Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Field theoretical methods in transport theory F. Flores A. Levy Yeyati J.C. Cuevas
2
Plan of the lectures Compact review of the non-equilibrium perturbation formalism Special emphasis on the applications: transport phenomena Background on standard equilibrium theory Some knowledge on Green functions General aim Stumbling block
3
Plan of the lectures (more detailed) L1 : Summary of equilibrium perturbation formalism (minimal) L2 : Non-equilibrium formalism L3 : Application to transport phenomena L4 : Transport in superconducting mesoscopic systems
4
L1: Summary of equilibrium theory Background material in compact form Model Hamiltonians in second quantization form Representations in Quantum Mechanics: the Interaction Representation Green functions (what is actually the minimum needed?) Compact review of equilibrium perturbation formalism
5
L2:Non-equilibrium theory: Keldish formalism Non equilibrium perturbation theory Keldish space & Keldish propagators Application to transport phenomena: Simple model of a metallic atomic contact
6
L3:Application to transport phenomena Current through an atomic metallic contact Shot noise in an atomic contact Current through a resonant level Current through a finite 1D region Multi-channel generalization: Concept of conduction eigenchannel
7
L4:Superconducting transport Superconducting model Hamiltonians: Nambu formalism Current through a N/S junction Supercurrent in an atomic contact Finite bias current: the MAR mechanism
8
A sample of transport problems that will be addressed Current through an atomic metallic contact STM fabricatedMCBJ technique AI V d.c. current through the contact contact conduction channels conductance quantization
9
Resonant tunneling through a discrete level resonant level L R Quantum Dot MM
10
N/S superconducting contact d Tunnel regime Contact regime Conductance saturation
11
Normal metal Superconductor Andreev Reflection ProbabilityTransmitted charge
12
SQUID configuration t ransmission S/S superconducting contact Josephson current
13
Conduction in a superconducting junction 22 22 I eV 22 E F,L E F,L - E F,R = eV > 2 22 E F,R I Standard tunnel theory
14
Superconductor Andreev reflection in a superconducting junction eV> I eV 22 ProbabilityTransmitted charge
15
Superconductor Multiple Andreev reflection eV > 2 /3 I eV 22 2 /3 ProbabilityTransmitted charge
16
Background material I. Model Hamiltonians in second quantized form In terms of creation & destruction field operators : first quantization Single electron Hamiltonian Interaction potential
17
A more useful expression in terms of a one-electron basis Expanding the field operators. The operators create or destroy electrons in 1-electron states |i H exhibits explicitly all non vanishing 1e and 2e scattering processes
18
Example 1 Non-interacting free electron gas first quantization second quantization Example 2 Non-interacting tight-binding system first quantizationsecond quantization local basis second quantization
19
Tight-binding basis: especially suited for systems in the nanometer scale: atomic contacts Example 3 Tight-binding linear chain Electronic and transport properties t 00 00 00 00 00 ttt graphical representation Importance of atomic structure Use of a local orbital basis
20
II. Representations in Quantum Mechanics A) Schrödinger representation Usual one, based on the time-dependent Schrödinger equation: In equilibrium Background material Example Free electron
21
B) Heisenberg representation Unitary transformation from Schrödinger representation: Equation of motion for the operators: In equilibrium Example Free electron gas
22
C) Interaction representation Necessary for perturbation field theory non interacting electrons perturbation Unitary transformation from Schrödinger representation: transformationsequations of motion
23
Dynamics of operators in the interaction representation It is the same that in the non-perturbed system Example Free electron gas with interactions irrespective of V
24
Dynamics of wave function in the interaction representation It is the perturbation V I that controls the evolution Connection between and (unperturbed ground state) Adiabatic hypothesis If V is adiabatically switched on (off) at t = It is generally possible to identify:
25
Adiabatic evolution of the ground state
26
The temporal evolution operator Without solving explicitly A formal expression for S is obtained: Transforming back to interaction: From which the following properties are easily derived: S -1 =S + S(t,t)=1 S(t,t’)S(t’,t’’)=S(t,t’’) S(t,t’)=S(t’,t) -1
27
Perturbation expansion of S An explicit expression for S is obtained from: by iteration Integral equation Zero order First order
28
Noticing that time arguments verify: T is the time ordering or chronological operator:
29
III. Compact survey on Green functions The current depends strongly on the local density of states in the junction region Both local density of states and current are closely related to the local Green functions in the junction region Close to the Fermi energy (linear regime) Background material What is actually the minimum needed for most practical applications? Systems we are interested in: MM electronic transport
30
Green functions of non-interacting electrons Green functions are first introduced in the solution of differential equations, like the Schrödinger equation: Example Electron in 1D Definition for a general non-interacting electron system matrix Green function in frequency (energy) space: In a particular one-electron basis the different Green functions will be:
31
Example Free electron gas Example Two site tight-binding model t 00 00
32
Precise definition as a complex function Retarded (Advanced) Green functions: Relation of imaginary part to the electronic density of states local basis
33
Proof One-electron basis set that diagonalize H Inserting Poles: one-electron energy eigenvalues
34
The imaginary part is related to the density operator (matrix): local basis
35
Relation of real and imaginary parts of Hilbert transform This a direct consequence of its pole structure:
36
The “wide band” approximation In the limit of a broad and flat band: Reasonable for a range of energies close to Transport in the linear regime
37
Master equation for Green function calculations: The Dyson equation On many occasions it is hard to obtain the GF from a direct inversion Let H be a 1-electron Hamiltonian that can be decomposed as: Where the green functions of H 0 are known. then Particular instance of the Dyson equation (more general) self-energy
38
Example Surface Green function and density of states (important for transport calculations) Simple model: semi-infinite tight-binding chain t 00 00 00 00 tt surface site Assume a perturbation consisting in coupling an identical level at the end: 00 t As the final system is identical to the initial one:
39
Then using the Dyson equation: Taking into account that: The following closed equation is obtained:
40
Solving the equation we have for the retarded (advanced green function): semi-elliptic density of states
41
local Green functions local density of states
42
Example Quantum level coupled to an electron reservoir 00 metallic electrode uncoupled dot green function perturbation coupled dot green function dot selfenergy
43
00 metallic electrode
44
In the wide band limit: Lorentzian density of states
45
00 LR
46
In addition to The causal Green function needed in equilibrium perturbation theory
47
Green functions in time space Green functions in time space are related with the probability amplitude of an electron propagating: In space from one state to another Hole propagation:
48
Green functions in time space (propagators) are defined combining the electron and hole propagation amplitudes The retarded Green function
49
The advanced Green function The causal Green function Different ways of combining the same electron and hole parts
50
Example The free electron gas ground state: Fermi sphere Then, for instance, the retarded Green function Transforming Fourier to frequency space:
51
Perturbation theory in equilibrium Compact summary in six steps 1) Interaction representation non interacting electrons perturbation Assume an electronic system of the form: full quantum mechanical knowledge
52
We want to calculate averages in the ground state: change to interaction representation The time evolution of is known (non-interacting system)
53
2) Adiabatic hypothesis (theorem) Switching on an off the perturbation at If is the unperturbed stationary ground state Does it all make sense when ? ?
54
Commentaries on the adiabatic hypothesis What really happens is that the have function acquires a phase while evolving In time This phase factor diverges when as Example : two site tight-binding system t0t0 00 00 exact solution
55
Solution: Problem: symmetry breaking!!
56
Time symmetry (equilibrium) This is not true out of equilibrium!!
57
3) Expansion of S From a formal point of view this would be all From a practical this is not the case at all !!
58
4) Wick’s theorem General statement of statistical independence in a non-interacting electron system In the perturbation expansion the averages have the form Wick’s theorem: the average decouples in all possible factorizations of elemental one-electron averages (only two fermion operators)
59
Example (Wick’s theorem) Factorizations containing averages are not included
60
The “elementary unit” in the decoupling procedure is the causal Green function of the unperturbed system Example (Wick’s theorem)
61
5) Expansion of the Green function Wick’s theorem allows to write the perturbation expansion in terms of the unperturbed causal Green function It is interesting to analyze the expansion of Dyson equation Wick’s theorem Diagrams Dyson equation
62
5) Feynman diagrams and Dyson equation The different contributions produced by Wick’s theorem are usually represented by diagrams Example: External static potential Graphical conventions:
63
Terms in the expansion of as given by Wick’s theorem Zero order First order Second order intermediate variables integrated
64
Perturbative expansion in diagrammatic form Dyson equation
65
general validity one-electron potential Coulomb interaction
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.