1. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 Jets In ATLAS Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA

2. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 2 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Preliminaries This talk This talk Focus on explanation of algorithms, methods, and measureable jet features Focus on explanation of algorithms, methods, and measureable jet features Including some pointers to underlying principles, motivations, and expectations Including some pointers to underlying principles, motivations, and expectations Some reference to physics Some reference to physics Restricted to published or blessed material Restricted to published or blessed material Most performance expectations from “The ATLAS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider” (G.Aad et al., 2008 JINST 3 S08003) Most performance expectations from “The ATLAS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider” (G.Aad et al., 2008 JINST 3 S08003) Most results shown >1 year old Most results shown >1 year old Everything is based on simulations Everything is based on simulations Experiments may tell a (very?) different story in some cases Experiments may tell a (very?) different story in some cases LHC beam conditions used for most studies are not appropriate for first data LHC beam conditions used for most studies are not appropriate for first data Center of mass 14 TeV Center of mass 14 TeV Mostly a phase space limitation in the first data for basic jet performance studies No pile-up effects included except where especially stated No pile-up effects included except where especially stated

3. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 3 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Roadmap 1.Jets at LHC a.Where do they come from? Selected hadronic final states Selected hadronic final states b.Physics collision environment Underlying event and pile-up Underlying event and pile-up 2.Hadronic signals in ATLAS a.The ATLAS detector Focus on calorimeters Focus on calorimeters General response issues General response issues b.Signals for jet reconstruction Unbiased and biased towers Unbiased and biased towers Topological clusters Topological clusters 3.Jet measurement a.Jet input objects Towers Towers Topological clusters Topological clusters Particles Particles b.Jet reconstruction and calibration Reconstruction sequence Reconstruction sequence Calibration schemes Calibration schemes 4.Jet reconstruction performance a.QCD di-jets b.Photon/z + jet(s) c.W mass spectroscopy d.Jet vertices and track jets 5.Conclusions & Outlook

4. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 4 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 1. Jets at LHC

5. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 5 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Where do Jets come from at LHC? inclusive jet cross-section Fragmentation of gluons and (light) quarks in QCD scattering Fragmentation of gluons and (light) quarks in QCD scattering Most often observed interaction at LHC Most often observed interaction at LHC Decay of heavy Standard Model (SM) particles Decay of heavy Standard Model (SM) particles Prominent example: Prominent example: Associated with particle production in Vector Boson Fusion (VBF) Associated with particle production in Vector Boson Fusion (VBF) E.g., Higgs E.g., Higgs Decay of Beyond Standard Model (BSM) particles Decay of Beyond Standard Model (BSM) particles E.g., SUSY E.g., SUSY

6. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 6 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 top mass reconstruction Fragmentation of gluons and (light) quarks in QCD scattering Fragmentation of gluons and (light) quarks in QCD scattering Most often observed interaction at LHC Most often observed interaction at LHC Decay of heavy Standard Model (SM) particles Decay of heavy Standard Model (SM) particles Prominent example: Prominent example: Associated with particle production in Vector Boson Fusion (VBF) Associated with particle production in Vector Boson Fusion (VBF) E.g., Higgs E.g., Higgs Decay of Beyond Standard Model (BSM) particles Decay of Beyond Standard Model (BSM) particles E.g., SUSY E.g., SUSY Where do Jets come from at LHC? CERN-OPEN-2008- 020

7. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 7 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Fragmentation of gluons and (light) quarks in QCD scattering Fragmentation of gluons and (light) quarks in QCD scattering Most often observed interaction at LHC Most often observed interaction at LHC Decay of heavy Standard Model (SM) particles Decay of heavy Standard Model (SM) particles Prominent example: Prominent example: Associated with particle production in Vector Boson Fusion (VBF) Associated with particle production in Vector Boson Fusion (VBF) E.g., Higgs E.g., Higgs Decay of Beyond Standard Model (BSM) particles Decay of Beyond Standard Model (BSM) particles E.g., SUSY E.g., SUSY Where do Jets come from at LHC? CERN-OPEN-2008- 020

8. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 8 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Fragmentation of gluons and (light) quarks in QCD scattering Fragmentation of gluons and (light) quarks in QCD scattering Most often observed interaction at LHC Most often observed interaction at LHC Decay of heavy Standard Model (SM) particles Decay of heavy Standard Model (SM) particles Prominent example: Prominent example: Associated with particle production in Vector Boson Fusion (VBF) Associated with particle production in Vector Boson Fusion (VBF) E.g., Higgs E.g., Higgs Decay of Beyond Standard Model (BSM) particles Decay of Beyond Standard Model (BSM) particles E.g., SUSY E.g., SUSY electrons or muons jets missing transverse energy Where do Jets come from at LHC? CERN-OPEN-2008- 020

9. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 9 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Collisions of other partons in the protons generating the signal interaction Collisions of other partons in the protons generating the signal interaction Unavoidable in hadron-hadron collisions Unavoidable in hadron-hadron collisions Independent soft to hard multi- parton interactions Independent soft to hard multi- parton interactions No real first principle No real first principle calculations calculations Contains low pT (non- pertubative) QCD Contains low pT (non- pertubative) QCD Tuning rather than calculations Tuning rather than calculations Activity shows some correlation with hard scattering (radiation) Activity shows some correlation with hard scattering (radiation) pTmin, pTmax differences pTmin, pTmax differences Typically tuned from data in physics generators Typically tuned from data in physics generators Carefully measured at Tevatron Carefully measured at Tevatron Phase space factor applied to LHC tune in absence of data Phase space factor applied to LHC tune in absence of data One of the first things to be measured at LHC One of the first things to be measured at LHC Underlying Event

10. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 10 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Rick Field’s (CDF) view on di- jet events Collisions of other partons in the protons generating the signal interaction Collisions of other partons in the protons generating the signal interaction Unavoidable in hadron-hadron collisions Unavoidable in hadron-hadron collisions Independent soft to hard multi- parton interactions Independent soft to hard multi- parton interactions No real first principle No real first principle calculations calculations Contains low pT (non- pertubative) QCD Contains low pT (non- pertubative) QCD Tuning rather than calculations Tuning rather than calculations Activity shows some correlation with hard scattering (radiation) Activity shows some correlation with hard scattering (radiation) pTmin, pTmax differences pTmin, pTmax differences Typically tuned from data in physics generators Typically tuned from data in physics generators Carefully measured at Tevatron Carefully measured at Tevatron Phase space factor applied to LHC tune in absence of data Phase space factor applied to LHC tune in absence of data One of the first things to be measured at LHC One of the first things to be measured at LHC Look at activity (pT, # charged tracks) as function of leading jet pT in transverse region Underlying Event

11. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 11 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 CDF data (√s=1.8 TeV) LHC prediction: x2.5 the activity measured at Tevatron! pT leading jet (GeV) Number charged tracks in transverse region CDF data: Phys.Rev, D, 65 (2002) Collisions of other partons in the protons generating the signal interaction Collisions of other partons in the protons generating the signal interaction Unavoidable in hadron-hadron collisions Unavoidable in hadron-hadron collisions Independent soft to hard multi- parton interactions Independent soft to hard multi- parton interactions No real first principle No real first principle calculations calculations Contains low pT (non- pertubative) QCD Contains low pT (non- pertubative) QCD Tuning rather than calculations Tuning rather than calculations Activity shows some correlation with hard scattering (radiation) Activity shows some correlation with hard scattering (radiation) pTmin, pTmax differences pTmin, pTmax differences Typically tuned from data in physics generators Typically tuned from data in physics generators Carefully measured at Tevatron Carefully measured at Tevatron Phase space factor applied to LHC tune in absence of data Phase space factor applied to LHC tune in absence of data One of the first things to be measured at LHC One of the first things to be measured at LHC Underlying Event

12. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 12 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Multiple Proton Interactions Expect ~ additional proton collisions at each bunch crossing at LHC design luminosity Expect ~ additional proton collisions at each bunch crossing at LHC design luminosity Statistically independent Statistically independent Actual number at given bunch crossing Poisson distributed Actual number at given bunch crossing Poisson distributed Mostly soft to semi-hard collisions Mostly soft to semi-hard collisions Very similar dynamics as underlying event Very similar dynamics as underlying event Generate 100’s-1000’s particles in addition to hard scatter Generate 100’s-1000’s particles in addition to hard scatter High occupancy in inner detector is experimentally challenging High occupancy in inner detector is experimentally challenging High ionization rate in calorimeters High ionization rate in calorimeters Signal collection time versus bunch crossing an issue Signal collection time versus bunch crossing an issue Experimental handles Experimental handles Energy flow and track distributions in minimum bias events Energy flow and track distributions in minimum bias events Help to understand physics features of pile-up events Help to understand physics features of pile-up events Feedback for modelers Feedback for modelers Multiple primary vertices Multiple primary vertices Explicit reconstruction of MPVs indicates event-by-event pile- up activity Explicit reconstruction of MPVs indicates event-by-event pile- up activity

13. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 13 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Why Is That Important? Jet calibration requirements very stringent Jet calibration requirements very stringent Systematic jet energy scale Systematic jet energy scale uncertainties to be extremely uncertainties to be extremely well controlled well controlled Top mass reconstruction Top mass reconstruction Relative jet energy resolution Relative jet energy resolution requirement requirement Inclusive jet cross-section Inclusive jet cross-section Di-quark mass spectra cut-off in SUSY Di-quark mass spectra cut-off in SUSY Event topology plays a role at 1% level of precision Event topology plays a role at 1% level of precision Extra particle production due to event color flow Extra particle production due to event color flow Color singlet (e.g., W) vs color octet (e.g., gluon/quark) jet source Color singlet (e.g., W) vs color octet (e.g., gluon/quark) jet source Small and large angle gluon radiation Small and large angle gluon radiation Quark/gluon jet differences Quark/gluon jet differences Control of underlying event and pile-up contributions Control of underlying event and pile-up contributions

14. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 14 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 2. Hadronic Signals in ATLAS

15. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 15 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Total weight : 7000 t Overall length: 46 m Overall diameter: 23 m Magnetic field: 2T solenoid + toroid The ATLAS Detector

16. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 16 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 EM Endcap EMEC EM Barrel EMB Hadronic Endcap Forward Tile Barrel Tile Extended Barrel The ATLAS Calorimeters

17. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 17 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 ATLAS Calorimeter Summary Non-compensating calorimeters Non-compensating calorimeters Electrons generate larger signal than pions depositing the same energy Electrons generate larger signal than pions depositing the same energy Typically e/π ≈ 1.3 Typically e/π ≈ 1.3 High particle stopping High particle stopping power over whole detector acceptance |η|<4.9 ~26-35 X 0 electromagnetic ~26-35 X 0 electromagneticcalorimetry ~ 10 λ total for hadrons ~ 10 λ total for hadrons Hermetic coverage Hermetic coverage No significant cracks in No significant cracks inazimuth Non-pointing transition between barrel, endcap and forward Non-pointing transition between barrel, endcap and forward Small performance penalty for hadrons/jets Small performance penalty for hadrons/jets High granularity High granularity 6 (barrel)-7 (end-caps) longitudinal samplings 6 (barrel)-7 (end-caps) longitudinal samplings ~200,000 independently read-out cells in total ~200,000 independently read-out cells in total Pre-samplers in front of barrel and end-cap Pre-samplers in front of barrel and end-cap

18. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 18 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Signal history in calorimeter increases noise Signal history in calorimeter increases noise Signal collection in ATLAS 10-20 times slower than bunch crossing rate (25 ns) Signal collection in ATLAS 10-20 times slower than bunch crossing rate (25 ns) Signal history effectively adds to noise Signal history effectively adds to noise Baseline suppressed by fast signal shaping Baseline suppressed by fast signal shaping Bi-polar shape with net 0 integral Bi-polar shape with net 0 integral Noise has coherent character Noise has coherent character Cell signals linked through past shower developments Cell signals linked through past shower developments Pile-Up in ATLAS (1) Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys. 60:484-551,2008 E t ~ 58 GeV E t ~ 81 GeV without pile-up

19. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 19 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 E t ~ 58 GeV E t ~ 81 GeV with design luminosity pile-up Pile-Up in ATLAS (2) Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys. 60:484-551,2008 reading out (digitize) 5 samples sufficient! ~450 ns @ 2mm LAr, 1 kV/mm Cell signal shape in ATLAS LAr Calorimeter

20. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 20 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Pile-Up in ATLAS (3) Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys. 60:484-551,2008 Online digital filtering Online digital filtering Explicit knowledge of physics pulse shape allows precise reconstruction of amplitude Explicit knowledge of physics pulse shape allows precise reconstruction of amplitude Needs linear filter coefficients and auto- correlation matrix Needs linear filter coefficients and auto- correlation matrix Suppresses noise wrt single reading Suppresses noise wrt single reading 1/√2 for 5 samples 1/√2 for 5 samples First data issues First data issues Pulse-shape and filtering works best at high ionization rates Pulse-shape and filtering works best at high ionization rates Most complete area cancellation Most complete area cancellation Initial bunch crossing 50/75/450 ns introduce baseline Initial bunch crossing 50/75/450 ns introduce baseline Magnitudes depend on actual bunch spacing Magnitudes depend on actual bunch spacing Increased noise also possible for some configurations Increased noise also possible for some configurations

21. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 21 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Basic Signal Scales in ATLAS Cell signals Cell signals Raw data for physics from online system is amplitude, time, filter quality, gain selection Raw data for physics from online system is amplitude, time, filter quality, gain selection Special readout configurations providing 5…32 samples possible Special readout configurations providing 5…32 samples possible Cell signals are energy, time, quality, and gain Cell signals are energy, time, quality, and gain Energy scale is “electromagnetic” – determined by electron testbeams and simulations Energy scale is “electromagnetic” – determined by electron testbeams and simulations All electronic corrections are applied All electronic corrections are applied Signal efficiency corrections are applied Signal efficiency corrections are applied Reduced signals due to HV problems etc. Towers and clusters Towers and clusters Individual cell signals hard to use Individual cell signals hard to use Can be <0 due to noise Can be <0 due to noise Hard to determine source of signal without context/neighbourhood Hard to determine source of signal without context/neighbourhood e/h > 1 required specific corrections for hadronic signals Need to collect cell signals into larger objects Need to collect cell signals into larger objects Towers and clusters Towers and clusters

22. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 22 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Impose a regular grid view on event Impose a regular grid view on event Δ  ×Δφ = 0.1×0.1 grid Δ  ×Δφ = 0.1×0.1 grid Motivated by particle Et flow in hadron-hadron collisions Motivated by particle Et flow in hadron-hadron collisions Well suited for trigger purposes Well suited for trigger purposes Collect cells into tower grid Collect cells into tower grid Cells EM scale signals are summed with geometrical weights Cells EM scale signals are summed with geometrical weights Depend on cell area containment ratio Depend on cell area containment ratio Weight = 1 for projective cells of equal or smaller than tower size Weight = 1 for projective cells of equal or smaller than tower size Summing can be selective Summing can be selective See jet input signal discussion See jet input signal discussion Towers have massless four- momentum representation Towers have massless four- momentum representation Fixed direction given by geometrical grid center Fixed direction given by geometrical grid center projective cells non-projectivecells ATLAS Calorimeter Towers

23. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 23 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Signal extraction tool Signal extraction tool Attempt reconstruction of Attempt reconstruction of individual particle showers individual particle showers Reconstruct 3-dim clusters of Reconstruct 3-dim clusters of cells with correlated signals cells with correlated signals Use shape of these clusters to Use shape of these clusters to locally calibrate them locally calibrate them Explore differences between Explore differences between electromagnetic and hadronic electromagnetic and hadronic shower development and select shower development and select best suited calibration best suited calibration Supress noise with least bias on physics signals Supress noise with least bias on physics signals Often less than 50% of all cells in an event with “real” signal Often less than 50% of all cells in an event with “real” signal Some implications of jet environment Some implications of jet environment Shower overlap cannot always be resolved Shower overlap cannot always be resolved Clusters represent merged particle showers in dense jets Clusters represent merged particle showers in dense jets Clusters have varying sizes Clusters have varying sizes No simple jet area as in case of towers No simple jet area as in case of towers Clusters are mass-less 4-vectors (as towers) Clusters are mass-less 4-vectors (as towers) No “artificial” mass contribution due to showering No “artificial” mass contribution due to showering Issues with IR safety at very small scale insignificant Issues with IR safety at very small scale insignificant Pile-Up environment triggers split as well as merge Pile-Up environment triggers split as well as merge Note that calorimeters themselves are not completely IR safe Note that calorimeters themselves are not completely IR safe ATLAS Topological Cell Clusters (1)

24. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 24 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Cluster seeding Cluster seeding Cluster seed is cell with significant signal above a primary threshold Cluster seed is cell with significant signal above a primary threshold Cluster growth: direct neighbours Cluster growth: direct neighbours Neighbouring cells (in 3-d) with cell signal significance above some basic threshold are collected Neighbouring cells (in 3-d) with cell signal significance above some basic threshold are collected Cluster growth: control of expansion Cluster growth: control of expansion Collect neighbours of neighbours for cells above secondary signal significance threshold Collect neighbours of neighbours for cells above secondary signal significance threshold Secondary threshold lower than primary (seed) threshold Secondary threshold lower than primary (seed) threshold Cluster splitting Cluster splitting Analyze clusters for local signal maxima and split if more than one found Analyze clusters for local signal maxima and split if more than one found Signal hill & valley analysis in 3-d Signal hill & valley analysis in 3-d Final “energy blob” can contain low signal cells Final “energy blob” can contain low signal cells Cells survive due to significant neighbouring signal Cells survive due to significant neighbouring signal Cells inside blob can have negative signals Cells inside blob can have negative signals ATLAS also studies “TopoTowers” ATLAS also studies “TopoTowers” Use topological clustering as noise suppression tool only Use topological clustering as noise suppression tool only Distribute only energy of clustered cells onto tower grid Distribute only energy of clustered cells onto tower grid Motivated by DZero approach Motivated by DZero approach ATLAS Topological Cell Clusters (2)

25. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 25 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 cluster candidate #1 cluster candidate #2 #3? ATLAS Topological Cell Clusters (3)

26. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 26 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 ATLAS Local Hadronic Calibration Local hadronic energy scale restoration depends on origin of calorimeter signal Local hadronic energy scale restoration depends on origin of calorimeter signal Attempt to classify energy deposit as electromagnetic or hadronic from the cluster signal and shape Attempt to classify energy deposit as electromagnetic or hadronic from the cluster signal and shape Allows to apply specific corrections and calibrations Allows to apply specific corrections and calibrations Local calibration approach Local calibration approach Use topological cell clusters as signal base for a hadronic energy scale Use topological cell clusters as signal base for a hadronic energy scale Recall cell signals need context for hadronic calibration Recall cell signals need context for hadronic calibration Basic concept is to reconstruct the locally deposited energy from the cluster signal first Basic concept is to reconstruct the locally deposited energy from the cluster signal first This is not the particle energy This is not the particle energy Additional corrections for energy losses with some correlation to the cluster signals and shapes extend the local scope Additional corrections for energy losses with some correlation to the cluster signals and shapes extend the local scope True signal loss due to the noise suppression in the cluster algorithm (still local) True signal loss due to the noise suppression in the cluster algorithm (still local) Dead material losses in front of, or between sensitive calorimeter volumes (larger scope than local deposit) Dead material losses in front of, or between sensitive calorimeter volumes (larger scope than local deposit) After all corrections, the reconstructed energy is on average the isolated particle energy After all corrections, the reconstructed energy is on average the isolated particle energy E.g., in a testbeam E.g., in a testbeam But not the jet energy – missing curling tracks, dead material losses without correlated cluster signal,… But not the jet energy – missing curling tracks, dead material losses without correlated cluster signal,…

27. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 27 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 ATLAS Local Scale Sequence Electronic and readout effects unfolded (nA->GeV calibration) 3-d topological cell clustering includes noise suppression and establishes basic calorimeter signal for further processing Cluster shape analysis provides appropriate classification for calibration and corrections Cluster character depending calibration (cell signal weighting for HAD, to be developed for EM?) Apply dead material corrections specific for hadronic and electromagnetic clusters, resp. Apply specific out-of-cluster corrections for hadronic and electromagnetic clusters, resp.

28. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 28 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 3. Jet Input Objects

29. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 29 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Jet Input Objects (1) Calorimeter signal based Calorimeter signal based Basic 0.1 x 0.1 calorimeter towers Basic 0.1 x 0.1 calorimeter towers All cells (~190,000) projected into towers All cells (~190,000) projected into towers Electromagnetic energy scale signal Electromagnetic energy scale signal No noise suppression but noise cancellation attempt No noise suppression but noise cancellation attempt Topological 0.1 x 0.1 calorimeter towers Topological 0.1 x 0.1 calorimeter towers Cells from topological clusters only Cells from topological clusters only Electromagnetic energy scale signal Electromagnetic energy scale signal Noise suppression like for topological clusters Noise suppression like for topological clusters Topological calorimeter cell clusters Topological calorimeter cell clusters Electromagnetic and local hadronic scale signals Electromagnetic and local hadronic scale signals Noise suppressed Noise suppressed From tracking detectors From tracking detectors Reconstructed tracks Reconstructed tracks Charged particles only Charged particles only From simulation From simulation Stable and interacting particles from generators reaching sensitive detectors Stable and interacting particles from generators reaching sensitive detectors Lab lifetime > 10 ps Lab lifetime > 10 ps Excludes neutrinos and muons from hard interaction Excludes neutrinos and muons from hard interaction

30. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 30 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Jet Input Objects (2) from K. Perez, Columbia U.

31. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 31 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Jets in the ATLAS Calorimeters S.D. Ellis, J. Huston, K. Hatakeyama, P. Loch, M. Toennesmann, Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys.60:484-551,2008

32. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 32 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Sequential process Sequential process Input signal selection Input signal selection Get the best signals out of your detector on a given signal scale Get the best signals out of your detector on a given signal scale Preparation for jet finding Preparation for jet finding Suppression/cancellation of “unphysical” signal objects with E<0 (due to noise) Suppression/cancellation of “unphysical” signal objects with E<0 (due to noise) Possibly event ambiguity resolution (remove reconstructed electrons, photons, taus,… from detector signal) Possibly event ambiguity resolution (remove reconstructed electrons, photons, taus,… from detector signal) Not done in ATLAS before jet reconstruction! Pre-clustering to speed up reconstruction (not needed anymore) Pre-clustering to speed up reconstruction (not needed anymore) Jet finding Jet finding Apply your jet finder of choice Apply your jet finder of choice All implementations from FastJet and SISCone available Default is AntiKt4 with R = 0.4 Default is AntiKt4 with R = 0.4 Reference is legacy ATLAS seeded fixed cone Narrow jets least affected by pile-up Jet calibration Jet calibration Depending on detector input signal definition, jet finder choices, references… Depending on detector input signal definition, jet finder choices, references… Default calibration uses cell weights Default calibration uses cell weights Jet selection Jet selection Apply cuts on kinematics etc. to select jets of interest or significance Apply cuts on kinematics etc. to select jets of interest or significance Objective Objective Reconstruct particle level features Reconstruct particle level features Test models and extract physics Test models and extract physics ATLAS Jet Reconstruction

33. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 33 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Monte Carlo Jet Calibration Typical Monte Carlo based normalization Typical Monte Carlo based normalization Match particle level jets with detector jets in simple topologies (fully simulated QCD di-jets) Match particle level jets with detector jets in simple topologies (fully simulated QCD di-jets) Use same specific jet definition for both Use same specific jet definition for both Match defined by maximum angular distance Match defined by maximum angular distance Can include isolation requirements Determine calibration function parameters using truth particle jet energy constraint Determine calibration function parameters using truth particle jet energy constraint Fit calibration parameters such that relative energy resolution is best Fit calibration parameters such that relative energy resolution is best Include whole phase space into fit (flat in energy) Correct residual non-linearities by jet energy scale correction function Correct residual non-linearities by jet energy scale correction function Numerical inversion technique applied here Numerical inversion technique applied here Magnitudes of calibrations and corrections depend on signal choices Magnitudes of calibrations and corrections depend on signal choices Electromagnetic energy scale signals require large corrections while particle level or local hadronic signal have much less corrections Electromagnetic energy scale signals require large corrections while particle level or local hadronic signal have much less corrections Effect on systematic errors Effect on systematic errors

34. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 34 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 ATLAS Jet Cell Weights Cell signal weighting Cell signal weighting Statistically determined cell signal Statistically determined cell signal weights try to compensate for weights try to compensate for e/h>1 in jet context e/h>1 in jet context Motivated by H1 cell weighting Motivated by H1 cell weighting High cell signal density indicates High cell signal density indicates on average electromagnetic on average electromagnetic signal origin signal origin Ideally weight = 1 Low cell signal indicates hadronic deposit Low cell signal indicates hadronic deposit Weight > 1 Cell weights are determined as function of cell signal density and location Cell weights are determined as function of cell signal density and location Use truth jet matching in fully simulated QCD di-jet events Use truth jet matching in fully simulated QCD di-jet events Crack regions not included in fit Crack regions not included in fit Residual jet energy scale corrections – see next slides Residual jet energy scale corrections – see next slides

35. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 35 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Cell Weight Calibration For Jets Cell signal weighting functions do not restore jet energy scale for all jets Cell signal weighting functions do not restore jet energy scale for all jets Crack regions not included in fits Crack regions not included in fits Only on jet context used for fitting weights Only on jet context used for fitting weights Cone jets with R=0.7 Cone jets with R=0.7 Only one calorimeter signal definition used for weight fits Only one calorimeter signal definition used for weight fits CaloTowers CaloTowers Additional response corrections applied to restore linearity Additional response corrections applied to restore linearity Non-optimal resolution for other than reference jet samples can be expected Non-optimal resolution for other than reference jet samples can be expected Changing physics environment not explicitly corrected Changing physics environment not explicitly corrected Absolute precision limitation Absolute precision limitation

36. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 36 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 ATLAS Cell Weight Calibration For Jets Cell signal weighting functions do not restore jet energy scale for all jets Cell signal weighting functions do not restore jet energy scale for all jets Crack regions not included in fits Crack regions not included in fits Only on jet context used for fitting weights Only on jet context used for fitting weights Cone jets with R=0.7 Cone jets with R=0.7 Only one calorimeter signal definition used for weight fits Only one calorimeter signal definition used for weight fits CaloTowers CaloTowers Additional response corrections applied to restore linearity Additional response corrections applied to restore linearity Non-optimal resolution for other than reference jet samples can be expected Non-optimal resolution for other than reference jet samples can be expected Changing physics environment not explicitly corrected Changing physics environment not explicitly corrected Absolute precision limitation Absolute precision limitation

37. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 37 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 ATLAS Cell Weight Calibration For Jets Cell signal weighting functions do not restore jet energy scale for all jets Cell signal weighting functions do not restore jet energy scale for all jets Crack regions not included in fits Crack regions not included in fits Only one jet context used for fitting weights Only one jet context used for fitting weights Cone jets with R=0.7 Cone jets with R=0.7 Only one calorimeter signal definition used for weight fits Only one calorimeter signal definition used for weight fits CaloTowers CaloTowers Additional response corrections applied to restore linearity Additional response corrections applied to restore linearity Non-optimal resolution for other than reference jet samples can be expected Non-optimal resolution for other than reference jet samples can be expected Changing physics environment not explicitly corrected Changing physics environment not explicitly corrected Absolute precision limitation Absolute precision limitation Response for jets in ttbar (same jet finder as used for determination of calibration functions with QCD events)

38. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 38 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Final Jet Energy Scale Calibration Jet energy scale (JES) for first data Jet energy scale (JES) for first data Fully Monte Carlo based calibrations hard to validate quickly with initial data Fully Monte Carlo based calibrations hard to validate quickly with initial data Too many things have to be right, including underlying event tunes, pile-up activity, etc. Too many things have to be right, including underlying event tunes, pile-up activity, etc. Mostly a generator issue in the beginning Mostly a generator issue in the beginning Need flat response and decent energy resolution for jets as soon as possible Need flat response and decent energy resolution for jets as soon as possible Data driven scenario a la DZero implemented Data driven scenario a la DZero implemented Additional jet by jet corrections Additional jet by jet corrections Interesting ideas to use all observable signal features for jets to calibrate Interesting ideas to use all observable signal features for jets to calibrate Geometrical moments Geometrical moments Energy sharing in calorimeters Energy sharing in calorimeters Concerns about stability and MC dependence to be understood Concerns about stability and MC dependence to be understood Can consider e.g. truncated moments using only prominent constituents for stable signal Can consider e.g. truncated moments using only prominent constituents for stable signal

39. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 39 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 ATLAS JES Correction Model for First Data optional data driven MC

40. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 40 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 4. Jet Reconstruction Performance

41. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 41 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Jet Performance Evaluations (1) Jet performance evaluation Jet performance evaluation Proof of success for each method Proof of success for each method Closure tests applied to calibration data source Closure tests applied to calibration data source Strong indications that one jet reconstruction approach is not sufficient Strong indications that one jet reconstruction approach is not sufficient Evaluation needs to be extended to different final states Evaluation needs to be extended to different final states Systematic errors and corrections for alternative jet finders and configurations need to be evaluated Systematic errors and corrections for alternative jet finders and configurations need to be evaluated G. Salam, talk at ATLAS Hadronic Calibration Workshop, Tucson, Arizona, USA, March 2009

42. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 42 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Jet Performance Evaluations (2) Jet signal linearity and resolution Jet signal linearity and resolution Closure tests for calibration determination Closure tests for calibration determination Ultimate precision and resolution for given method applied to calibration sample Ultimate precision and resolution for given method applied to calibration sample Response comparisons for different signal definitions Response comparisons for different signal definitions Need to reduce exploration phase space Need to reduce exploration phase space Real data needed for final decision Real data needed for final decision E.g. towers vs clusters, calibration scheme Jet Energy Scale (JES) stability Jet Energy Scale (JES) stability Typically better than 2% with respect to signal linearity in closure tests Typically better than 2% with respect to signal linearity in closure tests Calibration approaches are stable Calibration approaches are stable Signal uniformity within the same average deviations Signal uniformity within the same average deviations Resolution goal is achievable with studied calibration approaches Resolution goal is achievable with studied calibration approaches See next slide See next slide

43. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 43 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Jet Energy Resolution 98 63 26 98 63 26 1123 728299 111 41 1123 728299 111 41 Very preliminary! Older evaluation!

44. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 44 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Data Driven Evaluation Photon+jet(s) Photon+jet(s) Well measured electromagnetic system balances jet response Well measured electromagnetic system balances jet response Central value theoretical uncertainty ~2% limits precision Central value theoretical uncertainty ~2% limits precision Due to photon isolation requirements But very good final state for evaluating calibrations But very good final state for evaluating calibrations Can test different correction levels in factorized calibrations Can test different correction levels in factorized calibrations E.g., local hadronic calibration in ATLAS E.g., local hadronic calibration in ATLAS Limited pT reach for 1-2% precision Limited pT reach for 1-2% precision 25->300 GeV within 100 pb -1 25->300 GeV within 100 pb -1 Z+jet(s) Z+jet(s) Similar idea, but less initial statistics Similar idea, but less initial statistics Smaller reach but less background Smaller reach but less background

45. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 45 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Data Driven Evaluation Photon+jet(s) Photon+jet(s) Well measured electromagnetic system balances jet response Well measured electromagnetic system balances jet response Central value theoretical uncertainty ~2% limits precision Central value theoretical uncertainty ~2% limits precision Due to photon isolation requirements But very good final state for evaluating calibrations But very good final state for evaluating calibrations Can test different correction levels in factorized calibrations Can test different correction levels in factorized calibrations E.g., local hadronic calibration in ATLAS E.g., local hadronic calibration in ATLAS Limited pT reach for 1-2% precision Limited pT reach for 1-2% precision 25->300 GeV within 100 pb-1 25->300 GeV within 100 pb-1 Z+jet(s) Z+jet(s) Similar idea, but less initial statistics Similar idea, but less initial statistics Smaller reach but less background Smaller reach but less background

46. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 46 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 W Mass Spectroscopy In-situ calibration validation handle In-situ calibration validation handle Precise reference in ttbar events Precise reference in ttbar events Hadronically decaying W- bosons Hadronically decaying W- bosons Jet calibrations should reproduce W-mass Jet calibrations should reproduce W-mass Note color singlet source Note color singlet source No color connection to rest of collision – different underlying event as QCD No color connection to rest of collision – different underlying event as QCD Also only light quark jet reference Also only light quark jet reference Expected to be sensitive to jet algorithms Expected to be sensitive to jet algorithms Narrow jets perform better – as expected Narrow jets perform better – as expected raw signal

47. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 47 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Jets Not From Hard Scatter Dangerous background for W+n jets cross- sections etc. Dangerous background for W+n jets cross- sections etc. Lowest pT jet of final state can be faked or misinterpreted as coming from underlying event or multiple interactions Lowest pT jet of final state can be faked or misinterpreted as coming from underlying event or multiple interactions Extra jets from UE are hard to handle Extra jets from UE are hard to handle No real experimental indication of jet source No real experimental indication of jet source Some correlation with hard scattering? Some correlation with hard scattering? Jet area? Jet area? No separate vertex No separate vertex Jet-by-jet handle for multiple proton interactions Jet-by-jet handle for multiple proton interactions Classic indicator for multiple interactions is number of reconstructed vertices in event Classic indicator for multiple interactions is number of reconstructed vertices in event Tevatron with RMS(z_vertex) ~ 30 cm Tevatron with RMS(z_vertex) ~ 30 cm LHC RMS(z_vertex) ~ 8 cm LHC RMS(z_vertex) ~ 8 cm If we can attach vertices to reconstructed jets, we can in principle identify jets not from hard scattering If we can attach vertices to reconstructed jets, we can in principle identify jets not from hard scattering Limited to pseudorapidities within 2.5! Limited to pseudorapidities within 2.5! Track jets Track jets Find jets in recon- Find jets in recon- structed tracks structed tracks ~60% of jet pT, ~60% of jet pT, with RMS ~0.3 – with RMS ~0.3 – not a good not a good kinematic estimator kinematic estimator Dedicated algorithm Dedicated algorithm Cluster track jets in Cluster track jets in pseudo-rapidity, azimuth, pseudo-rapidity, azimuth, and delta(Z Vertex ) and delta(Z Vertex ) Match track and Match track and calorimeter jet calorimeter jet Also helps response! Also helps response!

48. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 48 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 6. Conclusions & Outlook

49. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 49 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Conclusions This was a mere snapshot This was a mere snapshot Jet reconstruction at ATLAS deserves a book Jet reconstruction at ATLAS deserves a book Complex environment, complex signals, lots of information content in ATLAS (and CMS) events Complex environment, complex signals, lots of information content in ATLAS (and CMS) events First data jet reconstruction and calibration strategy in place First data jet reconstruction and calibration strategy in place Includes simulation and data input Includes simulation and data input Emphasis on “data driven” Emphasis on “data driven” Expect to establish flat jet response for first physics quickly Expect to establish flat jet response for first physics quickly Discussion on how to establish initial systematic uncertainties just started Discussion on how to establish initial systematic uncertainties just started Some ideas exist but procedures need to be ironed out better Some ideas exist but procedures need to be ironed out better Still on track for first useful collision data Still on track for first useful collision data We are looking beyond obvious jet performance variables We are looking beyond obvious jet performance variables Jet shapes are considered for refined JES calibration Jet shapes are considered for refined JES calibration Jet-by-jet corrections Jet-by-jet corrections Experimental sensitivity to unfold jet substructure explored Experimental sensitivity to unfold jet substructure explored Needs more studies with real data Needs more studies with real data Discovery tool for boosted heavy particles! Discovery tool for boosted heavy particles! We are waiting for collision data! We are waiting for collision data!

50. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 50 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Some Backup

51. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 51 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Electromagnetic Calorimetry Highly segmented lead/liquid argon accordion Highly segmented lead/liquid argon accordion No azimuthal cracks No azimuthal cracks 3 depth segments 3 depth segments + pre-sampler (limited coverage) + pre-sampler (limited coverage) Strip cells in 1 st layer Strip cells in 1 st layer Very high granularity in pseudo- rapidity Very high granularity in pseudo- rapidity Deep cells in 2 nd layer Deep cells in 2 nd layer High granularity in both directions High granularity in both directions Shallow cells in 3 rd layer Shallow cells in 3 rd layer Electromagnetic Barrel

52. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 52 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Tile calorimeter Tile calorimeter Iron/scintillator tiled readout Iron/scintillator tiled readout 3 depth segments 3 depth segments Quasi-projective readout cells Quasi-projective readout cells First two layers: First two layers: Third layer Third layer Very fast light Very fast lightcollection ~50 ns ~50 ns Dual fiber Dual fiber readout for each channel Hadronic Calorimetry

53. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 53 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 EndCap Calorimeters Electromagnetic “Spanish Fan” accordion Electromagnetic “Spanish Fan” accordion Highly segmented with up to three longitudinal segments Highly segmented with up to three longitudinal segments Hadronic liquid argon/copper Hadronic liquid argon/coppercalorimeter Parallel plate Parallel platedesign Four longitudinal Four longitudinalsegments Quasi-projective Quasi-projectivecells

54. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 54 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 FCal1 FCal2 FCal3 Forward Calorimeters Design features Design features Compact absorbers Compact absorbers Small showers Small showers Tubular thin gap electrodes Tubular thin gap electrodes Suppress positive charge build-up (Ar+) in high ionization rate environment Suppress positive charge build-up (Ar+) in high ionization rate environment Stable calibration Stable calibration Rectangular non-projective readout cells Rectangular non-projective readout cells Electromagnetic FCal1 Electromagnetic FCal1 Liquid argon/copper Liquid argon/copper Gap ~260 μm Gap ~260 μm Hadronic FCal2 Hadronic FCal2 Liquid argon/tungsten Liquid argon/tungsten Gap ~375 μm Gap ~375 μm Hadronic FCal3 Hadronic FCal3 Liquid argon/tungsten Liquid argon/tungsten Gap ~500 μm Gap ~500 μm

55. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 55 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Sum up electromagnetic scale calorimeter cell signals into towers Sum up electromagnetic scale calorimeter cell signals into towers Fixed grid of Δ η x Δ φ = 0.1 x 0.1 Fixed grid of Δ η x Δ φ = 0.1 x 0.1 Non-discriminatory, no cell suppression Non-discriminatory, no cell suppression Works well with pointing readout geometries Works well with pointing readout geometries Larger cells split their signal between towers according to the overlap area fraction Larger cells split their signal between towers according to the overlap area fraction Tower noise suppression Tower noise suppression Some towers have net negative signals Some towers have net negative signals Apply “nearest neighbour tower recombination” Apply “nearest neighbour tower recombination” Combine negative signal tower(s) with nearby positive signal towers until sum of signals > 0 Combine negative signal tower(s) with nearby positive signal towers until sum of signals > 0 Remove towers with no nearby neighbours Remove towers with no nearby neighbours Towers are “massless” pseudo-particles Towers are “massless” pseudo-particles Find jets Find jets Note: towers have signal on electromagnetic energy scale Note: towers have signal on electromagnetic energy scale Calibrate jets Calibrate jets Retrieve calorimeter cell signals in jet Retrieve calorimeter cell signals in jet Apply signal weighting functions to these signals Apply signal weighting functions to these signals Recalculate jet kinematics using these cell signals Recalculate jet kinematics using these cell signals Note: there are cells with negative signals! Note: there are cells with negative signals! Apply final corrections Apply final corrections CaloTower Jets

56. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 56 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 TopoCluster Jets

57. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 57 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Apply noise suppression to tower jets Apply noise suppression to tower jets Topological clustering is used as a noise suppression tool only Topological clustering is used as a noise suppression tool only Similar to DZero approach Similar to DZero approach New implementation New implementation Only in ESD context so far Only in ESD context so far Working on schema to bring these jets into the AOD Working on schema to bring these jets into the AOD Including constituents Including constituents Allows comparisons for tower and cluster jets with similar noise contribution Allows comparisons for tower and cluster jets with similar noise contribution Should produce rather similar jets than tower jets at better resolution Should produce rather similar jets than tower jets at better resolution Less towers per jet Less towers per jet TopoTower Jets CERN-OPEN-2008-020

58. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 58 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Calibration Flow Lots of work in calorimeter domain!

59. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 59 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Data Driven JES Corrections (1) PileUp subtraction PileUp subtraction Goal: Goal: Correct in-time and residual out-of-time pile-up contribution to a jet on average Correct in-time and residual out-of-time pile-up contribution to a jet on average Tools: Tools: Zero bias (random) events, minimum bias events Zero bias (random) events, minimum bias events Measurement: Measurement: Et density in Δ  ×Δφ bins as function of Et density in Δ  ×Δφ bins as function of # vertices # vertices TopoCluster feature (size, average TopoCluster feature (size, average energy as function of depth) changes energy as function of depth) changes as function of # vertices as function of # vertices Remarks: Remarks: Uses expectations from the average Et flow for a given instantaneous luminosity Uses expectations from the average Et flow for a given instantaneous luminosity Instantaneous luminosity is measured by the # vertices in the event Instantaneous luminosity is measured by the # vertices in the event Requires measure of jet size (AntiKt advantage) Requires measure of jet size (AntiKt advantage) Concerns: Concerns: Stable and safe determination of average Stable and safe determination of average Determination of the Absolute Jet Energy Scale in the D0 Calorimeters. NIM A424, 352 (1999) Note that magnitude of correction depends on calorimeter signal processing!

60. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 60 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Data Driven JES Corrections (2) Absolute response Absolute response Goal: Goal: Correct for energy (pT) dependent jet response Correct for energy (pT) dependent jet response Tools: Tools: Direct photons, Z+jet(s),… Direct photons, Z+jet(s),… Measurement: Measurement: pT balance of well calibrated system (photon, Z) pT balance of well calibrated system (photon, Z) against jet in central region against jet in central region Remarks: Remarks: Usually uses central reference and central jets (region of flat reponse) Usually uses central reference and central jets (region of flat reponse) Concerns: Concerns: Limit in precision and estimates for systematics w/o well understood simulations not clear Limit in precision and estimates for systematics w/o well understood simulations not clear

61. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 61 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Data Driven JES Corrections (3) Direction response corrections Direction response corrections Goal: Goal: Equalize response as function of jet Equalize response as function of jet (pseudo)rapidity (pseudo)rapidity Tools: Tools: QCD di-jets QCD di-jets Direct photons Direct photons Measurement: Measurement: Di-jet pT balance uses Di-jet pT balance uses reference jet in well calibrated reference jet in well calibrated (central) region to correct (central) region to correct second jet further away second jet further away Measure hadronic response Measure hadronic response variations as function of the jet variations as function of the jet direction with the missing Et direction with the missing Et projection fraction (MPF) method projection fraction (MPF) method Remarks: Remarks: MPF only needs jet for direction reference MPF only needs jet for direction reference Bi-sector in di-jet balance explores different sensitivities Bi-sector in di-jet balance explores different sensitivities Concerns: Concerns: MC quality for systematic uncertaunty evaluation MC quality for systematic uncertaunty evaluation Very different (jet) energy scales between reference and probed jet Very different (jet) energy scales between reference and probed jet uncalibrated

62. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 62 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Jet Mass Sensitivity change of mass log 10 (least biased reconstructed mass/GeV) QCD kT jets, D = 0.6 ATLAS MC (preliminary)

63. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 63 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 We expected clusters to represent individual particles We expected clusters to represent individual particles Cannot be perfect in busy jet environment! Cannot be perfect in busy jet environment! Shower overlap in finite calorimeter granularity Shower overlap in finite calorimeter granularity Some resolution power, though Some resolution power, though Much better than for tower jets! Much better than for tower jets! ~1.6:1 particles:clusters in central region ~1.6:1 particles:clusters in central region This is an average estimator subject to large fluctuations This is an average estimator subject to large fluctuations ~1:1 in endcap region ~1:1 in endcap region Best match of readout granularity, shower size and jet particle energy flow Best match of readout granularity, shower size and jet particle energy flow Happy coincidence, not a design feature of the ATLAS calorimeter! Happy coincidence, not a design feature of the ATLAS calorimeter! Jet Composition S.D. Ellis et al., Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys.60:484-551,2008

64. Jets In ATLAS Week of Jets FNAL, Aug. 24-28, 2009 64 P. Loch U of Arizona Aug. 27, 2009 Jet Substructure Mass too complex? Mass too complex? Can be too sensitive to small signals in jets Can be too sensitive to small signals in jets UE, pile-up, other noise UE, pile-up, other noise Use YSplitter to detect substructure Use YSplitter to detect substructure Determines scale y for splitting a giving jet into 2,3,… subjects, as determined by y cut, from Determines scale y for splitting a giving jet into 2,3,… subjects, as determined by y cut, from More stable as only significant constituents are used ? More stable as only significant constituents are used ? At least additional information to mass At least additional information to mass Other option: Other option: Look at mass of 2…n hardest constituents (Ben Lillie,ANL) Look at mass of 2…n hardest constituents (Ben Lillie,ANL) Not very sensitive to calorimeter signal details!