1. A review of international developments in policy and legal frameworks for sharing of spatial data Professor Anne Fitzgerald Neale Hooper

2. Outline Recent Australian government statements, reviews and reports International Organisations (OECD,UN,GEOSS) Australian federal agencies’ operational uptake (ABS, GA, BoM) NZ, US, EU and UK Australian states (Qld (GILF), Vic (EDIC)) Open Content Licences (CC) and copyright

3. Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner "The rise of internet-enabled peer production as a social force necessitates a rethink about how policy and politics is done in Australia," he said. "In the longer term, governments will have to adapt to information's new online centre of gravity.” "This is not an undesirable thing; there are significant opportunities for government to use peer production to consult, develop policy and make closer connections with the citizens it serves." Mr Tanner said the Government not only had to adapt to a world moving online, but would have to do so at an ever-increasing pace. "As a huge creator and manager of information with an obligation to be open and transparent, we have little choice," he said. http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,27574,24601440-15306,00.html

4. Innovation Minister Kim Carr “We want the research conducted in universities and public research agencies to inspire and inform fresh thinking across the community. The more collaboration and interaction there is between researchers and the society around them, the better. It follows that research and research data should be widely disseminated and readily discoverable... The results of publicly funded research should be publicly available. … More accessible information equals more robust debate equals a stronger national innovation system.” “There is More than One Way to Innovate” 7 Feb 2008 http://minister.industry.gov.au/SenatortheHonKimCarr/Pages/

5. Kim Carr, Speech launching the Review of the National Innovation System Report (9/9/2008) “Creative commons The last big idea in the report I want to touch on is open access. It is embodied in a series of recommendations aimed at unlocking public information and content, including the results of publicly funded research. The review panel recommends making this material available under a creative commons licence through machine searchable repositories, especially for scientific papers and data cultural agencies, collections and institutions, which would be funded to reflect their role in innovation and the internet, where it would be freely available to the world…. ….. http://www.melbourne.org.au/media-centre/in-the-news/post/speech-by-senator-the-hon-kim-carr- review-of-the-national-innovation-system-report-venturous-australia

6. Venturous Australia Report Promotes the development of a National Information Strategy (August 2008)

7. Policy- National Information Strategy - Rec 7.7 Australia should establish a National Information Strategy to optimise the flow of information in the Australian economy. The fundamental aim of a National Information Strategy should be to: –utilise the principles of targeted transparency and the development of auditable standards to maximise the flow of information in private markets about product quality; and –maximise the flow of government generated information, research, and content for the benefit of users (including private sector resellers of information).

8. Open Access and CC - Rec 7.8 Australian governments should adopt international standards of open publishing as far as possible. Material released for public information by Australian governments should be released under a creative commons licence.

9. Sharing government funded Information - Rec 7.14 To the maximum extent practicable, information, research and content funded by Australian governments – including national collections – should be made freely available over the internet as part of the global public commons. This should be done whilst the Australian Government encourages other countries to reciprocate by making their own contributions to the global digital public commons.

10. Digital Economy Future Directions (2008 – Fed agency DBCDE) In another important development, the Digital Economy, Future Directions consultation paper released by the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy in December 2008 raised “Open Access to Public Sector Information” as a key issue for discussion, observing that there is increasing support for “the notion that the Australian Government should provide access to public sector information on terms that clearly permit the use and re- use of that information.” The final report, Australia’s Digital Economy: Future Directions expressly recognised “the digital economy and innovation benefits generated by open access to PSI, subject to issues such as privacy, national security and confidentiality”. Enabling open access to PSI is seen not only as a way of promoting public sector innovation but also as a means by which government can facilitate private sector innovation.

11. International

12. Paul Uhlir (2004) Policy Guidelines for the Development and Promotion of Governmental Public Domain Information, report prepared for UNESCO Uhlir’s description of the key elements required for a national information policy highlights the need for governments to: –consider what information is to be made publicly available (with open access as the default); –develop legal frameworks that provide not only for freedom of information (FOI) but also encompass a positive right of access to PSI: and –develop a comprehensive national Information Policy Framework and detailed plans for implementation of the guiding policy, including strategies on information systems and information technology management.

13. Seoul Declaration on the Future of the Internet Economy, OECD Ministerial Meeting (2008)

14. OECD – Future of the Internet Economy At the Seoul Ministerial Meeting on the Future of the Internet Economy in 2008, the OECD Ministers endorsed the Seoul Declaration on the Future of the Internet Economy and supporting policy framework. The Seoul Declaration incorporates key principles from the OECD’s Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding and the Recommendation of the Council for Enhanced Access and More Effective Use of Public Sector Information and both of these documents form part of the supporting materials annexed to the Declaration. They provide guidelines on the availability of research data, including openness, transparency, legal conformity, interoperability, quality, efficiency, accountability and sustainability. OECD Recommendations have the status of OECD legal instruments although they are not legally binding. They do have strong moral force.

15. Environment Image by Individuo http://www.flickr.com/photos/individuo/272642617/http://www.flickr.com/photos/individuo/272642617/

16. Environmental Acknowledgement of the need for data access and sharing is invariably found, in express statements, in the framework documents of large-scale observational projects generating vast amounts of data about the earth, water, marine environment and the atmosphere. Data and information sharing provisions are found in numerous international environmental treaties, including the Antarctic Treaty (1959), the Convention on the Law of the Sea, the Ozone Protocol, the Convention on Biodiversity and the Aarhus Convention (1998). Article III of the Antarctic Treaty establishes the principle that scientific data will be “exchanged and made freely available”:

17. GEOSS The need for coherence between data sharing principles and the policy and legal frameworks in place in the diverse jurisdictions where researchers operate is highlighted by the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) initiated in 2005 by the Group on Earth Observations (GEO). GEOSS seeks to connect the producers of environmental data and decision-support tools with the end users of these products, with the aim of enhancing the relevance of Earth observations to global issues. The end result is to be a global public infrastructure that generates comprehensive, near-real-time environmental data, information and analyses for a wide range of users. The vision for GEOSS is as a “system of systems” linking a diverse and growing array of instruments and systems for monitoring and forecasting changes in the global environment. This “system of systems” supports policymakers, resource managers, science researchers and many other experts and decision-makers.

18. GEOSS- datasharing One of GEO’s earliest actions was to explicitly acknowledge the importance of data sharing in achieving its vision and to agree on a strategic set of data sharing principles for GEOSS: There will be full and open exchange of data, metadata and products shared within GEOSS, recognising relevant international instruments, and national policies and legislation. All shared data, metadata and products will be made available with minimum time delay and at minimum cost. All shared data, metadata and products being free of charge or at no more than the cost of reproduction will be encouraged for research and education.

19. Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision Making, and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) (1998)

20. Aarhus Convention - Environmental Article 5 deals with the collection and dissemination of environmental information by public authorities in contracting parties to the Convention: 1. Each Party shall ensure that: (a) Public authorities possess and update environmental information which is relevant to their functions; (b) Mandatory systems are established so that there is an adequate flow of information to public authorities about proposed and existing activities which may significantly affect the environment; ….. 2. Each Party shall ensure that, within the framework of national legislation, the way in which public authorities make environmental information available to the public is transparent and that environmental information is effectively accessible, inter alia, by: (a) Providing sufficient information to the public about the type and scope of environmental information held by the relevant public authorities, the basic terms and conditions under which such information is made available and accessible, and the process by which it can be obtained; ….. The Convention provides for the processes for applying for environmental information Article 9 sets out the rights to access justice conferred on a party unsuccessfully requesting environmental information.

21. PSI and INSPIRE Directives The EU PSI Directive, adopted in 2003, and the Directive establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information (“the INSPIRE Directive”) adopted in 2007. The PSI Directive establishes a framework of rules governing the re-use of existing documents held by the public sector bodies of EU member states. The INSPIRE Directive (which EU member states were due to implement by May 2009) establishes EU policy and principles on spatial information held by or on behalf of public authorities, such as information about mapping of the land and sea, the weather, geology, the environment, population, housing and public utility services. Its purpose is to ensure that private and public sector bodies and citizens can gain access to this information and reuse it where appropriate, to develop new services and information resources.

22. Australia

23. Federal government agencies Acceptance of the importance of developing the policy framework for access to PSI has been growing, while key Australian federal government agencies have made significant changes to their information licensing practices.

24. In December 2008, the ABS released all content on the ABS website (other than logos and other trade marked content) - including all census data, economy data, fact sheets, analysis, press releases etc. - for re-use under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Australia licence. Australian Bureau of Statistics

25. From the ABS website: Creative Commons licensing is here !! The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) has introduced Creative Commons (CC) licensing for the bulk of the content on this website. This will lessen the restrictions on the use of free data from the website considerably by changing the copyright from "all rights reserved" to "some rights reserved". In effect, what the ABS is asking is only that it be acknowledged as the source of the data. People are free to re-use, build upon and distribute our data, even commercially. This makes a wealth of data readily available to the community, researchers and business, facilitating innovative research and development projects based on quality statistics, and promoting the wider use of statistics in the community, which is one of our core objectives. This step has followed a process of investigation and consultation with various stakeholders including Commonwealth Government Agencies and the Creative Commons community of interest. The change was achieved through the release of a new copyright statement on 18 December 2008, and the addition of CC metadata to the footer of each page of the website on 19 December 2008.

26. Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) BoM is moving in the same direction, towards making water data available through the Australian Water Resources Information System (AWRIS) under Creative Commons licences. The oral submission by Dr L Minty, Assistant Director, Water Analysis and Reporting, Water Division, Bureau of Meteorology to Vic EDIC Inquiry, available at http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/edic/inquiries/a ccess_to_PSI/transcripts/EDIC_080908_BOM.p df http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/edic/inquiries/a ccess_to_PSI/transcripts/EDIC_080908_BOM.p df

27. Geoscience Australia (GA) GA offers free downloads of geospatial data from its website, based on the the Office of Spatial Data Management (OSDM) Policy. GA has been an “early adopter” of Creative Commons (CC) licensing. GA indicates on its website that by making various important information products available online under CC licences in October 2008, it became the first Australian government agency to implement CC licensing, after conducting a detailed analysis and internal trials of CC licences. This followed requests for a simplified process for gaining access to key Geoscience Australia (GA) mapping, satellite and other information products, together with clearer and more transparent statements about the rights of reuse, thus enabling users to merge spatial and geoscience data from different sources.

28. Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission 2009 – Interim Report Image from http://goldcoaster.wordpress.com/2009/02/22/australias-day-of- mourning/http://goldcoaster.wordpress.com/2009/02/22/australias-day-of- mourning/

29. Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission 2009 – Interim Report Single portal and Linking data being posted to CFA and to DSE (Sustainability and Environment). Rec 5.4 –The State ensure that a single, multi-agency portal for bushfire information be established that uploads information simultaneously to both CFA and DSE websites. REC 5.5 –The State ensure that the single multi-agency portal for bushfire information be designed to allow Incident Control Centres to directly post information and warnings. Also - improving technology and processes to accelerate the updating of common bushfire information on agency websites

30. Victorian EDIC Report Report of the Economic Development and Infrastructure Committee (EDIC) on the Inquiry into Improving Access to Victorian Public Sector Information and Data (June 2009)

31. Victorian EDIC Report The first inquiry in Australia to consider in depth the issue of access to public sector information (PSI) Released June 2009

32. Victorian EDIC Report The 46 recommendations of the Victorian Parliament’s EDIC include that the Victorian government should –publicly endorse open access as the default position for the management of its PSI, –develop a whole-of-government information management framework (IMF), –adopt Creative Commons licensing as the default licensing system for the IMF and –develop specific guidelines for the pricing of PSI, emphasising no or marginal cost provision wherever possible.

33. New Zealand Image by Abi Skipp http://www.flickr.com/photos/9557815@N05/3252195112/http://www.flickr.com/photos/9557815@N05/3252195112/

34. New Zealand By contrast with Australia, New Zealand has developed a comprehensive information strategy at the national level, which encompasses sector- specific strategies for digital content, e- government and geospatial information. Ongoing work has been done on the development of whole-of-government policies and practices for PSI since the NZ Cabinet approved the Policy Framework for New Zealand Government-held Information in 1997.

35. New Zealand The Policy Framework for New Zealand Government-held Information, adopted the position that government-held information should be made as accessible as possible, with barriers to access removed. It balances the ease of access with security and the need to withhold certain types of information (notably personal information). It enunciated 11 principles which provide general guidance on matters including: availability, coverage, pricing, ownership, stewardship, collection, copyright, preservation, quality, integrity and privacy. The New Zealand Geospatial Strategy, launched in 2007, is designed to improve knowledge of, and access to, the geospatial assets owned, maintained or used by government. Giving effect to these goals, the NZ government on 1 July 2009, announced that - the Land Cover Database (LCD) and Land Environments New Zealand (LENZ) classification – would be available online, for free and licensed under an unrestricted Creative Commons licence. Both of these databases are widely used by government agencies in environmental and resource management planning.

36. United States

37. OMB Circular A-130 on Management of Federal Information Resources Office of Management and Budget- OMB

38. OMB Circular A-130: Access and reuse policy to PSI Circular A-130, issued by the OMB in 2000 establishes the data access and reuse policy framework for executive branch departments and agencies of the US federal government, is the US federal government’s most significant policy statement on access to PSI. As well as acknowledging that government information is a valuable public resource and that the nation stands to benefit from the dissemination of government information, OMB Circular A-130 requires improperly restrictive practices to be avoided.

39. OMB Circular A-16 Circular A-16, entitled Coordination of Geographic Information and Related Spatial Data Activities, provides that US federal agencies have a responsibility to - [c]ollect, maintain, disseminate, and preserve spatial information such that the resulting data, information, or products can be readily shared with other federal agencies and non- federal users, and promote data integration between all sources.

40. President Obama’s Memo on Transparency and Open Government

41. Obama Administration President Obama came into office in 2009 with a technology policy aimed at creating “a transparent and connected democracy”, including the use of technology “to reform government and improve the exchange of information between the federal government and citizens while ensuring the security of our networks”. On his first day in office President Obama issued a Presidential Memorandum on Transparency and Open Government, encouraging transparency in government and instructing US government agencies to err on the side of making information public. As part of the Obama administration’s Open Government Initiative, the data.gov portal was launched in May 2009 providing access to large numbers of federal datasets. For example, machine-readable datasets may be accessed from the “raw” data catalogue, in a variety of formats (including XML, CSV/TXT, KL/KMZ and Esri) with accompanying metadata and analysed using tools available on the portal.

42. Europe

43. CERN - Large Hadron Collider An early example of co-operation and sharing of data at the European level is found in the Convention that established the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN) in 1953. The Convention, which establishes CERN’s role in organising and sponsoring international cooperation in research, promoting contacts between scientists and interchange among laboratories and institutes requires research results to be “made generally available”: –The Organization shall provide for collaboration among European States in nuclear research of a pure scientific and fundamental character (...). The Organization shall have no concern with work for military requirements and the results of its experimental and theoretical work shall be published or otherwise made generally available.

44. PSI and INSPIRE Directives The two Directives : Central to any consideration of access to PSI in Europe are the Directive on the re-use of public sector information (“the PSI Directive”), adopted in 2003, and the Directive establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information (“the INSPIRE Directive”), adopted in 2007. PSI Directive The lack of harmonisation of policies and practices regarding PSI across EU member states was regarded as a barrier to the development of digital products and services based on information obtained from different EU countries. In response, the PSI Directive establishes a framework of rules governing the access to and re-use of existing documents held by the public sector bodies of EU member states.

45. INSPIRE Directive The INSPIRE Directive (which EU member states were due to implement by May 2009) establishes EU policy and principles on spatial information held by or on behalf of public authorities, such as information about mapping of the land and sea, the weather, geology, the environment, population, housing and public utility services. Its purpose is to ensure that private and public sector bodies and citizens can gain access to this information and reuse it where appropriate, to develop new services and information resources.

46. UK The United Kingdom has established itself at the forefront of European Union member states in implementing initiatives to enable access to public sector materials. It took the lead in 2005 by transposing the PSI Directive into UK law and establishing an effective administrative regime, central to which is the Office of Public Sector Information (OPSI). From the mid-2000s, the UK government has demonstrated a broad commitment to the introduction of reforms to enable access to PSI, commissioning a series of important reports from which it has drawn guidance, including the Power of Information: an independent review (2007), the report on Models of Public Sector Information Provision via Trading Trusts (“the Cambridge Report”) and the Power of Information Taskforce report (2009). Throughout these reports are findings and recommendations that support the introduction of fundamental reforms to longstanding policies and practices on access to and reuse of PSI, including those of the Ordnance Survey Office and other trading trusts.

47. Power of Information Taskforce Report (UK) 2009 Rec 8 Government should ensure that there is a uniform system of release and licensing applied across all public bodies; individual public bodies should not develop or vary the standard terms for their sector. The system should create a ‘Crown Commons’ style approach, using a highly permissive licensing scheme that is transparent, easy to understand and easy to use, modeled on the ‘Click Use’ license, subject to the caveats below. OPSI, part of the National Archives, should investigate how source code can be handled within the public sector information framework, and look into appropriate licensing terms drawing on best practice in the open source community. The Government should report on the options for these three recommendations by end 2009 and if required, statutory measures should be brought forward not later than the 2009/2010 session.

48. Power of Information Taskforce Report (UK) Rec 12 OPSI should begin a communications campaign to re-present and improve understanding of the permissive aspects of Crown Copyright along the lines of creative commons by end June 2009. This should be combined with ‘permission to scrape’ being given over Crown Copyright data, removing any risk of prosecution under the Computer Misuse Act. This might fall under the banner of a ‘Crown Commons’ brand. OPSI should begin a communications campaign to that end by end June 2009.Computer Misuse Act

49. Victorian EDIC Report-2009 Rec 14: The Committee was asked to consider how flexible licensing systems would facilitate reuse of government information It recommended that the Victorian Government adopt the Creative Commons licensing model for the IMF. The Committee formed the view that the economic and social benefits arising from the release of Victorian Government information at no cost will far outweigh the benefits of treating it as a commodity.

50. Government Information Licensing Framework (GILF) (Qld) Stage 2 Report (October 2006) recommendations: 2.1 That the Queensland Government establish a policy position that, while ensuring that confidential, security classified and private information collected and held by government continues to be appropriately protected, enables greater use and re- use of other publicly available government data and facilitates data-sharing arrangements. 2.2 That the CC open content licensing model be adopted by the Queensland Government to enable greater use of publicly available government data and to support data-sharing arrangements. 2.5 That the Draft Government Information Licensing Framework toolkit, which incorporates the six iCommons (Creative Commons Australia) licences, be endorsed for use in pilot projects proposed for Stage 3, which involves Information Queensland, the Department of Natural Resources and Water, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, the Office of Economic and Statistical Research of Queensland Treasury and the Queensland Spatial Information Council, enabling testing of the CC licences for multi-agency and whole-of-Government arrangements. http://www.qsic.qld.gov.au/

51. GILF Standardised Licences 6 Creative Commons (Australia) licences and 1 Restrictive Licence (template): –Attribution (BY) –Attribution – Non Commercial (BY-NC) –Attribution – Share Alike (NY-SA) –Attribution – No Derivatives (BY-ND) –Attribution – Non Commercial – Share Alike (BY-NC-SA) –Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives (BY-NC-ND);and Template Restrictive Licence (RL) intended to cover the majority of licensing requirements within the public sector environment

52. CC Licences – OA and reuse CC licences are – –clear and simple –easily applied –interoperable –understandable –legally valid –widely used –discoverable; and Facilitate reuse and value adding as the basis of new information business models

53. Some other issues CC and Data Multiple datasets and attribution Moral rights (and CC0 shortcomings)

54. Policies and Principles on Access To and Reuse of Public Sector Information: a review of the literature in Australia and selected jurisdictions Professor Anne Fitzgerald (2008) The full economic, cultural and environmental value of information produced or funded by the public sector can be realised through enabling greater access to and reuse of the information. To do this effectively it is necessary to describe and establish a policy framework that supports greater access and reuse among a distributed, online network of information suppliers and users. The objective of the literature review is to identify materials published in Australia and elsewhere dealing with policies, principles and practices relating to access to and reuse of public sector information. http://www.aupsi.org/publications/reports.jsp

55. Policies and Principles on Access To and Reuse of Public Sector Information: a review of the literature in Australia and selected jurisdictions Professor Anne Fitzgerald (2008) http://www.aupsi.org/publications/reports.jsp Now available: Chapter 1: Australia Chapter 2: New Zealand Chapter 3: International Chapter 6: Canada Forthcoming: Chapter 4: Europe, UK and Ireland Chapter 5: United States Chapter 7: Asia