1. L6: CAPM & APT 1 Lecture 6: CAPM & APT The following topics are covered: –CAPM –CAPM extensions –Critiques –APT

2. L6: CAPM & APT 2 CAPM: Assumptions Investors are risk-averse individuals who maximize the expected utility of their wealth Investors are price takers and they have homogeneous expectations about asset returns that have a joint normal distribution (thus market portfolio is efficient – page 148) There exists a risk-free asset such that investors may borrow or lend unlimited amount at a risk-free rate. The quantities of assets are fixed. Also all assets are marketable and perfectly divisible. Asset markets are frictionless. Information is costless and simultaneously available to all investors. There are no market imperfections such as taxes, regulations, or restriction on short selling.

3. L6: CAPM & APT 3 Derivation of CAPM If market portfolio exists, the prices of all assets must adjust until all are held by investors. There is no excess demand. The equilibrium proportion of each asset in the market portfolio is – (6.1) A portfolio consists of a% invested in risky asset I and (1-a)% in the market portfolio will have the following mean and standard deviation: – (6.2) – (6.3) A portfolio consists of a% invested in risky asset I and (1-a)% in the market portfolio will have the following mean and standard deviation: Find expected value and standard deviation of with respect to the percentage of the portfolio as follows.

4. L6: CAPM & APT 4 Derivation of CAPM Evaluating the two equations where a=0: The slope of the risk-return trade-off: Recall that the slope of the market line is: ; Equating the above two slopes:

5. L6: CAPM & APT 5 Extensions of CAPM 1.No riskless assets 2.Forming a portfolio with a% in the market portfolio and (1-a)% in the minimum-variance zero-beta portfolio. 3.The mean and standard deviation of the portfolio are: – 4.The partial derivatives where a=1 are: – ; 5.Taking the ratio of these partials and evaluating where a=1: – 6.Further, this line must pass through the point and the intercept is. The equation of the line must be: –

6. L6: CAPM & APT 6 Extensions of CAPM The existence of nonmarketable assets –E.g., human capital; page 162 The model in continuous time –Inter-temporal CAPM The existence of heterogeneous expectations and taxes

7. L6: CAPM & APT 7 Empirical tests of CAPM Test form -- equation 6.36 –the intercept should not be significantly different from zero –There should be one factor explaining return –The relationship should be linear in beta –Coefficient on beta is risk premium Test results – page 167 Summary of the literature.

8. L6: CAPM & APT 8 Roll (1977)’s Critiques Roll’s (1977) critiques (page 174) The efficacy of CAPM tests is conditional on the efficiency of the market portfolio. As long as the test involves an efficient index, we are fine. The index turns out to be ex post efficient, if every asset is falling on the security market line.

9. L6: CAPM & APT 9 Arbitrage Pricing Theory Assuming that the rate of return on any security is a linear function of k factors: Where Ri and E(Ri) are the random and expected rates on the ith asset Bik = the sensitivity of the ith asset’s return to the kth factor Fk=the mean zero kth factor common to the returns of all assets ε i =a random zero mean noise term for the ith asset We create arbitrage portfolios using the above assets. No wealth -- arbitrage portfolio Having no risk and earning no return on average

10. Deriving APT Return of the arbitrage portfolio: To obtain a riskless arbitrage portfolio, one needs to eliminate both diversifiable and nondiversifiable risks. I.e., L6: CAPM & APT 10

11. Deriving APT L6: CAPM & APT 11 How does E(R i ) look like? -- a linear combination of the sensitivities As:

12. L6: CAPM & APT 12 APT There exists a set of k+1 coefficients, such that, – (6.57) If there is a riskless asset with a riskless rate of return R f, then b 0k =0 and R f = – (6.58) In equilibrium, all assets must fall on the arbitrage pricing line.

13. APT vs. CAPM APT makes no assumption about empirical distribution of asset returns No assumption of individual’s utility function More than 1 factor It is for any subset of securities No special role for the market portfolio in APT. Can be easily extended to a multiperiod framework. L6: CAPM & APT 13

14. L6: CAPM & APT 14 Example Page 182 Empirical tests –Gehr (1975) –Reinganum (1981) –Conner and Korajczyk (1993)

15. FF 3-factor Model http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.fren ch/Data_Library/f-f_factors.htmlhttp://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.fren ch/Data_Library/f-f_factors.html L6: CAPM & APT 15