Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Frank R. Leslie, B. S. E. E., M. S. Space Technology, LS IEEE 2/2/2010, Rev. 2.0.2 (321) 674-7377 7.0 Nuclear Energy.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Frank R. Leslie, B. S. E. E., M. S. Space Technology, LS IEEE 2/2/2010, Rev. 2.0.2 (321) 674-7377 7.0 Nuclear Energy."— Presentation transcript:

1 Frank R. Leslie, B. S. E. E., M. S. Space Technology, LS IEEE 2/2/2010, Rev. 2.0.2 fleslie @fit.edu; (321) 674-7377 www.fit.edu/~fleslie 7.0 Nuclear Energy FPL’s St. Lucie Nuclear Plant

2 In Other News... ~1/25/2010 Crude oil at $73 due to “demand destruction”, that is demand has dropped due to layoffs, plant closings, consumer lack of confidence  When the economy improves, more demand will drive prices up Energy Act of 2009 or 2010 may be revisited “soon” Nuclear fission/fusion hybrid reactor investigation of “spent fuel” reduction (transuranic wastes) Florida Public Service Commission denies rate increases leading to FPL and Progress Energy stopping plans for nuclear power plant additions 100128

3 Nuclear energy was once gushingly said to be “too cheap to meter” in the future (the meter and reading it would cost more than the electricity would sell for)  That isn’t close to happening 50 years later and is not likely now  Think of the economics of having a flat rate for electricity! US commercial nuclear power began at Shippingport PA in 1957; Soviets began in 1954 Nuclear power supplied ~20% of US energy in 2005 Nuclear energy is cheap to the consumer; but heavily subsidized by the Federal Government (only taxpayers pay for that!) Great controversy (among some) about dangers and eventual doom from spent fuel Plants will likely be built again after none since 1978(?) Developing countries considering/building nuclear power 7.0 Overview of Nuclear Energy 090129

4 7.0 About This Presentation 7.1 Nuclear Reactions 7.2 Sources 7.3 Reactor Types 7.4 Fuel Cycle and Spent Fuel 7.5 Reprocessing of Spent Fuel 7.6 Safety Record 7.7 Risk Assessment 7.8 Conflicts and Controversy 7.9 Advantages and Disadvantages 7.10 Degree of Nuclear Use 7.11 Shutdown Scenario 7.12 Future Trends 7 Conclusion 090129

5 92 n + 235 U 143  236 U 144  144 Ba 88 + 89 Kr 53 + 3n + 176.9 MeV n = 1.00867 89 Kr = 88.91660 144 Ba = 143.92000 235 U= 235.04394 236 U = 236.05261 36 56 92 Neutron 89 Kr 144 Ba Fission occurs when uranium atom is “split” into atoms of lesser atomic weight plus emitted energy 7.1 The Nuclear Fission Reaction 100128 Gamma Ray 235 U 85 to 104 a.w. 130 to 149 a.w. Fission Clumping Gamma Ray Neutron 92 [After Ristinen, p. 174] 236 U 235 U 143 Protons At. No., Z Mass no., nucleons= protons + neutrons Neutrons

6 7.1 The Nuclides and Radiation Decay A beta particle emission moves up to the next element; an alpha emission moves down and left These tables also have another format, Z vs. N 238 U is common; 235 U is required for fission 090129

7 7.2 Sources, extraction, and preparation Found in Congo, Canada, US (CO, WY, UT, NM, etc.), Africa, Ukraine, and everywhere to some extent Uranium mining of ore  US carnotite contains 238 U, 99.28%; 235 U, 0.71%; and 234 U, 0.006% Uranium extraction  Convert raw ore to uranium oxide (U 3 O 8 ) or “yellowcake” ~$15.50/lb to $43.00 (2010) http:// www.uxc.com/review/uxc_Prices.aspx http:// www.uxc.com/review/uxc_Prices.aspx Convert that yellowcake to uranium hexafluoride gas  Enrich the 235 U from 0.7% up to 2% to 5% for power plants; 93% for weapons (lots of centrifuges [Iran has 6000] in series) Uranium fuel preparation  Make uranium dioxide pellets (~0.4 inch diam x 0.4 inch long)  Load the pellets end-to-end in a zirconium alloy tube  Place tubes in assemblies for ease of handling and loading 100125

8 7.3 Types of Reactors Major Reactor Categories:  Light Water Reactors (LWR) use H 2 O  Heavy Water Reactors (HWR) use D 2 O or deuterium oxide Canadian CANDU (Canadian deuterium oxide) reactor  Boiling water reactors produce steam at top of the core area  Pressurized water reactors keep water from boiling  Mixed oxide (MOX) reactors contain both plutonium and uranium oxides (make from old warheads)  Breeder reactors produce additional radioactive fuel that may be used in conventional reactors (recyclable?) Ft. Vrain CO HTG reactor shut down and converted to a natural gas plant  Fusion Reactors (based upon hydrogen) 2H 2 into helium, 1He 4  Cold Fusion (Univ. of Utah mistake or worse?) could not be replicated by anyone! 090129

9 7.3.1 Light Water Reactors Ordinary, but pure, deionized (noncorrosive) water is used as a fuel core coolant  Some reactors have used liquid sodium metal as a “coolant” with a heat exchanger The coolant flows around the fuel elements and carries off the heat  Heat exchangers prevent leakage of the radioactive water into the steam turbines  The primary side water remains in liquid state due to high pressure  If the water area vents and goes dry, the core can melt if the reaction isn’t stopped in time (the “China Syndrome) 100125

10 7.3.1.1 St. Lucie Plant on Hutchinson Island FL 1680 MW Services much of Eastern Florida Ocean water cooling exits to lagoon On barrier island subject to hurricane wave overwash 090129 http://www.fmpa.com/html/power_supply/st_lucie.html Uprating will take it to 2400 MW

11 7.3.2 Boiling Water Reactors (BWR) Boiling water reactors have part of the water as steam around the fuel The water acts as a moderator to slow the neutrons to fission the uranium, while the steam is less dense and doesn’t moderate well If overheating occurs, the steam pushes the water level lower, slows the reaction and is protects the reactor 090124 www.nrc.gov

12 7.3.3 Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) Water is under high pressure so it can’t flash into steam The reaction is modified entirely by the control rods 040202 http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/vessel-head-degradation/vessel-head-degradation-files/pwr-rx-vessel.html www.nrc.gov

13 7.3.4 CANDU Reactor The Canadian heavy water (deuterium oxide, DO 2 ) reactor can use unrefined uranium U 238 as fuel Canada, Argentina, and Pakistan use this reactor type This avoids the expense of uranium enhancement, but deuterium oxide must be separated from ordinary water  Deuterium occurs about once in 6500 molecules of water 090124

14 7.3.5 Mixed Oxide Reactor http://www.fepc.or.jp/english/nuclear_power/cycle/thermal.html 090124

15 7.3.6 Pebble-bed; Breeder reactor Pebble-bed reactors use fuel/carbon/ceramic pellets sized like a billiard ball  The balls can be pushed through pipes into the reactor on top and removed at the bottom, thus no shutdowns are required; refueling is continuous Breeder reactors produce more fissile fuel than they consume  The US (under Pres. Carter’s administration) presently prohibits breeder reactors because of potential weapons that could be made  President Bush was considering using breeder reactors; President Obama decided against them  Without breeder reactors, uranium ore may be depleted in ~50 - 80 years 100201

16 Hydrogen can be fused into helium yielding more energy than was required to create the fusion The Shiva machine (named after the multiple-armed Indian Goddess) has 20 lasers that simultaneously strike a small plastic shell containing deuterium oxide to create fusion  Immense amounts of energy fire the 20 lasers simultaneously to cause a negligible amount of fusion energy  Remember EROEI, where a high amount of energy must come out compared to what went in for the conversion to be useful, but this is the reverse so far 7.3.7 Fusion Reactors 090130 www.llnl.gov http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva_laser

17 7.3.7.1 New Fission/Fusion Reactor Studied Compact Fusion Neutron Source “A new fusion-fission hybrid pairs nuclear fission reactors with a fusion reactor neutron source to eliminate virtually all of their waste and produce clean power, even with older fission reactor designs. (Source: Angela Wong/University of Texas at Austin)“hybrid www.dailytech.com/New+FusionF ission+System+Invented+Promis es+Clean+Nuclear+Power/article 14081.htm

18 7.4 The Fuel Cycle and the Spent Fuel Problem Conventional reactors require 18-month refueling to remove 1/3 “spent” fuel and replace it with active fuel Spent fuel must be reprocessed to make more active fuel or be stored in isolation  Newly removed fuel is lowered into water tanks to allow radioactivity to diminish safely with time ~2 years Intense radiation causes the blue luminescence of the Cherenkov Effect; thus I claim nuclear-generated hydrogen is “blue” (fossil=black, wind or sun=green)  After several years, the fuel assemblies can be removed and placed in “casks” for dry storage on site or elsewhere  A National Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada intended to receive fuel transported by train and truck Not many voters in the lowest population state, but one is Sen. Reid, the Democrat majority leader, who is blocking storage there This project is now dead (wasted effort and materials) 100125 www.bnl.gov

19 7.4.1 Spent Fuel Diversion & Nuclear Weapons In the FSU, there is concern that nuclear material may be diverted to criminal or terrorist purposes Nuclear weapons  Fission Two subcritical masses are pushed together to critical mass A surround of explosive detonates to compress the core to dense critical mass  Fusion Atomic explosion initiates hydrogen fusion bomb  Electromagnetic Pulse Weapon High altitude burst radiates EMP and damages electrical and electronic equipment by induced voltage overload  Neutron Bomb Neutron pulse kills without building destruction [Jack Welch, GE]  Contamination by “Dirty Bomb” Radioactive materials are spread by conventional explosive to cause terror and decontamination delays; more psychological effect 090124 “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds.“ Vishnu in Bhagavad Gita - Robert Oppenheimer at the Trinity Site

20 7.5 Reprocessing (Dilution) The US buys excess nuclear weapon warhead materials from Russia to reduce danger of “leakage” to terrorists  Reprocesses (mixes) the plutonium with uranium spent fuel to form reusable fuel that would be hard to separate for future weapons use (remember the centrifuges?)  Reduces diversion or sale to terrorists or “evil-doers” They’ll buy from North Korea or Iran instead  Now, the problem is not traditional weapons but the cheap “Dirty Bomb”; processing is stirring and mixing High explosive mixed with radioactive waste explodes to cast radioactive particles over a wide area The degree of radioactivity isn’t important (old radioactive gloves and such would do), since terrorists seek terror, not necessarily death and injury 100125

21 7.6 Safety Record US plants have a good safety record  The Three-Mile Island gas venting event caused disruption and evacuation, but no deaths or injuries  Core breaching or meltdown would have made this a far worse event! Very close to that happening Chernobyl had a poor design that is not used in the US  31 died, and 35,000 (?) were predicted to have long term radiation poisoning; cities relocated  Radioactivity released into the air was detected in Norway Safety inspectors must report to the highest level of organization; resident Federal inspectors must be present to check the commercial inspectors 070130 www.grida.no & AMAP

22 7.6.1 Radioactive Plume Blown to NW www.grida.no & AMAP 090124

23 7.6.1.1 Three Mile Island, PA Unit 2 still closed and defueled Cemented in to seal it 100125 http://www.solcomhouse.com/tmi.htm

24 7.6.2 Boric Acid Problem near Lake Erie, OH 060127 Boric acid (moderator) leaks were found under insulation; now fixed

25 7.7 Risk Assessment (from Failure Analysis) Risk assessment estimates the probable loss from various sources and is based upon failure analysis Risk = Probability of damage x dollar consequence of damage Dropped Light Bulb Scenario:  Prob(event) = 1 in 1000 (guess based upon experience)  C = $0.37/bulb (in four-packs)  Risk = P x C = 0.001 x $0.37 = $0.00037 (skip insurance) “Armageddon” (Bruce Willis) meteor strikes Pacific Ocean:  P = 10 -12 /year (wipes out Earth; my guess)  C = $10 +24 (my wild guess; what’s yours?)  Risk = $10 +12 /year (should we spend this $1 trillion annually to attempt to prevent disaster? How?) Total all risks and rank them high $ to low $ for examination 100128

26 7.8 Conflicts and Controversy Basic “Anti-Nuc”, “Anti-war” ideology drives protesters who have a separate progressive/liberal/leftist agenda [in my humble opinion]  Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings ended World War II with less loss of life than continuing the war  Anti-war activists attack nuclear energy and food preservation radiation for civilian use (Mulberry, Florida)  Cassini launch to Saturn was vociferously protested because of the 72.3 lb 238 Pu radioisotope power source (invaded CCAFB and were arrested); New Horizons launch was protested as well Yucca Mt., NV attacked for seismic activity, heat, not good enough for 250,000 years storage of isotopes  Possibly future generations might recover the waste and change the storage in 1000 years? Safe or not? By what scoring? Who decides? Obama did, and stopped the project by executive order 100128

27 7.9 Advantages and Disadvantages Advantages  Low-cost electricity due to Gov’t subsidies, services, & insurance  Provides “baseload” constant power to carry most of the load  Clean power without air pollution (no CO 2 ?)  Requires highly paid work force (job votes)  Source of local taxation revenue Disadvantages  Potential for radiation leakage and health effects  Possible terrorist target Useful just as threat  Apparent cheap power retards renewable energy development  What to do with the spent fuel? 090124

28 7.10 Degree of Nuclear Use  Nuclear plants provide so much energy (~20%) that they cannot be discontinued quickly; replacement power would be required first at high cost  Nuclear power primarily has a political problem and is opposed by strident antinuclear activists/protesters  Condo owner organizations next to St. Lucie Plant spoke in favor of relicensing citing “Good Neighbor”!  Miami area anti-nuke activist drew attention to potential fire in spent fuel pool if cooling water level fell and pellet zirconium cladding fire resulted, thus spreading radiation  US nuclear plant construction likely to start again since population growth demands more energy, and natural gas prices will be higher in the future 070130

29 7.10 US nuclear reactors are near user load centers 090124 http://www.nrc.gov/info-finder/reactor/ Note reactors in Pres. Obama’s home state of Illinois

30 7.11 Shutdown Scenario for “Anti-Nucs” Why not close down reactors right now? ! ? Likely scenario that would follow:  Utilities warn public to cut energy use 20% immediately! Public ignores warning; consumes as usual  Nuclear generators are taken off the Grid by law on stop date  Immediate Grid overload occurs (~20% of energy missing)  Electricity outages occur simultaneously across the entire country, not just as in the past Northeast states disruptions  Electric lighting, communication, refrigeration, trains, elevators, traffic lights, gas pumps, oxygen generators, etc. fail to operate  Back-up diesel generators use up reserve fuel in days  Civilization as we know it drops back to the 1700s, but without the appropriate conveniences they were using back then  As widespread hunger spreads, pillaging mobs kill for food (and TVs), while soldiers shoot looters by thousands So should we shut off nuclear reactors immediately? 100125

31 7.12 Future Trends in Nuclear Energy  Older plants (>40 years) must seek relicensing from the NRC to continue operation  The St. Lucie Nuclear Plant at Ft. Pierce FL was recently granted a 20-year license extension  Standardized plant designs speed construction and increase safety; use additional reactor units as needed  Nuclear energy will increase in the less-developed countries in order to have long-term energy Some countries may desire to create nuclear weapons at the same time; e.g., North Korea, Iran?  Fusion reactors may become useful in the future but years of research have only yielded less energy than was put in to the process --- I like our fusion sun! 100125

32 7.12.1 Future Trends in Nuclear Energy (Con’t)  ITER (Latin for “The Way”, I T E Reactor) Produce 0.5 GW for 400 seconds! Fuse deuterium and tritium to make H 2 and emit a neutron  Seven countries researching fusion energy  Tokamak accelerator  Goal is >10 units of energy out for each unit in  Perhaps demo ready between 2030 to 2035 http://www.iter.org/default.aspx http://www.pppl.gov/polImage.cfm?doc_Id=48&size_code=Doc 100202

33 7.C Conclusion Nuclear plants provide a significant 20% of US energy Some antinuclear organizations want all plants closed right now and vocally oppose them Nuclear energy provides too much energy to readily close them without a substitute (~1600 MW/plant) Nuclear energy may be a transitional approach from fission plants to fusion plants some far away day Nuclear plants likely will be built again since population growth demands more energy, natural gas prices will be higher in the future, and fossil fuel plants pollute  Wind energy is the closest renewable, since major hydro is difficult (see China’s Three Gorges Dam) 060127

34 Olin Engineering Complex 4.7 kW Solar PV Roof Array 080116 Questions?

35 7.B References: Books Glasstone, Samuel. The Effects of Nuclear Weapons. 1950 out of print, ~$315. Brower, Michael. Cool Energy. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, 1992. 0-262-02349-0, TJ807.9.U6B76, 333.79’4’0973. Duffie, John and William A. Beckman. Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 920 pp., 1991 Gipe, Paul. Wind Energy for Home & Business. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Pub. Co., 1993. 0-930031-64-4, TJ820.G57, 621.4’5 Patel, Mukund R. Wind and Solar Power Systems. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1999, 351 pp. ISBN 0-8493-1605-7, TK1541.P38 1999, 621.31’2136 Sørensen, Bent. Renewable Energy, Second Edition. San Diego: Academic Press, 2000, 911 pp. ISBN 0-12-656152-4. 070130

36 7.R References: Websites, etc. www.energyquest.ca.gov/story/chapter13.html http://fsv.homestead.com/FSVHistory.html http://eia.doe.gov/cneaf/nuclear/page/nuc_reactors/superla.html http://www.fpl.com/environment/nuclear/nuclear_power_serves_you.shtml ______________________________________________________________ __ mailto:energyresources@egroups.com www.dieoff.org. Site devoted to the decline of energy and effects upon population www.ferc.gov/ Federal Energy Regulatory Commission www.google.com/search?q=%22renewable+energy+course%22 solstice.crest.org/ dataweb.usbr.gov/html/powerplant_selection.html en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power 100202

37 Slide stockpile follows! Older slides follow this one. Look at these if you have interest or time. It’s difficult to decide what to leave out of the lecture to save time!


Download ppt "Frank R. Leslie, B. S. E. E., M. S. Space Technology, LS IEEE 2/2/2010, Rev. 2.0.2 (321) 674-7377 7.0 Nuclear Energy."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google