1. 41’ SeaTow tests (July 30, 2003): Sea State: ??? Waypoints : Brant Beach (BB): 39° 36.917’ N; 74° 11.90’ W Loveladies (LL): 39° 44.171’ N; 74° 7.029’ W Tuckerton (T): 39° 32.615 N; 73° 58.665 W T O LL Figure 1. Onboard GPS track for July 30, 2003 SeaTow 41 tests.

2. Figure 2. SeaTow 41. Speed range form 0-30 knots

3. Parameters used for the 41’ SeaTow tests (July 30, 2003): Legs 1-4 (14:15 GMT – 17:00 GMT) Loveladies Frequency: 4.55 MHz Bandwidth: 50 KHz Blank : 121.6 microsecs Tuckerton Frequency: 4.55 MHz Bandwidth: 50 KHz Blank : 121.6 microsecs Boat Speed: 21-23 knots Leg 1 : T-O Leg 2: O-LL Leg 3: LL-O

4. Applied Mathematics, Inc. SEATOW 41 FT TEST – 30 JULY 2003 Figure 3. Legs 1-3 Detection Data: Time vs. Range, Range Rate, and Bearing

5. Applied Mathematics, Inc. ) SEATOW 41 FT TEST – 30 JULY 2003 Figure 4. Legs 1-3 Detection Data: Time vs. Range, Range Rate, and Bearing Errors

6. SEATOW 41 FT TEST – 30 JULY 2003 Figure5. Time vs. Range for First Leg: 1419.21 – 1450.21 Figure 6. Time vs. Range Rate for First Leg: 1419.21 – 1450.21 Figure 7. Time vs. Bearing for First Leg: 1419.21 – 1450.21

7. Applied Mathematics, Inc. SEATOW 41 FT TEST – 30 JULY 2003 Figure 8. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker Solution for First Leg: 1419.21 – 1450.21 + + x x +x+x 301419.21Z JUL 03 301450.21Z JUL 03 LOVELADIES TUCKERTON

8. SEATOW 41 FT TEST – 30 JULY 2003 Figure 9. Time vs. Range for Second and Third Leg: 1533.53 – 1558.38 Figure 10. Time vs. Range Rate for Second and Third Leg: 1533.53 – 1558.38 Figure 11. Time vs. Bearing for Second and Third Leg: 1533.53 – 1558.38

9. SEATOW 41 FT TEST – 30 JULY 2003 Figure 12. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker Solution for Second and Third Leg: 1533.53 – 1558.38 LOVELADIES TUCKERTON + + x x +x+x 301533.53Z JUL 03 301558.38Z JUL 03

10. 25’ SeaTow tests (October 8, 2003): Sea State: Glassy, 1-2’ swell (15sec) Waypoints : Brant Beach (BB) : 39° 36.917’ N; 74° 11.90’ W Loveladies (LL) : 39° 44.171’ N; 74° 7.029’ W Offshore (O): 39° 35.72’ N; 73° 57.88’ W BB O LL Figure 13. Onboard GPS track for October 8, 2003 SeaTow 25 tests.

11. Figure 14. SeaTow 25. Speed range form 0-40 knots

12. Parameters used for the 25’ SeaTow tests (October 8, 2003): Legs ABCD (13:13 GMT – 15:25 GMT) Loveladies Frequency: 4.55 MHz Bandwidth: 50KHz Blank : 121.6 microsecs Brant Beach Frequency: 24.7 MHz Bandwidth: 50 KHz Blank : 121.6 microsecs Legs EFGH (15:45 GMT – 17:50 GMT) Loveladies Frequency: 4.55 MHz Bandwidth: 50KHz Blank : 240.8 microsecs Brant Beach Frequency: 24.7 MHz Bandwidth: 50 KHz Blank : 240.8 microsecs Boat Speed: 23-26 knots Leg A/E : BB-O Leg B/F : O-LL Leg C/G : LL-O Leg D/H: O-BB

13. Figure 15. Brant Beach detections for legs ABCD for (a) range, (b) range rate, and (c) bearing.

14. Figure 16. Brant Beach SNR for legs ABCD for (a) range, (b) range rate, and (c) bearing.

15. SEATOW 25 FT TEST – 8 OCTOBER 2003 Figure 17. Time vs. Range for Leg A: 1337.00 – 1351.00 Figure 18. Time vs. Range Rate for Leg A: 1337.00 – 1351.00 Figure 19. Time vs. Bearing for Leg A: 1337.00 – 1351.00

16. SEATOW 25 FT TEST – 8 OCTOBER 2003 Figure 20. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker Solution for Leg A: 1337.00 – 1351.00 + + x x +x+x 081337.00Z OCT 03 081351.00Z OCT 03 LOVELADIES BRANT BEACH TRACKER SOLUTION IS BASED ON DATA FROM BRANT BEACH

17. SEATOW 25 FT TEST – 8 OCTOBER 2003 Figure 21. Time vs. Range for Leg D: 1511.15 – 1524.15 Figure 22. Time vs. Range Rate for Leg D: 1511.15 – 1524.15 Figure 23. Time vs. Bearing for Leg D: 1511.15 – 1524.15

18. SEATOW 25 FT TEST – 8 OCTOBER 2003 Figure 24. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker Solution for Leg D: 1511.15 – 1524.15 + + x x +x+x 081511.15Z OCT 03 081524.15Z OCT 03 LOVELADIES BRANT BEACH TRACKER SOLUTION IS BASED ON DATA FROM BRANT BEACH

19. Figure 25. Loveladies detections for legs ABCD for (a) range, (b) range rate, and (c) bearing.

20. Figure 26. Loveladies SNR for legs ABCD for (a) range, (b) range rate, and (c) bearing.

21. SEATOW 25 FT TEST – 8 OCTOBER 2003 Figure 27. Time vs. Range for Leg B: 1416.33 – 1424.03 Figure 28. Time vs. Range Rate for Leg B: 1416.33 – 1424.03 Figure 29. Time vs. Bearing for Leg B: 1416.33 – 1424.03

22. SEATOW 25 FT TEST – 8 OCTOBER 2003 Figure 30. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker Solution for Leg B: 1416.33 – 1424.03 + + x x +x+x 081416.33Z OCT 03 081424.03Z OCT 03 LOVELADIES BRANT BEACH TRACKER SOLUTION IS BASED ON DATA FROM LOVELADIES

23. SEATOW 25 FT TEST – 8 OCTOBER 2003 Figure 31. Time vs. Range for Leg C: 1430.27 – 1448.42 Figure 32. Time vs. Range Rate for Leg C: 1430.27 – 1448.42 Figure 33. Time vs. Bearing for Leg C: 1430.27 – 1448.42

24. SEATOW 25 FT TEST – 8 OCTOBER 2003 Figure 34. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker Solution for Leg C: 1430.27 – 1448.42 + + x x +x+x 081430.27Z OCT 03 081448.42Z OCT 03 LOVELADIES BRANT BEACH TRACKER SOLUTION IS BASED ON DATA FROM LOVELADIES

25. Figure 35. Brant Beach detections for legs EFGH for (a) range, (b) range rate, and (c) bearing.

26. Figure 36. Brant Beach SNR for legs EFGH for (a) range, (b) range rate, and (c) bearing.

27. SEATOW 25 FT TEST – 8 OCTOBER 2003 Figure 37. Time vs. Range for Leg E: 1548.35 – 1620.10 Figure 38. Time vs. Range Rate for Leg E: 1548.35 – 1620.10 Figure 39. Time vs. Bearing for Leg E: 1548.35 – 1620.10

28. SEATOW 25 FT TEST – 8 OCTOBER 2003 Figure 40. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker Solution for Leg E: 1548.35 – 1620.10 + + x x +x+x 081548.35Z OCT 03 081610.20Z OCT 03 LOVELADIES BRANT BEACH TRACKER SOLUTION IS BASED ON DATA FROM BRANT BEACH

29. SEATOW 25 FT TEST – 8 OCTOBER 2003 Figure 32. Time vs. Range for Leg C: 1430.27 – 1448.42 Figure 41. Time vs. Range for Leg H: 1728.18 – 1748.03 Figure 42. Time vs. Range Rate for Leg H: 1728.18 – 1748.03 Figure 43. Time vs. Bearing for Leg H: 1728.18 – 1748.03

30. SEATOW 25 FT TEST – 8 OCTOBER 2003 Figure 44. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker Solution for Leg H: 1728.18 – 1748.03 + + x x +x+x 081728.18Z OCT 03 081748.03Z OCT 03 LOVELADIES BRANT BEACH TRACKER SOLUTION IS BASED ON DATA FROM BRANT BEACH

31. Figure 45. Loveladies detections for legs EFGH for (a) range, (b) range rate, and (c) bearing.

32. Figure 46. Loveladies SNR for legs EFGH for (a) range, (b) range rate, and (c) bearing.

33. SEATOW 25 FT TEST – 8 OCTOBER 2003 Figure 47. Time vs. Range for Leg F: 1637.21 – 1642.51 Figure 48. Time vs. Range Rate for Leg F: 1637.21 – 1642.51 Figure 49. Time vs. Bearing for Leg F: 1637.21 – 1642.51

34. SEATOW 25 FT TEST – 8 OCTOBER 2003 Figure 50. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker Solution for Leg F: 1637.21 – 1642.51 + + x x +x+x 081637.21Z OCT 03 081642.51Z OCT 03 LOVELADIES BRANT BEACH TRACKER SOLUTION IS BASED ON DATA FROM LOVELADIES

35. SEATOW 25 FT TEST – 8 OCTOBER 2003 Figure 51. Time vs. Range for Leg C: 1430.27 – 1448.42 Figure 52. Time vs. Range Rate for Leg C: 1430.27 – 1448.42 Figure 53. Time vs. Bearing for Leg C: 1430.27 – 1448.42

36. SEATOW 25 FT TEST – 8 OCTOBER 2003 Figure 54. CODAR Data, GPS Track, and Tracker Solution for Leg C: 1430.27 – 1448.42 + + x x +x+x 081430.27Z OCT 03 081448.42Z OCT 03 LOVELADIES BRANT BEACH TRACKER SOLUTION IS BASED ON DATA FROM LOVELADIES

37. SeaTow 25 Brant Beach Detections 121 Blank (Run 1)

38. SeaTow 25 Brant Beach Detections 121 Blank (Run 1)

39. SeaTow 25 Loveladies Detections 121 Blank (Run 1)

40. SeaTow 25 Loveladies Detections 121 Blank (Run 1)

41. SeaTow 25 Brant Beach Detections 240 Blank (Run 2)

42. SeaTow 25 Brant Beach Detections 240 Blank (Run 2)

43. SeaTow 25 Loveladies Detections 240 Blank (Run 2)

44. SeaTow 25 Loveladies Detections 240 Blank (Run 2)