Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

0 The ‘‘Japanese Model’’ Japan’s Initiatives for Meeting the Future May 14, 2009 Copenhagen, Denmark Takashi SUZUKI Commissioner Japan Patent Office.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "0 The ‘‘Japanese Model’’ Japan’s Initiatives for Meeting the Future May 14, 2009 Copenhagen, Denmark Takashi SUZUKI Commissioner Japan Patent Office."— Presentation transcript:

1 0 The ‘‘Japanese Model’’ Japan’s Initiatives for Meeting the Future May 14, 2009 Copenhagen, Denmark Takashi SUZUKI Commissioner Japan Patent Office

2 1 What is the ideal IP System in 2020? IP System for Pro-Innovation Challenge ◆ Cleaning up the Backlog ◆ Change in the Environment of Innovation

3 2 Topics 1. Current patent system and related issues 2-1. PPH – eliminating the backlog 2-2. Patent system for pro-innovation 2. JPO efforts to solve issues and establish IP system suitable for 2020

4 33 Progress of Economy Promotion of Invention Patent 1. Current Patent System and Related Issues

5 4 ◆ Change in the Environment of Innovation ◆ Eliminating the Backlog - Rapid increase of Patent Applications throughout the world - Increasing “Pendency Period” - Change of the Role of the Patent - Change in the Obstacle to Promoting Innovation 1. Current Patent System and Related Issues

6 5 Applications by Non-residents: Approx. 700,000 Approx. 700,000 1.76 million 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 199620012006 (Million) Applications by residents Rapid increase in the number of Patent Applications throughout the world 2-1. PPH – Eliminating the Backlog

7 6 Increasing “Pendency Period” (Months) 2-1. PPH – Eliminating the Backlog 10 20 30 40 50 60 19992001200320052007

8 7 PPH - Patent Prosecution Highway OFF OSF Examination Application Patent Request for PPH Accelerated Examination 2-1. PPH – Eliminating the Backlog

9 8 Application Patent FA 2-3 months Without PPH With PPH ◆ Case of JP US Expeditious Examination FA 25-27 months Period from Request to First Action 2-1. PPH – Eliminating the Backlog

10 9 Overall 44% PPH 95% Improvement of Quality 49% 64% JP=>US US=>JP Grant rate (transitional) in JP-US PPH 2-1. PPH – Eliminating the Backlog

11 10 2-1. PPH – Eliminating the Backlog Applications by Non-residents PPH Accelerated Examination Complementary Interaction between PCT & PPH PCT Applications: Approx. 340,000 Paris Route Applications: Approx. 360,000

12 11 Expanding PPH Network 2-1. PPH – Eliminating the Backlog DPMA IP Australia Mar. 2008 DKPTO JPO UKIPO KIPO CIPO EPO Sep. 2008 ROSPatent IPOS NBPR : Under consideration : Full implementation : Pilot implementation APO Apr. 2008 Sep. 2007 Jan. 2008 Mar. 2009 Apr. 2007 Jul. 2007 Nov. 2008 Jul. 2008 Jul. 2006 USPTO Feb. 2009 Apr. 2009 May. 2009 Apr. 2009

13 12 Plurilateral PPH Framework StandardizedRequirements JPO Office A Request for PPH Office B Office C USPTO 2-1. PPH – Eliminating the Backlog

14 13 Company A Company A (Fuel Cell) Company B Company B (Body of vehicle ) Progress through Open Innovation Fuel Cell Vehicle Open Innovation 2-2. Patent System for Pro-Innovation

15 14 1,000 Patents for 1 Product Injunction Infringement against JUST 1 Patent STOP! 1 Patent 2-2. Patent System for Pro-Innovation

16 15 Injunction Patent Troll Companies Extortionate Fee Patent 2-2. Patent System for Pro-Innovation

17 16 - Patent system for accelerating innovation - Strong patent right supported by patent offices and courts - International harmonization for granting a patent right quickly ◆ Three important purposes 2-2. Patent System for Pro-Innovation

18 17 1. Injunction Right 2. Exceptions to the Effects of Patent Rights (Experimental or Research Purposes) 3. Modified ”Mutual Recognition” 2-2. Patent System for Pro-Innovation

19 18 Injunction Right Four-factor test The plaintiff has suffered an irreparable injury. Remedies available at law, such as monetary damages, are inadequate to compensate for that injury. Considering the balance of hardships between the plaintiff and defendant, a remedy in equity is warranted. The public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction. eBay Case 2-2. Patent System for Pro-Innovation

20 19 Exceptions to the Effects of Patent Rights [Experimental or Research Purposes] 1. Research for Patentability 2. Research to Determine Operability 3. Examination for Future Progress 2-2. Patent System for Pro-Innovation

21 20 Patent Country A Country B Exploring ”Mutual Recognition” Examination Application 2-2. Patent System for Pro-Innovation

22 21 Thank you


Download ppt "0 The ‘‘Japanese Model’’ Japan’s Initiatives for Meeting the Future May 14, 2009 Copenhagen, Denmark Takashi SUZUKI Commissioner Japan Patent Office."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google