarding 1:1 Teaching and Learning Programs (cont.) Area of InterestLevel 1Level 2Level 3 Planning35%50%10% Learning Assessment30%40%15% Content Resources30%45%15% Research and Evaluation (Program Impact)28%36%16% Leadership Turnover20%40%15% Parental Involvement and Support20%40%25% Warranties (Hardware)20%30%40% Content Filtering15%30%

11. 2008 Results: Special Areas of Interest and Need Regarding 1:1 Teaching and Learning Programs (cont.) Area of InterestLevel 1Level 2Level 3 Total Cost of Ownership Studies10%30%25% Insurance to Cover Devices10%45%20% Using TCO Information for Planning Decisions10%30%25% Take Home Policies10%40%35% Network Security10%45%25% Internal Communications10%40%20% Student Acceptable Use Policies10%45%30%

12. 2008 Results: Special Areas of Interest and Need Regarding 1:1 Teaching and Learning Programs (cont.) Area of InterestLevel 1Level 2Level 3 External Communications/Public Relations5%50%15% Database Management0%25%35%

13. 2009 Results: Special Areas of Interest and Need Regarding 1:1 Teaching and Learning Programs Area of InterestLevel 1Level 2Level 3 Teacher Professional Development94%0%6% Financial Sustainability82%18%0% Leadership/Administrative Support76%12% Teacher and Staff Motivation71%29%0% Content Resources59%29%6% Learning Assessment53%41%6% Research and Evaluation (program impact)55%35%12% Please note that Level 1 is the highest rank/most important item, followed by Levels 2 and 3, respectively.

14. 2009 Results: Special Areas of Interest and Need Regarding 1:1 Teaching and Learning Programs (cont.) Area of InterestLevel 1Level 2Level 3 Teacher Technology Skills53%41%6% Technology Staff Support47% 6% Public Support47%24%12% Total Cost of Ownership41%12%41% Hardware and Network Maintenance35%65%0% Planning35%59%6% Warranties35%41%18% Parental Involvement35% 24%

15. 2009 Results: Special Areas of Interest and Need Regarding 1:1 Teaching and Learning Programs (cont.) Area of InterestLevel 1Level 2Level 3 Student Acceptable Use Policies 35% 24% Leadership Turnover35% 18% Content Filtering35%29%24% Using Total Cost of Ownership Info for Planning29%35%24% Take Home Policies29%35% Network Security24%47%24% Insurance to Cover Devices18%47%18% Internal Communication12%41%29%

16. 2009 Results: Special Areas of Interest and Need Regarding 1:1 Teaching and Learning Programs (cont.) Area of InterestLevel 1Level 2Level 3 Database Management12%41%24% External Communications/ Public Relations6%35%47%

17. 2008 Results: Types of Student Devices Being Used in 1:1 Programs Teachers use was slightly higher for laptops/tablets and slightly lower for desktops and thin clients. Please note: Some districts implement “thin client” on notebook and desktop computers, while others implement it on network devices.

18. 2009 Results: Types of Student Devices Being Used in 1:1 Programs

19. Next Generation Ultra Portable Devices 2008 50% of the respondents said that they will plan to purchase a version of UMPCs in the future. Here are their preferred purchases…… 46% Interested in other devices (palms, other laptops) 54% XO 23% Classmate PC 23% Asus Eee PC 31% Thin Client

20. Next Generation Ultra Portable Devices in 2009 71% of the respondents said that they will plan to purchase a version of UMPCs in the future. Here are their preferred purchases…… 67% Interested in other devices (HP, Dell, other) 8% XO 25% Classmate PC 17% Asus Eee PC 0% Thin Client

21. 2008 Results: Length of Time in 1:1 1%

22. 29% 2009 Results: Length of Time in 1:1

23. 2008 Results: Year that Planning Started in the Development of 1:1 Programs

24. 2009 Results: Year that Planning Started in the Development of 1:1 Programs

25. Vendors and Devices 2008 Apple 40% Dell 20% Gateway 15% HP 20% IBM 25% Toshiba 15% Palm 10% Other, please specify 15%Dt Research/ e-Pad tablets

26. Vendors and Devices 2009 Apple 35% Dell 24% Gateway 18% HP 35% IBM 6% Toshiba 6% Palm 6% Other - 12% UMPC

27. 2008 Results: Are research results on the impact or costs of your 1:1 program available?

28. 2009 Results: Are research results available on the impact or costs of your 1:1 program?

29. Funding for 1:1 Devices 2008 Federal30% State55% Local70% Leasing 25% 2009 Federal41% State35% Local59% Bonds29%

30. What Are Top Priorities for 2009? Continued quasi experimental research Blending 1:1 practice within overall 21 st century learning environment Incorporating web 2.0 tools in curriculum and instruction-engage social networking systems Work toward paradigm shift: this is an education approach, not about hardware/software

31. What Are Top Priorities for 2009? Teachers need to become coaches, facilitating student-centered, student- empowered classrooms Need for effective leadership for sustainability and setting expectations for the 1:1 environment Getting the wireless network to work in a high density environment Professional development

32. What Are Top Priorities for 2009? Community involvement Seeking customized, scalable devices for a range of ages Address students’ home internet access to complement the school’s 1:1 approach Share, recommend quality software applications, free web resources

33. Thank you for your attention and for your hard work to ensure that the future of education is transformed by technology-rich teaching and learning.lesliew@1two1.org