Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Scaling and Modeling of Larval Settlement Satoshi Mitarai Oct. 19, 2005
2
GOAL OF “FLOW” Assess larval dispersal scales using idealized simulations of California Current Develop simple modeling to establish source-destination relationships –Without fluid dynamics simulations, which are time consuming
3
WHAT’S NEW? Weak upwelling case is added Larval dispersal scales are quantified A simple model to establish source- destination relationships is proposed –Accounts for spatial scales properly
4
TEMPERATURE FIELD (TOP VIEW) Strong upwelling Weak upwelling Summer Winter
5
MEAN TEMPERATURE FIELD (SUMMER) Simulation CalCOFI Shows reasonable agreement with CalCOFI data (Averaged over 6 realizations)
6
MEAN TEMPERATURE FIELD (WINTER) Simulation CalCOFI Shows a good agreement with CalCOFI data (Averaged over 6 realizations)
7
LARVAL TRAJECTORIES SummerWinter Eddies sweep larvae into “packet” which stays together thru much of pelagic stage
8
LAGRANGIAN STATISTICS 3.4 / 4.340 / 484.2 / 4.6 Poulain et al (1998) 4.3 / 4.532 / 382.9 / 3.5 Swenson et al (2001) 1.6 / 1.829 / 296.9 / 5.7 Winter Simulations 3.1 / 4.131 / 353.7 / 3.7 Summer Simulations Diffusivity Zonal / Merid Length Scale Zonal / Merid Time scale Zonal / Merid Data Set Winter shows more correlation in time & less diffusivity
9
LARVAL TRANSPORT & SETTLEMENT Summer Winter More settlers are observed in winter
10
ONLY SETTLERS SummerWinter
11
ALONGSHORE DISPERSAL KERNEL SummerWinter Gaussian fitting More alongshore travel distance in summer (Obtained from 6 realizations) AVG = -122 km, STD = 103 kmAVG = -80 km, STD = 92 km
12
CROSS-SHORE DISPERSAL KERNEL Lognormal fitting SummerWinter More offshore travel distance in summer Settlers move out nearshore habitat before settle (Obtained from 6 realizations)
13
ARRIVAL DIAGRAM Summer 15 days 21 days 43 km 64 km Using variogram … Winter
14
CONNECTIVITY MATRIX Summer Winter 48 km 53 km
15
SUMMARY Travel distance & survivability shows difference between summer & winter –More travel distance in summer –Lower survivability in summer Settlement scales do not show much difference between summer & winter –Arrival length ~ 50 km –Arrival time ~ a few weeks –Connectivity length ~ 50 km
16
CONNECTIVITY MATRIX MODEL Diffusion model Spiky kernel model Neither one accounts for spatial structures
17
A NEW MODEL FOR CONNECTIVITY MATRIX Idea: model settlement events as a summation of “settlement packets” –Number –Size –Source locations –Travel distance Rossby radius (~50 km) Randomly (uniform distribution) Randomly (dispersal kernel)
18
Determine # of settlement packets N = (T/t) (L/l) f (D/l) NUMBER OF SETTLEMENT PACKETS T: Larval release duration t: Lagrangian correlation time L: domain size l: Rossby radius f: survivability D: standard deviation of dispersal kernel Total # of released packets # of settlement events per packet
19
MODEL PREDICTIONS SummerWinter Accounts for spatial structures
20
DIFFUSION LIMIT Packet model 1 season 6 seasons 12 seasons 120 seasons 1 season 6 seasons 12 seasons Diffusion Flow simulation Diffusion model
21
NEXT STEPS Use proposed model in F 3 model Investigate effect of larval behavior –Preliminary study has been already done Investigate effect of coastal topography
23
LAGRANGIAN STATISTICS 3.4 / 4.340 / 484.2 / 4.6 Poulain et al (1998) 4.3 / 4.532 / 382.9 / 3.5 Swenson et al (2001) 1.6 / 1.829 / 296.9 / 5.7 Winter Simulations 3.1 / 4.131 / 353.7 / 3.7 Summer Simulations Diffusivity Zonal / Merid Length Scale Zonal / Merid Time scale Zonal / Merid Data Set Simulations: 6 realizations, 6000 particles Swenson et al (2001): late spring to early fall, 1985-1990, 124 drifters, 18N-40N Poulain et al (1998): early spring to late fall, 1985-1986, 29 drifters, 18N-36N
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.